Proposed Nevada bill aims to expand IVF access
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — A new bill in the Nevada Legislature focuses on modern family planning, specifically expanding IVF access to Nevada families.
SB 217 was introduced to the Health and Human Services committee on Thursday. The bill pushes for Nevada families to have greater access to IVF and was modeled after the Colorado Building Families Act.
'The treatments provide hope and opportunity for those struggling with infertility, for same-sex couples who are seeking biological parenthood, individuals with medical conditions that could affect their fertility,' said Democratic State Senator Nicole Cannizzaro, who is one of the bill's primary sponsors.
Majority Leader Cannizzaro had with her the founder of Nevada Fertility Advocates, Amanda Klein, who understands the subject matter all too well.
'My husband and I struggled with infertility for five years. I did have to do IVF, I had several miscarriages,' Klein told 8 News Now. 'Ultimately, we had to hire a surrogate to have our daughter, but she's incredible, and she's the reason I do this work today.'
Klein has been working with Senator Cannizzaro on this bill for the past year. SB217 includes coverage for treatments like IVF, as well as fertility preservation for those who have diagnoses like cancer.
'We were hit with the reality that one in six Nevadans face and that is that infertility is a disease,' Klein continued. 'The American Medical Association has recognized infertility as a disease- just like cancer, just like diabetes, just like heart disease for several decades- and it should be recognized by insurance companies as well.'
However, the legislation isn't without pushback. Some disagree with the bill because of parts of the language.
'SB 217 clearly states that fertilized eggs and embryos before implantation are not legally considered persons,' said Melissa Clement, with the Nevada Right to Life, who spoke on the floor in opposition. 'This is neither scientific nor medical.'
Additionally, there are some opponents concerned about the price tag.
'The infertility coverage mandates apply to large employers, which means that the cost for employers and employees will increase due to the cost of these treatments,' expressed Shelly Capurro with the Nevada Association Of Health Plans.
However, Klein responded to some of the opposition, saying that family building is a bipartisan issue.
'We understand, especially me, being a lifelong Nevadan that there are cost implications to a bill like this,' Klein said. 'But it is incredibly important for us to work from both sides of the aisle- Republican and Democrat- to get this bill to a place where we can all agree to it.
The bill is set to head to the finance committee.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
41 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
The number of abortions kept rising in 2024 because of telehealth prescriptions, report finds
While the total number of abortions has risen gradually over those three years, the number has dropped to near zero in some states, while abortions using pills obtained through telehealth appointments have become more common in nearly all states. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Pills are used in the majority of abortions and are also prescribed in person. Advertisement The overall number of abortions has risen, but it is below historic highs The latest survey, released Monday, tallied about 1.1 million abortions nationally last year, or about 95,000 a month. That is up from about 88,000 monthly in 2023 and 80,000 a month between April and December of 2022. WeCount began after Roe was overturned, and the 2022 numbers don't include January through March, when abortions are traditionally at their highest. The number is still well below the historic peak in the U.S. of nearly 1.6 million a year in the late 1990s. The Society of Family Planning relies primarily on surveys of abortion providers and uses estimates. Advertisement The chart above compares abortions prescribed by telehealth appointments to those prescribed in-person. Phil Holm/Associated Press Pills prescribed by telehealth now account for one-fourth of US abortions WeCount found that in the months before the Dobbs ruling was handed down, about 1 in 20 abortions was accessed by telehealth. But during the last three months of 2024, it was up to 1 in 4. The biggest jump over that time came in the middle of 2023, when laws in some Democratic-controlled states took effect with provisions intended to protect medical professionals who use telehealth to prescribe pills to patients in states where abortion is banned or where there are laws restricting telehealth abortion. WeCount found that about half of the telehealth abortions last year were facilitated by the shield laws. The number of telehealth abortions also grew for those in states without bans. WeCount is the only nationwide public source of information about the pills prescribed to women in states with bans. One key caveat is that it is not clear how many of the prescriptions result in abortion. Some women may change their minds, access in-person abortion or be seeking pills to save for future use. The WeCount data could help explain data from a separate survey from the Guttmacher Institute, which found the number of people crossing state lines for abortion declined last year. Anti-abortion efforts are focused on pills Anti-abortion efforts are zeroing in on pills, along with barring federal funds for Planned Parenthood and undoing ballot measures that provided for abortion access. Three states have sued to try to get courts to limit telehealth prescriptions of mifepristone, one of the two drugs usually used in combination for medication abortions. President Donald Trump's administration last month told a judge it does not believe the states have legal standing to make that case. Advertisement The U.S. Supreme Court last year found that anti-abortion doctors and their organizations didn't have standing, either. Meanwhile, officials in Louisiana are using criminal laws, and there is an effort in Texas to use civil penalties against a New York doctor accused of prescribing abortion pills to women in their states. Louisiana lawmakers have also sent the governor a bill to further restrict access to the pills. SBA Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser said on a call with reporters Monday that it's a priority for her group to keep pushing U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other officials to investigate the safety of abortion pills — and to require that they be dispensed only in person.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Brother and sister compete for Florida state senate seat in a sibling showdown
