Which Vanguard ETFs Have Beaten Warren Buffett's Favorite ETF Since Inception?
Only two Vanguard ETFs have outperformed Buffett's favorite ETF over the long run.
Both of these winners focus on large-cap growth stocks.
10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF ›
Warren Buffett has dropped enough hints to ascertain that his favorite exchange-traded fund (ETF) is the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO). This ETF has been a huge winner historically, but which Vanguard ETFs have beaten Buffett's favorite ETF since inception?
Only two make the list: the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund ETF (NASDAQ: VONG) and the Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund ETF (NYSEMKT: VOOG).
Of Vanguard's 94 ETFs, the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF has been the best performer over the long run. This fund's average annual return since its inception on Sept. 20, 2010, is an impressive 16.4%. By comparison, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF's average annual return since its inception on Sept. 7, 2010, is 14.24%.
This Vanguard ETF attempts to track the return of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The index includes growth stocks in the large-cap Russell 1000 index. The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF currently owns 392 stocks. Its largest positions are Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple, Amazon, and Meta Platforms. Not so coincidentally, these are also the five largest holdings of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.
Many of the stocks in the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund ETF are also in the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, so how has it delivered such a higher average annual return? One key is that the ETF's focus on growth stocks eliminates some of the S&P 500 members that don't typically generate outstanding returns.
Granted, there is at least one way that the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF beats the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF. Its annual expense ratio of 0.03% is lower than the latter's expense ratio of 0.07%. Of course, that small difference doesn't matter much with the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF's higher returns.
Also, if you're interested in income, you'll probably prefer the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. Its 30-day SEC yield (which reflects a fund's projected annual dividend yield over a trailing-30-day period) is 1.24%, versus only 0.53% for the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
Since the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF has outperformed the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF over the long term, it isn't surprising that the Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF has also been a bigger winner. This Vanguard ETF has delivered an average annual return since its inception on Sept. 7, 2010, of 16.01%.
Like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, the Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF only includes stocks in the S&P 500. However, it's even more exclusive by limiting the pool to growth stocks. The fund currently owns 212 stocks. Its top holdings are similar to those of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, but not exactly alike: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, Apple, and Broadcom.
The main disadvantages of the Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF compared to the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF are the same as those mentioned for the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF. The fund's annual expense ratio of 0.07% is a little higher. Its 30-day SEC yield of 0.55% is lower.
If you wanted to beat Buffett's favorite ETF in the past, the only Vanguard ETFs to have pulled it off since inception are the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund ETF and the Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund ETF. However, there's a more important question: Which Vanguard ETFs are most likely to outperform the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF over the long term?
I think the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF and the Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF would likely make the list again. Their focus on stocks that deliver strong growth could give these ETFs an edge.
It's important to note, though, that over multiple decades, small-cap value stocks have typically outperformed other asset classes. With this in mind, the top Vanguard ETFs to own in the future just might include the Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (NYSEMKT: VIOV) and the Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (NYSEMKT: VBR). Only time will tell.
Before you buy stock in Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keith Speights has positions in Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Which Vanguard ETFs Have Beaten Warren Buffett's Favorite ETF Since Inception? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Dallas Mavericks Must Think Twice Before Trading for Jrue Holiday
Why Dallas Mavericks Must Think Twice Before Trading for Jrue Holiday originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Dallas Mavericks find themselves in an enviable yet challenging position this offseason. Fresh off drafting Cooper Flagg with the No. 1 pick and armed with championship aspirations, the front office faces a critical decision at the guard position with Kyrie Irving sidelined until 2026, recovering from a torn ACL. Advertisement While recent reports have connected Dallas to Boston Celtics veteran Jrue Holiday, the Mavericks should think twice before pulling the trigger on what could be a costly trade that doesn't align with their current timeline or financial flexibility. Holiday undoubtedly brings a championship pedigree and defensive versatility that would complement Dallas's core. At 35, he remains one of the league's premier perimeter defenders and has proven his worth as a finishing piece for title contenders, as evidenced by his championship runs with Milwaukee and Boston. However, the cost of acquiring Holiday presents significant concerns for Dallas's long-term planning. With three years and $104 million remaining on