In Kananaskis, the G7 held together, but showed signs of strain
After Prime Minister Mark Carney and President Donald Trump met one-on-one for 30 minutes on Monday morning, but before their respective teams joined to continue the discussion, the two leaders invited reporters and television cameras into a meeting room in Kananaskis, Alta. to witness them exchanging formal pleasantries.
Carney opened by wishing the president a happy belated birthday and then noted the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army (the reason for Trump's military parade in Washington this past weekend). The prime minister then segued to the fact this was the 50th anniversary of these meetings of the leaders of the world's most powerful democracies.
"And the G7 is nothing without U.S. leadership, your personal leadership, leadership of the U.S.," Carney said.
In fairness, Carney also told German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that "we'd be nowhere without Germany and without you personally" and he said that French President Emmanuel Macron, the current dean of the G7 leaders, offered "essential" leadership. But perhaps, given the context, this suggestion to Trump resonates differently.
On one level, this no doubt flattered the president, personally. Perhaps it could even be read as an entreaty for the United States to remain engaged and allied with the nations of the G7.
On another level, it might read as a simple statement of the obvious — about the central, historic importance of the United States to the G7, about American influence over a body that operates on consensus or about the simple mathematical reality that the G7 without the United States would be the G6.
On a higher level, Carney's comments might have spoken to the central tension of this week's meetings in Kananaskis and the larger questions about the G7's utility and future in a world where Trump is president of the United States.
On a different level, there is also the question of whether the United States still wants to lead — or in what direction and in what ways.
Some or all of this might be said to have hung over the two days of meetings that Carney chaired in Alberta — two days that highlighted both the potential value and the real strains of a grouping that at least made it through its 50th meeting without falling apart.
Indeed, moments after Carney's opening comments, the challenge of finding consensus became loudly apparent when Trump, unprompted, began to lament (again) that Russia was expelled from what had been the G8 in 2014. When a reporter asked him whether China should also be invited, Trump agreed.
Carney, appearing increasingly eager to get on with the rest of his meeting with the president, finally stepped forward and encouraged reporters to be on their way.
WATCH | What Carney achieved at the G7 after Trump left:
What Carney achieved at the G7 after Trump left
6 hours ago
Duration 7:33
Despite the shadow cast by U.S. President Donald Trump's early departure, Prime Minister Mark Carney pressed ahead with his G7 goals, but did he get everything he wanted? The National breaks down the summit's big moments and what waning U.S. interest means for the G7 in the future.
At that point, the 50th meeting of the Group of Seven was still an hour or so away from officially beginning — shortly after concluding his meeting with Trump, Carney would go outside to officially welcome each leader to the summit.
"We're gathering at one of those turning points in history. A turning point where the world looks to this table for leadership," Carney said, perhaps a little hopefully, when the leaders gathered around a circular table inside to begin their formal talks. "We might not agree on absolutely every issue, but where we will cooperate, we will make an enormous difference, for our citizens and for the world."
Approximately 12 hours later, Trump departed by helicopter, pleading that he needed to return to Washington urgently to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict.
Where the G7 leaders agree and disagree
The president's early exit from Kananaskis recalled his early departure from Charlevoix in 2018 and thus might suggest something about Trump's interest in these forums. But before he left he still claimed to have enjoyed himself this time.
"I tell you, I loved it," Trump told reporters at the G7's family photo. "And I think we got a lot done."
As foreshadowed by Canadian officials last week, the Kananaskis summit did not produce the sort of expansive joint communique — a formal expression of the G7's shared views and desired actions — that typically follows these kinds of international confabs. Instead, the summit ended with narrower statements on artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, migrant smuggling, transnational repression, critical minerals and responding to wildfires.
Limiting the desired results to those topics likely prevented a more acrimonious summit. But the differences were still impossible to completely paper over.
WATCH | Carney pledges support for Ukraine to wrap G7:
Carney pledges support for Ukraine to wrap G7
5 hours ago
Duration 3:18
Canada pledged $4.3 billion in support for Ukraine and added sanctions to Russia, as the G7 summit wrapped in Alberta. Prime Minister Mark Carney met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the summit's final day.
