Apple's AI Delay Might Have Made It Consider Buying This AI Startup: Know More

Last Updated:
Apple is facing long delays with Siri AI so the company might be looking at other ways to get going against Google and OpenAI.
Apple's AI struggle has stretched beyond one year since its AI features were showcased at the WWDC 2024 last year. And it seems the company is looking at exterior solutions to get its ambitions off the tracks which could involve buying another company which has readymade AI tools available from day one. Reports this week suggest Apple has internally considered bidding for Perplexity which is another AI company vying for a spot amongst Google and OpenAI.
Bloomberg has quoted sources in its report which clearly highlights the situation over at the Apple Park in Cupertino. These talks have mostly gone through internally, and an actual bid or discussion with the AI company has not happened.
Apple's AI Push: Buy Big
The report claims Adrian Perica has discussed the deal with Eddy Cue at Apple along with other senior decision makers. It also says that Apple might eventually decide against making an offer but these details are showing us the company's intent to get started maybe using existing platforms rather than invest in building a new one.
After all, Perplexity already has an AI assistant, a search engine and plans to build more effective AI tools. The AI company already offers some of these features for iPhone users, which Siri can only dream of right now.
Apple is a trillion dollar valued tech giant, which means buying any company will come easy at least with regards to the money. But even if Apple decides to formalise its interest in buying Perplexity, how much would it possibly cost? The AI company will be aware of the desperation at Apple and decide to get the highest price possible, which could be well over $50 billion if not more.
This is unlikely to be the last time we hear rumours about Apple strolling the cart looking for a solid product to buy. The company's senior executives were recently grilled in an interview by the Wall Street Journal and you can feel the uneasiness in their body language when Siri AI is brought up and how the AI race has become a tough nut to crack for the iPhone maker in the last 2 years.
There is a reason why Apple decided to deal with both OpenAI and Google to bring their ChatGPT and Gemini AI tools to iPhone users, now it is time to see the company make a serious move for its own future in this battle.
First Published:

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Economic Times

29 minutes ago

• Economic Times

Is ChatGPT making us dumb? MIT brain scans reveal alarming truth about AI's impact on the human mind

MIT researchers have discovered that using ChatGPT for essay writing reduces brain engagement and learning over time. Through EEG brain scans of 54 students, those who relied on AI performed worse than others across neural and linguistic metrics. The study raises concerns that AI tools may hinder critical thinking and promote passive acceptance of algorithm-driven content. A new MIT study warns that regular use of ChatGPT could impair memory, brain activity, and critical thinking. Students relying on the AI tool showed significantly lower cognitive engagement than peers using Google or no tools at all. (Representational image: iStock) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Brain vs Bot: How the Study Was Done Google Wasn't Great, But Still Better Than ChatGPT Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Shortcut with a Hidden Toll What This Means for the AI Generation It's quick, it's clever, and it answers almost everything—no wonder millions around the world rely on ChatGPT . But could this digital genie be dulling our minds with every wish we make? According to a startling new study by scientists at MIT's Media Lab, the answer may be yes. Researchers have now found that excessive use of AI tools like ChatGPT could be quietly eroding your memory, critical thinking, and even your brain on arXiv, the study titled 'The Cognitive Cost of Using LLMs' explores how language models—especially ChatGPT—affect the brain's ability to think, learn, and retain examine what they call the 'cognitive cost' of using large language models (LLMs), MIT researchers tracked 54 students over a four-month period using electroencephalography (EEG) devices to monitor brain activity. The participants were divided into three groups: one used ChatGPT, another relied on Google, and the last used no external help at all—dubbed the 'Brain-only' the AI-powered group initially showed faster results, the long-term findings were more sobering. Students who depended on ChatGPT for essay writing exhibited poorer memory retention, reduced brain engagement, and lower scoring compared to their peers. As the researchers noted, 'The LLM group's participants performed worse than their counterparts in the Brain-only group at all levels: neural, linguistic, and scoring.'Interestingly, students who used Google showed moderate brain activity and generated more thoughtful content than those who leaned on ChatGPT. Meanwhile, those in the Brain-only group had the highest levels of cognitive engagement, producing original ideas and deeper insights. In fact, even when ChatGPT users later attempted to write without assistance, their brain activity remained subdued—unlike the other groups who showed increased engagement while adapting to new suggests that habitual ChatGPT usage might not just affect how we think, but whether we think at study also points to how this over-reliance on AI encourages mental passivity. While ChatGPT users reported reduced friction in accessing information, this convenience came at a cost. As the researchers explained, 'This convenience came at a cognitive cost, diminishing users' inclination to critically evaluate the LLM's output or 'opinions'.'The team also raised red flags about algorithmic bias : what appears as top-ranked content from an AI is often a result of shareholder-driven training data, not necessarily truth or value. This creates a more sophisticated version of the 'echo chamber,' where your thoughts are subtly shaped—not by your own reasoning, but by an AI's probabilistic AI tools become more embedded in our everyday tasks—from writing emails to crafting essays—this study is a wake-up call for students, educators, and professionals. While tools like ChatGPT are powerful assistants, they should not become cognitive researchers caution that as language models continue to evolve, users must remain alert to their potential mental side effects. In a world where convenience is king, critical thinking might just be the first casualty.

