Which ‘S.W.A.T.' Stars Are — And Aren't — Returning for Surprise Spinoff After Multiple Cancellations?

The cast of S.W.A.T. has weathered multiple cancellations while continuing to advocate for more seasons of the show — but that doesn't mean everyone is returning for the surprise spinoff.
Based on the 1975 TV show and 2003 film adaptation of the same name, S.W.A.T. centered around the Los Angeles Police Department. The CBS series premiered in 2017 and aired six seasons before it was picked up for a seventh and final season. CBS ultimately reversed that decision and S.W.A.T. returned for season 8. But the celebration didn't last long — the network canceled the show for a second time in March 2025.
S.W.A.T. seemingly came to an end two months later when the series finale aired on CBS. In the final episode, the team survived yet another mission and the last scene showed 20 Squad leaving headquarters to take on their next crisis.
Just two days after the finale aired, Sony Pictures Television picked up a spinoff titled S.W.A.T. Exiles, which will pick up after "a high-profile mission goes sideways, Daniel 'Hondo' Harrelson is pulled out of forced retirement to lead a last-chance experimental SWAT unit made up of untested, unpredictable young recruits." Shemar Moore's character must "bridge a generational divide, navigate clashing personalities, and turn a squad of outsiders into a team capable of protecting the city and saving the program that made him who he is."
Which TV Shows Were Canceled Multiple Times Before the Decision Stuck? From 'S.W.A.T.' to '7th Heaven'
Moore reacted to the 10-episode continuation of S.W.A.T., saying in a statement, "My eight seasons on S.W.A.T. have been epic and memorable. We entertained the world, defied the odds, came back from the dead twice, and continued to woo fans and families worldwide."
He continued: "I am excited for this next generation and iteration of S.W.A.T. with Sony. Katherine Pope, Neal H. Moritz, Jason Ning, and I will keep the franchise, thrill ride action, heartfelt drama, and storytelling of S.W.A.T. alive. WE DON'T LOSE!!!! ROLL SWAT!!!'
While Moore's return was announced, fans couldn't help but notice that the rest of the cast wasn't confirmed. The last season of S.W.A.T also starred Jay Harrington, David Lim, Patrick St. Esprit, Anna Enger Ritch, Annie Ilonzeh and Niko Pepaj.
Keep scrolling for what each cast member has said about whether they would reprise their character — and whether they have officially been offered the chance to return:
'To all my homies, fans and baby girls… to everybody out there around the world who have supported us for eight years, first of all, thank you," the actor, who plays Daniel "Hondo" Harrelson, said in a video shared by Sony Pictures Television. "We couldn't have done this without you,' he said. 'I know the sad news is we got cancelled, but the good news is we don't stop fighting. And guess what happens when you don't stop fighting? We won! S.W.A.T. ain't going nowhere! Hondo ain't going nowhere!"
Before the series finale, Harrington reflected on his character Deacon's conclusion, telling TV Insider in May, "The way the writers crafted this entire 13 episodes was really, really interesting because they didn't want it to be — not just because there's a chance we could come back, but sometimes in shows when they just end and they tie it all into this bow and it's perfect, yeah, you want to do that in some way, but these guys, SWAT officers, they're special."
He continued: "So they really wanted the idea of, the show must go on and it's a job that doesn't go away and we don't lose them. They crafted it very, very smartly, I think."
Despite showing interest in a return, Harrington hasn't publicly reacted yet to the spinoff news and his name wasn't listed in the press release.
When viewers last saw Tan, he accepted a liaison position but remained in the field with the rest of 20 Squad. Lim, meanwhile, has yet to address the surprise spinoff but has expressed interest in remaining in the universe.
'It might not be just over for S.W.A.T. just yet,' he said on KTLA 5 Morning News in April 2025. 'We believe in the show. We believe in what we've built. We're passionate. We want to continue. We're actively trying to find a new home for S.W.A.T., and there's been an outpouring of love and support from our fans.'
Ritch, who plays Zoe Powell, has pitched ideas for what other stories there are still left to tell, sharing with Collider in March 2023, 'I think it would be interesting to see the women go through trying to juggle what it would be like to have a family and also maintain a SWAT tactical officer career. I don't think that's anything I've ever dove into on this show particularly, but hopefully, as we continue, should we continue, that would be an interesting exploration.'
The actress, however, hasn't sounded off on the spinoff — or whether Powell will appear — yet.
Every TV Spinoff to (Hopefully) Look Forward to in 2025: From 'The Testaments' to 'The Madison'
After being promoted to main cast, Pepaj has continued to show support for his character Alfaro's journey. Pepaj documented the days leading up to the series finale but hasn't weighed in on S.W.A.T.'s spinoff.
Before news of S.W.A.T. Exiles broke, Ilonzeh spoke with Us Weekly about attempts to revive the series.
"We are crossing our fingers. So there is a particular discussion being had. I hope I can say [soon] that we really did it. We rallied for a third time," she shared in April 2025 while reflecting on her time playing Gamble. "But we're making noise. They do see it — producers and streamers that are interested — they are like, 'OK, this is something.' So if we can plug and play, we're all geared up to go. We don't want this ride to be over."
Despite fighting for S.W.A.T. to get a new home, it would be the show's last battle to stay on the air.
"I was just talking to [my costar] Shemar [Moore] yesterday and he was like, 'If we do this for a third time — whenever we do get canceled again — I will be OK with it. I'm not fighting for a fourth [time] because we really did it and we end on that,'" she noted. "We will end on the fight and the win and relish in all of this and squeeze the life out of it. We will know that we did it, we did our job and we can walk away happy campers."
Ilonzeh has also not acknowledged the spinoff news yet.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Miami Herald