The leaders did ultimately agree to issue a statement on the situation with Israel and Iran, but according to reporting by the Washington Post and the Guardian references to "restraint" and a ceasefire were removed at the behest of American officials. And Trump then attacked Macron on social media on Monday night after Macron suggested Trump might push for a ceasefire.
Official comments on Ukraine may or may not have run into some difference of opinion. But after repeated questions from reporters at his closing news conference, Carney acknowledged that "there would be things that some of us, Canada included, would say above and beyond what was said in the chair's summary."
And while the leaders did agree about the threat of wildfires, the text of their agreement does not explicitly refer to "climate change."
What was it like in the room?
"Over the past few days," Carney reported on Tuesday evening, "Canada has worked with our G7 partners to determine where we can cooperate, build resilience and lasting prosperity."
That this G7 summit came to a conclusion without a major falling-out will likely be viewed as a mark of success. Carney seemed comfortable in the chairman's seat — at least during the few moments that were broadcast publicly. And tangible progress may ultimately flow from what the leaders agreed to, however much the paper output of this summit may have left something to be desired.
That the strains and limitations are still apparent will no doubt continue to raise questions about the exact nature of the G7's future.
But after the time for questions from reporters on Tuesday had expired, Carney decided to pose a question to himself that no one had asked: "What was it like in the room?" And in answering his own question, he offered an implicit defence of the institution based on the value of dialogue (echoing comments that a former U.S. State Department official recently made to CBC News).
WATCH | Carney addresses the room where it happens:
Carney addresses the room where it happens
7 hours ago
Duration 2:14
In his final remarks at the G7 news conference, Prime Minister Carney offered a personal reflection on the summit, telling reporters that the discussions over the past two days were marked by a range of differing opinions, frank conversations, and strategic exchanges.
"The advantage of, particularly, the G7 is that there are only, oddly, nine people in the room," Carney said (meetings of the G7 typically include the presidents of the European Council and European Commission). "And there is a great amount of direct dialogue and discussion. Very frank exchanges, very strategic exchanges. Differences of opinion on a number of issues. But from an effort to find common solutions to some of these problems."
These exchanges, Carney said, are very important for building relationships and trust. "At a time when multilateralism is under great strain … that we got together, that we agreed on a number of areas … that's important, that's valuable."
However much the world has changed and whatever the state of American leadership, the members of the G7, including the United States, apparently still see value in gathering around the G7's table.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
18 minutes ago
- CTV News
U of R professor found liable of defamation for calling a book ‘racist garbage'
Image is file of McLean reading her book. A University of Regina professor has been found liable for defamation after calling a book critical of the Neil Stonechild inquiry 'racist garbage.' The book's author, Candis McLean, filed the lawsuit eight years ago. Justice Neil Robertson issued his written decision on June 13 at the Regina Court of King's Bench. 'I'm absolutely thrilled to get this decision,' McLean said in an interview with CTV News. McLean's 2016 book, When Police Become Prey: The Cold, Hard Facts of Neil Stonechild's Freezing Death, challenged the findings of the inquiry into Stonechild's death. The inquiry concluded the 17-year-old from Saulteaux First Nation was taken into custody by two Saskatoon police officers on the night he froze to death in November 1990. The book claims to clear the names of the two officers who were fired from the Saskatoon Police Service as part of the broader 'Starlight Tours' scandal, where police were accused of dropping Indigenous people on the outskirts of the city in freezing temperatures. When McLean planned book signings in Saskatchewan, they were met with backlash from the Saskatchewan Coalition Against Racism. University of Regina professor Michelle Stewart was among those opposed, urging venues to cancel the signings. She also called the book 'racist garbage' on Facebook. In his ruling, Justice Robertson found Stewart made the post without reading the book. 'Having read the book, I do not find that it is racist,' he wrote. He added that while the comment targeted the book, the term 'racist' could reasonably be associated with its author. 'If a reasonable person believed that the book was racist, they might then believe that the author was as well,' Robertson said. He noted that 'racist' is a 'highly charged word' and should not be 'thrown around carelessly.' Stewart was also found liable for inducing a breach of contract by contacting venues and urging them to cancel McLean's events. McLean sought $165,642 in damages. The court awarded her $6,450, including $1,000 in general damages for defamation, $3,000 for inducing breach of contract, and $2,450 in actual damages related to the cancellations. She was not awarded any additional special, aggravated or punitive damages. McLean said while she's 'disappointed' with the amount, her lawyer reminded her they were fighting for 'the principle of free speech.' 'I'm hoping that the activists will now realize there are limits to their behavior,' she said. 'They deserve freedom of speech, but not to the point where it impinges on others.' CTV News reached out to Stewart and her lawyer but did not get a response by publication.
