Britain's biggest bank to cut UK investments in snub to Reeves

Lloyds Bank is to pull billions of pounds from Britain's stock market in a major blow to Rachel Reeves's efforts to boost the UK economy.
Scottish Widows, the bank's pensions division, plans to cut its exposure to the UK and move more money into better-performing markets such as the US.
It is a blow to the Chancellor, who has been encouraging pension funds to invest more in British stocks to boost both the market and the economy.
The Telegraph previously revealed that Scottish Widows, which manages £230bn, had refused to sign up to an industry pledge to invest a certain amount of funds into Britain.
The pact, known as the Mansion House Accord, will see 17 of Britain's largest workplace pensions providers invest at least 5pc of funds held in their defined contribution schemes into UK stocks by 2030.
At the time, Chirantan Barua, Scottish Widows' chief executive, said: 'We will continue this investment approach to support our communities where it generates strong returns for pensioners.'
Scottish Widows is planning to lower its exposure to UK stocks in its highest growth fund from 12pc to 3pc, the Financial Times reported. The Edinburgh fund manager also plans to cut UK investments in its most conservative fund from 4pc to 1pc. It aims to complete the changes by January 2026.
The overhaul means Scottish Widows' £72bn default workplace pensions fund will take a 'market weight' approach, meaning the amount of money allocated to each country will depend on the size of their stock market.
In practice, this will mean less investment in Britain. At the moment, Scottish Widows has more of its assets invested in the UK than other markets relative to the size and value of Britain's economy. Of its £72bn workplace pension pot, it invests £5.5bn, or 7.6pc, in Britain.
The decision to cut back comes after an extended slump for the London Stock Exchange. The relative value of the UK's stock market has fallen sharply over the past two decades, from around 11pc of the MSCI World Index in 2000 to 4pc today.
Big investors have increasingly pulled away from British stocks because of dwindling returns since the financial crash of 2008. Conversely, American stock markets have surged.
Pension funds had 53pc of their assets invested in UK stocks in 2000 but that has fallen to 6pc today, according to a report from New Financial.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

BBC News

2 hours ago

• BBC News

Wearing shorts still a 'grey area' as offices scrap dress codes

When I call Tony Hardy, it's a sunny day. As he often does during the summer months, he's wearing a pair of shorts in the office."We wear shorts all the time," he runs a branding agency in Northumberland, with nine employees. His company, Canny Creative, doesn't have a dress code. Instead he encourages staff to dress professionally but comfortably - especially because the air conditioning in their office has recently broken."Imagine sweating buckets all day and being really uncomfortable and then expecting them to also turn out great work," Tony says. What the stylists say With summer upon us, and much of Britain set to be basking in a heatwave this week and next, keeping cool in the office and during the commute can be a challenge. Take one look at TikTok, and you'll see that the topic of whether or not shorts are ever appropriate for the office remains highly in a 2022 YouGov poll, 66% of Britons said that it was acceptable for men to wear shorts in the office, up from 37% in 2016 - though the 2022 poll was conducted on the UK's hottest-ever people wear to the office has "just gone so casual" in the past few years, with more people wearing jeans and trainers to work, says personal stylist Karina Taylor. She attributes that largely to the Covid pandemic, when people could dress much more casually to work from included people wearing shorts as they worked from their kitchens or home offices, says Carmen Bellot, style editor at Esquire magazine - they no longer had to think about the bottom half of their outfits while on video-call wearing shorts to the office is still "very much a grey area", Karina says, describing them as "the ultimate casual piece of clothing". Stylists agree that whether or not you can wear shorts to the office is overwhelmingly based on context - and they're often too casual for client-facing roles such as law and professionals advise that if your company has no explicit dress code, you should monitor what your colleagues are wearing and decide whether shorts would look out of "you may be pushing the boundaries," warns Nick Hems, a personal stylist in London. What the companies say The BBC contacted a range of companies to ask if they had a formal dress code and whether shorts would be acceptable to wear to the office, if styled professionally. Many companies, including consultancy Accenture and British American Tobacco, told the BBC they don't have explicit dress codes but expect staff to dress both comfortably and professionally, and to take extra care to dress appropriately when meeting clients or attending giant PwC says it trusts staff to make "appropriate decisions" about what to wear to work. "We don't list items that people can and can't wear," a spokesperson said. Santander says both casual and business dress is acceptable for staff who aren't required to wear a uniform, but noted "anything that could be beachwear isn't okay for the office". The type of shorts So if your company does allow you to wear shorts to the office, what sort of shorts should you go for?There's a clear consensus among the experts: keep it formal - ideally tailored - and don't go too short. Beach, sports, cargo and denim shorts are generally all this isn't the case for all companies. At social media marketing agency We Are Social, some employees have even worn hot pants to work, according to managing director, Lucy Doubleday."You can wear what you want," she says, with the company seeing clothing as an expression of a similar story for CEO Tony and his team, who even wear shorts to client meetings, including when they visited London to meet staff at a major bank's headquarters in Canary Wharf."We did get really strange looks," Tony says. "Everybody there was in suits and it was boiling hot. But we're a creative agency and we went as we would go to our regular meetings." He argues that if another company has a problem with how his staff dress, they probably aren't the right fit to work together. What's right for you? Shorts might be perceived differently on men and women, stylists suggest. Carmen says that even outside the office, shorts can be "quite divisive among men," she says."When I speak to men about their opinions on shorts, they tend to say that they don't feel comfortable wearing them when not on holiday," Carmen says. "I don't think there's this type of sentiment in womenswear." Some men embrace the opportunity to get out of long trousers, though - including 46-year-old primary school headteacher, Dave McPartlin. At his school in Lancashire he spends most of the final weeks of term before the summer holidays wearing thinks it's "ridiculous" people are still discussing whether it's appropriate to wear shorts for work - and the students don't treat him any differently based on what he wears, he says. "I don't think they could care less."Diane Brander wears shorts to work sometimes, too. She says her performance in her account administration job "would probably suffer" if she was too hot in the office and unable to wear shorts, and says she finds them more comfortable than skirts and dresses. So what should you do? Karina's best advice is to only wear shorts to work if you're confident about your company's dress code and how to style them. "If in doubt, probably avoid," Karina says, "because it will cause you far too much stress to get the look right and you maybe won't feel confident about pulling it off."