an hour ago

• Miami Herald

‘The Great One' Jackie Gleason had a big role in South Florida. Take a look

You may know Jackie Gleason just from the name of a Miami Beach theater. He was much more than that. Gleason brought his TV show to the city from New York in the 1960s and he retired to Inverrary in Lauderhill, spending lots of time on the golf course. 'The Jackie Gleason Show,' a fixture on CBS since 1952 and featuring 'The Honeymooners,' moved to Miami Beach in 1964 and stayed there until it went off the air in 1970. Each week during his variety show from 'the sun and fun capital of the world,' Gleason proclaimed: 'The Miami Beach audience is the greatest audience in the world!' In the summer of 1964, Gleason made a highly publicized 36-hour train trip from New York to Florida, when he and more than 100 actors, dancers, musicians, crew members and their families moved south for the TV show. Miami Beach at the time estimated that Gleason's working in South Florida was worth $9 million a year in publicity alone. Every show opened with a dramatic water view of the skyline. Gleason did his show at the Miami Beach Auditorium, later converted to a performing arts center and now known as The Fillmore Miami Beach at The Jackie Gleason Theater. MORE: These Miami brothers took their musical act to national TV. Remember them? Let's take a look at Gleason's time in South Florida through the photo archives of the Miami Herald: In Miami Beach with Mike Douglas On the golf course in South Florida On stage in Miami Beach Man about town Show cast members Farewell

