The Merge aftermath: Did Ethereum really become green?
In 2022, Ethereum made a dramatic change. It shifted from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, a move that promised to cut its energy use by over 99 percent. Headlines called it a climate win, and supporters claimed Ethereum had finally gone green. But going green is more than just a headline. It takes proof, consistent results, and more than surface-level changes.
Now that some time has passed, it's worth asking what really changed. Has Ethereum become as energy efficient as promised? Did the Merge fix the environmental criticism that followed the network for years? Let's look at the aftermath and what it really means to be a 'green' blockchain.
How the Merge Changed Ethereum's Energy Use
Ethereum used to run on a system called proof-of-work, where miners used powerful machines to validate transactions. That process burned through huge amounts of electricity. At its peak, Ethereum's energy usage matched that of some small countries. This sparked criticism from environmental groups and pushed projects, including those on the
The Merge introduced a cleaner model called proof-of-stake. Instead of solving power-hungry puzzles, validators now secure the network by locking up ETH. Here's what changed:
Energy consumption dropped by over 99% after the switch.
Mining was replaced by staking, ending the need for expensive equipment.
The network became more efficient, using far less electricity per transaction.
Eco-conscious platforms joined the network, from NFTs to gaming apps.
Reduced costs and cleaner operation attracted developers to build new projects.
Ethereum's shift was not just about sustainability. It opened doors for broader adoption, especially in industries that care about transparency and energy use.
Has Ethereum's Carbon Footprint Actually Improved?
Reducing energy use was the main goal of
Ethereum's total energy use has dropped by over 99%. That's a huge improvement. It also shifted Ethereum's public image. Many now see it as the 'cleaner' alternative to Bitcoin. But having a smaller footprint doesn't mean there's no footprint at all.
How Ethereum Compares Today, Step-by-Step:
Here's a breakdown of what changed after the Merge and what those changes really mean:
Estimated CO₂ output: ~0.6 metric tons per year. Before the Merge, it was in the millions.
Energy per transaction: Less than 0.01 kWh. That's about the same as a Google search.
Bitcoin comparison: Bitcoin still uses over 100 TWh a year and emits tens of millions of tons of CO₂.
Top carbon trackers: Groups like Crypto Carbon Ratings Institute and Digiconomist track Ethereum's progress.
Ethereum now fits better into ESG conversations. Some funds and apps that once avoided crypto are now including it because of these changes. But not every validator runs on clean power. And if Ethereum keeps growing, power use could rise again. The Merge was a huge step, but it wasn't the final one.
Institutional Adoption and Green Narratives
Ethereum's switch to proof-of-stake did more than lower energy use. It also shifted how institutions see the network. Before the Merge, Ethereum faced the same criticism as Bitcoin for consuming too much energy. That kept many ESG-focused funds and climate-conscious investors from getting involved, even as Ethereum powered major parts of DeFi and NFTs. After the Merge, with energy use cut by over 99 percent, Ethereum became one of the most environmentally friendly blockchains.
This change opened the door to wider institutional interest. Investors began to view Ethereum as a platform that could evolve and align with modern sustainability goals. The improved energy profile fits better with corporate ESG standards, making it easier to include in portfolios. Because of this, Ethereum is now seeing increased attention from asset managers, fintech platforms, and even banks. The shift is not just about image. Cleaner technology leads to real investment from groups that would not have considered it before.
Life After the Merge: How Ethereum Users Have Responded
The Merge was more than just a technical change. It shifted how people view Ethereum's purpose and long-term role in the crypto world. Before the switch to proof-of-stake, Ethereum was often criticized for its energy use and scalability problems. After the update, the network gained a reputation for being cleaner and more future-ready.
That shift influenced behavior across the board. More users began staking ETH, developers turned their focus to scaling tools, and many projects embraced the idea of Ethereum as a sustainable base layer. It's not perfect, but it's no longer seen as the energy hog it once was.
Ways the Merge changed user habits:
Staking increased: Many users now treat staking as a regular way to earn and support the chain.
Green appeal grew: Lower energy use helped attract users who care about sustainability.
Builders refocused: Developer attention shifted to lower fees and better speed.
Investor confidence returned: Some had paused activity before the Merge and came back after.
App messaging evolved: DApps and platforms now highlight Ethereum's cleaner footprint.
Tip: If you're active on Ethereum, track how your gas usage and staking habits have changed over time. It helps you see whether the Merge is matching your expectations in real terms.
What Still Needs Fixing on Ethereum
The Merge improved Ethereum's energy usage, but it didn't solve every problem. Several ongoing issues continue to affect usability, performance, and decentralization. While switching to proof-of-stake was a major step, it left some challenges untouched.
