ECB's next move on rates most likely a cut, Villeroy says
PARIS - If the European Central Bank decides to move on interest rates in the next six months, it would most likely be a cut, ECB policymaker Francois Villeroy de Galhau said on Thursday.
The ECB signalled a pause in policy easing this month despite projections showing price growth dipping below its 2% target temporarily due to the strong euro and low oil prices, reviving worries that the ultra-low inflation environment of the pre-pandemic decade could return.
"Barring a major exogenous shock, including possible new military developments in the Middle East, if monetary policy were to move in the next six months, it could be more in the direction of accommodation," Villeroy said in a speech at the European University Institute in Italy.
Crude oil prices jumped 7% on Friday after Israel launched an unprecedented wave of airstrikes on Iran, prompting Tehran to fire hundreds of ballistic missiles at Israel.
Villeroy, who is also governor of the Bank of France, said that the ECB would monitor the situation for signs of a spillover from energy prices into underlying inflation and broader price expectations, which could prompt it to adapt monetary policy accordingly.
While oil prices have risen off recent lows before Israel's move against Iran, the strength of the euro helps to offset the impact in Europe.
A 10% appreciation in the euro's exchange rate broadly compensates for the inflationary effect of a 10 euro increase in oil prices, Villeroy said.
Meanwhile, financial market pricing suggests that there is a bigger risk that euro zone inflation undershoots the ECB's 2% inflation target rather than overshooting it.
The ECB's own projections this month see inflation falling below 2% in the second quarter of this year and returning to the target in 2027 partly due to the introduction of a new emissions trading system.
"In such a context, we need to remain alert and agile, in all our next meetings," Villeroy said.
(Reporting by Leigh Thomas Editing by Frances Kerry)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Has Europe given Iran an impossible nuclear ultimatum?
European negotiators have insisted Iran must accept that it cannot enrich uranium as part of its nuclear programme, so that peace can return to the Middle East, experts told The National. It is understood that Iran has been agreeable to limiting enrichment to 3.67 per cent, which is the standard level required for civilian nuclear reactors and was part of the previous nuclear agreement. But even this amount is unacceptable to the three European countries, Britain, France and Germany, currently holding talks with Iran in Geneva. 'The Europeans have now started insisting on zero as well, which the Iranians have said is going to be a non-starter,' said Darya Dolzikova, an expert on nuclear proliferation at the Rusi think tank. Iran has engaged in years of brinkmanship by defying international inspectors to enrich uranium to near weapons-grade level. Until the Israeli attacks of the last week, the threat of an assault on its installations seemed to have 'lacked some credibility for the Iranians'. In recent days the regime has appeared to accept the 3.67 per cent figure as a negotiating position, the same amount agreed under the 2015 JCPOA nuclear agreement. For any deal to last it will have to be signed off by US President Donald Trump who has also insisted on zero enrichment, said Richard Pater, director of Bicom, the Anglo-Israeli think tank. 'It all depends on whether 3.67 is acceptable to Trump or whether he's insisting on no enrichment whatsoever,' he said. 'But it's also this question of whether Trump will accept that [3.67 per cent] to get the big peace deal that he wants. Israel will then have no choice but to acquiesce to the American position.' Ms Dolzikova also argued that the Iranians would not agree to a deal that 'doesn't involve the United States as they are the critical players'. But Israel itself has insisted that it will not back down until Iran completely ends its nuclear programme and has made clear that any uranium enrichment on Iranian soil is something that it will not accept. Hasan Al Hasan, a nuclear expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, suggested that the 3.67 per cent figure was now redundant as 'there is no indication that Israel is in a mood to negotiate'. Having achieved near total freedom of action in the skies, Israel was likely to 'press ahead with its maximalist war objectives of eliminating Iran's nuclear and missile programmes and perhaps even regime change'. He added that Mr Trump's announcement that he would make no decision on joining the attacks - that would benefit from America's massive bunker-busting bombs - for the next two weeks was a signal for Israel to 'get the job done' in that period. But there is also a question whether within that fortnight window Israel, without US bombs, has the capability to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities. 'Israel is obviously probably more bullish right now and looking for the removal of the whole nuclear project in its entirety, but it remains to be seen whether that's in their gift,' said Ms Dolzikova. There is also a fear that if 3.67 per cent is agreed by Iran then it might in secret enrich uranium, and conduct a nuclear weaponisation programme viewing it as the only effective deterrent. 'If the regime survives this, then 3.67 per cent gives them another basis with which to start again,' said Mr Pater. 'Israel is under no illusion the Iranians given the chance, will do it all over again.'
