Trump hints at regime change in Iran after surprise attack on nuclear sites
US President Donald Trump on Sunday hinted at the possibility of regime change in Iran, questioning the future of Iran's ruling theocracy.
Trump's social media jab at the regime in Iran came after he ordered a surprise attack on three of the country's main nuclear sites, raising the risk of a broader war in the Middle East amid warnings from his supporters at home and allies and foes from abroad.
'It's not politically correct to use the term 'regime change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be a regime change,' Trump posted on social media.
His comments seemingly contradicted an earlier call to Iran for negotiations and de-escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict.
Trump's words also marked something of a reversal from his US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said.
Speaking on Fox News on Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that any retaliation against the US or a rush toward building a nuclear weapon would 'put the Iranian regime at risk.'
Rubio explained that what the US administration has made clear is that it wants Iran to stop any development of nuclear weapons.
'We're not at war with Iran,' US Vice President JD Vance said in a separate interview with NBC. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.'
According to him, the strike offers a chance to restart stalled talks on reducing Iran's nuclear program.
Despite the efforts of Trump's senior aides to clarify the situation and establish a coordinated message and strategy regarding US involvement or plans, Trump himself has made a series of threatening statements, even as he has simultaneously called for restarting negotiations.
Analysts believe the messaging makes it hard to get a complete read on whether the US president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the fighting between Israel and Iran that began earlier this month.
Related
US operation against Iran in detail: Bombs, planes and missiles used
Can Iran attack the US now and how (and where) can it do it?
Before Trump's post on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging from Trump's secretary of state, top military adviser, vice president, and head of the Pentagon indicated a belief that any fallout would be controlled.
The Israel-Iran conflict began on 13 June when Israel attacked Iran's military infrastructure, killing a number of Tehran's top commanders, including the country's intelligence chief Mohammad Kazemi and his deputy Hassan Mohaqiq, and several prominent nuclear scientists.
Iran responded with ballistic missiles and drone attacks on Israel, but Iran's military capabilities are believed to have been severely decimated after Israel's aerial campaign that took out much of Tehran's air defences and missile launchers.
At least 950 people have been killed by Israel's strikes on Iran, according to figures from a Washington-based group, Human Rights Activists, and 27 people have died in Israel from Iran's retaliatory strikes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
The Budget Bill Is Creating a Republican Existential Crisis
The Republican budget bill, a $3.7 trillion tax cut packaged with $1.2 trillion in spending cuts, is deeply problematic legislation from almost any perspective — including those of its authors. The Congressional Budget Office has the details about how it will be expensive and ineffectual. But for Republicans, President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is creating what amounts to an existential crisis. For half a century, Republicans have been committed to the policy of lower taxes to aid the economy — impervious to any evidence that tax cuts are inefficient and prohibitively expensive. At this point, to walk away from the bill is to abandon their economic raison d'etre.
Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bloomberg Surveillance TV: June 23, 2025
- Norman Roule, Senior Adviser at the Center for Strategic & International Studies - Daan Struyven, Head: Commodity Research at Goldman Sachs - Mark Esper, former US Secretary of Defense - Danny Danon, Israel's Ambassador to the United Nations Norman Roule, Senior Adviser at the Center for Strategic & International Studies, discusses the US strikes on Iran and what's next for conflict in the Middle East. Daan Struyven, Head: Commodity Research at Goldman Sachs, offers his outlook for oil and global commodities in the wake of the US' attack on Iran. Mark Esper, former US Secretary of Defense, talks about the strategy aimed at weakening Iran's nuclear capabilities and whether early indications show the US achieved its objectives. Danny Danon, Israel's Ambassador to the United Nations, talks about Israel's position in the Middle East after the US' strike on Iran.
Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Netherlands Defence Minister: NATO-wide 5% defence spend would be "historic"
Ruben Brekelmans, Netherlands Minister of Defence said they and their European partners support President Donald Trump's calls to encourage Iran to the negotiation table in order to "come to a sustainable solution". Speaking about the upcoming NATO meeting, he told Bloomberg's Oliver Crook "if we agree to 5% spending on core defence and defence-related matters, that would be a historic step" and said it would be of particular significance "if 32 allies in unity agree on this". (Source: Bloomberg)