The Independent

4 hours ago

• The Independent

Creative industries to get £380m boost ahead of industrial strategy launch

Britain's film, music and video game industries are set to receive millions of pounds of investment as the Government seeks to ensure the UK's place as a creative superpower. The investment, announced by Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, will see £380 million spent on a range of projects intended to double private investment in the creative industries. Ms Nandy said the investment would 'boost regional growth, stimulate private investment, and create thousands more high-quality jobs'. The figure includes £25 million for research into cutting-edge technologies such as the virtual avatars used in Abba Voyage, and £75 million to support the film industry. It will also see £30 million put towards backing start-up video games companies – an industry worth billions of pounds to the UK – and another £30 million for the music industry, including an increase in funding for grassroots venues. Another £150 million will be split between the mayors of Manchester, Liverpool, the West Midlands, West Yorkshire, the North East and the West of England to support creative businesses in their regions. The announcement comes as the Government prepares to publish its industrial strategy next week, billed as a 10-year, multibillion-pound plan to back certain sectors and secure growth for the UK economy. The creative industries are set to be one of the winners, with a plan for the sector expected to be published alongside the wider industrial strategy. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'The UK's creative industries are world-leading and have a huge cultural impact globally, which is why we're championing them at home and abroad as a key growth sector in our modern industrial strategy.' But earlier this month, the Government also rejected a planning application for a major new film studio near Holyport, in Berkshire, over its impact on the green belt. The £380 million has been welcomed by the industry, with the Broadcasting, Entertainment, Communications and Theatre Union (Bectu) saying it was a 'show of commitment to the sector'. But Bectu chief Philippa Childs said creative workers would also be looking for 'sustained support' from the Government as the sector 'recovers from a series of external shocks'. Recent years have seen the sector rocked by Covid, the cost-of-living crisis and concerns about the impact of AI and Donald Trump's threat to impose tariffs on films made outside the US. Conservative shadow culture secretary Stuart Andrew accused Labour of threatening the 'very survival' of the creative industries. He said: 'From their national insurance jobs tax to their business rates hike, Labour are pushing creative businesses to the brink, and we now know that Rachel Reeves has a secret plan to raise taxes – meaning things will only get worse. 'Labour must recognise that their economic mismanagement is dealing a devasting blow to the sector.'

Scottish Sun

4 hours ago

• Scottish Sun

Families face £20billion tax sting as Government borrowing soars to second highest May level on record

Labour have been accused of 'spending recklessly' TAX YIKES Families face £20billion tax sting as Government borrowing soars to second highest May level on record Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) FAMILIES face a £20billion tax hit after Government borrowing jumped last month, experts warned. The second highest figure on record for May, beaten only during the pandemic, saw borrowing surge to £17.7 billion, higher than forecast by the independent watchdog. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up Receipts for the Treasury were up to £82 billion due to higher income tax and the NI increase that kicked in from April. But with sluggish growth and the high borrowing costs could mean Rachel Reeves could lose her £10 billion financial cushion by the Budget. Thomas Pugh, economist at RSM UK, said the Chancellor may have to raise taxes between £10-£20 billion. He added: 'The under-performance of the economy and higher borrowing costs mean the Chancellor may already have lost the £9.9bn of fiscal headroom that she clawed back in March.' Shadow Chancellor, Sir Mel Stride said: 'Labour is spending recklessly, with no plan to pay for it. "Debt interest now costs us £100bn a year - that's almost twice the defence budget. 'Having turned on the spending taps, Labour have left themselves with only one option and that's to put up your taxes. Treasury Minister Darren Jones insisted the government had 'stabilised the economy and the public finances'. Growth forecast SLASHED in Spring Statement - sparking fears of MORE tax rises