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
US rate cuts could come as soon as July, Fed official says
A senior official at the Federal Reserve has suggested that the US central bank should consider cutting interest rates as soon as next month. 'We could do this as early as July,' Fed Governor Christopher Waller said on CNBC. 'That would be my view, whether the committee would go along with it or not.' As a governor on the Federal Reserve Board, Mr Waller holds a permanent vote on the central bank's rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee. Mr Waller and other Fed officials unanimously voted to hold interest rates steady between 4.25 and 4.50 per cent on Wednesday. The Central Bank of the UAE, which follows Fed decisions because of the dollar peg, also held rates steady following the US central bank's decision. Fed officials this week also maintained their forecast for two quarter-point cuts this year before slowing the pace of cuts in 2026. Several officials projected zero rate cuts, pointing to some uncertainty on the future policy path. The central bank has not adjusted interest rates in its last four meetings, largely due to the uncertainty surrounding tariffs. But Mr Waller said the Fed can 'look through' their inflation impact, arguing tariffs would create a one-time inflation bump rather than persistent high prices. Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday said tariffs could either have a one-off or persistent effect on inflation. Asked by reporters why not cut interest rates this month, Mr Powell said he expected to see 'meaningful' inflation in the coming months. Data shows that the Fed's preferred inflation metric has decelerated for three consecutive months. The PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditures) Price Index rose 2.1 per cent annually last month, one-tenth of a percentage point above the Fed's long-term target. 'The data the last few months has been showing that trend inflation is looking pretty good,' Mr Waller said. He suggested that, if the Fed were to begin cutting rates in July, it should begin slowly. 'But start the process,' Mr Waller suggested. 'That's the key thing. And then if there's some big shock due to maybe the Middle East conflict, we can pause.' Mr Waller added that he is also concerned about the jobs market. While the unemployment rate has remained stable at around 4.2 per cent, Mr Waller said he was concerned about fewer jobs being created. The four-week average of jobless claims is at its highest level since August 2023, according to data from the Labour Department. 'Why do we want to wait until we actually see it crash before we start cutting rates?' he added. 'So I'm all in favour of saying maybe we should start thinking about cutting the policy rate at the next meeting, because we don't want to wait till the job market tanks before we start cutting the policy rate.' The Fed holds its next two-day meeting from July 29 to 30.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Shipping unhindered in Strait of Hormuz despite Israel-Iran war risks
Ships are continuing to travel through the Strait of Hormuz, but leading companies say they are closely monitoring the Israel-Iran conflict, and safety is a priority. 'So far, our operations across the region continue without interruption,' a spokesperson for German shipping company Hapag-Lloyd told The National in a statement. The company added that it is closely monitoring the 'geopolitical developments' in the Middle East and the 'safety of our seafarers and vessels as well as the cargo of our customers' are its priority. Ships carry about 20 million barrels of crude and refined products daily through the key waterway between Iran and Oman to various destinations from Gulf producers and from Iran and Iraq. This week, two ships collided in the Sea of Oman near the Strait of Hormuz after a 'navigational misjudgment' by one of the vessels. The UAE Energy Ministry did not blame the accident on the current conflict but it highlighted the risk of navigating through the water channel as it continues. Closing down the waterway is one option Iran could take to respond to its enemies, said Behnam Saeedi, a member of the Iranian parliament's national security committee. Shipping major Maersk said it will continue to use the Strait of Hormuz but will pause calling at the Israeli port of Haifa following Iran's bombardment of the coastal city this week. 'We will continue to closely monitor the situation and will be ready to reassess this as soon as feasible," Maersk said. The conflict began on June 13 when Israel launched a wave of strikes across Iran, killing senior military officials and hitting key nuclear sites. Iran launched retaliatory missile strikes on Israel, hitting a number of targets. The conflict is continuing with both countries hitting each others targets. Some LNG vessels en route to Qatar to load are holding back near Oman, maritime Research Consultancy Drewry Shipping said. Dry bulk imports of grain and agri-products, including soya beans and sugar, to Iran are also stalled at the moment, Rahul Sharan, deputy director of bulk research at Drewry told The National. 'Similarly, Iran's exports of iron ore, cement and clinkers, steel products and urea are also stalled,' he said. About 20 per cent of the world's oil consumption passes through the Strait of Hormuz, which is the only entry point to the Arabian Gulf. Impact on oil and trade Energy companies have also expressed concern about the war's impact on trade and oil shipments. A blockage of the Strait of Hormuz could deliver a substantial shock to global trade, Shell chief executive Wael Sawan said at the Japan Energy Summit and Exhibition in Tokyo on Thursday. 'If that artery is blocked, for whatever reason, it has a huge impact on global trade,' Bloomberg reported quoting Mr Sawan as saying. 'We have plans in the eventuality that things deteriorate.' Oil prices are trading higher on supply related concerns. Prices surged as much as 13 per cent on the first day of the conflict and analysts are expecting oil to touch $150 per barrel if the Strait of Hormuz is shut. 'What is particularly challenging right now is some of the jamming that's happening,' said Mr Sawan, referring to the interference with navigation signals in and around the Arabian Gulf. Shell is 'being very careful' with shipping in the Middle East due to the conflict, he said. Rising shipping costs Another impact of the war has been on shipping costs, which have gone up for vessels travelling through the region, including through rising insurance premiums, according to analysts and insurers. 'The price to charter a very large crude carrier from the Gulf to China reportedly more than doubled from about $20,000 a day a week ago to about $47,600 on Wednesday,' Philip Damas, managing director and head of Drewry Supply Chain, said. Insurance rates have also gone up for cargo vessels sailing in the Red Sea, Arabian Gulf and travelling to or from Israeli ports, according to Marcus Baker, global head of marine and cargo at Marsh McLennan. 'All quotes are now valid for 24 hours from most leaders, as opposed to 48 hours previously,' Mr Baker said. There is also a slight rise in war risk insurance rates for the Red Sea and Arabian Gulf and ports in Israel, he added. 'We are now seeing a modest drop in the number of ships sailing through the area,' Jakob Larsen, chief safety and security officer at Bimco shipping association, told The National. He added that US authorities reported no indications of a threat from Iran towards commercial ships other than those with links to Israel. However, Iran might expand their threats "to also take aim at ships without links to Israel,' if the tension mounts, he added. 'Iranian forces are highly skilled in asymmetric warfare and have prepared for decades for a scenario involving attacks against shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and adjacent waters,' he said. Last year, Iran's Revolutionary Guard seized a container ship with links to Israel in the strait.
