Bacterial toxin implicated In young adult colon cancers
Colon cancer cases have been increasing among younger adults, and now researchers think they've identified a potential culprit.
A bacterial toxin called colibactin, produced by certain strains of E. coli, appears to alter gut DNA in a way that prompts colon cancer, researchers report in the journal Nature.
Colibactin leaves behind specific patterns of DNA mutations that are more than three times as common in early-onset colon cancers, specifically in adults younger than 40 compared to those 70 or older, results show.
Researchers suspect colibactin-producing bacteria may be silently colonizing children's colons, setting the stage for cancer in midlife and beyond.
"These mutation patterns are a kind of historical record in the genome, and they point to early-life exposure to colibactin as a driving force behind early-onset disease," senior researcher Ludmil Alexandrov said in a news release. He is a professor of bioengineering and cellular and molecular medicine at the University of California-San Diego.
Colon cancers have been steadily increasing among people under 50, so much so that guidelines have been updated to lower the age of screening to 45.
Colon cancer rates increased by 2.4% a year among people younger than 50 between 2012 and 2021, according to the American Cancer Society. Likewise, death rates in people under 55 have been increasing about 1% a year since the mid-2000s.
At the same time, colon cancers have been declining among older adults, thanks to screening methods like colonoscopy, the ACS says.
For the new study, researchers analyzed 981 colon cancer samples collected from patients in 11 countries.
The analysis revealed that colibactin is a common toxin among these cases, particularly in early-onset colon cancers.
The results show that colibactin's damaging effects begin early in tumor development, and account for about 15% of the earliest genetic alterations that directly promote cancer development.
"If someone acquires one of these driver mutations by the time they're 10 years old," Alexandrov explained, "they could be decades ahead of schedule for developing colorectal cancer, getting it at age 40 instead of 60."
More research now is needed to figure out how children are being exposed to colibactin-producing bacteria, and what can be done about it, researchers said.
The team also is working on an early detection test that could analyze stool samples for colobactin-related mutations.
"This reshapes how we think about cancer," Alexandrov said. "It might not be just about what happens in adulthood -- cancer could potentially be influenced by events in early life, perhaps even the first few years.
"Sustained investment in this type of research will be critical in the global effort to prevent and treat cancer before it's too late."
More information
The American Cancer Society has more on colon cancer rates.
Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
6 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Slash your biological age by up to 16 years by doing this one thing during your daily walk — new study says
There's a way to roll back the clock on your biological age — and, according to a new(ish) study, you can do it on your daily walk. No frills, no nonsense, just a small tweak for big results. We already know there are many benefits to walking, including a boost to your cardiovascular health, stronger muscles, bones and joints, ramped up calorie burn, a healthier metabolism and better mood and emotional wellbeing. If that's not enough, research straight out of Britain has shown that one particular aspect of your walks could supercharge your results, including reducing your biological age by up to 16 years. Yep, you read that correctly. And no, it's not 10,000 steps, a weighted vest, or walking backwards. This is the one thing you need to know the next time you lace up a pair of the best hiking boots and head out. Research, published in Nature in 2022, found that your speed could play a role in cutting your biological age. The study assessed over 400,000 Brits and biological age (how quickly you're aging based on chemical markers) and found that speed made a difference. Results showed that those with a steady to average and brisk walking pace 'had significantly longer LTL compared with slow walkers.' LTL, meaning leucocyte telomere length, is a marker of biological age. Using 'accelerometer-assessed measures of physical activity,' the researchers found associations between longer LTL and 'habitual activity intensity,' rather than total amount of activity. In other words, your pace may do more for your health than total steps. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. While it's true that the more you move during the day, the better for your metabolism and overall health, we now know that you don't need 10,000 steps every day to maximize it; as little as 7,000 steps per day could be enough! But if you plan to track your step count, making your walk more brisk could be more beneficial across the same distance than an amble. That said, I love a slow walk, and recently took up intuitive walking to boost mindfulness, so I'm a firm believer in a time and place for everything. Given that brisk walking, like power walking, can have a positive impact on weight management and cardiovascular fitness, it checks out that this could also improve your biological age, too. So what about speed? The study used self-reported walking pace, providing participants with a touchscreen Q&A and response options of 'slow,' 'steady/average,' or 'brisk.'Slow pace was defined as less than 3mph, steady pace was between 3 -4mph and brisk walking was over 4mph. There you have it. A faster walking pace is associated with longer LTL, potentially cutting up to 16 years off your biological age. The study showed that brisk walkers had a biological age of up to 16 years younger, and that brisk walking could lead to a younger biological age rather than the other way around. The study also suggests that time spent habitually in higher-intensity activities like brisk walking had a stronger association with biological age than the total amount of walking or distance. All in all, this supports the idea that more intensive and habitual movement, like increased walking pace, can impact biological markers and overall health. And better still, if you increase your pace, even a short walk could boost longevity.
