11 charged in Toronto taxi scam that allegedly defrauded customers of over $500K
Eleven people have been arrested and charged after a Toronto police investigation into a taxi scam that allegedly defrauded more than $500,000 from unsuspecting customers over 10 months.
The 11, accused of being part of a criminal network that exploited members of the public, face 108 charges.
At a news conference on Thursday, police said the investigation called Project Fare began last July after police received multiple reports by victims of the taxi scam. Initially, police identified 61 incidents of fraud, but that number quickly grew to more than 300.
Det. David Coffey, spokesperson for the Toronto Police Service, told reporters that the suspects masqueraded as taxi drivers using vehicles that were modified to look like licensed cabs.
Coffey said unsuspecting customers got into what they thought were legitimate taxi cabs only to find out that they were scammed after they paid their fares.
"Unsuspecting victims were picked up and asked to pay for the ride using a credit or debit card. During the transaction, the suspects discreetly swapped the victim's card with a card that looked like theirs. The real card and their PIN is then passed on to accomplices," Coffey said.
"These fraudsters used the stolen cards and PINs to withdraw funds from ATMs, deposit fraudulent checks to artificially inflate account balances and make high value purchases, including electronics, gift cards and luxury clothing."
At the news conference, police displayed some of the items that the fraudsters purchased and that police seized during the investigation.
On May 21, members of the police's financial crimes unit, with help from officers from various divisions, carried out three search warrants at addresses linked to the accused. Police made arrests and seized several point-of-sale terminals, high end clothing, electronics, artwork, several bank cards and vehicles resembling taxis.
The suspects include 10 men and one woman from the Greater Toronto Area, ranging from 19 to 50 years old. The charges include fraud over $5,000 and possession of proceeds of crime over $5,000. Police said they are still looking for two male suspects and a female considered a person of interest in the case.
News of arrests brings relief to cab company
Kristine Hubbard, operations manager for Beck Taxi, said after the news conference that she is relieved that police have laid charges.
"I'm just really relieved to know that this was taken seriously and that it's been dealt with," Hubbard said. "When someone defrauds or engages in criminal activity in the name of legitimate services, it's pretty heartbreaking and it's pretty defeating."
Hubbard said she has advice for customers.
"Nobody's saying no to cash. That's number one. And if someone has a point of sale terminal, it can't accept debit and not credit, right? So our debit terminals or point of sale terminals are clearly branded," she said.
"They have the Beck branding on them and they take debit and credit. If somehow a massive cell outage happens, obviously that's affecting the whole city, that might be the case where there's no debit and no credit, but there's never one and not the other."
Also, she said customers should never let their debit cards out of sight and it should not leave their hands.
Customers should also look for a brand that they trust and look at vehicle numbers to identify legitimate taxis, she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
2 cities, 2 buildings and 1 fugitive landlord leaves tenants in unlivable conditions
A wanted fugitive accused of being the ringleader of a grandparent scam has left tenants in two southwestern Ontario cities with a host of maintenance issues and no one to turn to for help. Gareth West, 45, owns two apartment buildings in London and St. Thomas, according to property records obtained by CBC News. He's been at large since U.S. authorities issued an arrest warrant for him in February for the alleged scam call centre he operated out of Montreal, defrauding American seniors out of more than $21 million US. Tenants at both of his buildings say they haven't been able to get a hold of West in months. In that time, they've dealt with sporadic power and water outages, garbage piling up, their units in need of significant repairs and now, without a landlord, they're unsure of what comes next. "We're kind of left in limbo. Gareth is missing in action and nobody knows where he is," Audrey Knight said, who lives at 14 Holland Street, a three-storey walk-up in St. Thomas where she pays $1,900 in rent each month. "We have one email [contact] and it doesn't get replies, so we're just trying to navigate where we go next and unfortunately nobody really has great answers for us," Knight said. Despite residents keeping up with their monthly rent, power was cut off for several hours on Tuesday because their landlord hasn't paid the hydro bills. Garbage also hasn't been collected since April and some residents have taken it upon themselves to do lawn care and clean the building, Knight said. "It's very stressful when you don't know from one day to the next if I'm going to have water or electricity because we paid all our bills," said Wendy Nichols, 70, who has lived at the building for almost six years. The residents said they won't be paying rent until the situation is resolved, with some saying efforts to make their payments have been unsuccessful. A handful of residents said their deposits weren't accepted, though others said the money was withdrawn from their accounts. The City of St. Thomas has issued property standards orders, which allows bylaw to enforce the Residential Tenancies Act. Tenants believe the next step will be the bank seizing the property and it going on sale again. Property records show West purchased in the building in 2022 and Nichols said she is among the few residents who have met him. She said he offered her a $20,000 buyout to move elsewhere, so he could renovate the property and raise rent, which she declined. West has branded himself on social media as a real estate builder and health enthusiast, and made several Instagram videos standing outside his properties, including in St. Thomas, where he'd give tips on flipping properties