his contract, including a hefty $37.2 million player option for 2027-28, Holiday's deal represents a massive financial commitment for a player entering his 17th NBA season. More troubling for the Mavericks is what Boston would likely demand in return. The Celtics need to shed $20-25 million in salary just to get under the second apron, meaning they're motivated sellers. However, Holiday's proven playoff value ensures Boston won't simply give him away. Advertisement Reports suggest Dallas would need to part with valuable pieces like P.J. Washington or Daniel Gafford, two players who were instrumental in last year's Finals run and offer more team-friendly contracts. Rather than mortgage their future for an aging Holiday, the Mavericks should explore more cost-effective options that better align with their championship window and financial flexibility. Collin Sexton emerges as an intriguing trade target from Utah. The 25-year-old guard averaged 18.7 points and 4.9 assists last season while shooting 48.8 percent from the field. Sexton's youth and offensive upside make him a more sustainable option alongside Irving's eventual return, and Utah's rebuilding timeline suggests he could be available for a reasonable price without sacrificing core rotation players. The free agent market also offers compelling veteran options that wouldn't require Dallas to gut its frontcourt depth. Dennis Schröder brings playoff experience and proven leadership, having helped guide teams through difficult stretches when primary ball-handlers were unavailable. His championship experience with the Lakers and ability to manage an offense would provide stability during Irving's absence. Advertisement Chris Paul, despite his age, represents another veteran presence who could mentor young players while providing steady point guard play. Paul's basketball IQ and ability to maximize teammates' potential could be invaluable for integrating Flagg into the rotation while maintaining championship expectations. The Mavericks' championship window with Anthony Davis turning 33 and Irving 34 may be narrower than initially anticipated, but that doesn't mean Dallas should sacrifice future flexibility for a short-term fix. Washington and Gafford provide versatility and value on reasonable contracts, making them attractive trade assets if a better opportunity emerges mid-season. With Flagg entering the fold and the team's young core still developing, maintaining depth and financial flexibility could prove more valuable than betting big on Holiday's aging curve. The rookie's immediate defensive impact should help offset some of the concerns about perimeter defense that make Holiday attractive. While Holiday's championship pedigree is undeniable, the combination of his age, contract, and Boston's asking price makes this trade a risky proposition for Dallas. The Mavericks have built something special with their current core, and dismantling that foundation for a 35-year-old guard—no matter how talented—doesn't align with sustainable championship building. Advertisement Instead, Dallas should pursue more affordable options like Sexton or veteran free agents who can bridge the gap until Irving returns without compromising the team's long-term flexibility. Sometimes the best trade is the one you don't make, and for the Mavericks, that wisdom might apply perfectly to the Jrue Holiday situation. The championship window remains open in Dallas, but keeping it that way requires smart, measured decisions rather than desperate gambles. Holiday may help other teams, but for the Mavericks, better options await. Related: Indiana Pacers Could Take a Page from 2011 Dallas Mavericks' Playbook in NBA Finals Related: Mavericks Head Coach Jason Kidd Has Hall of Fame Comparison for Cooper Flagg This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 20, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Draymond Green Issues Warning About Lakers After $10 Billion Sale
Draymond Green Issues Warning About Lakers After $10 Billion Sale originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Los Angeles Lakers owner Jeanie Buss and her family agreed on Wednesday to sell the historic NBA franchise to Mark Walter, owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers and CEO of TWG Global. Advertisement Even though Walter has been a stakeholder in the Lakers since 2021, he will now own the majority stake while Buss will continue to act as the team's governor. The landmark sale will cost $10 billion, making it the most expensive team sale in sports history. The new ownership can also help the organization spend more money on its team more frequently, which differs from the Buss family's style of management because they relied on the income they made from the Lakers. Furthermore, this issue halted much of the team's development as they had to be cautious with their spending, which makes the deal even more beneficial for the Lakers and a warning sign in the eyes of some players, including Golden State Warriors forward Draymond Green. 'Oh man, that makes the Lakers dangerous,' Green said during a recent episode of 'The Draymond Green Show with Baron Davis." 'The only thing stopping the Lakers by NBA ownership standards is Jeanie Buss and the Buss family [being] one of the least wealthy families as far as money goes.' Golden State Warriors head coach Steve Kerr and forward Draymond Green (23).Sergio Estrada-Imagn Images Green noted that the Lakers were able to bring in a fair amount of income during the COVID-19 pandemic era between 2020-21 because of their lucrative regional television deal with Spectrum SportsNet, now worth $3 billion. Advertisement 'They got so much money from their regional television deal,' Green added. 'That puts them in a position to profit when no one was in the stands, but the Lakers did in large part due to their regional TV deal. 'So now we have an owner with deep pockets, who's going to say, well, I don't need all that money and take it and put it into the team. Let's do whatever we want with this roster, and get that guy and this guy.' Green concluded his speech by claiming that Walter's wealth, combined with the Lakers' legacy as a historic franchise, will be 'dangerous' for years to come. Related: Draymond Green Disagrees With Steve Kerr's Bold Statement on Warriors Player This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 21, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP's food stamp plan is found to violate Senate rules. It's the latest setback for Trump's big bill
