Fantasy 5 winners: West Palm, Boca Raton markets sell winning Florida Lottery tickets

A supermarket in suburban West Palm Beach and a mini-mart in Boca Raton sold winning tickets in the May 29 evening Fantasy 5 drawing, the Florida Lottery said.
The winning tickets bore the number combination of 4-11-23-29-32 and paid $36,872.43 each.
The West Palm Beach-area supermarket was the Presidente at Okeechobee Boulevard and Military Trail. The Boca Raton mini-mart was the PRIP market on West Camino Real, just west of South Dixie Highway.
The winner sold at Presidente was a Quick Pick, meaning the lottery's computers chose the number combination for the player.
The third winning ticket was sold at a Publix super market in Spring Hill, north of Tampa.
Tom Elia is an editor at The Palm Beach Post, overseeing coverage of public safety, the courts and Palm Beach County's northern and western communities. You can reach him at telia@pbpost.com. Support local journalism: Subscribe today.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Fantasy 5: West Palm, Boca Raton markets sell winning tickets

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hamilton Spectator

7 hours ago

• Hamilton Spectator

Decoding your kid's report card: What it says and what it really means

Sarah Jane had just finished writing report cards for her Grade 7 students when she called her principal and declared she was done with teaching. 'It was the tipping point,' says the Niagara-area teacher who retired in 2021, marking the end of a 35-year career. 'I thought I just don't want to do another set of report cards and be all stressed out. It's so much work. 'I loved the kids, and I loved teaching. But I felt like report cards are too sugar-coated and sometimes even dishonest because we always have to say what the child does well … You want to find a child's strength, but we're always trying to phrase everything so positively that I think parents don't always know where their child is' academically. Jane is the creator of Ontario Report Card Comments , a Facebook group with nearly 15,000 members where educators share tips and support to get through one of the most nuanced, high-stakes and emotionally charged tasks facing teachers. Report card flashback: What teachers said to a future Nobel prize winner, a prolific author and a future premier The results of which are imminent: final report cards are about to land in the hands of students across the province. For families, it's a nerve-wracking moment that can bring great pride or crushing disappointment. Reviewing anyone's performance can be stressful and intimidating, says Brampton high school teacher Jason Bradshaw, but 'imagine speaking of somebody's child, that takes it to another level. People are going to be all the more emotionally invested. So teachers have a responsibility to be constructive and transparent.' But report cards don't always successfully reflect that. Vague, standardized language and a lack of personalization can leave families unsure of how their child is progressing. To help decode this familiar yet at times cryptic document, the Star spoke with educators who shared how challenging it is to capture a student's story in just a few chosen lines. That homework causing family tension every night? It doesn't count. While homework is important for reinforcing learning, Growing Success , Ontario's education policy on reporting student achievement, makes it clear assignments done at home shouldn't be factored into final marks. Still, skipping homework isn't without consequence — it can show up under learning skills, a key part of assessment for all students in grades 1 to 12. 'In the age of ChatGPT, a lot of educators are moving to the position where we simply do not evaluate work that isn't done in front of us,' says Bradshaw. 'We now have to build in time for students to complete that work entirely in class, to know it's authentic.' In high school, marks are given as percentages and accumulate over a semester. In grades 1 to 6, letters reflect progress since the last report — not from the start of the year. 'The kind of writing a student is doing in September isn't going to be the same as the writing they are doing in December,' says Angela Simone, a Grade 3 teacher with the York Catholic school board. 'It's not really fair to go back; you want to focus on their most recent work.' Teachers mark tests, presentations and assignments according a four-level rubric, which is translated into percentages or letter grades for report cards: Level 4 equals A- to A+ and 80-100 per cent; Level 3 is B- to B+ and 70-79; Level 2 is C- to C+ and 60-69; Level 1 is D- to D+ and 50-59 per cent. 'There's a lot of pressure to see those Level 4 or those As,' says Simone. 'But it's important that people recognize that a Level 3 means they're at the provincial expectations. So there's nothing wrong with a B.' Grades are based on numeric data. Learning skills rely on something else entirely — observation, interpretation and a fair amount of subjectivity. All children in Ontario grades 1 to 12 are evaluated on six competencies: responsibility, organization, independent work, collaboration, initiative and self-regulation. 'You really have to know the child and be able to back up anything you say with proof,' says Jane, who found evaluating these skills the most challenging and time-consuming part of assessment duties, likening it to having to write three separate essays on each student — one for every report card. Simone agrees it can be tedious. 