Toyota's Chairman Shared This Controversial Opinion About EV Sports Cars

As the former President and CEO and now chairman of Toyota's board, Akio Toyoda has long balanced his corporate responsibilities with a passion for racing. Under the pseudonym "Morizo Kinoshita," he created a second identity on the track, competing in major motorsport events such as the 24 Hours of Nürburgring in 2009, 2014, and 2019. Often behind the wheel of Toyota- and Lexus-branded race cars.
In fact, his input behind the wheel at races and behind development, production, and race cars has been cemented so deeply into Toyota lore that cars like the Toyota GR Corolla Morizo Edition have been named after him.
In a recent interview with Automotive News, Toyoda doubled down on his skepticism of battery-electric vehicles. However, when acknowledging that some Toyota engineers want an EV sports car, he said that the idea doesn't exactly align with his values.
"There will always be people inside Toyota passionate about developing electric sports cars," Toyoda told AutoNews. "But for me, as the master driver, my definition of a sports car is something with the smell of gasoline and a noisy engine."In addition, he still believes that the company has a mountain to climb when it comes to building a selection of EVs that fit with Toyota's mantra of providing affordable, high-quality cars to its customers. Currently, in the United States, Toyota offers only one EV: the bZ4x, a crossover co-developed with Subaru.
"Toyota is a mass-production brand, so we also need to think about affordability, even with BEVs," he said. "Once Toyota has the capacity to offer affordable BEVs, then maybe that's a moment when I as a master driver will be introducing a BEV sports car."
In response to a question asking him if in his capacity as Toyota's "Master Driver," would he ever race an EV in a competitve race, the man known to enthusiasts simply as Morizo expressed that he wouldn't want to race an EV because the kind of races he likes to do (endurance races) would be less about driving skill and more about the cars' technical limitations.
"No! It's not exciting," he said. "Because you won't be able to go around the circuit for more than an hour. The kind of races I enter are mostly endurance races, so with the current BEVs, it's not going to be a race of the cars. It's a race of charging time or battery exchange or something. The next master driver will have to take on that challenge. That's their job."
I am not exactly surprised about Toyoda's deterrance towards this sort of thing. He has been openly critical about EVs in the past, and this is just more ink in that section of the book. In a statement at a Toyota company event in January 2024, Morizo argued that EVs "come as a set with infrastructure," arguing that many Toyota drivers live in parts of the world with little to access to electricity.
"No matter how much progress BEVs make, I think they will still only have a 30 % market share," Toyoda said. "Then, the remaining 70% will be HEVs [hybrid-electric vehicles], FCEVs [fuel cell electric vehicles], and hydrogen engines. And I think [gas] engine cars will definitely remain. I think this is something that customers and the market will decide, not regulatory values ​​or political power."
In the same AutoNews interview, he defended the company's push toward hybrids by saying: "we said as a company the enemy is carbon," additionally noting that in the span of making 27 million hybrid cars, it "had the same impact as 9 million BEVs on the road."
"But if we were to have made 9 million BEVs in Japan, it would have actually increased the carbon emissions, not reduced them. That is because Japan relies on the thermal power plants for electricity," he said. "We should look at all options and work in all directions. As a company, we have been very consistent in saying what we're fighting against is carbon dioxide."
Taken together, Toyoda's on-track alter ego and his cautious stance on EVs paint a clear picture: he's someone who believes driving should remain an emotional, accessible experience, not just a political or regulatory checkbox. Whether it's pushing Toyota's race cars to their limits or advocating for a more flexible approach to carbon reduction, Toyoda consistently champions a future where car enthusiasts still have a say in how that future looks.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Miami Herald

