Republican hawks vs Maga isolationists: the internal war that could decide Trump's Iran response

As Donald Trump considers a direct intervention in Israel's conflict with Iran, another war has broken out in Washington between conservative hawks, calling for immediate US strikes on uranium enrichment facilities, and Maga isolationists, who are demanding Trump stick to his campaign pledge not to involve the US in new overseas wars.
At stake is whether the US could target the mountain redoubt that is home to the Fordow fuel enrichment plant, a key uranium enrichment site hidden 80 to 90 metres underground that cannot be targeted directly by Israeli jets – although they can attack some of the infrastructure that allows the plant to operate.
A direct strike would require the US Air Force's 30,000-pound class GBU-57/B massive ordinance penetrators and the US B-2 Stealth Bombers capable of carrying them, making Washington's sign-on a key goal for Israeli officials.
Related: Iran's nuclear sites have not suffered damage since Friday, says energy chief
'Mr Trump posted on social media Sunday that 'we can easily get a deal done' to end the war,' read a Wall Street Journal editorial this week. 'But that prospect will be more likely if he helps Israel finish the military job.
'If Mr Trump won't help on Fordow, Israel will need more time to achieve its strategic goals,' it went on. 'A neutral US means a longer war.'
Over the weekend, the US began to move airborne refuelling tankers to Europe and ordered a second carrier group, the USS Nimitz, to the Middle East, part of preparations experts say would be necessary for the strike. The US does not currently have B-2 bombers stationed in the region. A deployment of six stealth bombers returned from the Diego Garcia airbase in the Indian Ocean to the US in May.
'Trump's assembling the forces necessary to do the Fordow strike,' wrote Daniel Shapiro, a former Pentagon official for Middle Eastern affairs and ex-ambassador to Israel. 'Tankers, fighters, and the second carrier. Doesn't mean he has made the decision to do it but he's giving himself the option. Can that be leveraged to get a major Iranian concession that pre-empts the need for it?'
Senior White House officials have told US media that the refuelling tankers and other assets have been sent to Europe to station them closer to the Middle East and to give Trump 'more options'.
As US forces head to the region, Trump increased pressure on the Iranian government to cut a deal. On Monday, he posted that Iran 'should have signed the deal I told them to sign' and reiterated that 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON'.
'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' he added, referring to a city of about 10 million people.
Other US officials have sought to dampen speculation that the US is planning for an offensive strike on Iran.
'Over the weekend, I directed the deployment of additional capabilities to the United States Central Command Area of Responsibility,' said the secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, in a statement. 'Protecting US forces is our top priority and these deployments are intended to enhance our defensive posture in there region.'
Reports have suggested that Trump is seeking last-minute talks this week between Iran and his Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff.
But the escalating conflict – and America's possible role in it – has already led to a schism among vocal Trump supporters.
Some of Trump's most powerful allies, including his vice-president, JD Vance, have called for the US to restrain itself from sending its troops to fight wars overseas. Powerful pundits like Tucker Carlson have condemned the potential for US involvement in a war in Iran.
Speaking on a podcast, Carlson called out fellow media personalities as 'warmongers' and said that description 'would include anyone who's calling Donald Trump today to demand airstrikes and other direct US military involvement in a war with Iran'.
Trump took to social media to shout down Carlson, an influential ally and media personality who played an important role in popularising his America First platform.
'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that IRAN CAN NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,' Trump shot back.
The schism among Trump officials also runs through the Pentagon. Elbridge Colby, the undersecretary of defense for policy, is among the most prominent of a group of 'prioritisers' who had hoped to focus US resources away from Europe and the Middle East towards the growing threat from China. The Pentagon has denied there are any disagreements on policy within the department.
Those close to the group have said that traditional republicans such as Senator Tom Cotton, as well as senior Pentagon officials like Centcom Gen Michael Erik Kurilla, have continued to impress upon Trump the need for a more hawkish Iran policy.
Kurilla was seen as especially influential in pushing for 'Operation Rough Rider', the seven-week US campaign against the Houthis that was abruptly concluded after burning through more than $1bn, thousands of bombs and missiles, seven UAVs that were shot down and two fighter jets that sank after falling off carriers.
Asked last week by the House armed services chair, Mike Rogers, whether US Central Command (Centcom) was prepared to 'respond with overwhelming force to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran', Kurilla responded: 'Yes … I have provided the secretary of defense and the president a wide range of options.'
With Trump rushing back to Washington from a G7 meeting in Canada to an emergency national security council meeting, the potential for a strike against Iran appeared as high as at any time since the beginning of the crisis.
'What's happening here is some of the isolationist movement led by Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon are distressed we may be helping the Israelis defeat the Iranians,' Mitch McConnell, the former Senate Republican leader, told CNN. 'I would say it's been kind of a bad week for the isolationists.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fox News

18 minutes ago

• Fox News

Gabbard was in Situation Room on Iran, still key player despite Trump saying she was 'wrong' on intel