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Safer Sunscreens: Selecting Healthy and Reef-Safe Products
Choosing sunscreen that is healthy and reef-safe can be challenging. As summer temperatures soar and we flock to beaches, pools, and outdoor recreation areas, choosing the right sunscreen is important but challenging. On one hand, the American Cancer Society estimates that more than 100,000 Americans will be diagnosed with invasive melanoma in 2025. On the other hand, some sunscreen ingredients are linked to hormone disruption and other health harms. And then there's the fact that approximately 14,000 tons of sunscreen wash into coral reefs annually, contributing to the destruction of marine ecosystems. How can our sunscreen choices balance these concerns? Mineral Sunscreens Are Safer Than Chemical Sunscreens Under current FDA guidelines, only two active ingredients are classified as "Generally Recognized As Safe and Effective" (GRASE): zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. These mineral-based compounds work by creating a physical barrier on the skin that reflects and scatters ultraviolet radiation away from the body. In contrast, the FDA has requested additional safety data for 12 chemical sunscreen ingredients, including avobenzone, oxybenzone, octinoxate, and octocrylene. This is because there is growing evidence that these chemicals can be absorbed through the skin and may pose health risks. Mineral sunscreens are also more reef-safe. Oxybenzone and octinoxate, two of the most common chemical sunscreen ingredients, have been identified as primary drivers of coral bleaching, a process that strips corals of their life-sustaining algae and leaves them vulnerable to disease and death. These chemicals also disrupt the endocrine systems and brains of fish. Mineral-based alternatives like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide pose no known harm to coral reefs or other marine life. Sunscreen Lotions Are Safer Than Sprays And Mists While spray sunscreens are convenient, they may be the worst choice for both human health and the environment. This is because aerosol delivery systems release significant quantities of sunscreen into the air rather than onto skin. These airborne particles can travel considerable distances before settling on surfaces, potentially contaminating areas far from where we applied the sunscreen. When used near beaches, lakes, or other water bodies, spray sunscreens directly introduce chemicals into aquatic environments without the intermediate step of skin contact. There is also a risk of inadvertent inhalation of spray sunscreen particles, especially when products are used on children. Additionally, achieving adequate coverage with spray formulations proves challenging, often resulting in uneven protection and increased sunburn risk. Picking The Best Sunscreens How can you tell which sunscreens are safe for your health and for reefs? Check the label. The Surfrider Foundation's "HEL list" (Harmful Elements List) provides a clear framework for ingredients to avoid: oxybenzone, octinoxate, octocrylene, 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, PABA, parabens, triclosan, microplastics like 'exfoliating beads,' and nanoparticles. The organization emphasizes avoiding nano-sized zinc oxide and titanium dioxide particles, which may pose risks to marine ecosystems despite their mineral origin. If you're looking for specific brand recommendations, here are some expert guides: There are also helpful shopping resources like Clearya. This free platform functions as both a browser extension and mobile app, automatically scanning product ingredients against comprehensive databases of potentially harmful chemicals. You can scan sunscreens while shopping on major retail platforms like Amazon, Sephora, and Walmart, receiving instant feedback on product safety. Beyond Sunscreen: Comprehensive Sun Safety Strategies Although sunscreen is effective, it's important to remember that physical barriers are our first line of defense against UV radiation. Wide-brimmed hats provide excellent protection for faces, necks, and ears—areas often inadequately covered by sunscreen application. Lightweight, long-sleeved shirts and pants offer extensive coverage while remaining comfortable in hot weather. Avoiding direct sun exposure during peak intensity hours (typically 10 AM to 4 PM) can also significantly reduce overall radiation exposure. Seeking shade whenever possible provides natural protection. So, what's the takeaway here? Prioritize mineral sunscreens with zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, choose lotion formulations over sprays, and prioritize comprehensive sun safety strategies that protect both our health and the precious marine ecosystems.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Health care workers on alert for ICE raids in hospitals