Gas fees are still high when the network is busy. Staking also introduces concerns about power concentration, as a small number of platforms now control a large portion of staked ETH. For many users, these factors create friction and uncertainty.
Common concerns post-Merge include:
High transaction fees: Still a major barrier for everyday users.
Validator centralization: A handful of entities hold too much control.
Scalability limits: Network still lacks the speed for mass adoption.
User experience issues: Complex tools and confusing wallets.
Long upgrade timeline: Future improvements take years to roll out.
Conclusion
The Merge marked real progress for Ethereum, especially by cutting energy use. But it did not fix everything. Fees remain high, and control still leans toward a small group of validators. Ethereum is greener now, but it has more to prove. For the network to reach its full potential, it needs to become faster, cheaper, and more open to everyone. People want more than clean energy. They want a system that delivers on its original promises. The Merge was a strong step forward, but it is only part of a longer path to real change.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
4 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
Charles Hoskinson wants to make ADA an AI crypto – what does it mean?
Crypto enthusiasts know there are few figures as influential as Charles Hoskinson, who is the co-founder of Ethereum and founder of Cardano. Hoskinson is one of the personalities who has been at the forefront of blockchain innovation for years, and lately he has been making waves with its plans to transform ADA, Cardano's native token into the backbone of a decentralized artificial intelligence ecosystem. Experts believe this is an ambitious and bold step in the convergence of two of the most transformative technologies of the moment, which are blockchain and artificial intelligence. In order to make an Discussing the vision Charles Hoskinson's latest statements and directions about projects reveal that he is quite interested in combining blockchain and AI to resist monopolization by big tech companies and preserve decentralization. At the core of his plan to make ADA an AI crypto lays the desire to democratize AI development and deployment, and ensure that no single entity can control its outcomes or growth. Charles Hoskinson has a vision for the future of AI systems: He wants them to be transparent, especially when it comes to decision making He desires for decentralized communities to ethically govern them He wants blockchain technology to be used to create immutable and verifiable systems And he plans to use decentralized computational infrastructure to power them. To this end, the ADA token and Cardano's blockchain are positioned to serve as the foundational elements in this emerging AI economy. Cardano could become the first AI-native blockchain ecosystem if it leverages ADA for governance, computation rewards, and data transactions. Is Cardano suitable for AI? Now this is a question worth answering because it's vital for the project to be suitable for artificial intelligence for the plans to be successful. The Cardano team, together with Hoskinson believe that Cardano has some unique features that make it well-suited for hosting AI systems. The list includes: Formal methods and peer review. Cardano has always stood apart in the crypto sector for its academic rigor. All features and updates are peer-reviewed and grounded in formal mathematical principles. Its approach builds trust, which is critical when dealing with sensitive decisions regarding artificial intelligence, like autonomous vehicles and medical diagnoses. Scalability via Hydra. Scalability has always been a sticking point for blockchain adoption. Cardano's solution is Hydra, a layer-2 scaling protocol designed to significantly increase transaction throughput. For AI, which often requires high-speed data processing, Hydra ensures Cardano can support the necessary bandwidth and latency. Interoperability. Cardano has a special approach to interoperability, which allows it to communicate with other data sources, blockchains, and which could enable AI systems to draw from a wider pool of information. Data is paramount for the success of AI, so this feature is critical. Governance with Voltaire. Voltaire, Cardano's governance system, allows token holders to vote on protocol upgrades and project funding. Applied to AI, this democratic model could allow communities to decide how AI systems are trained, how their outputs are used, and how ethical dilemmas are resolved. Reviewing the key components of Hoskinson's AI strategy Charles Hoskinson has a multi-layered approach to develop an AI-centric crypto ecosystem. Let's have a look at his plan. 1. Integrating AI Agents with Smart Contracts Cardano's smart contract platform, Plutus, will support AI-powered agents – autonomous bots that can negotiate, trade, and make decisions without human input. These agents can interact with decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, manage supply chains, and even create new AI models by pooling resources. 2. Decentralized AI Marketplaces Using the Cardano blockchain, decentralized marketplaces for AI models, datasets, and computation power can be developed. Developers could offer AI models for rent, users could share data anonymously, and validators could earn ADA for contributing GPU power to AI computations. 3. AI for Blockchain Governance One of the more futuristic aspects of Hoskinson's vision is the use of AI in managing blockchain governance. AI could help detect fraudulent proposals, recommend funding allocations based on network data, and provide predictive analytics for protocol evolution. 