ORLANDO, Fla. — Randolph Bracy and LaVon Bracy Davis are taking sibling rivalry to a new level as the brother and sister run against each other in a race for a Florida state Senate seat on Tuesday. Not only that, one of their opponents for the Democratic nomination in the district representing parts of metro Orlando is Alan Grayson, a combative former Democratic U.S. congressman who drew national attention in 2009 when he said in a House floor speech that the Republican health care plan was to 'die quickly.' The headline-grabbing candidates are running in the special primary election for the seat that had been held by Geraldine Thompson, a trailblazing veteran lawmaker who died earlier this year following complications from knee-replacement surgery. A fourth candidate also is running in the Democratic primary — personal injury attorney Coretta Anthony-Smith. The winner will face Republican Willie Montague in September for the general election in the Democratic-dominant district. Black voters make up more than half registered Democrats in the district. Both siblings have experience in the state legislature. Bracy Davis was a state representative, and Bracy was a former state senator. Adding to the family dynamics was the fact that the siblings' mother, civil rights activist Lavon Wright Bracy, was the maid of honor at Thompson's wedding and was one of her oldest friends. She has endorsed her daughter over her son. The siblings' family has been active in Orlando's civic life for decades. Their father, Randolph Bracy Jr., was a local NAACP president, a founder of a Baptist church in Orlando and director of the religion department at Bethune-Cookman University. It wasn't the first time the family has been caught up in competing endorsements. When Bracy and Thompson ran against each other for the Democratic primary in a state senate race last year, Bracy Davis endorsed Thompson over her brother. Campaign fliers sent out recently by a Republican political operative start with 'Bracy Yourself!' Bracy, 48, who one time played professional basketball in Turkey, told the Orlando Sentinel that it was 'disappointing and hurtful' for his sister to run after he had announced his bid. But Bracy Davis, 45, an attorney by training, said she was running for the people in state senate District 15, not against any of the other candidates. She said that she intended to continue Thompson's legacy of pushing for voters' rights and increasing pay for public schoolteachers. Thompson's family has endorsed Bracy Davis. Grayson was elected to Congress in 2008 and voted out in 2010. Voters sent him back to Congress in 2012, but he gave up his seat for an unsuccessful 2016 Senate run.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
New York City is using ranked choice voting in its Democratic mayoral primary. Here's how it works.
Rather than pick just one candidate, voters get to rank several in order of preference. Even if a voter's top choice doesn't have enough support to win, their rankings of other candidates still play a role in determining the victor. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The system is more complex than a traditional election, making it tough to forecast a winner. It could also take longer to get results. Advertisement How does it work? In New York City's version, voters get to rank up to five candidates, from first to last, on the ballot. If one candidate is the first choice of a majority of voters — more than 50% — that person wins the race outright, just like in a traditional election. If nobody hits that threshold, ranked choice analysis kicks in. Vote tabulation is done by computer in rounds. After the first round, the candidate in last place — the candidate ranked No. 1 by the fewest amount of people — is eliminated. The computer then looks at the ballots cast by people who ranked that candidate first, to see who they ranked second. Those people's votes are then redistributed to their second choices. Advertisement That process then repeats. As more candidates are eliminated, voters' third, fourth and even fifth choices could potentially come into play. Rounds continue until there are only two candidates left. The one with the most votes wins. Eleven candidates are on the ballot in the Democratic mayoral primary. Incumbent Mayor Eric Adams isn't one of them. He's a Democrat but is running as an independent. The Republican Party has already picked its nominee, Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa. How long will this take? The computerized process of tabulating votes takes little time, but it doesn't start right away. Polls close at 9 p.m. Tuesday. Within a few hours, preliminary results should give a picture of how the candidates are doing based on voters' first choices. The ranked choice tabulations, however, won't start until July 1 because the city needs to wait for the arrival of mail-in ballots. The July 1 tabulation could potentially give a clear picture of who won, but the result won't be official. Further rounds of ranked choice analysis will be done as additional absentee ballots come in until the board certifies the election July 15. This will be the second time New York City has used ranked choice in a mayoral primary. The first time, in 2021, things went haywire when elections officials neglected to clear test data from the tabulation program. That led to an inaccurate vote tally being reported until officials realized the error. Officials are hoping things go smoother this time. Advertisement Why do people like ranked choice? One benefit is that nobody 'wastes' their vote by picking an unpopular candidate as their first choice. Voters can rank someone they like No. 1, even if they suspect the candidate doesn't stand a chance. If that person is eliminated, voters still get a say in who wins based on their other rankings. Another benefit is that it's tough for someone to get elected without broad support. In a traditional election, it's possible for someone with fringe political views to win in a crowded field of candidates, even if they are deeply disliked by a majority of voters. That's theoretically less likely in a ranked choice system. A candidate could get the largest share of first-choice votes but still lose to someone who is the second or third choice of a large number of people. What are the negatives? The system is tough to grasp. It requires voters to do more research. It also makes races less predictable. Transparency and trust are also potential problems. Ordinarily, candidates, the public and news organizations can see votes coming in, precinct by precinct, and know exactly who is leading and where their support comes from. Under the ranked choice system, the process of redistributing votes is done by computer. Outside groups will have a harder time evaluating whether the software sorted the ranked votes accurately. That's a challenge for news organizations, like The Associated Press, that analyze vote tallies and attempt to report a winner before the count is complete. There may be instances when candidates who seem to have a comfortable lead in first-place votes on election night lose because relatively few voters rank them as their second or third choice. That could lead to people questioning the results. Advertisement