'You don't want to be repetitive, and every child is their own and you want to speak to that child's individuality, but how many times can you say, 'Your desk is messy?' ' The subjectivity required also makes them possibly problematic. A 2018 study using Toronto District School Board data found that students with identical scores on standardized math tests may have different evaluations of their learning skills — differences that correlated with race and gender. Educators often discuss skill expectations with students, and in some cases, have them evaluate their strengths and weaknesses so, as Jane says, they 'take ownership for some of it.' Joanne Sallay, president of tutoring company Teachers on Call , notes that when students struggle, it's often not the curriculum — it's motivation: 'It's handing in work on time — organization, planning skills and how to study effectively. These are really important for the future of work — skills that as adults determine our success.' It's perhaps why on report cards, learning skills are given prime position. That doesn't stop students and parents from skipping over them to check out subject grades. 'We are hardwired to do that,' says Christopher DeLuca, a Queen's University professor of educational assessment . 'And yet, if we understand learning a little bit more deeply, we understand that how we learn impacts what we learn.' DeLuca adds that of all the skills measured on the report card, strong self-regulation is the most critical. The province's Growing Success policy states that all parents should receive 'standard, clear, detailed and straightforward information' about their child's progress based on the Ontario curriculum. That may explain why teacher comments can sound like they've been lifted from a jargon-filled curriculum manual — sometimes they are. 'It's hard when you have 30 students to write an authentic communication of each student's learning,' says Toronto public elementary teacher Andrew Delost. 'Sometimes it's going to sound robotic because a teacher might just be copying and pasting.' Delost recently developed Curricumate , an AI-based assistant to support Ontario educators as they navigate through 'pain points,' including writing report cards. Filling out a report card can take 20 minutes to four hours per student, plus months of tracking grades and recording observations. While professional development days are dedicated to the task, the work usually spills into evenings and weekends. Curricumate, which has 4,000 users, integrates the Ontario curriculum so teachers can select relevant comments and personalize them while maintaining student confidentiality. Teachers have relied on some form of comment banks for decades — whether self-made, shared by colleagues or provided by school boards. More recently, many have turned to tools like ChatGPT. Still, most agree: AI can support feedback, but it shouldn't replace it. Direct communication with parents, they say, remains the most effective way to support student growth. Even as generalized and vague as report comments might seem, clues lie within. 'Qualifiers are so important because that's going to give you a little hint,' says Simone. For example, if a comment on a science unit notes that 'Angela understands plants with a high degree of effectiveness,' she's at a Level 4; if with a considerable degree, she's at Level 3. (Level 2 would use some and limited for Level 1.) Simone says teachers rely on qualifiers particularly when measuring learning skills: If a teacher was to say, 'Sally usually listens well to lesson,' usually means she's not doing it all the time, that she could be chatty, says Simone. 'So even though it doesn't sound like there's an issue, the qualifier lets you know there might be one.' Growing Success advises teachers, when writing anecdotal comments, to 'focus on what students have learned, describe significant strengths, and identify next steps for improvement.' This asset-based reporting emphasizes positive attributes. 'It strengthens and bolsters student confidence,' says DeLuca. But some teachers call it a disservice. 'Only telling students what they're doing well gives them a false impression about what their strengths and weaknesses are, and unfortunately that can catch up to them,' says Bradshaw. 'I can understand how that might be frustrating for parents because we are essentially asking them to read between the lines.' Comments are limited by strict word counts, giving teachers little space to focus on more than one key message. This is especially challenging in math and language, where recent curriculum changes eliminated separate grades for individual strands. Instead of seeing distinct marks for oral communication, writing, reading and media literacy, for example, parents now get just one overall language grade. Check the attendance field. Teachers say missed classes and lateness are often overlooked by parents who may be unaware of their child's habits. Absences can explain why achievements are below expectations. Yes, but not easily. How failing grades are reported varies by board. (One board, for example, will round up a 46 per cent to 50 for a pass.) Up to Grade 8, a decision to hold back a child is made in consultation with parents; in high school, students who receive below 50 may repeat materials related only to expectations not achieved. But a failing mark should not come as a surprise to students or parents. 'Failures are used very judiciously, for a reason,' says DeLuca, 'A failure academically is not just about holding a student from progressing to the next grade, it has social consequences for life and career progression.' Assessment is important, says Bradshaw, but it shouldn't be the only priority. 'When we hyper-focus on marks and evaluations, it gives the impression that day-to-day learning doesn't matter.' Progress reports offer an early opportunity to flag concerns without assigning grades, but they come with their own challenges — especially since they come so early that some teachers, particularly itinerant ones, may have seen a student only a handful of times. More effort typically goes into the first provincial report card when there's still time for students to respond to feedback. Final report cards feel high-stakes, but by June, they should contain no surprises. That said, Sallay emphasizes even these reports should include clear next steps. 'I know that it seems final, but a report card shouldn't define your future success,' she says. 'Look at the recommendations and work on them; it doesn't mean you need to give up. 'It's the end of June, but next year is a whole new year.'

