Prada's €1.25bn Versace takeover: a new era for Italian luxury

Prada has agreed to buy the Versace fashion brand for €1.25bn ($1.38bn) from the fashion conglomerate Capri Holdings.
It comes after months of speculation about a potential deal to combine the two Italian fashion houses and, more recently, rumours that the acquisition was set to collapse after market upheaval in response to President Trump's tariff policies.
Insiders say the original deal was expected to be agreed at $1.6bn, but a discount of about $200m was achieved because market turmoil has hit the retail industry particularly hard.
Capri, which also owns Michael Kors and Jimmy Choo, originally bought Versace for $2.1bn in 2018. After an $8.5bn attempt by Tapestry – the American group that owns Coach and Kate Spade – to acquire Capri was blocked last year by the US Federal Trade Commission, Capri has been under pressure to sell off Versace to reduce its debt. According to those close to the deal, Prada was one of the earliest bidders.
In a statement confirming the news, Prada's group chair and executive director Patrizio Bertelli said the group was 'ready and well positioned to write a new page in Versace's history'. Bertelli added that both companies 'share a strong commitment to creativity, craftsmanship and heritage'.
While Capri failed to create an American luxury group to rival fashion companies such as LVMH and Kering, the acquisition hints at an attempt by Prada to strengthen its position as an Italian powerhouse. Versace will join the fashion brands Prada and Miu Miu, the footwear brands Church's, Car Shoe and Luna Rossa, the America's Cup sailing team Luna Rossa and the pastry brand Marchesi.
It is not the first endeavour by Prada to add to its portfolio. In 1999, it acquired Jil Sander and Helmut Lang and, in 2000, it added Alaia to its lineup. However, by 2007, after a series of disputes and financial challenges, it had parted ways with all three brands. Now, the Versace acquisition offers them another opportunity to intensify the global reach of the Made in Italy group.
While the luxury fashion market has been facing a significant slowdown, the Prada Group has enjoyed rare success. It reported revenues of €5.4bn in 2024, 17% higher than the previous year. This increase was partly driven by Miu Miu – the brand behind those viral micro-miniskirts and satin ballet shoes – which has almost doubled its profits this year, hitting close to £1bn in sales.
Sign up to Fashion Statement
Style, with substance: what's really trending this week, a roundup of the best fashion journalism and your wardrobe dilemmas solved
after newsletter promotion
Last month, it was announced that Dario Vitale, a former image director at Miu Miu, would be succeeding Donatella Versace as creative director, a position Versace had held for 27 years. Instead, Versace will take up the role of chief brand ambassador, overseeing the house's red-carpet dressing and philanthropic work.
Prada and Versace are often pitted against each other as Italian fashion rivals, but their designs are diametrically opposed. Versace champions the traditional tropes of femininity with unabashed enthusiasm – see high hemlines, high heels, big hair. Miuccia Prada, who holds a doctorate in political science and, prior to joining the family business in 1970 was a Communist, is often referred to as 'fashion's intellectual'. She has previously described her work as ugly clothes in hideous fabrics. However, the two women have a perhaps unlikely friendship. Speaking to The Telegraph in 2012, Versace said: 'We just talk, talk, talk. She's so inspiring. We make fun of each other and teach each other. She says, 'I could never make sexy clothes, but I love them.' And I say, 'Well, I love what you do'.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Herald Scotland

31 minutes ago

• The Herald Scotland

Carnegie fortune to help pay for new Edinburgh concert hall

The grant from the Carnegie Corporation of New York was announced as it was predicted that the 1000-seater venue, which is expected to cost at least £115 million to create, will generate £170m for the economy in its first 20 years. Read more: The venue, which is expected create more than 300 jobs, is already being ked to the tune at at least £35 million by the Dunard Fund, a charity set up by American philanthropist Carol Colburn Grigor. The new backing has been confirmed weeks after Ms Grigor, one of the biggest private financial backers of Scottish culture in modern times, was awarded the Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy. Previous winners of the honour, which is award on behalf of Carnegie trusts and foundations around the world, including Dolly Parton, Michael Bloomberg, Bill Gates and the Scottish businessman Sir Tom Hunter. Born in Dunfermline in 1835, Andrew Carnegie emigrated to Pennsylvania with his family at the age of 12, built a multi-million dollar business empire in the steel industry and was one of the world's richest men by the end of the century. However he famously gave away most of his fortune via trusts and institutions set up in his name, including the Carnegie Corporation of New York, which he established in 1911 and is now led by a former principal of St Andrews University, Louise Richardson. The Dunard Centre, which has attracted more than £80 million in private donations to date, is also being supported by the Scottish and UK governments, and Edinburgh City Council, who are contributing £25m in total. Dunard Centre chief executive Jo Buckley said: 'We are hugely grateful for this grant, which recognises both the global significance of the Dunard Centre and the role it will play in enriching the lives of local people, by giving them greater access to the arts. "The money will help us develop and advance our engagement strategy, which is a vital element of our mission to create a 'hall for all' here in Edinburgh. 'With a focus on supporting civic participation and socioeconomic mobility, we intend to build trusted relationships, design thoughtful creative engagement programmes, and establish the team that will bring this work to life when we open our doors in 2029. 'We look forward to the opportunity of exploring and sharing the parallels between the transformational philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie – and the mark this left upon the world – and the various ways civic society benefits from the provision of outstanding performance and lifelong engagement with music.'