Vancouver Sun
19 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Letters to The Sun: Community services not keeping up with development in Vancouver
Being a long-time Vancouver resident, I've seen the evolution of the city firsthand. There are so many amazing attributes to enjoy and be proud of, but the current direction of city council and development at all costs is not one of them. They work to build more housing — great, but then delay the needed investments in renewals for community services and amenities, which is a travesty. Add 24,000 people to the old Jericho lands, 64,000 people to the Broadway corridor, three towers at Commercial and Broadway, perfect. A replacement 50-metre pool at the Vancouver Aquatic Centre, I don't think so. A new Britannia Community Centre, delay that. More park and recreation amenities, no, let's just cram the people in. Given this current trajectory, the Vancouver of tomorrow will be a far cry in terms of livability from what people know today. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Levi Higgs, east Vancouver B.C. Ferries announced on June 10 that the bidding process to replace four aging vessels resulted in contracts going to China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards. Since then, loud accusations have come from all corners and levels of British Columbia's political spectrum, with many incendiary comments from professional pundits and members of the public. Many declare that the vessels should be built in Canada, although no Canadian yard answered the invitation to bid. Then come claims that China is untrustworthy in trade tariffs and international politics. Some dissenters worry about the quality of steel used in Chinese shipyards, along with perceived lack of expertise of welders and other trades. Having spent a large chunk of my life working on freighters and tankers criss-crossing the oceans, it's amazing to hear so much negative rhetoric from those who should know better. Hardly ever mentioned is that China has been the world's leading commercial shipbuilder for many years, and is far more cost-competitive than anywhere else. Latest figures show China accounting for 62 per cent of global shipbuilding orders. China produces and delivers to all parts of the world just about everything used in our daily lives, from vehicles to appliances to electronics, and everything in between. China manufactures the goods and builds the ships to transport them — they also build huge gantry cranes that load and discharge containers at ports worldwide. These cranes arrive from China on purpose-built heavy-lift vessels, of course. Recently, U.S. President Donald Trump blustered that he would revitalize the shipbuilding in the U.S., but industry experts advise that it is five times as expensive to build comparable ships in America than in China. I rest my case. Bernie Smith, Parksville British Columbians should be concerned about the B.C. government's reported plan to purchase ferries from a Chinese state-linked shipyard. This raises serious ethical and security concerns, especially given China's increasingly aggressive behaviour in the Indo-Pacific, including its harassment of neighbouring countries and threats to regional stability. Just last year, Canadian naval vessels were confronted by Chinese warships in international waters near Taiwan. It would be troubling for B.C. to direct public funds to a shipbuilder linked to a regime known for threatening peace and democracy. There are also cybersecurity risks. Modern ferries are not just mechanical — they rely on embedded digital systems that could be vulnerable to interference, particularly if sourced from authoritarian states. Premier David Eby should cancel the deal and commit to sourcing from democratic countries instead. Public infrastructure should reflect our values and protect our security, not compromise them. Gabriel Yiu, Vancouver Re: Alberta minister 'optimistic' B.C. tanker ban will be lifted During a visit to Prince Rupert, Alberta's minister of transportation and economic corridors, Devin Dreeshen, questioned why there is a ban on oil tanker ships to and from that port but no ban on similar ships at the Port of Vancouver. Dreeshen is too young to remember the Exxon Valdez oil spill that fouled the northwest coast. The moratorium is its legacy. Nevertheless, Dreeshen pointed out that American oil tanker ships routinely carry Alaskan crude oil down the west coast. I wonder if the diluted bitumen from Alberta poses more of an environmental risk in the event of a tanker spill than a spill of Alaskan crude oil? After passing new legislation to expedite national projects, I expect the new Mark Carney federal government will lift the northwest oil shipping ban by pledging to expand the 'world class' emergency response infrastructure at the Port of Vancouver to include the Port of Prince Rupert. Derek Wilson, Port Moody
CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
U.S. federal judge blocks Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students
