Judge sides with ACLU in lawsuit against CCSD over graduation stole ban
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — The Clark County School District will issue updated guidance to graduating seniors and school administrators Monday after a federal judge ruled in favor of student expression in a case brought by the ACLU of Nevada.
During an emergency court hearing Sunday, U.S. District Judge Richard Boulware found that two stoles, one featuring the phrase 'Black Girl Magic' on kente cloth and another representing the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Nevada's Emerging Leaders Program, were lawfully protected under the First Amendment.
Both stoles had previously been denied by a school administrator.
The decision prompted an agreement between the district and the ACLU requiring CCSD to notify all graduates and school leaders by 3 p.m. with clear guidance on what is permitted at graduation ceremonies.
Graduates will be allowed to wear up to five stoles and may decorate their caps and gowns with flat adornments.
Decorations must not be lewd, obscene, vulgar, profane, or promote violence, illegal drug use, harassment, bullying, or discrimination.
If any decoration or item is found to be substantially disruptive or materially interfering with the ceremony, the graduate may be asked to remove it to participate.
While certain items may still be restricted, any prohibition must be consistent with the First Amendment and state law.
Pre-approval of stoles and flat cap decorations will not be required, effectively lifting previous deadlines.
This new policy will apply to all high schools within the CCSD.
'It was important for us to bring this case because if we didn't, our client would have been prohibited from wearing her stole that reads 'Black Girl Magic' and those graduates in our Emerging Leaders Youth Leadership Program would have have met the same fate depending on the school they attend. It was also important for us to ensure CCSD complies with the law and school faculty and administrators do not get to be the arbiters of the First Amendment based on their own viewpoints. Consistency matters across CCSD. The First Amendment is for everyone. ACLU of Nevada will always fight to make sure that's a reality, and we are grateful to the Judge in this matter for hearing this case when he did in an emergency fashion. You only graduate high school once and this moment is a time for graduates to celebrate their cultures, not experience censorship. We are grateful to spend our Memorial Day weekend defending the First Amendment.'
ACLU of Nevada Executive Director Athar Haseebullah
The ACLU is urging all administrators who receive the updated guidance to ensure their staff comply, warning that any violations could lead to further litigation, including potential claims for damages.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Mahmoud Khalil vows to continue protesting Israel and the war in Gaza after release from detention
Advertisement Joining Khalil at the airport, Ocasio-Cortez said his detention violated the First Amendment and was 'an affront to every American.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'He has been accused, baselessly, of horrific allegations simply because the Trump administration and our overall establishment disagrees with his political speech,' she said. 'The Trump administration knows that they are waging a losing legal battle,' Ocasio-Cortez added. 'They are violating the law, and they know that they are violating the law.' Khalil, a 30-year-old legal resident whose wife gave birth during his 104 days of detention, said he also will speak up for the immigrants he left behind in the detention center. 'Whether you are a citizen, an immigrant, anyone in this land, you're not illegal. That doesn't make you less of a human,' he said. Advertisement Khalil was not accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. However the administration has said noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country for expressing views it considers to be antisemitic and 'pro-Hamas,' referring to the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Khalil was released after U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz said it would be 'highly, highly unusual' for the government to continue detaining a legal resident who was unlikely to flee and had not been accused of any violence. The government filed notice Friday evening that it was appealing Khalil's release. Ramer reported from Concord, New Hampshire.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mahmoud Khalil describes pain of missing son's birth in latest court filing
Mahmoud Khalil, the detained Columbia University graduate and Palestinian activist, has said in a new court filing that the 'most immediate and visceral harms' he has experienced during his nearly three-month detention have been missing the birth of his son and being separated from his wife. 'Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' Khalil said. 'I listened to her pain, trying to comfort her while 70 other men slept around me. When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep. 'To not be able to see them, hold them, speak with them freely, enjoy everything I imagined our first days as a family would be like, is devastating,' he wrote about the birth in late April. The declaration, filed on Wednesday night and made public on Thursday, is part of new evidence submitted by Khalil's legal team in New Jersey federal court in support of his request for a preliminary injunction requesting his immediate release. Related: Mahmoud Khalil finally allowed to hold one-month-old son for the first time It comes a week after a US district judge said in a lengthy order that the use by the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, of a rarely invoked law to detain and attempt to deport Khalil was probably unconstitutional. The judge wrote that the government's justification for deporting Khalil – that his beliefs may pose a threat to US foreign policy – could lead to vague and arbitrary enforcement. The judge, however, stopped short of ordering Khalil's release, and requested additional information before ruling further. On Wednesday night, Khalil's legal team filed a brief and dozens of declarations and expert reports describing the 'irreparable harm' they say that Khalil 'and others will continue to suffer as long as he remains illegally detained in Louisiana and until and unless the Rubio Determination is overturned'. His attorneys argue that Khalil's arrest and detention is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to suppress constitutionally protected speech and are challenging Rubio's determination. In a letter to the court made public on Thursday, Khalil's attorneys write that Khalil is suffering 'irreparable harm from his arrest and detention' including the 'loss of Mr Khalil's liberty; the chilling of his First Amendment protected activities; the separation from his family, particularly his wife and newborn child; and psychological harm specific to his arrest and detention'. They also