CPI(M) on the back foot as its 1977 alliance with Jan Sangh resurfaces
A new controversy erupted on the eve of the Nilambur Assembly byelection on Wednesday over an alliance between the CPI(M) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in the late 1970s.
An alleged revelation by CPI(M) State secretary M.V. Govindan during a media interview about the alliance put the LDF on the defensive with the rival United Democratic Front (UDF) seizing the opportunity to capitalise on the dispute.
The volatile political rivalry between the UDF and LDF turned more intense on the election eve when both sides sharpened their accusations over allying with communal forces.
Former BJP president K. Raman Pillai validated Mr. Govindan's statement that the CPI(M) had contested the 1977 election with the support of the RSS. Mr. Pillai told a TV channel that the CPI(M) had gleefully accepted the RSS support in the wake of the Emergency.
The dispute put the LDF on the back foot in Nilambur at a time when it kept on attacking the UDF for taking the support of the Jamaat-e-Islami. In an attempt to turn the table, UDF candidate Aryadan Shoukath said that there could be more such alliances during elections in future.
Mr. Shoukath said he suspected a tacit understanding between the CPI(M) and the BJP in Nilambur. 'I suspect 100% the chances of an alliance between the CPI(M) and the BJP,' he said.
LDF candidate M. Swaraj rejected Mr. Govindan's revelation and asserted that the CPI(M) had never cooperated with the RSS. He said the Left had cooperated with the Janata Party, which comprised groups with different views, against the Congress in the wake of the Emergency.
Mr. Swaraj said that CPI(M) ideologue E.M.S. Namboodiripad had openly rejected the votes of the RSS. He alleged that it was the Congress which made an alliance with the Janata Party backed by the RSS.
Mr. Swaraj also alleged that the Congress had fielded RSS leaders such as O. Rajagopal and K.G. Marar as its candidates in the State.
CPI State secretary Binoy Viswam too rejected Mr. Govindan's revelation, saying that the Left had nothing to do with the RSS, which was the face of majority communalism.
According to Mr. Raman Pillai, the CPI(M) and RSS drifted away after 1977.
Meanwhile, the BJP said here that both the UDF and LDF were resorting to allegations about the RSS to divert attention from the key developmental issues in Nilambur.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Nilambur Election Results: Congress' Aryadan Shoukath vs CPM's M Swaraj, who is winning this key battle before Kerala state elections next year
Nilambur Election Results: Kerala closely watches the Nilambur bypoll result. The result is a key indicator for the 2026 assembly election. The constituency saw a four-cornered fight. UDF, LDF, and NDA are confident of victory. Issues ranged from human-animal conflict to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Political accusations flew between LDF and UDF. All eyes are now on the counting of votes. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Nilambur Election Results: Why this seat matters Nilambur Election Results: The main contenders Bloc Candidate Notes UDF Aryadan Shoukath Former Nilambur municipal chairman LDF M Swaraj Former MLA and CPI(M) leader NDA Mohan George Lawyer-politician TMC (Independent) P V Anvar Two-time former MLA; left LDF in January Nilambur Election Results: Voter turnout Nilambur Election Results: Campaign themes Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Human–animal conflict near forest villages Delay in welfare pension payments The Israel–Palestine war's local impact Alleged links between Congress and Jamaat-e-Islami What leaders said Nilambur Election Results: Predictions before counting UDF managers forecast a Shoukath victory margin of 15,000 votes, citing anti-incumbency. votes, citing anti-incumbency. LDF workers expected Swaraj to win by 10,000 votes, crediting grassroots work. votes, crediting grassroots work. NDA organisers spoke of a shift toward their candidate. P V Anvar said he would win by 25,000 votes. Nilambur Election Results: Background to the by-poll The Election Commission began counting votes for the Nilambur Assembly by-election on Monday morning. In the first of 19 rounds, Congress-UDF candidate Aryadan Shoukath recorded 3,614 votes, giving him an initial lead of about 500 votes after postal ballots and the first batch of Electronic Voting is the only seat voting between state elections. Parties see the result as a signal for the 2026 Kerala Assembly race. The ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF), the opposition United Democratic Front (UDF) and the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) all treated the poll as a test of their rain, Nilambur recorded. Out ofeligible voters,cast ballots. Anotherused postal discussed:Chief Ministertold rallies that the Congress leadership wasUDF leaders denied the charge and accused the LDF of seeking votes on religious lines. They also recalled Vijayan's earlier remarks on Malappuram district. The LDF countered by citing AICC general secretary K C Venugopal's 'bribery' comment about pension seat fell vacant after P V Anvar, elected twice as an LDF-backed Independent, resigned in January following differences with the CPI(M). With the Vijayan government nearing the end of its second term, both major fronts wanted a morale boost from will continue through 19 rounds. Final results are expected later on Monday. All eyes remain on whether Shoukath can hold his early advantage or if the numbers swing in later rounds.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Texas Law Requiring Warnings on Some Foods Signed by Governor
(Bloomberg) -- Texas legislation that will require warning labels on food and beverages such as M&Ms, Cinnamon Toast Crunch and Fanta will become law after Governor Greg Abbott signed the initiative. Abbott signed Senate Bill 25 on Sunday night — a victory for Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' movement, which is looking to remove ingredients such as synthetic dyes from the nation's food supply. Food companies, which have maintained that all of their ingredients are safe, now have until 2027 to eliminate more than 40 ingredients, including dyes and bleached flour, from their products sold in Texas. If they don't, they'll have to include a label on new packaging warning the product contains ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption' by other countries. Many, but not all, of the additives are banned or require warnings in other countries. The law creates a new requirement for packaged-food companies in a state with more than 31 million residents — the second-most populous in the US. Historically, state regulations have triggered national changes as companies look to streamline production. Companies have already started to mobilize amid pressure from the government and activists to remove ingredients that officials have blamed for health problems including hyperactivity, obesity and diabetes in children. Kraft Heinz Co. and General Mills Inc. recently announced the removal of synthetic dyes from their US products by the end of 2027. Industry groups have said no formal agreement exists with the federal government, however. As currently formulated, products including Coca-Cola Co.'s Fanta, PepsiCo Inc.'s Cheetos Crunchy and Nacho Cheese Doritos and Mars Inc.'s Skittles and M&Ms would be subject to the warning labels. So would Kellanova's Frosted Strawberry Pop-Tarts. Companies can avoid the label requirements for the targeted ingredients if the FDA or USDA declare them safe after Sept. 1. Additionally, if the agencies restrict an ingredient's use, require a warning label, or ban it outright after that same date, then that action would supersede the Texas regulation. If the federal government mandates labeling for 'ultra-processed or processed foods,' that would also supersede Texas' required labels. Barring these conditions or new qualifications for the ingredients' use from the federal government, the warnings will be required on labels beginning in 2027. Questions remain in the industry about how the legislation will be implemented. The law applies for any food labeling copyrighted or developed beginning on Jan. 1, 2027, and under one interpretation, that means it only applies when a company next updates its packaging. Gary Huddleston, a grocery-industry consultant for the Texas Retailers Association, said companies will be able to wait until they reformulate a product or otherwise change their labels. Ingredients listed in the Texas law include BHT, a food additive, titanium dioxide, used for food coloring, and DATEM, an emulsifier. Lawsuits from packaged-food producers are expected. 'I don't expect that to be the end of the debate here,' said Smitha Stansbury, a partner at King & Spalding's FDA and Life Sciences practice, predicting the law will be 'subject to litigation.' 'There's precedent for food companies to challenge this law under First Amendment grounds,' said Seth Mailhot, a partner at Husch Blackwell and the leader of the law firm's FDA group. The food industry has argued that the legislation is too broad. It has also criticized the idea of making policy based on foreign governments' classification of ingredients, as opposed to US or Texas regulators. --With assistance from Deena Shanker. More stories like this are available on
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Karnataka and LK Advani's jail stint during Emergency
Bengaluru: 'I boarded an aeroplane for the first time in November 1975,' BJP MLA S Suresh Kumar says with biting sarcasm, recalling the trauma of the Emergency imposed by then prime minister Indira Gandhi on June 25, 1975, which suspended civil liberties across the country. Kumar, then a young political activist, was arrested and subjected to brutal treatment at Bengaluru's High Grounds Police Station before being shifted to Bengaluru Central Jail, where he spent 15 months. The 'aeroplane' punishment, he explained, involved having one's hands tied behind the back and being hoisted upward—an ordeal causing unbearable pain. The 21-month Emergency cast a long, dark shadow over democratic institutions nationwide, and Karnataka was no exception. Press censorship, mass arrests under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA), and a climate of fear reshaped the political and social landscape of the state. Among the notable detenus was senior BJP leader and former Deputy Prime Minister L K Advani, who was imprisoned in Bengaluru during this period. His incarceration, along with that of other national leaders, became a defining chapter in the resistance against authoritarianism. Suresh Kumar, a former Minister, said the Emergency forged his political identity. 'I was part of the agitation from the time the Emergency was declared,' he said. He recalled participating in a protest at Mysore Bank Circle on June 26, 1975—perhaps the first significant anti-Emergency demonstration in Karnataka. Surprisingly, no arrests were made that day. Soon after, on July 4, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), Jamaat-e-Islami, and 11 other political organisations were banned. Kumar said Karnataka's Congress government, led by Chief Minister D Devaraj Urs, implemented Emergency directives with near-total obedience to Delhi. Urs, remembered for land reforms and championing backward classes, oversaw a regime that clamped down harshly on dissent. Opposition leaders—from the Bharatiya Jana Sangh and Lok Dal to Socialists—were systematically jailed, silenced, or harassed. Journalists, student leaders, and trade unionists were among those detained as Karnataka mirrored the Centre's authoritarian streak. RSS leader Suresh Naik Ankola, who was jailed alongside Kumar, said L K Advani's imprisonment was one of the most symbolic. Then a rising Bharatiya Jana Sangh figure, Advani was arrested shortly after the Emergency began. Initially detained in Delhi, he was transferred to Bengaluru Central Jail, where he spent much of his jail term. Advani later said his belief in constitutional democracy strengthened during the emergency when he was jailed. Late veteran socialist leader George Fernandes, known for his deep roots in Karnataka's labour movement, was declared an absconder and later arrested in the infamous Baroda dynamite case. 'The Bengaluru jail became an unlikely incubator of political thought, resilience, and inter-party bonding,' Kumar observed, recalling the shared spirit of resistance among the jailed. Despite heavy suppression, silent forms of protest thrived. Underground pamphlets, clandestine poetry, and hushed intellectual resistance echoed through cities like Bengaluru, Dharwad, Mysuru, and Mangaluru. Kumar said he was arrested while trying to hand a pamphlet to a visiting foreign delegation to alert them about the state of affairs in India. According to him, a miscalculation by Indira Gandhi's loyalists led her to call for elections in 1977—a decision that proved fatal for the Congress in the north. 'While the Congress was routed elsewhere, it still found solid support in south India, including Karnataka,' Kumar noted. He concluded by invoking Advani's famous remark about institutional complicity during the Emergency. 'When they were asked to bend, they began to crawl.'