Rowers paddle down the Charles River near the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., on March 7, 2017. (Charles Krupa / AP Photo) BOSTON — A U.S. federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration's efforts to keep Harvard University from hosting international students, delivering the Ivy League school another victory as it challenges multiple government sanctions amid a battle with the White House. The order from U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston preserves Harvard's ability to host foreign students while the case is decided, but it falls short of resolving all of Harvard's legal hurdles to hosting international students. Notably, Burroughs said the federal government still has authority to review Harvard's ability to host international students through normal processes outlined in law. Harvard sued the Department of Homeland Security in May after the agency abruptly withdrew the school's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork for their visas, skirting most of its usual procedures. The action would have forced Harvard's roughly 7,000 international students - about a quarter of its total enrollment - to transfer or risk being in the U.S. illegally. New foreign students would have been barred from coming to Harvard. The university said it was experiencing illegal retaliation for rejecting the White House's demands to overhaul Harvard policies related to campus protests, admissions, hiring and more. Burroughs temporarily had halted the government's action hours after Harvard sued. Less than two weeks later, in early June, U.S. President Donald Trump tried a new strategy. He issued a proclamation to block foreign students from entering the U.S. to attend Harvard, citing a different legal justification. Harvard challenged the move, saying the president was attempting an end-run around the temporary court order. Burroughs temporarily blocked Trump's proclamation as well. That emergency block remains in effect, and Burroughs did not address the proclamation in her order Friday. 'We expect the judge to issue a more enduring decision in the coming days,' Harvard said Friday in an email to international students. 'Our Schools will continue to make contingency plans toward ensuring that our international students and scholars can pursue their academic work to the fullest extent possible, should there be a change to student visa eligibility or their ability to enroll at Harvard.' Students in limbo The stops and starts of the legal battle have unsettled current students and left others around the world waiting to find out whether they will be able to attend America's oldest and wealthiest university. The Trump administration's efforts to stop Harvard from enrolling international students have created an environment of 'profound fear, concern, and confusion,' the university said in a court filing. Countless international students have asked about transferring from the university, Harvard immigration services director Maureen Martin said. Still, admissions consultants and students have indicated most current and prospective Harvard scholars are holding out hope they'll be able to attend the university. For one prospective graduate student, an admission to Harvard's Graduate School of Education had rescued her educational dreams. Huang, who asked to be identified only by her surname for fear of being targeted, had seen her original doctoral offer at Vanderbilt University rescinded after federal cuts to research and programs related to diversity, equity and inclusion. Harvard stepped in a few weeks later with a scholarship she couldn't refuse. She rushed to schedule her visa interview in Beijing. More than a month after the appointment, despite court orders against the Trump administration's policies, she still hasn't heard back. 'Your personal effort and capability means nothing in this era,' Huang said in a social media post. 'Why does it have to be so hard to go to school?' An ongoing battle Trump has been warring with Harvard for months after the university rejected a series of government demands meant to address conservative complaints that the school has become too liberal and has tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Trump officials have cut more than US$2.6 billion in research grants, ended federal contracts and threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. On Friday, the president said in a post on Truth Social that the administration has been working with Harvard to address 'their largescale improprieties' and that a deal with Harvard could be announced within the next week. 'They have acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations, and appear to be committed to doing what is right,' Trump's post said. Trump's administration first targeted Harvard's international students in April. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded that Harvard turn over a trove of records related to any dangerous or illegal activity by foreign students. Harvard says it complied, but Noem said the response fell short and on May 22 revoked Harvard's certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. The sanction immediately put Harvard at a disadvantage as it competed for the world's top students, the school said in its lawsuit, and it harmed Harvard's reputation as a global research hub. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the lawsuit said. The action would have upended some graduate schools that recruit heavily from abroad. Some schools overseas quickly offered invitations to Harvard's students, including two universities in Hong Kong. Harvard President Alan Garber previously said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. But Harvard, he said, will not stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles,' even after receiving federal ultimatums. By Collin Binkley.
