Germany rejects Uganda's ‘subversive activities' accusation
The German Foreign Ministry on Monday dismissed Uganda's accusations that Berlin's ambassador, Mathias Schauer, had been involved in illicit meddling in the East African country's affairs.
A ministry spokesperson said that Berlin 'strongly condemned' the allegations, describing them as 'absurd' and 'baseless'.
What are Uganda's allegations against the German ambassador?
In an X post published on Sunday, Ugandan military spokesperson Chris Magezi said that Kampala had received 'credible intelligence reports' that the German ambassador had been 'actively engaged in subversive activities' in Uganda.
He said that Uganda's army would suspend all cooperation with Germany.
'The Uganda People's Defence Forces has with immediate effect suspended all ongoing defence and military cooperation activities with the Federal Republic of Germany,' Magezi said.
Ugandan troops participate in an African Union peacekeeping force in Somalia, a mission partially funded by the European Union.
What is the political situation in Uganda?
Earlier in the month, Ugandan military chief Muhoozi Kainerugaba warned that the EU was 'playing with fire' after a group of European diplomats met senior members of the National Unity Platform (NUP) opposition party, including leader Bobi Wine.
Peter Busomoke/AFP
Kainerugaba is the son of President Yoweri Museveni and is likely to succeed the 80-year-old strongman, who has been in power since 1986.
Wine, who was a popular musician before launching his political career, has been put under house arrest by Ugandan authorities multiple times.
Another major Ugandan opposition figure, Kizza Besigye of the Forum for Democratic Change (FDC), was jailed in November.
Last August, 36 FDC members were charged with terrorism, an accusation rights groups argued was politically motivated.
Valerie Macon/AFP
Uganda has also been criticised by Western governments and rights groups for a 2023 law imposing penalties of up to life in prison for consensual same-sex relations and containing provisions allowing the death penalty for 'aggravated homosexuality'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump said he was giving Iran a window to come to the table. He struck 2 days later.
It was just on Thursday that President Donald Trump said he would decide "within the next two weeks" on whether to order a U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities -- ostensibly to give diplomacy a chance, at least temporarily. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Trump said in a statement read to reporters by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. On Friday, asked by a reporter to explain his thinking, he responded it was to give time for the Iranians to "come to their senses." MORE: Israel-Iran live updates: Trump addresses nation after attack on Iranian nuclear sites The president also dismissed the talks held in Geneva Friday between European diplomats and Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, playing down the already low expectations for a breakthrough. "They didn't help," Trump said of the discussions. "Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one." He added, "we are ready, willing and able and have been speaking to Iran and we'll see what happens." MORE: Israel-Iran live updates: Trump announces attack on Iranian nuclear sites When a reporter asked, "Does Iran have two weeks or could you strike before that? Are you essentially giving them a two-week timeline?" Trump answered, "Well I'm giving them a period of time. We're going to see what that period of time is. But I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum." MORE: White House says Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in 'a couple of weeks' In recent days, Iran has rebuffed a standing offer from the U.S to resume nuclear negotiations. The president's announcement Thursday about a possible delay in hitting Iran frustrated Israeli officials, who have been privately pushing their case for U.S. military involvement for months, according to officials familiar with the matter. Meanwhile, as sharp differences between Israeli and American assessments on Iran's nuclear abilities came to the forefront, Trump also showcased distrust for his own intelligence community, including his own director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. MORE: Transcript: President Donald Trump addresses nation after US strikes on Iran On Friday, Trump was asked about Gabbard's testimony to Congress in March that the U.S. assessed that Iran was not "building" a nuclear weapon and that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei had not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003. "She's wrong," Trump said flatly. Shortly after Trump spoke, Gabbard criticized the news media, posting on X, "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." Speaking to the nation late Saturday night -- about two hours after he announced the strikes -- Trump said, "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier."
News24
2 hours ago
- News24
SA Post Office chases R1.5bn profit by 2029 in ambitious five-year turnaround plan
Gallo Images Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now Show Comments ()
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Massachusetts lawmakers react to U.S. strikes on Iran, calling them "unconstitutional"
Massachusetts lawmakers reacted to President Trump's announcement that the U.S. had successfully attacked three nuclear sites in Iran. Lawmakers react to U.S. strikes on Iran Senator Elizabeth Warren took to X right before Mr. Trump spoke at 10 p.m. about the strikes. She said, "The United States should not wage war against Iran. Donald Trump's bombing of Iran is unconstitutional. Only Congress can declare war — and the Senate must vote immediately to prevent another endless war. This is a horrific war of choice." Senator Ed Markey released a statement on the strikes, saying that a "diplomatic solution remains the best way" to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. "Trump's military attack on Iran was illegal and unconstitutional. This attack was not approved by Congress and holds dangers for all Americans. The American people do not want another endless war in the Middle East... Trump's illegal actions raise the risk of escalation into a wider regional war with grave risks for U.S. troops and personnel and civilians in the region." Markey finished by calling on Mr. Trump to begin ceasefire talks with Israel and Iran. Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley reacted on X shortly after the news broke, saying, "This is a violation of the Constitution that is risking innocent lives. We do not need another deadly, endless war. Congress must act immediately to rein in Trump." Representative Jake Auchinloss called for action, saying, "Two things should happen immediately: - Iran surrenders its nuclear program & ceases funding terrorists. - Congress revokes the 2001 & 2002 war authorities so that the American public can get an open & thorough debate on war-making." Representative Jim McGovern said that Congress must return to Washington immediately to stop the U.S.'s involvement in Iran: "This is insane. Trump just bombed Iran without Congressional approval, illegally dragging us into war in the Middle East. Have we not learned our lesson!?!?"