USA Today

an hour ago

• USA Today

What does regime change mean? Trump comments on Iran leadership

Hours after the United States military bombed three Iranian nuclear sites on June 21, President Donald Trump floated the possibility of a regime change in Iran. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on June 22. Trump's post also came on the heels of Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio each saying on June 22 that regime change in Iran was not the United States' objective. "We don't want a regime change," Vance told NBC's Meet the Press. "We want to end the nuclear program, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here." Rubio echoed the sentiment on CBS's Face the Nation, saying, "in this particular case, what we are focused on is not the changing of the regime.' Here's what to know about the term "regime change" and why it's a point of focus after U.S. airstrikes on Iran nuclear facilities. Live updates: What is Iran's next move? World awaits response to U.S. bombing What is a regime change? Regime change refers to the replacement of a nation's leadership, dictionary definitions agree. In the context of foreign affairs, the phrase can refer to an external party taking action or using military force to complete the change. According to Britannica, the phrase refers to the "overthrow of a government considered illegitimate by an external force and its replacement with a new government according to the ideas or interests promoted by that force." The Global Nonviolent Action Database at Swarthmore College notes that some scenarios exist where a leader steps aside but "continues to rule from behind the scenes" or the oligarchy that backed the leader remains intact. Where the United States is concerned, the government has been involved in several notable regime changes throughout history. For example, in the Iraq War, the U.S. overthrew the regime of Saddam Hussein just three weeks after military forces entered Iraq, per the Defense Technical Information Center. On April 9, 2003, U.S. forces pulled down a statue of Hussein in Baghdad's Firdos Square, symbolizing the end of his reign. The war continued for eight years after that. What has Trump said about a regime change in Iran? Trump said on June 21 the U.S. strikes were intended to 'stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terror." Days before, though, Trump threatened Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, writing on Truth Social, "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!" "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding," he said in another June 17 post. "He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now." "Our patience is wearing thin," he added. After the U.S. carried out airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites on June 21, Trump took to Truth Social the following day to signal his openness to new leadership in Iran, breaking from comments made by his vice president and secretary of state earlier that day. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!,' Trump wrote. Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at

San Francisco Chronicle​

8 hours ago

• San Francisco Chronicle​

The Latest: Trump muses about regime change in Iran after U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities

Israel's military said Monday it was striking around Iran's western city of Kermanshah, as fears of a wider regional conflict loomed large after the United States inserted itself into Israel's war by attacking Iranian nuclear sites. The operation raised urgent questions about what remained of Tehran's nuclear program and how its weakened military might respond. The price of oil rose as financial markets reacted. Iran lashed out at the U.S. for crossing 'a very big red line' with its risky gambit to strike the three sites with missiles and 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. President Donald Trump, who has warned of additional strikes if Tehran retaliates against U.S. forces, has mused about the possibility of 'regime change ″ in Iran, despite administration officials earlier indicating they wanted to restart talks with Iran. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in an interview with CBS, said: 'Let's meet directly.' Ali Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Iran's supreme leader, said any country used by the U.S. to strike Iran 'will be a legitimate target for our armed forces,' the state-run IRNA news agency reported. Tens of thousands of American troops are based in the Middle East. North Korea's Foreign Ministry said in a statement Monday that the United States and Israel were escalating tensions in the Middle East through the use of military force, and called on the 'just-minded international community' to raise a unified voice against their 'confrontational behavior.' During his first term, U.S. President Donald Trump met North Korean leader Kim Jong Un three times in 2018 and 2019, but their diplomacy collapsed over disagreements in exchanging the release of U.S.-led sanctions against North Korea and the North's steps to wind down its nuclear and missile program. Kim has since accelerated his arms development while ignoring talk offers by Washington and Seoul. He has shifted the priority of his foreign policy to Russia, sending thousands of troops and huge shipments of military equipment to fuel Russian President Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine. Trump claims 'monumental damage' inflicted on Iranian nuclear sites President Donald Trump asserted on his Truth Social platform that Iran's nuclear sites sustained 'monumental damage' in the American attack, though a U.S. assessment on the strikes is still underway. 'The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!' he wrote. U.S. defense officials have said they are working to determine about just how much damage the strikes did. Iran as well has not said how much damage was done in the attack, though Tehran has not offered any details so far on the strikes it has faced from Israel in its war with that country. Iran likely filled in tunnels at nuclear sites ahead of U.S. strikes An analysis of satellite photos by a nuclear nonproliferation group based in Washington shows Iran likely filled in tunnels at its nuclear site at Isfahan ahead of U.S. strikes early Sunday. The U.S. attack likely targeted the tunnel entries, the group said. 'At least three of the four tunnel entrances are collapsed,' it said. 'The status of the fourth one is unclear.'