and using the "cash for keys" model to renovict tenants. He and 25 others are facing wire fraud charges in the U.S. for the alleged grandparent scam, and if West is convicted, he could spend 40 years in jail. West's London, Ont. property It's a similar situation for tenants over at his other rental on 308 Egerton Street in London. Residents at the apartment have banded together in efforts to fix their water heater but are told they might have to incur those costs out of pocket, which most people can't afford, said Cheyenne Lemieux, who has lived there since September. "We've been without hot water for about a-week-and-half now, our garbage hasn't been taken out in over a month. There's garbage everywhere, some of us have been keeping it in our units because we don't know what to do with it. We're drowning in it," said tenant Andrew Foster. "It's been a pretty rough situation, especially since I have two young kids." The tenants said they're frustrated because they've been forced to take on responsibilities they didn't sign up for. "We're just supposed to pay rent and that's why somebody moves into an apartment, so they don't have to deal with the other stuff with having a house but we're worrying about the garbage, grass and cleaning the building. It would be nice to worry about my own apartment and not all the other things that have come with it," said Knight. City officials in St. Thomas didn't respond to a request for comment in time for publication. The City of London said after failed attempts to contact the property owner to address the maintenance issues, it is now working with the mortgage company to resolve the matter.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aussie blocked from her own account exposes bank's 'insane' request to unblock it
An ING customer is urging banks to rethink their fraud processes after she said she was blocked from her bank account and unable to access her money for days due to two innocuous transactions. Katie McMaster has been a long-time customer of the digital bank, which is one of the biggest in the country. The Melbourne resident received an email from the bank's fraud department on Tuesday saying her account had been suspended due to 'suspicious activity'. She immediately contacted ING and was told she needed to wait for the fraud team to contact her via email and she couldn't speak to them on the phone. The 35-year-old told Yahoo Finance she had to verify her identity over email and had to reply with her full name, date of birth and mobile number. RELATED Commonwealth Bank customer rages over threat to cut access to his money Centrelink age pension changes coming into effect from July 1 Centrelink rule change gives more Aussies access to $5,000 cash boost 'I just thought that was insane in itself to be sending that data across email to verify. For a bank of their size, I just thought that shouldn't be the process, especially when you're trying to get in touch with the fraud department,' she said. She was later sent a verification text from the bank and told to upload her identification. After that, she said she heard nothing from the bank and was still unable to get someone on the phone. She was told the fraud team could take two business days to respond. Meanwhile, the personal assistant was unable to access her funds, use her card or get money out. She said she had to rely on her credit card for funds, which ING did not block.'It was stressful in the fact that I could obviously see the balance, but the available balance was zero,' she said. 'But what was sort of frustrating was that they didn't block my credit card with them. They were happy for me to keep using my credit card, but then I would have to pay interest on that, but they wouldn't let me access my funds, and I couldn't withdraw any cash.' It wasn't until 5pm on Thursday that she received an email from ING asking her to verify two transactions flagged as suspicious. They were her monthly salary, which goes into her account at the same time each month, and a $300 transfer from a friend for Usher tickets. After she confirmed the purpose of the funds, she finally received a call from the ING fraud department, and they were able to unblock her accounts "on the spot". McMaster said the worker she spoke to was confused why the transactions had been flagged as suspicious and apologised for taking so long to resolve the issue. She claimed she was the only one manning the fraud email inbox. 'The lack of communication was frustrating me the most. I understand banks have their processes, but I'd rather sit on hold for an hour knowing I'd get through than wait a couple of days,' she said. An ING spokesperson told Yahoo Finance safeguarding customers' funds and identities was "central" to how it operated. "When our systems detect suspicious transactions, we proactively act on behalf of customers to protect their funds. This often involves temporarily placing a hold on a customer's account until we can confirm the transactions with the customer," the spokesperson said. "To reactivate account activity, we verify the customer's identity through our secure fraud portal. During this process, the customer's biometrics are matched against the identity documents we securely hold on record. "We recognise that temporarily pausing activity on an account can impact customers, so we always check they have access to essential funds, ensuring they are not placed in financial hardship." McMaster shared her experience online and was met with hundreds of responses from other Australians, with several others saying they also had their ING accounts blocked. "This happened to me in 2019, I was overseas and there was no help. For the rest of my trip I had to use a friend's money to be able to pay for anything. They cancelled the card and that was it," one wrote. "Same happened with me! You feel so vulnerable not being able to get access to money! Luckily, I was able to borrow cash from someone because you literally can't get access to any money, it's crazy," another said. "It's actually terrifying that they can do this," a third added. Others agreed they would feel uneasy about providing their personal information over email. "I'd refuse to send personal details over email, that's ridiculous!!" one said. "It's a very odd process for fraud verification, and goes against our basic security instincts ... It adds even more stress and confusion to the situation," another said. McMaster said she was now in the process of changing banks and was considering opening up accounts with multiple banks to avoid getting stuck in the same position. She has called on ING and other banks to reconsider their fraud verification processes, including the requirement for customers to provide sensitive information via email. 