Business Insider

21 hours ago

• Business Insider

Tesla (TSLA) Invites a Small Group of People to Test Its Robotaxi Service

EV maker Tesla (TSLA) has started inviting a small group of people to try out its robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. The test could begin as early as Sunday, according to Reuters. Riders must be at least 18 years old, and a Tesla employee will sit in the front passenger seat during each ride. Furthermore, the test will use about 10 Model Y SUVs running on Tesla's Full Self-Driving software. Those who receive the invitation can download Tesla's Robotaxi app to call a ride, and are asked to share their feedback on the experience. Confident Investing Starts Here: This trial is important for Tesla as the company shifts its focus from building affordable electric cars to working on robotics and artificial intelligence. Unsurprisingly, CEO Elon Musk says that safety is the top priority, with humans monitoring the cars remotely. He believes that the robotaxi service can grow quickly if the trial goes well. Still, experts are worried about Tesla's approach, which relies solely on cameras and AI, rather than incorporating additional sensors like lidar or radar. These worries grow in conditions like fog, heavy rain, or bright sunlight. As a result, some lawmakers and safety experts want more caution, which led a group of Austin-area Democratic lawmakers to ask Tesla to wait until September, when new state rules for autonomous vehicles take effect. It is worth noting that self-driving services are expensive and risky, and companies like Tesla, Waymo (GOOGL), and Zoox (AMZN) have already faced federal investigations and recalls after accidents. What Is the Prediction for Tesla Stock? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Hold consensus rating on TSLA stock based on 14 Buys, 12 Holds, and nine Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average TSLA price target of $286.14 per share implies 11% downside risk.

Miami Herald

a day ago

• Miami Herald

A Coral Gables Publix sold a Florida Lottery jackpot-winning ticket

One of the two lucky jackpot winners in Thursday's Florida Lottery big money draw games bought their ticket at one of the Publix stores in Coral Gables. Nobody won any of the Cash4Life big prizes and the evening draw Fantasy 5 happiness went to a player at a gas station mini mart in Port Richey. READ MORE: Inspector saw roaches coming out of the walls at a Coral Gables restaurant But, the winner of the Fantasy 5 midday draw — 2, 6, 9, 12 and 30 — got their Quick Pick ticket at the Publix at 2551 LeJeune Rd. Being the only winner made that a $54,361 piece of good fortune. This ticket must be cashed at the Florida Lottery main office in Tallahassee or one of the district offices, such as the one in Miami Lakes at 14621 Oak Ln. That office can be reached at MIARC@ or 305-364-3080. Appointments can be made, but aren't required.