WASHINGTON (AP) — In another blow to the Republicans' tax and spending cut bill, the Senate parliamentarian has advised that a proposal to shift some food stamps costs from the federal government to states — a centerpiece of GOP savings efforts — would violate the chamber's rules. While the parliamentarian's rulings are advisory, they are rarely, if ever, ignored. The Republican leadership was scrambling on Saturday, days before voting is expected to begin on President Donald Trump's package that he wants to be passed into law by the Fourth of July. The loss is expected to be costly to Republicans. They have been counting on some tens of billions of potential savings from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP, to help offset the costs of the $4.5 trillion tax breaks plan. The parliamentarian let stand for now a provision that would impose new work requirements for older Americans, up to age 65, to receive food stamp aid. 'We will keep fighting to protect families in need,' said Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, which handles the SNAP program. 'The Parliamentarian has made clear that Senate Republicans cannot use their partisan budget to shift major nutrition assistance costs to the states that would have inevitably led to major cuts,' she said. The committee chairman, Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., said in a statement that his team is examining options that would comply with Senate rules to achieve savings and "to ensure SNAP serves those who truly need it while being responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars.' What's at stake in the big bill The parliamentarian's ruling is the latest in a series of setbacks as staff works through the weekend, often toward midnight, to assess the 1,000-page proposal. It all points to serious trouble ahead for the bill, which was approved by the House on a party-line vote last month over unified opposition from Democrats and is now undergoing revisions in the Senate. At its core, the goal of the multitrillion-dollar package is to extend tax cuts from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire if Congress fails to act. It also adds new ones, including no taxes on tips or overtime pay. To help offset the costs of lost tax revenue, the Republicans are proposing cutbacks to federal Medicaid, health care and food programs — some $1 trillion. Additionally, the package boosts national security spending by about $350 billion, including to pay for Trump's mass deportations, which are running into protests nationwide. Trump has implored Republicans, who have the majority in Congress, to deliver on his top domestic priority, but the details of the package, with its hodgepodge of priorities, is drawing deeper scrutiny. All told, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package, as approved by the House, would add at least $2.4 trillion to the nation's red ink over the decade and leave 10.9 million more people without health care coverage. Additionally, it would reduce or eliminate food stamps for more than 3 million people. The Senate's strict 'Byrd Rule' The parliamentarian's office is tasked with scrutinizing the bill to ensure it complies with the so-called Byrd Rule, which is named after the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, and bars many policy matters in the budget reconciliation process now being used. Late Friday, the parliamentarian issued its latest findings. It determined that Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee's proposal to have the states pick up more of the tab for covering food stamps — what Republicans call a new cost-sharing arrangement — would be in violation of the Byrd Rule. Many lawmakers said the states would not be able to absorb the new requirement on food aid, which has long been provided by the federal government. They warned many would lose access to SNAP benefits used by more than 40 million people. Initially, the CBO had estimated about $128 billion in savings under the House's proposal to shift SNAP food aid costs to the states. Cost estimates for the Senate's version, which made changes to the House approach, have not yet been made publicly available. More questions and decisions ahead The parliamentarian's office rulings leave GOP leaders with several options. They can revise the proposals to try to comply with Senate rules or strip them from the package altogether. They can also risk a challenge during floor voting, which would require the 60-vote threshold to overcome. That would be unlikely in the split chamber with Democrats opposing the overall package. The parliamentarian's latest advice also said the committee's provision to make certain immigrants ineligible for food stamps would violate the rule. It found several provisions from the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, which is led by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, to be in violation. They include one to provide $250 million to Coast Guard stations damaged by fire in 2025, namely one on South Padre Island in Texas. Still to come are some of the most important rulings from the parliamentarian. One will assess the GOP's approach that relies on 'current policy' rather than 'current law' as the baseline for determining whether the bill will add to the nation's deficits. Already, the parliamentarian delivered a serious setback Thursday, finding that the GOP plan to gut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was a core proposal coming from the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, would be in violation of the Byrd Rule. The parliamentarian has also advised of violations over provisions from the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee that would rollback Environmental Protection Agency emissions standards on certain vehicles and from the Senate Armed Services Committee to require the defense secretary to provide a plan on how the Pentagon intends to spend the tens of billions of new funds. The new work requirements in the package would require many of those receiving SNAP or Medicaid benefits to work 80 hours a month or engage in other community or educational services. ___ Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.