'The main concern of all of this is the verification process. It was just having to click on a link to upload my ID from a text message. It's just everything we're told not to do,' she said. She has urged other Aussies to continue to remain diligent when it comes to scams and to double-check any messages received were legitimate.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Godfather of AI' believes it's unsafe - but here's how he plans to fix the tech
This week the US Federal Bureau of Investigation revealed two men suspected of bombing a fertility clinic in California last month allegedly used artificial intelligence (AI) to obtain bomb-making instructions. The FBI did not disclose the name of the AI program in question. This brings into sharp focus the urgent need to make AI safer. Currently we are living in the 'wild west' era of AI, where companies are fiercely competing to develop the fastest and most entertaining AI systems. Each company wants to outdo competitors and claim the top spot. This intense competition often leads to intentional or unintentional shortcuts – especially when it comes to safety. Coincidentally, at around the same time of the FBI's revelation, one of the godfathers of modern AI, Canadian computer science professor Yoshua Bengio, launched a new nonprofit organisation dedicated to developing a new AI model specifically designed to be safer than other AI models – and target those that cause social harm. So what is Bengio's new AI model? And will it actually protect the world from AI-faciliated harm? In 2018, Bengio, alongside his colleagues Yann LeCun and Geoffrey Hinton, won the Turing Award for groundbreaking research they had published three years earlier on deep learning. A branch of machine learning, deep learning attempts to mimic the processes of the human brain by using artificial neural networks to learn from computational data and make predictions. Bengio's new nonprofit organisation, LawZero, is developing 'Scientist AI'. Bengio has said this model will be 'honest and not deceptive', and incorporate safety-by-design principles. According to a preprint paper released online earlier this year, Scientist AI will differ from current AI systems in two key ways. First, it can assess and communicate its confidence level in its answers, helping to reduce the problem of AI giving overly confident and incorrect responses. Second, it can explain its reasoning to humans, allowing its conclusions to be evaluated and tested for accuracy. Interestingly, older AI systems had this feature. But in the rush for speed and new approaches, many modern AI models can't explain their decisions. Their developers have sacrificed explainability for speed. Bengio also intends 'Scientist AI' to act as a guardrail against unsafe AI. It could monitor other, less reliable and harmful AI systems — essentially fighting fire with fire. This may be the only viable solution to improve AI safety. Humans cannot properly monitor systems such as ChatGPT, which handle over a billion queries daily. Only another AI can manage this scale. Using an AI system against other AI systems is not just a sci-fi concept – it's a common practice in research to compare and test different level of intelligence in AI systems. Large language models and machine learning are just small parts of today's AI landscape. Another key addition Bengio's team are adding to Scientist AI is the 'world model' which brings certainty and explainability. Just as humans make decisions based on their understanding of the world, AI needs a similar model to function effectively. The absence of a world model in current AI models is clear. One well-known example is the 'hand problem': most of today's AI models can imitate the appearance of hands but cannot replicate natural hand movements, because they lack an understanding of the physics — a world model — behind them. Another example is how models such as ChatGPT struggle with chess, failing to win and even making illegal moves. This is despite simpler AI systems, which do contain a model of the 'world' of chess, beating even the best human players. These issues stem from the lack of a foundational world model in these systems, which are not inherently designed to model the dynamics of the real world. Bengio is on the right track, aiming to build safer, more trustworthy AI by combining large language models with other AI technologies. However, his journey isn't going to be easy. LawZero's US$30 million in funding is small compared to efforts such as the US$500 billion project announced by US President Donald Trump earlier this year to accelerate the development of AI. Making LawZero's task harder is the fact that Scientist AI – like any other AI project – needs huge amounts of data to be powerful, and most data are controlled by major tech companies. There's also an outstanding question. Even if Bengio can build an AI system that does everything he says it can, how is it going to be able to control other systems that might be causing harm? Still, this project, with talented researchers behind it, could spark a movement toward a future where AI truly helps humans thrive. If successful, it could set new expectations for safe AI, motivating researchers, developers, and policymakers to prioritise safety. Perhaps if we had taken similar action when social media first emerged, we would have a safer online environment for young people's mental health. And maybe, if Scientist AI had already been in place, it could have prevented people with harmful intentions from accessing dangerous information with the help of AI systems. Armin Chitizadeh is a Lecturer in the School of Computer Science at the University of Sydney. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article