Hans India

an hour ago

• Hans India

OpenAI Scrubs Jony Ive Deal from Web Amid Trademark Battle with Rival AI Firm

In a sudden turn of events, OpenAI has removed all public references to its much-discussed $6.5 billion acquisition of Jony Ive's AI hardware startup, IO Products. The move follows a legal challenge over trademark infringement by a competing firm with a similar name, stirring speculation and concern across the tech community. Over the weekend, social media users noticed the disappearance of promotional content and the official website linked to the IO Products deal. Both OpenAI and representatives for Jony Ive have since confirmed that the takedown was prompted by an ongoing trademark dispute with IYO Inc., a company also operating in the AI device space. According to Bloomberg, the case is now under judicial review. Responding to the controversy, a spokesperson for Ive called the legal complaint 'an utterly baseless complaint and we'll fight it vigorously.' The IO Products deal, officially unveiled in May, marked a pivotal shift for OpenAI—best known for its generative AI software. The partnership with Ive, the legendary former Apple designer behind iconic devices like the iPhone and iMac, aimed to bring OpenAI's first AI hardware device to market within a year. At the time of the announcement, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman had predicted that the company could sell up to 100 million units of the new hardware. He even suggested the acquisition could potentially boost OpenAI's valuation by $1 trillion, stating, 'This is the biggest thing we've ever done as a company.' In a now-deleted blog post, Altman and Ive had jointly written, 'It became clear that our ambitions to develop, engineer and manufacture a new family of products demanded an entirely new company.' OpenAI's financial commitment to the deal included $5 billion in equity, in addition to its existing 23% stake in IO from an earlier collaboration. IO Products was incorporated in Delaware in September 2023 and later registered in California in April 2025, according to public filings. Heading the new hardware division is OpenAI executive Peter Welinder, known for pioneering work in robotics and innovative product development. The team includes experts across design, hardware, software, and manufacturing, collaborating closely with OpenAI's San Francisco-based engineering and research teams. Altman and Ive's collaboration dates back to early 2023, though the public got its first hint of an 'AI-first device' in February 2025. While specific details remain under wraps, industry watchers speculate the product could rival the Humane AI Pin or Rabbit R1, or even explore futuristic formats like smart glasses, in-car systems, or AI-integrated robots. Reflecting on the collaboration, Ive shared, 'I have a growing sense that everything I have learned over the last 30 years has led me to this moment. I am so grateful for the opportunity to be part of such an important collaboration.' Altman added his admiration for Ive's approach, saying, 'AI is an incredible technology, but great tools require work at the intersection of technology, design, and understanding people and the world. No one can do this like Jony and his team; the amount of care they put into every aspect of the process is extraordinary.' As legal proceedings continue, OpenAI's ambitious foray into hardware hangs in the balance, with stakeholders closely watching how the trademark challenge might affect the future of this high-stakes collaboration.

Business Standard

an hour ago

• Business Standard

Garena Free Fire Max: Here are June 23 redeem codes to win skins, diamonds

Garena Free Fire Max has released a batch of redeem codes for June 23, offering players a chance to unlock free in-game items. These can range from special character outfits and weapon skins to diamonds and temporary power-ups. As the codes are valid for a limited time and have a usage cap, players should claim them as soon as possible. Here's a list of currently active codes and a quick guide on how to redeem them. As per a report by the InsideSport, active redeem codes for June 23 are: FGHY78POIUAD PLWE90QAZXCW NBVC34ASDFZA CVBN23BNMLQP BNNM12ZXCVBH WERZ89ASDFGH ERTY34LKJMNL VBNM45QWERTN QWTY89VCXZLK MNIU12MNBVCD MNBV78ERTYUI YUIP56BNMLKO DFGH67GHJKLT ASCV45LKJHGT HGFT01LKJHGN TREQ23ASDFGJ LKHJ67QWERTY ZXJH78GFDSAT POIU90ZXCNMQ JKLY56POIUYC Garena Free Fire Max redeem codes: How to use Visit the official Rewards Redemption website for Garena Free Fire Max. Log in using your preferred platform—Facebook, X, Google, or VK ID. Copy the redeem codes from the list and paste them into the provided text box. Once a Free Fire Max redeem code is successfully claimed, the rewards are automatically sent to the player's in-game mailbox. In the case of currencies like gold or diamonds, the balance reflects the update instantly. These codes can be used to unlock various rewards, including Rebel Academy outfits, Revolt Weapon Loot Crates, Diamond Vouchers, and other cosmetic upgrades. With a daily limit of 500 redemptions and a 12-hour validity window, it's best to redeem the codes promptly to ensure you don't miss out.