3 hours ago

• Miami Herald

Toyota Highlander Generations Overview: The RAV4's Big Brother

Just as the Toyota RAV4 was a trailblazer in the compact crossover segment, the larger Highlander did the same in the midsize segment, long before almost every major brand had a model competing in this space. The Highlander has now been around for 25 years in the USA and is in its fourth generation. For larger families who need more seating and cargo space, it's a logical step above the RAV4. Here's how the various Toyota Highlander generations have changed through the years, and how they've contributed to the insane number of Toyota cars on the road. Produced for the 2001 to 2007 model years, the Highlander was introduced as a more comfortable alternative to the 4Runner; the latter is a body-on-frame SUV more suited for off-roading. Initially, buyers could choose from either a 2.4-liter four-cylinder or a 3.0-liter six-cylinder, with power sent to the front or all four wheels. A 3.3L V6 was later available. A manual Highlander wasn't available, so transmission choices were limited to four- or five-speed automatics. A hybrid was also launched later; it used a 3.3L V6 and electric motor, and could hit 27 mpg combined. While the base 2.4L made just 155 hp, the 3.3L model had 215 hp. With just 30.2 inches of third-row legroom, the first Highlander's rearmost row wasn't ideal for adults, but the extra versatility was welcomed by buyers in the United States, as the model easily surpassed 100,000 annual sales figures for every year it was on sale besides the abbreviated first year. This Toyota Highlander's model years were from 2008 to 2013, after the XU40 was revealed in 2007. Third-row legroom remained tight at 29.9 inches, which was actually slightly less than in the first-gen model. The XU40 looked neater, though, and the modernized dashboard gained a 6.1-inch center touchscreen. Engine options included a 2.7-liter four-cylinder, a 3.5-liter V6, a 3.3-liter V6 hybrid, and a 3.5-liter V6 hybrid. The hybrids used a CVT, while the rest got either five- or six-speed automatics. The base 2.7L now made up to 187 hp, while the 3.5L hybrid was up to 280 hp. The second-gen Toyota Highlander's mild redesign came for the 2011 model year, with the usual updates to the headlights and grille, along with a new 50/50 folding third-row seat. Sales of this generation dropped slightly, but Toyota still managed to sell over 100,000 Highlanders in 2011 and 2012. Related: Toyota RAV4 Generations Overview: Evolution Of The Crossover Pioneer This Toyota Highlander generation's model years ran from 2014 to 2019, with the 2017-2019 models being facelifted. Not only larger, the XU50 had a bolder appearance than the conservative first two generations, as competition in the segment intensified. The XU50 was available with a 2.7-liter four-cylinder, a 3.5-liter V6, and a 3.5L V6 hybrid. A six-speed automatic was equipped to 2.7L and early 3.5L models, but the V6 later gained an eight-speed automatic. As before, FWD and AWD versions of the Highlander were sold. The 2.7L remained rather sluggish with its 185 hp, but the hybrid produced up to 306 hp and much more easily coped with a full house of people and luggage. Inside, the XU50 exhibited nicer materials than before and seating for up to eight people. Bizarrely, third-row legroom decreased again, this time measuring only 27.7 inches. Overall, the XU50's improvements were well-received; in 2017, the Highlander logged over 200,000 sales for the first time in a single year. Going into production in 2019, the fourth and current Highlander has been on sale since the 2020 model year, and is recognized as the most reliable mid-size SUV. Sharper styling, better safety and infotainment, and better cargo space behind the third row were some of the improvements. Third-row space remains an issue, with just 27.7 inches of legroom, but Toyota finally addressed this by introducing the larger Grand Highlander in 2023. A major improvement came at the bottom end of the XU70 lineup, where the sluggish four-cylinder units used previously were replaced by a standard V6 producing 295 hp. This model was complemented by a 243-hp hybrid. As of the 2023 model year, a 2.4-liter turbo-four replaced the V6; with 265 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque, this engine provided a more balanced combination of power and performance. All non-hybrid Toyota Highlander models use an eight-speed automatic. As long as you don't need generous third-row space, the latest Highlander is a solid and competent mid-size SUV. It's not exciting to drive, but that's never been the model's main selling point. Upper trims can be specified with more luxurious finishes and second-row captain's chairs, and dual 12.3-inch screens are available. Related: 6 Vehicles With the Most 3rd Row Legroom Sales peaked in 2021, with over 264,000 Highlanders sold. Since then, it appears the more practical Grand Highlander has eaten into sales of the normal Highlander. Nevertheless, this remains an important Toyota model and is one of the top-selling three-row SUVs in America. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Motor 1