Daily Mirror

an hour ago

• Daily Mirror

Drivers floored to discover meaning behind name of Elon Musk's Tesla Motors

Tesla is one of the most famous car companies in the world - but the name has a very special meaning few people know about thanks to Elon Musk. Here's what you need to know Tesla, the American trailblazer for electric vehicles and clean energy, has been talked about a lot this year. Established in 2003 as Tesla Motors by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning, it wasn't long before the charismatic Elon Musk powered through the initial investment phase in February 2004, taking charge as chairman and eventually climbing to the role of CEO in 2008. While Tesla's innovative streak is well known, there's still a veil of intrigue surrounding the origins of its name. It was recently brought up on social media when someone posed the question: "What is the meaning of the word 'Tesla' in a business context? How did the company get its name?" ‌ The query sparked a flurry of speculation but, unknown to many, the company pays homage to Nikola Tesla, an electrical engineer and illustrious inventor whose accomplishments were overshadowed during his time. Musk's decision to honour him with the company name keeps Tesla's spirit alive, contributing to his belated recognition. ‌ An article by Seattle Times highlighted: "In the age of Edison, Westinghouse, Marconi and J.P. Morgan, Tesla was a giant of innovation because of his contributions in the fields of electricity, radio and robotics." Many are now recognising that Tesla is finally receiving the recognition he deserves, largely attributed to Elon Musk. Marc Seifer, author of Wizard: The Life and Times of Nikola Tesla, stated: "It's a sociological fact that Elon Musk took the Tesla name and launched Nikola Tesla into the stratosphere. Tesla's risen to the surface again, and now he's getting his due." Despite gracing the cover of Time magazine in 1931, the inventor died impoverished in 1943 after years spent on underfunded projects. Today, some of Tesla's most significant inventions are gaining renewed attention. In 1884, Tesla arrived in New York with hopes that Thomas Edison would back his alternating-current (AC) motor and electrical system. The Seattle Times remarked: "But Edison was investing in highly inefficient direct-current (DC) systems, and he had Tesla re-engineer a DC power plant on Pearl Street in Lower Manhattan. The men soon parted company over a financial dispute. ‌ "George Westinghouse provided funding for Tesla's AC induction motors and devices, which soon came to dominate manufacturing and urban life. Unlike the DC motors of the time, Tesla's motors didn't create sparks or require expensive permanent magnets to operate. "Instead, they used a rotating magnetic field that used power more efficiently in a basic design that is still the core of most electric motors." In 1896, Tesla's creation of the power-generating system at Niagara Falls marked a massive leap for his AC system. Soon after cities started to adopt AC power following Westinghouse's victory over Edison, the staunch DC advocate, in a rivalry depicted in The Current War with Benedict Cumberbatch portraying Edison. Besides, Tesla was pivotal in evolving radio technology, experimenting from 1892 to 1894 and famously describing the radio as an "oscillator" that transformed electricity into high-frequency radio waves for transmitting energy, sound and further communications across vast distances. Envisioning a global transmission network, Tesla conducted promising tests in Colorado in 1899 and then attempted to build a so-called "World System" in Shoreham, Long Island, aiming for the wireless powering of vehicles, ships and planes. Just like smartphones fetch data, sound and visuals from thin air today, Tesla imagined universal accessibility to electricity, yet financial constraints and the cessation of support from financier J.P. Morgan Jr. thwarted his revolutionary aspirations. The Seattle Times remarked on the bittersweet legacy of a brilliant mind, stating: "His achievements remained incomplete. He created the AC energy system and the basics of radio communication and robotics but wasn't able to bring them all to fruition. His life shows that even for a brilliant inventor, innovation doesn't happen in a vacuum. It requires a broad spectrum of talents and skills. And lots of capital."