accuse the government of damaging Khalil's reputation 'by baselessly identifying him as a risk to the foreign policy of the United States, marking him and his family as targets for harassment and notoriety and severely undermining his ability to pursue a career in international diplomacy and human rights advocacy'. In Khalil's declaration, he says that the harms he has suffered as a result of the government's actions include 'dignitary and reputational harm, personal and familial hardship, including constant fear for personal safety, continued detention, restrictions on my freedom of expression, and severe damage to my professional future'. At a news conference on Thursday, Veronica Salama, a staff attorney at the New York Civil Liberties Union who is working on Khalil's case, said that Khalil's declaration was the 'first time' that Khalil 'is speaking directly to the court about the harms that he is facing'. She noted that before his arrest, Khalil had accepted a position at Oxfam International, but that the offer was rescinded on 3 April – a decision she said was a 'direct result' of the government's accusations against him and the public stigma that has followed. Other filings on Wednesday night included letters from attorneys, a declaration from Khalil's wife, Dr Noor Ramez Abdalla, as well as declarations from students and professors at Columbia University, a former state department official, legal service providers and more. Abdalla wrote that the end of her pregnancy and labor 'was extremely stressful because I was separated from Mahmoud due to his ongoing detention. 'Though I had immense support from family and friends in those early days, nothing could replace Mahmoud's presence,' she said. 'Those are days our little family will never get back. Mahmoud will never be part of bringing our first baby home from the hospital, awkwardly carrying the baby carrier, and figuring out how to hold such a tiny baby, and all of the other fun, hard, and challenging parts of adjusting to having a newborn. This reality of all we have missed and will never get back is a weight that constantly sits on me.' Related: To my newborn son: I am absent not out of apathy, but conviction | Mahmoud Khalil The ACLU said on Thursday that Khalil was 'still waiting for a full and final ruling on the preliminary injunction motion, in addition to his pending motions for release on bail and for him to be returned to New Jersey'. The new filings and the news conference on Thursday came a day after Khalil's case was raised during the New York City Democratic mayoral primary debate. The former New York governor Andrew Cuomo, the current frontrunner, called Khalil's detention 'a continuation of Trump eroding democracy, chipping away at due process'. Khalil, Cuomo said, 'should be released, he should be released immediately' adding: 'He shouldn't have been detained in the first place.' The Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, who is polling in second place, said that Khalil 'should be set free', adding that Khalil 'should be at home with his wife Noor and their young child'.
CBS News
8 hours ago
- CBS News
Lawsuit claims Sonoma County's drone surveillance program has gone beyond its normal limits
From data breaches to license plate readers to the uncertainty of AI, the idea of personal privacy is being lost in our high-tech world. But now, a lawsuit claims that Sonoma County's drone surveillance program has gone way beyond normal limits. In 2019, Sonoma County authorized the purchase of a drone. It was intended to help identify illegal cannabis grows in remote areas, but since then, there has been a lot of "mission creep." "When I saw the drone, I was walking around this side. And I saw the drone over me, and I listened," said Saadi Vega, imitating its sound. "I'm really confused and scared because I see the drone close to me. I can see the drone." Vega works at the Cloven Hoof Farm, an animal rescue facility and home owned by Nichola Schmitz Nichola is deaf, but it wasn't hard to see the drone hovering over her backyard. "I noticed something flying around," she said, through her interpreter, Ana. "It was pretty big. It was actually very big. And I thought, 'Hey, what's up?'" The drone is a large professional model about three feet across, made by DJI. It costs about $25,000 and can zoom in and even follow moving objects autonomously. It's the property of the county's code enforcement division, which makes sure that people's property conforms to local ordinances and is properly permitted. But the American Civil Liberties Union says the drone program is out of control, and they have filed a lawsuit on behalf of Nichola and two other property owners for illegally monitoring and recording the private spaces of their homes. "So, these are areas in their backyards, in their pools, in their hot tubs. And there is California law that makes this illegal," said Shilpi Agarwal, Legal Director for ACLU of Northern California. "They have been using this drone program for this large category of code enforcement--not just cannabis grows--but what they profess to be a whole swath of code violations. But they haven't told people that this is what they're doing." It was a year and a half later that the ACLU contacted Nichola to tell her that her home had been surveilled by the county. She had been blaming the neighbors for the intrusion. In the lawsuit, the lawyers quote documents allegedly showing a code enforcement supervisor trying to keep the program free from restrictions when crafting the drone policy. "I think that we should leave out language of warrants," it said. "I am concerned about reasonable expectations of privacy, as we do look at residences, yards, enclosures, sheds, greenhouses, etc.... We do not just stick to open fields when conducting our investigations." "The fact that Sonoma County is doing this without a warrant should really worry all of us," said attorney Agarwal, "because it really suggests that Sonoma County is really getting into, they're invading the core of what our privacy rights are meant to protect, which is our ability to act freely in our own homes without being surveilled by the government." Nichola's surveillance stemmed from a permitting dispute over her adding dirt to her backyard because of erosion following the 2017 Nuns Fire. But no one from the county ever told her they had taken pictures of her home from the sky. "I thought, this is a violation," Nichola said. "This is a private house, my haven. If I don't say anything about this situation, it could get worse and worse. And they could sneak into other people's lives and spy on them. There are no boundaries. They can come into my space. They could be anywhere. I want to stop this." The county responded to our request for comment with a statement saying they would not talk about the litigation but are reviewing the complaint and are taking the allegations "very seriously." Whether the lawsuit will bring changes is unknown at this point. But even if it does, Nichola said she will never again feel the same sense of security in her home that she once did.