6 hours ago

• Motor 1

The Brilliance of Electric Turbochargers

What is a turbocharger's job? In essence, it's to increase thermal efficiency. An electric turbocharger does this and more, which is why I'm a big fan. Thermal efficiency is a measure of how much of the potential energy of a fuel is consumed to create power, versus how much of it is simply generating waste heat. In pure terms, an automotive internal-combustion engine is not very efficient. For example, Toyota made a big deal in the late 2010s when it achieved 40 percent thermal efficiency in its Dynamic Force four-cylinder engine. Meaning it was only wasting 60 percent of its potential energy. Welcome to The Rabbit Hole , a bi-weekly column where Senior Editor Chris Perkins explores his latest obsession with automotive technology. He speaks to the best in the business to understand how cars work and what the future of the automobile looks like. Incidentally, this is why EVs have an appeal beyond zero local emissions. Thermal efficiency doesn't apply to electric motors because they're not directly powered by a heat source. But in terms of electrical efficiency—the ratio of electrical energy a motor consumes to its useful output—an EV's motor is about 75 to 90 percent efficient, according to Renault , at least. So, in short, internal-combustion engines, especially on their own, aren't especially energy efficient. Electric motors are very energy efficient. Turbocharging can help narrow that gap. Mind you, it's still a big gap, but any little bit helps, right? This story was available to our newsletter subscribers before it hit the site. Want early access? Sign up below. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Turbocharging 101: A turbocharger consists of a turbine in the exhaust system, a compressor in the intake, and a shaft connecting the two. The exhaust turbine spins up with the flow of exhaust gases, which in turn spins up the compressor, increasing the density of the air headed into the engine, boosting power. In terms of thermal efficiency, it takes energy that would otherwise be lost as heat and turns it into something useful. Photo by: Mercedes-Benz Turbocharging 201: An electric turbocharger adds a motor attached to the shaft between the turbine and compressor. This means you can spin up the turbocharger independent of exhaust-gas flow, which has all sorts of benefits. Most notable is the all-but-elimination of turbo lag, but also the lowering of boost threshold, and allowing for higher boost pressure. And simply knowing the shaft speed of a turbocharger—which admittedly can also be achieved with a simple speed sensor—allows the automaker to run the turbo more safely closer to its maximum speed. But an electric motor works backward too, generating electrical energy if you use it to brake the turbine. An engineer from Mercedes-AMG once told me that in some cases, an electric turbocharger can be energy neutral ; The energy the turbocharger's motor regenerates is enough to power the turbocharger itself. There are big thermal efficiency gains to be had using electric turbochargers. Mercedes-AMG said in 2017 its electric-turbocharged Formula 1 V-6 exceeded 50 percent thermal efficiency , which was one of the first times ever an automotive engine converted more of its fuel source into useful power than waste heat. Like all F1 engines, the AMG V-6 uses a Motor-Generator-Unit-Heat (MGU-H), which is simply another term for an electric turbocharger. AMG later became the first to offer electric turbochargers in a road car with the four-cylinder in the C43 and C63. Photo by: Mercedes-Benz Porsche then took things a step further with its hybrid system for the new 911 Carrera GTS . Its single BorgWarner turbocharger has a 14.7-horsepower electric motor on its shaft, and uniquely, no wastegate. Typically, a turbocharger uses a wastegate—a valve that opens to expel excess exhaust gas—to limit boost pressure. Porsche instead brakes the turbocharger's motor to control boost pressure, so it's not wasting any exhaust gas and generating additional electrical energy. That additional electrical energy can power either the turbocharger itself, or the 53.6-horsepower traction motor sandwiched between the engine and transmission. Photo by: Chris Perkins / Motor1 A Porsche engineer also tells Motor1 that using a large turbocharger and limiting its turbine speed with the motor reduces exhaust-gas temperature, and therefore, the temperature of the charge air going into the engine. That eliminates the need for fuel enrichment, which is often used to reduce combustion temperatures, but this practice now being banned with Euro 7 emissions regulations. Porsche's use of an e-turbo boosts the engine's thermal and fuel efficiency, and overall vehicle efficiency. Broadly speaking, going electric feels like a natural extension for turbocharging. If the point of turbocharging is to boost efficiency, why not go for a solution that furthers that aim? Well, electric turbochargers are expensive, complicated, and heavy. Ferrari is using electric turbochargers for its F80 hypercar, but its closest rival, McLaren, uses conventional turbos in the coming W1. McLaren engineers told Motor1 that they didn't want the extra weight electric turbos would bring, and that they'd rather use the car's electrical energy to power the traction motor. Adding weight and complexity is always a difficult decision for an automaker, one of the many compromises it must consider in the course of engineering a car. The complexity has to justify itself. McLaren might also have a point on the electrical energy side of things. In the past, I've written about interesting internal-combustion engine technologies, like Mazda's spark-controlled compression ignition and Nissan's variable compression . Both improve efficiency and performance, but not so much as augmenting internal combustion with a conventional hybrid system. Does electric turbocharging fall into the same category? Someone from one automaker might say yes, but then why would engineering powerhouses like Mercedes, Porsche, and Ferrari all embrace it? Photo by: Porsche Ironically, for a technology that was developed in Formula 1, the sport will soon abandon electric turbocharging. To attract more engine suppliers, F1 is changing its engine formula for next year to abandon the MGU-H, deeming it too expensive and not relevant to road cars… just as more road cars are embracing this technology. F1 is also upping the electric portion of its hybrid powertrain to achieve about a 50/50 split between engine and motor power. And hey, F1 is expanding its engine supplier base with Audi, Ford, and GM all joining the fray. F1 is a sport and a business, not simply a technological proving ground. In any case, turbocharging is, in spirit, about not leaving energy on the table. An internal-combustion engine is going to produce a ton of exhaust gas that is pure waste. Why not make something useful out of that? And why not generate additional electrical energy from it while you're at it? Engineering at its best maximizes the potential of what you have in front of you. This isn't to say that cars that don't use electric turbochargers are bad, or that there aren't legitimate reasons to skip out on this piece of tech. It's possibly something that only justifies itself in higher-end performance-car applications. There's an admirable engineering ideal with electric turbochargers that satisfies the nerd in me. Isn't maximizing potential something we should all strive for? Further Down the Rabbit Hole Why Carbon-Ceramic Brakes Are Expensive. And Why They Might Be Worth It Why BMW's B58 Is a True Successor to the Toyota 2JZ Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