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was inside the Situation Room Saturday when the U.S. military launched successful strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, a White House official confirmed to Fox News Digital Sunday morning. A White House official confirmed Gabbard was in the room Saturday and that she is a "key player" on President Donald Trump's national security team. Speculation had mounted there was a rift between Gabbard and Trump after the president told the media Gabbard was "wrong" about intelligence on Iran back in March when she testified before the Senate that the nation was not actively building a nuclear weapon. Photos of the Situation Room released Saturday evening did not show Gabbard present alongside Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and other administration officials. The photos, however, did not include wide shots showing the entire room or each individual present, with the White House confirming the intelligence chief was present. Trump and Gabbard appeared at odds earlier in June, when the president was asked about Gabbard's testimony before the Senate in March, when she reported intelligence showed Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon. Trump told the media June 16 he did not "care" what Gabbard had to say in previous testimony, arguing he believed Iran was close to building a nuke. "You've always said that you don't believe Iran should be able to have a nuclear weapon," a reporter asked Trump while aboard Air Force One on June 16. "But how close do you personally think that they were to getting one?" "Very close," Trump responded. Then again Friday, Trump said Gabbard was "wrong" after she reported that Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon. "My intelligence community is wrong," Trump said when asked about the intelligence community previously reporting that Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon. When Gabbard appeared before the Senate Intelligence Committee in March, she delivered a statement on behalf of the intelligence community that included testimony that Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon. "Iran's cyber operations and capabilities also present a serious threat to U.S. networks and data," Gabbard told the committee March 26. The intelligence community "continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003," she said. She did add that "Iran's enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons." "Iran will likely continue efforts to counter Israel and press for U.S. military withdrawal from the region by aiding, arming and helping to reconstitute its loose consortium of like-minded terrorist actors, which it refers to as its axis of resistance," she warned. However, as critics picked apart Gabbard's past comments, the White House stressed to Fox Digital that Gabbard and Trump were closely aligned on Iran. A White House official told Fox News Digital on Tuesday afternoon that Trump and Gabbard are closely aligned and that the distinction being raised between Gabbard's March testimony and Trump's remarks that Iran is "very close" to getting a nuclear weapon is one without a difference. The official noted that Gabbard had underscored in her March testimony that Iran had the resources to potentially build a nuclear weapon. Her March testimony reflected intelligence she had received that Iran was not building a weapon at the time but that the country could do so based on the resources it amassed for such an endeavor. Gabbard took to social media and blasted the media for "intentionally" taking her March testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee "out of context." "The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division," Gabbard said in a Friday post on X, accompanied by a video clip of her March testimony to Congress. "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly," she wrote. "President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." Trump announced in a Saturday evening Truth Social post that the U.S. military had carried out strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran, obliterating them. Trump held an address to the nation later Saturday night, describing the strikes as wildly successful and backing Iran into a corner to make a peace deal. "A short time ago, the U.S. military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan," Trump said from the White House on Saturday evening. "Everybody heard those names for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise. Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity, and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number-one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success." "For 40 years, Iran has been saying, 'Death to America. Death to Israel.' They have been killing our people, blowing off their arms, blowing off their legs with roadside bombs," Trump continued. "That was their specialty. We lost over a thousand people, and hundreds of thousands throughout the Middle East and around the world have died as a direct result of their hate in particular." Fox News Digital reached out to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for any additional comment on the Sunday strikes, but did not immediately receive a reply.

Axios

22 minutes ago

• Axios

U.S. has "no interest" in putting troops on the ground in Iran, Vance says

Vice President Vance said Sunday that the United States doesn't plan to send ground troops into Iran and there is "no interest" in engaging in a "protracted conflict" with the nation. The big picture: Vance and other Trump administration officials appeared on Sunday shows to praise President Trump 's decision to carry out a series of airstrikes against three Iranian nuclear sites, while reassuring Americans that the mission — dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer — isn't the launching point for a wider conflict. Speaking on NBC's "Meet the Press," Vance called the mission a "precise, a very surgical strike tailored to an American national interest" — preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon — and that he had "no fear" of a drawn-out conflict. Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed the sentiment on CBS' "Face the Nation," saying that there are no plans from the U.S. to engage in further attacks on Iran unless they "mess around" and attack Americans or U.S. military sites. What they're saying: Rubio said Sunday that the U.S. carried out the attack after efforts to negotiate with Iran stalled, but that Trump administration officials are "prepared to talk to them tomorrow." Both men also dismissed the notion that the U.S. is at war with Iran, with Vance stating that the war is with Iran's nuclear program. "We destroyed the Iranian nuclear program. I think we set that program back substantially," Vance told NBC News' Kristen Welker. Zoom out: Vance and Rubio were unable to confirm the extent of the damage done to the nuclear sites, but Iran Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told CNN that the strike was a "betrayal of diplomacy." "No one knows what will happen next, but what is sure is that the responsibility of the consequences of this war must be borne by the United States and Israel," he said. Bagahei refused to say how Iran might respond to the U.S. strike, but said the nation is entitled to "exercise its right of self-defense."

CNN

24 minutes ago

• CNN

Dem. Senator Adam Schiff says 'we simply don't know' if US is safer after Iran strikes

Democratic Senator Adam Schiff speaks to Kasie Hunt about the congressional response to President Trump's order to strike Iran.