4. Partnership with SingularityNET A cornerstone of this plan is Cardano's close collaboration with SingularityNET, a decentralized AI platform founded by Dr. Ben Goertzel. SingularityNET, which moved part of its operations from Ethereum to Cardano, is developing a decentralized network of AI services. The AGIX token (native to SingularityNET) is being bridged to Cardano, allowing for smoother integration between the two ecosystems. SingularityNET and Cardano share a common vision of democratized, ethical AI. Together, they aim to build 'Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)' in a decentralized way, potentially changing how AI is developed and controlled on a global scale. ADA could become the fuel for the AI economy Hoskinson sees Ada, As a payment method for AI services (e.g., model inference, training time, access to datasets). As a tool to incentivize annotation and data sharing. Reward method for decentralized computation providers. As a tool to vote on AI-related governance decisions. If this happens ADA will gain intrinsic value beyond speculation. The demand for decentralized artificial intelligence is higher by the day, so the demand for the cryptocurrency that powers it should follow the same trajectory, which could only reinforce its position as a key player in the new economy. A short look at the roadmap Hoskinson's roadmap for an AI-powered Cardano isn't expected to materialize overnight. The development is expected to progress in stages throughout 2025 and beyond. Key milestones will include: Launch of new AI-integrated dApps. Expansion of the SingularityNET partnership. Rollout of tools for AI agent development. Community governance of AI-related proposals. Integration of off-chain AI computation with Cardano nodes. As expected, academic research, community involvement, and transparent development will stay behind the transformation. If Cardano manages to enter the AI sphere, it could move from being a competitor in the smart contract sector to a pioneer in a new class of decentralized intelligence infrastructure.
Mail & Guardian
6 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
The Merge aftermath: Did Ethereum really become green?
In 2022, Ethereum made a dramatic change. It shifted from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, a move that promised to cut its energy use by over 99 percent. Headlines called it a climate win, and supporters claimed Ethereum had finally gone green. But going green is more than just a headline. It takes proof, consistent results, and more than surface-level changes. Now that some time has passed, it's worth asking what really changed. Has Ethereum become as energy efficient as promised? Did the Merge fix the environmental criticism that followed the network for years? Let's look at the aftermath and what it really means to be a 'green' blockchain. How the Merge Changed Ethereum's Energy Use Ethereum used to run on a system called proof-of-work, where miners used powerful machines to validate transactions. That process burned through huge amounts of electricity. At its peak, Ethereum's energy usage matched that of some small countries. This sparked criticism from environmental groups and pushed projects, including those on the The Merge introduced a cleaner model called proof-of-stake. Instead of solving power-hungry puzzles, validators now secure the network by locking up ETH. Here's what changed: Energy consumption dropped by over 99% after the switch. Mining was replaced by staking, ending the need for expensive equipment. The network became more efficient, using far less electricity per transaction. Eco-conscious platforms joined the network, from NFTs to gaming apps. Reduced costs and cleaner operation attracted developers to build new projects. Ethereum's shift was not just about sustainability. It opened doors for broader adoption, especially in industries that care about transparency and energy use. Has Ethereum's Carbon Footprint Actually Improved? Reducing energy use was the main goal of Ethereum's total energy use has dropped by over 99%. That's a huge improvement. It also shifted Ethereum's public image. Many now see it as the 'cleaner' alternative to Bitcoin. But having a smaller footprint doesn't mean there's no footprint at all. How Ethereum Compares Today, Step-by-Step: Here's a breakdown of what changed after the Merge and what those changes really mean: Estimated CO₂ output: ~0.6 metric tons per year. Before the Merge, it was in the millions. Energy per transaction: Less than 0.01 kWh. That's about the same as a Google search. Bitcoin comparison: Bitcoin still uses over 100 TWh a year and emits tens of millions of tons of CO₂. Top carbon trackers: Groups like Crypto Carbon Ratings Institute and Digiconomist track Ethereum's progress. Ethereum now fits better into ESG conversations. Some funds and apps that once avoided crypto are now including it because of these changes. But not every validator runs on clean power. And if Ethereum keeps growing, power use could rise again. The Merge was a huge step, but it wasn't the final one. Institutional Adoption and Green Narratives Ethereum's switch to proof-of-stake did more than lower energy use. It also shifted how institutions see the network. Before the Merge, Ethereum faced the same criticism as Bitcoin for consuming too much energy. That kept many ESG-focused funds and climate-conscious investors from getting involved, even as Ethereum powered major parts of DeFi and NFTs. After the Merge, with energy use cut by over 99 percent, Ethereum became one of the most environmentally friendly blockchains. This change opened the door to wider institutional interest. Investors began to view Ethereum as a platform that could evolve and align with modern sustainability goals. The improved energy profile fits better with corporate ESG standards, making it easier to include in portfolios. Because of this, Ethereum is now seeing increased attention from asset managers, fintech platforms, and even banks. The shift is not just about image. Cleaner technology leads to real investment from groups that would not have considered it before. Life After the Merge: How Ethereum Users Have Responded The Merge was more than just a technical change. It shifted how people view Ethereum's purpose and long-term role in the crypto world. Before the switch to proof-of-stake, Ethereum was often criticized for its energy use and scalability problems. After the update, the network gained a reputation for being cleaner and more future-ready. That shift influenced behavior across the board. More users began staking ETH, developers turned their focus to scaling tools, and many projects embraced the idea of Ethereum as a sustainable base layer. It's not perfect, but it's no longer seen as the energy hog it once was. Ways the Merge changed user habits: Staking increased: Many users now treat staking as a regular way to earn and support the chain. Green appeal grew: Lower energy use helped attract users who care about sustainability. Builders refocused: Developer attention shifted to lower fees and better speed. Investor confidence returned: Some had paused activity before the Merge and came back after. App messaging evolved: DApps and platforms now highlight Ethereum's cleaner footprint. Tip: If you're active on Ethereum, track how your gas usage and staking habits have changed over time. It helps you see whether the Merge is matching your expectations in real terms. What Still Needs Fixing on Ethereum The Merge improved Ethereum's energy usage, but it didn't solve every problem. Several ongoing issues continue to affect usability, performance, and decentralization. While switching to proof-of-stake was a major step, it left some challenges untouched. Gas fees are still high when the network is busy. Staking also introduces concerns about power concentration, as a small number of platforms now control a large portion of staked ETH. For many users, these factors create friction and uncertainty. Common concerns post-Merge include: High transaction fees: Still a major barrier for everyday users. Validator centralization: A handful of entities hold too much control. Scalability limits: Network still lacks the speed for mass adoption. User experience issues: Complex tools and confusing wallets. Long upgrade timeline: Future improvements take years to roll out. Conclusion The Merge marked real progress for Ethereum, especially by cutting energy use. But it did not fix everything. Fees remain high, and control still leans toward a small group of validators. Ethereum is greener now, but it has more to prove. For the network to reach its full potential, it needs to become faster, cheaper, and more open to everyone. People want more than clean energy. They want a system that delivers on its original promises. The Merge was a strong step forward, but it is only part of a longer path to real change.
The Herald
30-05-2025
- The Herald
SCA dismisses 'meritless' appeal by two environmental organisations
Because the company required the water use licencee to commence mining, it engaged various experts and obtained several specialist reports, including a hydrological, socioeconomic, geohydrology impact and a biodiversity baseline and impact assessment. It also obtained a numerical groundwater model report and conducted a public participation process as part of the application for the licence. These assessments informed the licencee conditions. In July 2016 the director-general (DG) of the department of water & sanitation issued the licence, valid for 15 years, to Atha-Africa. The licencee authorised specified water-use activities in relation to the mining to be conducted. In the same year, the two organisations appealed the DG's decision to issue the licence to the Water Tribunal. They claimed, among others, that the DG failed to consider the effect of the proposed water use on the water resource; that the DG failed to authorise certain water uses associated with the closure of the mine; that the consent of the owner of a farm regarding the use of underground water had not been obtained; and that the DG failed to apply environmental principles in the National Environmental Management Act. In 2019, the tribunal dismissed the appeal, concluding, among others, that the findings and scientific reviews by the appellants' experts were unsubstantiated and were demonstrated in evidence to be shallow. The tribunal found that sound methods were used in the Atha-Africa's wetland and hydrological studies. The SCA said the organisations appealed the tribunal's decision to the Pretoria high court in terms of section 149(1) of the NWA, which permits an appeal only on a question of law. The high court dismissed the organisations' appeal with costs. The SCA granted the appellants special leave to appeal. The SCA found in its judgment that most of the appeal grounds did not raise questions of law. It said these were questions of fact based on the evidence before the tribunal, and could not form the subject of an appeal in terms of the NWA. 'The appeal lodged by the appellants has little or no basis in law.' The court also noted the appellants lodged the appeal regardless of the consequences, including the inconvenience to and exorbitant costs that would be incurred by the department and Atha-Africa. The court said in 2011, Atha-Africa was invited to invest in South Africa. It has made an investment of US$40m in equity and prospecting rights to engage in coal mining. It has spent US$61m solely on specialist studies, to secure the necessary authorisations. 'More than 10 years later no mining has started and (Atha-Africa) has not realised any return on its investment.' TimesLIVE