The Independent

2 hours ago

• The Independent

Support for solar energy and offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents, AP-NORC poll says

Americans' support for green energy tax credits and renewable energies like wind and solar power has decreased in recent years, according to a new poll, driven by a softening in support from Democrats and independents. The poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that U.S. adults' support for tax credits for electric vehicles and solar panels has weakened, as well as their enthusiasm for offshore wind farm expansion. While Democrats remain the strongest supporters of these initiatives, the poll reveals signs of growing cynicism within their ranks. The poll results coincide with sweeping changes President Donald Trump 's Republican administration is making to regulations related to energy and climate change, including slashing the federal workforce in these departments. And although Democrats and independents have weakened their support for some green energy initiatives, there has not been an increase in support for Trump's energy policies. The poll found only about 4 in 10 U.S. adults — including only 1 in 10 Democrats and about 2 in 10 independents, along with three-quarters of Republicans — approve of the way Trump is handling climate change, which largely tracks with his overall approval rating. Democrats and independents drive decline in support for renewable energy credits About 6 in 10 Democrats, 58%, favor tax credits for purchasing an electric vehicle, down from about 7 in 10 in 2022. Among independents, support declined from 49% in 2022 to 28%. Only one-quarter of Republicans supported this policy in 2022, and that hasn't changed measurably. 'As far as the pollution goes ... the vehicles nowadays put out very little emissions to the air,' said JD Johnson, a 62-year-old Democrat from Meadowview, Virginia, who somewhat opposes tax credits to purchase an electric vehicle. That's partly because he sees the electric vehicle manufacturing process as energy intensive and believes gasoline-powered vehicles have made improvements with the pollutants they emit. The decline in favoring solar panel tax credits was across the board rather than being concentrated among Democrats. 'For solar panels, in all honesty, I don't think they're that efficient yet,' said Glenn Savage, 78, a left-leaning independent from Rock Hill, South Carolina. 'I'd rather see them pour money into research and try to get the solar panels more efficient before they start giving tax breaks to the public. I may be wrong on that, but that's just my thought.' Scientists say transitioning to renewable energies and ditching fossil fuels that release planet-warming emissions are essential to protect the planet. Billions of dollars in project grants for clean technologies awarded during President Joe Biden 's Democratic administration have been canceled by the Trump administration, and the offshore wind sector has been stunted by Trump's executive order that paused approvals, permits and loans for wind energy projects. Fewer than half of U.S. adults, 44%, now say that offshore wind farms should be expanded in the U.S., down from 59% in 2022. About half favor expanding solar panel farms, while about two-thirds were in support in 2022. When people are concerned about the economy and their personal finances, environmental issues are sometimes prioritized less, said Talbot Andrews, an assistant professor in the department of government at Cornell University who was not involved in the poll. 'I think it makes people anxious to think about increased taxes or increased spending on environmental issues when the cost of eggs are going through the roof,' Andrews said. Low support for Trump's efforts to expand offshore drilling and coal mining Trump has championed the expansion of offshore oil drilling, as well as domestic coal production. Despite a decline in support for expanded renewable energies, the new poll shows that only about one-third of U.S. adults think offshore drilling for oil and natural gas should be expanded in the U.S., and only about one-quarter say this about coal mining. In both cases, Republicans are much more likely than Democrats to support expanding these energy sources. Trump has sought to open up national monuments for oil drilling, but more U.S. adults oppose than support auctioning off more public space for oil drilling. Only about one-quarter of U.S. adults favor this, while 4 in 10 are opposed. Republicans are much more likely than independents or Democrats to be in support. Bipartisan support for consumer rebates and home appliance ratings The Energy Star program that certifies appliances, such as dishwashers and refrigerators, as energy efficient recently appeared in headlines when the EPA made plans to scrap the program. The blue and white logo is well recognized, and experts say the program has long had bipartisan support until recently. The poll found three-quarters of Democrats support providing consumer rebates for efficient home appliances, compared with 6 in 10 Republicans. Patrick Buck, 54, from Chicago, describes himself as a liberal Republican and is a fan of the consumer rebates for energy-efficient appliances. 'It seems to work in terms of transforming what people have in their houses, because a lot of people have a lot of old appliances and just can't afford new ones,' he said. Safe air, water, meat and produce The poll found only about 2 in 10 U.S. adults are 'extremely' or 'very' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of their drinking water, the air they breathe and the meat, poultry, fruits and vegetables they buy in grocery stores. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults are 'somewhat' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of each of these, and about 4 in 10 are 'not very' or 'not at all' confident. The Trump administration has announced plans to roll back rules and policies related to limiting pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, such as rules that limit pollution from power plants and blocking California's efforts to phase out cars that run on gas. The federal government has also cut staff at the Food and Drug Administration, the federal agency tasked with protecting public health and ensuring food supply safety. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at