S Korea's leader vows to ‘heal wounds' with nuke-armed North
SEOUL: South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung vowed to reach out to the nuclear-armed North and 'heal wounds' as he took office Wednesday, after winning a snap election triggered by his predecessor's disastrous martial law declaration. South Korea's new center-left leader also warned that 'rising protectionism and supply chain restructuring' pose an existential threat to Asia's export-dependent fourth-largest economy, which has been buffeted by the global trade chaos sparked by US President Donald Trump. Lee scored a thumping victory over conservative Kim Moon-soo of the disgraced ex-president's former party. His term began immediately after the vote tally was certified Wednesday.
Lee secured 49.4 percent of the vote, ahead of the 41.2 percent for Kim - who conceded, having been hampered by party infighting and a third-party candidate splitting the right-wing vote. Lee spoke to South Korea's top military commander and formally assumed operational control of the country's armed forces Wednesday, urging them to maintain 'readiness' in case of Pyongyang's provocations - but said in his first comments that he was ready to talk. 'We will heal the wounds of division and war and establish a future of peace and prosperity,' he said. 'No matter how costly, peace is better than war.'
He said Seoul would 'deter North Korean nuclear and military provocations while opening communication channels and pursuing dialogue and cooperation to build peace on the Korean Peninsula'. Lee took office just hours before US tariffs on steel and aluminum were due to take effect, with the 50 percent levy hitting crucial South Korean exports. 'The rapid changes in the global order such as rising protectionism and supply chain restructuring pose a threat to our very survival,' Lee said. Markets reacted favorably to the election, with the benchmark KOSPI and the won rising Wednesday.
'Significant departure'
Lee's comments on North Korea are a 'significant departure' from those of his hawkish predecessor as he did not immediately attach preconditions to dialogue, said Hong Min, a senior analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification. It signals 'his desire to resolve disagreements through talks', Hong told AFP. Lee held a modest inauguration ceremony at the National Assembly - where Yoon deployed armed troops on the night he attempted to suspend civilian rule. Lee also announced a number of top appointments, including long-time adviser Kim Min-seok as prime minister and former unification minister Lee Jong-seok as spy chief. Lee's day is expected to end with a flurry of congratulatory phone calls from world leaders, with Trump likely to be the first on the line.
Trump's top diplomat, Marco Rubio, was swift to offer his own congratulations and voice hope for working with Lee, who previously sought greater distance from the United States. Washington's alliance with Seoul was 'ironclad', the US secretary of state said, citing 'shared values and deep economic ties'. In a statement, the White House described the election as 'free and fair'. But it added: 'The United States remains concerned and opposed to Chinese interference and influence in democracies around the world'.
Chinese President Xi Jinping congratulated Lee, while emphasizing the 'great importance to the development of China-South Korea relations'. 'The Chinese side is willing to work with the South Korean side to ... firmly maintain the direction of good-neighborly friendship, adhere to the goal of mutual benefit and win-win,' Xi said, according to state media CCTV. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba also said he wanted to 'energize cooperation' between Seoul and Tokyo, South Korea's former colonial ruler. And India's Narendra Modi said on X he wanted to 'strengthen' ties with Seoul as he congratulated Lee.
'Positive direction'
Lee comes to power with his party already holding a parliamentary majority - secure for the next three years - meaning he is likely to be able to get his legislative agenda done. On the streets of Seoul, South Koreans said they welcomed Lee's overtures to the North. 'Since our economy and many other aspects of society are closely linked to the state of inter-Korean relations, I hope we can take a long-term perspective and move in a more positive direction,' Choi Ki-ho, 55, told AFP. Lee Ju-yeon, a 42-year-old quasi-public sector employee, said they hoped Lee 'will devote himself to uniting our divided nation'. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
an hour ago
- Kuwait Times
US strikes on Iran nuclear sites are real-life test of hard power's limits
North Korea-style race for bomb is one possible scenario VIENNA: US military strikes overnight in which President Donald Trump said Iran's main nuclear sites were 'obliterated' will put to the test the widely held view that such attacks can delay a nuclear program but not kill a determined push for atom bombs. As Iran's nuclear program has expanded and become more sophisticated over the past two decades, many officials and nuclear experts have warned: You can destroy or disable a nuclear program's physical infrastructure but it is very hard or impossible to eliminate the knowledge a country has acquired. Western powers including the United States have publicly suggested as much, complaining of the 'irreversible knowledge gain' Iran has made by carrying out activities they object to. 'Military strikes alone cannot destroy Iran's extensive nuclear knowledge,' the Washington-based Arms Control Association said in a statement after the US strikes with massive bunker-busting bombs on sites including Iran's two main underground enrichment plants at Natanz and Fordow. 'The strikes will set Iran's program back, but at the cost of strengthening Tehran's resolve to reconstitute its sensitive nuclear activities, possibly prompting it to consider withdrawing from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and possibly proceeding to weaponization.' Zionist entity has also said it has killed Iranian nuclear scientists but, while little is known about the personnel side of Iran's nuclear program, officials have said they are sceptical about that having a serious impact on Iran's nuclear knowledge, even if it might slow progress in the near term. The West says there is no civilian justification for Iran's enrichment of uranium to near weapons-grade fissile purity. Iran says its nuclear objectives are solely peaceful and it has the right to enrich as much as it wants. Iran's nuclear program has made rapid advances since Trump pulled the United States out of a 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers that placed strict limits on its atomic activities in exchange for sanctions relief. After the US withdrawal in 2018 and the re-imposition of US sanctions, Iran pushed past and then far beyond the limits imposed by the deal on items like the purity to which it can enrich uranium and how much it can stockpile. At least until Zionist entity's first strikes against its enrichment installations on June 13, Iran was refining uranium to up to 60 percent purity, a short step from the roughly 90 percent that is bomb-grade, and far higher than the 3.67 percent cap imposed by the 2015 deal, which Iran respected until the year after Trump pulled out. The last report on May 31 by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog that inspects Iran's nuclear facilities, showed Iran had enough uranium enriched to up to 60 percent, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. It has more at lower levels like 20 percent and 5 percent. The exact impact of Zionist and US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and materials has yet to be determined. In addition to the enrichment sites, the US struck Isfahan, where officials have said much of Iran's most highly enriched uranium stock was stored underground. One important open question is how much highly enriched uranium Iran still has and whether it is all accounted for. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow, the site producing the bulk of Iran's uranium refined to up to 60 percent, had been moved to an undisclosed location before the US attack there. Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi told state TV last weekend Iran would take measures to protect nuclear materials and equipment that would not be reported to the IAEA, and it would no longer cooperate with the IAEA as before. The IAEA has not been able to carry out inspections in Iran since the first Zionist airstrikes nine days ago, but has said it is in contact with the Iranian authorities. What Iran will do next in terms of its nuclear program is also unclear. Its threat to pull out of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty hints at a race for nuclear weapons, but Iran has maintained it has no intention of doing so. The only other country to announce its withdrawal from the NPT is North Korea in 2003. It expelled IAEA inspectors and went on to test nuclear weapons. 'Our biggest concern is that we end up with a North Korea scenario whereby these strikes convince the Iranians that the only way to save the regime is to go for the bomb. Nobody is bombing North Korea now, are they?' a European official said. Even if inspections continue, because of Trump's withdrawal in 2018 Iran had already scrapped extra IAEA oversight provided for by the 2015 deal. That means the agency no longer knows how many centrifuges Iran has at undeclared locations. The IAEA says that while it cannot guarantee Iran's aims are entirely peaceful, it also has no credible indication of a coordinated nuclear weapons program. The Zionist and now US strikes have already raised fears among diplomats and other officials, however, that Iran will use those centrifuges to set up a secret enrichment site, since one could be built inside a relatively small and inconspicuous building like a warehouse. 'It is quite possible that there are enrichment sites that we don't know about. Iran is a big country,' a Western official said, while adding that Iran could also choose to bide its time. 'In two years, if Iran were to start from scratch, they would only need a few months to reconstitute a new program and to get back to where they were yesterday.' — Reuters
Kuwait Times
an hour ago
- Kuwait Times
Olympic chief Kirsty's steeliness honed by hard knocks
PARIS: First impressions can be deceptive but Kirsty Coventry showed that behind a sunny disposition she will have the mettle to deal with the trickiest of people and situations when she succeeds Thomas Bach as president of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) on Monday. Looming large on the horizon of the 41-year-old Zimbabwean—the first woman and African to occupy the post of the most powerful single figure in sport—is US President Donald Trump. With Los Angeles hosting the 2028 Olympics, Trump will feature often on Coventry's agenda. Trump has not been shy in giving public dressing downs to world leaders—notably Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his South African counterpart Cyril Ramaphosa. Judging by Coventry's initial response, after a crushing first-round victory in the presidential election in March, she may have Trump's measure. 'I have been dealing with, let's say, difficult men in high positions since I was 20 years old,' she said, adding 'communication will be key.' Unlike Trump, though, Coventry embraces the word failure, for it helped forge her stellar career. 'Everything's scary. Embrace that. You have to fail,' Coventry told the swimming team at her American alma mater Auburn University last year. 'I've learned the best lessons by failing, and I have failed at many things. Life has a really good way of humbling you.' At the same time that steely resolve comes to the surface when winning is at stake. 'I was banned from playing card games with the family, because they didn't like to deal with me when I lost,' she said. A glance at Coventry's CV suggests failure in her life has been relative. Coventry, who had the Olympic rings tattooed on a leg after her first Games in 2000, is a two-time Olympic gold medalist and she has contributed seven of Zimbabwe's overall Games medals tally of eight. She has accrued domestic political experience, as she was Zimbabwe's Minister for Youth, Sport, Arts and Recreation from 2019 to this year. That attracted some flak as she was serving in a government whose election in 2023 was declared to be 'neither free nor fair' by the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ). 'I don't think you can stand on the sidelines and scream and shout for change,' she said in her defence. 'I believe you have to be seated at the table to try and create it.' Her record as a minister has been heavily criticized by the Zimbabwean arts community in particular. Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa, whose predecessor Robert Mugabe labelled Coventry 'a golden girl' and awarded her $100,000 after she came back with a gold medal from Beijing in 2008, hit back. 'Whoever was not impressed by her can appoint someone else when they become president,' said the 82-year-old. 'Very hard times' In 2004, Coventry gave an insight into why she would later accept such a poisoned chalice and how whites in Zimbabwe have to perform a delicate balancing act. 'Zimbabwe is my home,' she said after returning to a heroine's parade after winning her first gold medal at the Athens Olympics. 'It's where I was born. It's my culture. I will always represent Zimbabwe. Colour doesn't matter to me. 'I think every country goes through bad years and good years.' Coventry had a largely urban upbringing. Her parents Rob and Linn owned a chemicals firm in a suburb of Harare, but the farming evictions—where predominantly white farm owners were forced off their lands in their early 2000s—affected her too. 'I have had very close family members and friends on farms who have gone through very hard times,' said Coventry. Away from the controversies she has shown decisive leadership in dealing with Zimbabwean football chiefs and FIFA. She backed the government body Sports and Recreation Commission (SRC) when it suspended the Zimbabwean Football Association (ZIFA) over allegations of fraud and sexual harassment of referees. FIFA has a zero tolerance policy of political interference in its associations and barred Zimbabwe from international football in February 2022. However, by September the same year they were back in the fold. A ZIFA official was later banned for five years for sexually harassing three female referees. Coventry said in 2023 that the process had been 'hard, but it was worth it, to have a way forward that's going to benefit us as a country'. Those tempted to mess with Coventry in the years to come have been duly warned. — AFP
Arab Times
4 hours ago
- Arab Times
What else will happen to Iran?
THE saying 'East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet' once held true in ancient times, but today, with advances in communication and technology, it has become outdated. Yet, this mindset still influences Eastern elites, contributing to the ambiguous relationship between the West, Europe, and the Middle East. There is a long history of negotiations between Middle Eastern countries and the West and Europe, often ending in favor of the latter. Consequently, talks between the United States, Iran, and Europe frequently reveal ambiguity surrounding Iran's stance, especially on critical existential issues like the nuclear program. Iranian negotiators often rely on a culture of ambiguity, manipulation of terminology, and postponement of decisions under the guise of further study. On the other hand, a clear and direct response is the best way to resolve difficult issues that could otherwise cause more hardship for the people. Questions persist about Iran's intentions to acquire a nuclear weapon, and why it enriches uranium to levels far beyond what is needed for peaceful nuclear activities, levels dangerously close to those required for producing a nuclear bomb. This question is not only raised by the West and the United States but also by Iran's friends and neighbors. Because the answers are unconvincing, ambiguity has become a core element of the issue. Even after the 2015 nuclear agreement was signed, Tehran failed to reassure the other parties involved. Consequently, the world witnessed that as soon as Washington withdrew from the agreement in 2018, Tehran rapidly increased its uranium enrichment to higher levels, threatening global peace and bringing Iran closer to possessing a nuclear bomb. Allowing inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) access to Iran's nuclear reactors was insufficient, and surveillance cameras proved ineffective, as many nuclear facilities were undisclosed. This situation fueled doubts and suspicions that the Tehran regime has yet to dispel. Furthermore, a mere religious fatwa forbidding the possession and use of nuclear weapons is not enough to reassure the international community, especially since such fatwas can be quickly revoked or amended, as recent reports circulating from Iran indicate. It is true that some countries have possessed nuclear weapons but have not used them, except for the United States, which dropped nuclear bombs on Japan in 1945 and has since come to understand the horrific consequences of their use. Moreover, the world does not tolerate any country being subjected to an existential threat, especially when that country already exists, is internationally recognized, and enjoys the support of many Western and international nations, namely, Israel. Therefore, when former US President Trump stated that 'Iran is raising the slogan of annihilating Israel and the United States,' it represents a serious threat to Western consciousness that cannot be dismissed or minimized as mere rhetoric for domestic audiences. This issue has placed the current Iranian regime in a critical position and has become a major obstacle to any solution that could reassure the international community. This explains the muted international response to the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. Tehran still looks to the example of isolated North Korea, which possesses nuclear weapons, yet the world collectively agrees to prevent their use, due to North Korea's limited capabilities on one hand, and the reluctance of its own allies to permit the use of nuclear weapons on the other. All of this stems from an Eastern culture of ambiguity, whereas what is truly needed is clarity in positions. Some may argue that Israel practices strategic ambiguity regarding its possession of weapons of mass destruction. However, this policy cannot be justified. Tel Aviv fully understands that any attempt to use nuclear weapons would provoke global condemnation, especially from the United States, which would be the first to punish Israel for crossing the red lines set by Washington and the West. Ultimately, Israel is a functioning state that cannot make unilateral decisions without consulting its allies, and those who are perceptive will understand this reality.