President Trump's whittling away of protected places for immigrants has fueled fears among health care workers that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents will arrest patients in or around hospitals. In January, the Trump administration rescinded a Biden-era policy that protected certain areas like churches, schools and hospitals from immigration enforcement. And lawmakers in at least one state have introduced legislation aimed at making it easier for ICE to make arrests in hospitals. As the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) seeks to ramp up ICE raids at hotels, restaurants, farms and other sites, nurses worry their workplace could be next. 'We were all worried about what this meant,' Michael Kennedy, a nurse at a University of California, San Diego health facility located very near the U.S.-Mexico border, said of the policy changes under Trump. 'As we've seen these immigration raids ramp up, our first thought is about our patients and what that means for them.' ICE agents made a record number of migrant arrests in a single day this month and have appeared outside of courthouses in Seattle and stores in the New York City area. The agency's workplace raids in Los Angeles spurred days of protests, which in turn prompted a heavy-handed response from the Trump administration. Sandy Reding is a nurse at a hospital in Bakersfield, Calif., which serves communities of farm workers and employs a diverse staff. 'There is a lot of concern [about] ICE agents showing up with FBI or with the military, because we've seen a lot of reports on TV, and we have reports in our area where this is happening as well,' she said. Reding and her fellow nurses, she said, are also worried that the news of increased ICE raids will deter some patients from coming to the hospital to seek care. 'What we are going to see is a large burden on communities and hospitals if people delay care,' Reding said. 'And there are worse outcomes.' Nancy Hagan, an intensive care unit nurse at Maimonides Medical Center in New York City, said those concerns have come to fruition at her hospital. In May, she said, an immigrant New Yorker had appendicitis but waited too long to go to the emergency room. Their appendix burst, spreading infected tissue and bacteria to other organs, which ultimately killed them. 'Once patients hear that a hospital is no longer a safe place for them to go, they are afraid to come to the hospital,' she said. Hagan, a Haitian immigrant, added that she and her colleagues, who work at hospitals across the city, have noticed that emergency rooms appear to be emptier in recent months. Kennedy, the nurse in San Diego, said the Level 1 trauma center, which is typically packed, has been emptier than usual. He admitted the decline in patient visits could be seasonally related, but he said he believes that the possibility of ICE agents arresting immigrants is having a 'chilling effect.' 'I can't see how this doesn't affect our patients' willingness to seek care,' he said. 'I'm willing to bet that a lot of people are delaying care because they're afraid.' ICE did not get back to The Hill in response to questions on whether agents have arrested people in or around hospitals, or if there are plans to do so. DHS announced in January that it had rescinded former President Biden's guidelines on immigration enforcement at 'sensitive locations' that were first issued under former President Obama. 'The Trump Administration will not tie the hands of our brave law enforcement, and instead trusts them to use common sense,' a DHS spokesperson said at the time. The National Immigration Law Center said that while immigrants no longer have special protections at hospitals and other 'sensitive locations,' they still have basic rights. 'Instead, individuals will need to rely on basic constitutional protections in these spaces,' it said in a fact sheet. 'Specifically, the Fourth Amendment protects all individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Fifth Amendment ensures the right to remain silent when confronted by law enforcement.' The Emergency Medicine Residents' Association has distributed a flyer with step-by-step guidance for health care workers on dealing with ICE agents if they do enter hospitals. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