Yahoo

7 hours ago

• Yahoo

Trump-Linked Toymaker Goes Crypto--Turns $5M Into $127M Overnight

A forgotten toymaker just became one of the hottest crypto plays of the yearand it all happened in less than a month. SRM Entertainment (NASDAQ:SRM), best known for hawking koala backpacks and Smurf-branded tumblers, saw its stock spike over 500% this week after announcing it would pivot into crypto under a new name: Tron Inc. The move came with a surprise twistJustin Sun, the controversial crypto entrepreneur, joined as an adviser. Behind the scenes, a small investment bank called Dominari Holdingswhere Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump now serve as adviserswas orchestrating the deal. SRM shares jumped from under $2 to over $9 before settling above $7. The biggest winner? A fund tied to Dominari scooped up a stake for $5 million in May. By Tuesday, that bet was worth $127 million. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with SRM. This windfall wasn't random. Dominari played both sides of the deal. It arranged the original SRM investment for American Ventures LLC Series III SRM, a fund run by Dominari executive Soo Yuwho also happens to be married to the firm's president. Dominari and Yu were paid in warrants as part of the May deal, which grew from $230,000 to $3.8 million. Then this week, Yu's fund received another 5.36 million warrants for stepping in as advisernow worth more than $38 million. SRM plans to keep making toys while quietly building a stash of digital tokens tied to Sun's crypto platform. Obviously he's quite an impact player in this space, SRM's CEO Richard Miller said. It's a bet on convergence: old-school toys + new-school tokens. Zoom out, and this fits a bigger pattern. Dominari pivoted into investment banking less than three years ago, abandoning its biotech roots. Since then, it's been laying crypto breadcrumbsbuilding ventures like World Liberty Financial and American Bitcoin, both with Trump-linked ownership. Justin Sun has been a recurring face in those plays, too, despite a paused SEC lawsuit hanging over him. There's no indication the Trump brothers were involved in the SRM trades. But when your firm's address is Trump Tower, your executive team includes family friends, and your fund's crypto play just minted $100M+ on paper investors tend to pay attention. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio