Texas Law Requiring Warnings on Some Foods Signed by Governor

(Bloomberg) -- Texas legislation that will require warning labels on food and beverages such as M&Ms, Cinnamon Toast Crunch and Fanta will become law after Governor Greg Abbott signed the initiative.
Abbott signed Senate Bill 25 on Sunday night — a victory for Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' movement, which is looking to remove ingredients such as synthetic dyes from the nation's food supply.
Food companies, which have maintained that all of their ingredients are safe, now have until 2027 to eliminate more than 40 ingredients, including dyes and bleached flour, from their products sold in Texas.
If they don't, they'll have to include a label on new packaging warning the product contains ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption' by other countries. Many, but not all, of the additives are banned or require warnings in other countries.
The law creates a new requirement for packaged-food companies in a state with more than 31 million residents — the second-most populous in the US. Historically, state regulations have triggered national changes as companies look to streamline production.
Companies have already started to mobilize amid pressure from the government and activists to remove ingredients that officials have blamed for health problems including hyperactivity, obesity and diabetes in children.
Kraft Heinz Co. and General Mills Inc. recently announced the removal of synthetic dyes from their US products by the end of 2027. Industry groups have said no formal agreement exists with the federal government, however.
As currently formulated, products including Coca-Cola Co.'s Fanta, PepsiCo Inc.'s Cheetos Crunchy and Nacho Cheese Doritos and Mars Inc.'s Skittles and M&Ms would be subject to the warning labels. So would Kellanova's Frosted Strawberry Pop-Tarts.
Companies can avoid the label requirements for the targeted ingredients if the FDA or USDA declare them safe after Sept. 1. Additionally, if the agencies restrict an ingredient's use, require a warning label, or ban it outright after that same date, then that action would supersede the Texas regulation.
If the federal government mandates labeling for 'ultra-processed or processed foods,' that would also supersede Texas' required labels.
Barring these conditions or new qualifications for the ingredients' use from the federal government, the warnings will be required on labels beginning in 2027.
Questions remain in the industry about how the legislation will be implemented. The law applies for any food labeling copyrighted or developed beginning on Jan. 1, 2027, and under one interpretation, that means it only applies when a company next updates its packaging.
Gary Huddleston, a grocery-industry consultant for the Texas Retailers Association, said companies will be able to wait until they reformulate a product or otherwise change their labels.
Ingredients listed in the Texas law include BHT, a food additive, titanium dioxide, used for food coloring, and DATEM, an emulsifier.
Lawsuits from packaged-food producers are expected.
'I don't expect that to be the end of the debate here,' said Smitha Stansbury, a partner at King & Spalding's FDA and Life Sciences practice, predicting the law will be 'subject to litigation.'
'There's precedent for food companies to challenge this law under First Amendment grounds,' said Seth Mailhot, a partner at Husch Blackwell and the leader of the law firm's FDA group.
The food industry has argued that the legislation is too broad. It has also criticized the idea of making policy based on foreign governments' classification of ingredients, as opposed to US or Texas regulators.
--With assistance from Deena Shanker.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

2 hours ago

• Hindustan Times

What is an ectopic pregnancy? GOP rep's scare sparks Florida law debate

Florida Republican Congresswoman Kat Cammack says fear caused by abortion-rights groups delayed the medical care she needed during a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy in May 2024. Doctors at the emergency room told Cammack she was about five weeks pregnant, but the pregnancy was ectopic and posed a serious risk to her life.(Bloomberg) Doctors at the emergency room told Cammack she was about five weeks pregnant, but the pregnancy was ectopic and posed a serious risk to her life. There was no heartbeat. Medical staff said she needed a shot of methotrexate to end the pregnancy, but since Florida's six-week abortion ban had just taken effect, they hesitated. They were afraid they could lose their licenses or face criminal charges. Cammack says she pulled up the law on her phone to show the staff that her situation was not illegal under state rules. She even tried to contact the governor's office. After several hours, doctors gave her the medication, as per The Guardian report. Also Read: USAID families have their lives upended by Trump move to shut agency Cammack, who is anti-abortion and co-chairs the House Pro-Life Caucus, told the Wall Street Journal she blames abortion-rights advocates for the delay. She says they have created fear around laws like Florida's, even though treatment for ectopic pregnancies is legal. 'It was absolute fearmongering at its worst,' Cammack said. She added that abortion rights groups would likely view her story differently and blame the laws, not the messaging. 'There will be some comments like, 'Well, thank God we have abortion services,' even though what I went through wasn't an abortion,' she told the paper. Florida's abortion law, which went into effect May 1, 2024, bans abortions after six weeks—before many people know they're pregnant. For months, doctors said the wording of the law left them unsure whether emergency treatments were allowed. In response, the state's health agency released guidance clarifying that care is legal if the pregnant person's life or health is in danger. Cammack says she wants to help both sides find some agreement Now pregnant again and due soon, Cammack says she wants to help both sides find some agreement. 'I would stand with any woman – Republican or Democrat – and fight for them to be able to get care in a situation where they are experiencing a miscarriage and an ectopic' pregnancy, she said. Ectopic pregnancies aren't abortions Abortion rights advocates say the law itself creates confusion. Florida health officials say ectopic pregnancies aren't abortions and are exempt from restrictions. But Molly Duane from the Center for Reproductive Rights told the Journal the law doesn't clearly define ectopic pregnancies, and those can be hard to diagnose. Alison Haddock, president of the American College of Emergency Physicians, said early pregnancy care is 'medically complicated' and that doctors in abortion-restricted states worry 'whether their clinical judgment will stand should there be any prosecution.'

Hindustan Times

2 hours ago

• Hindustan Times

Bengal girl killed allegedly after TMC workers hurled bombs during victory rally

Kolkata: A 13-year-old girl was killed in an explosion triggered by a crude bomb allegedly hurled by workers of the Trinamool Congress (TMC) while they were celebrating the party's victory in the bye-elections at Kaliganj in West Bengal's Nadia district on Monday afternoon. Police said they shall spare no stones unturned to nab the culprits . (Representational image) 'Today, a 13-year-old girl succumbed to her injuries sustained from an explosion in Kaliganj PS area of Krishnanagar police district. We shall spare no stones unturned to nab the culprits who were behind the incident. Raids are on in full swing to arrest those responsible for this extremely unfortunate death,' the state police wrote on X. Alifa Ahmed, the TMC candidate, won the bye-election by 50,049 votes. While Ahmed received 102,759 votes, Ashish Ghosh, the BJP-candidate, received 52,710 votes. The by-election was necessitated after the death of former TMC MLA Nasiruddin Ahmed in February this year. Nasiruddin Ahmed was the father of Alifa Ahmed. The TMC has been winning the seat since 2011. 'I am shocked and deeply saddened at the death of a young girl in an explosion at Barochandgar in Krishnanagar police district. My prayers and thoughts are with the family in their hour of grief. Police shall take strong and decisive legal action against the culprits at the earliest,' Mamata Banerjee, chief minister of West Bengal, wrote on X. Ziaul Sheikh, a local resident who was also beaten up, said, 'TMC workers and supporters were playing with green colour, shouting slogans, bursting crackers. Crude bombs were being hurled indiscriminately at the houses of CPI(M) and Congress workers and supporters. One such bomb killed the 13-year-old girl.' The TMC had first won the seat in 2011 when it came to power ending the 34-year-old Left regime. Nasiruddin Ahmed was elected the TMC legislator. In 2016, he lost the seat to Congress-CPI(M) alliance candidate Sheikh Hasanuzzaman. However, Hasanuzzaman later joined Trinamool. Nasiruddin reclaimed the Kaliganj seat in the 2021 Assembly polls. The seat fell vacant after his demise. The bye-election is being seen as a litmus test for both the ruling TMC and its arch rival the BJP ahead of the 2026 assembly elections.

First Post

3 hours ago

• First Post

Bilateral trade talks stall as US demands low duties on GM crops threaten India's farmers

As the Donald Trump administration of the United States has stuck to its maximalist demands, the India-US trade talks have stalled. The disagreement primarily lies over agricultural products and dairy products. read more The India-US trade talks have stalled as negotiators have made extractive demands but have not offered anything substantial in return. The main areas of dispute are agriculture, dairy, pharmaceuticals, and digital services. Officials have described the US position as that of take-it-or-leave-it. The news of trade talks hitting a hurdle has come at a time when US President Donald Trump's actions have soured the India-US relationship. Since last month, he has sought to intervene in the Kashmir conflict and consistently taken Pakistan's side in the India-Pakistan conflict and undermined India's position. He open embrace of jihadists and jihad sympathisers from West Asia to Central Asia has also compromised India's security interests. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If a deal is not reached by July 8, India would be slapped with 26 per cent tariffs as the pause announced in 'reciprocal tariffs' would come to an end. India-US trade talks stall over US demands The Trump administration has demanded India to allow lower-duty imports of US agricultural products like maize and soybean and India is resisting the demand, according to The Times of India. The government is concerned about the effect of such imports on farmers. There are also concerns about potential effects of genetically modified food on health. Sources told the newspaper that India-US trade talks have hit a hurdle. India had also expected to secure zero duty access to US markets for Indian textiles, leather goods, pharmaceuticals, and some engineering goods and automobile parts, but US negotiators have said that going down to zero tariffs immediately is not possible. Separately, Bloomberg has reported that the Trump administration wants India to remove tariffs and ease price controls on medical devices. It has also demanded India to relax its data localisation requirements for digital services. US following take-it-or-leave-it approach As the Trump administration has persisted with maximalist demands, an Indian officials told Mint that its dealings came off as a 'take-it-or-leave-it offer'. The newspaper further reported that India has made it clear to the Trump administration that unless it changes its animal feeding practices, such as the usage of non-vegetarian feed to cattle, US dairy products will not be allowed into India. 'The negotiations are not progressing as expected. The talks were meant to be two-way, as agreed. However, the US team's insistence on opening certain critical sectors comes across as a take-it-or-leave-it offer," a person familiar with the matter told the newspaper. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD