logo
Americans are witnessing immigration arrests firsthand. Many say they can't just watch

Americans are witnessing immigration arrests firsthand. Many say they can't just watch

Independenta day ago

Barefoot and armed with only his iPhone, poet and podcast producer Adam Greenfield raced out of his San Diego home after his girlfriend alerted him to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) vehicles pulling up in their neighbourhood.
Nursing a cold, Mr Greenfield joined a handful of neighbours recording masked agents raiding a popular Italian restaurant nearby, as they collectively yelled at officers to leave.
Within an hour, the impromptu gathering swelled to nearly 75 people, many positioning themselves in front of the agents' vehicles. "I couldn't stay silent," Mr Greenfield said. "It was literally outside of my front door."
The incident reflects a growing trend across the United States, where more citizens are witnessing immigration arrests unfold in public spaces – from shops and gyms to restaurants – as President Donald Trump's administration aggressively works to increase such detentions.
This heightened visibility is prompting many Americans, including those who rarely engage in civil disobedience, to spontaneously record events on their phones and launch protests in response.
Greenfield said on the evening of the May 30 raid, the crowd included grandparents, retired military members, hippies, and restaurant patrons arriving for date night. Authorities threw flash bangs to force the crowd back and then drove off with four detained workers, he said.
'To do this, at 5 o'clock, right at the dinner rush, right on a busy intersection with multiple restaurants, they were trying to make a statement,' Greenfield said. "But I don't know if their intended point is getting across the way they want it to. I think it is sparking more backlash.'
Previously many arrests happened late at night or in the pre-dawn hours by agents waiting outside people's homes as they left for work or outside their work sites when they finished their day. When ICE raided another popular restaurant in San Diego in 2008, agents did it in the early morning without incident.
White House border czar Tom Homan has said agents are being forced to do more arrests in communities because of sanctuary policies that limit cooperation with ICE in certain cities and states. ICE enforces immigration laws nationwide but seeks state and local help in alerting federal authorities of immigrants wanted for deportation and holding that person until federal officers take custody.
Vice President JD Vance during a visit to Los Angeles on Friday said those policies have given agents 'a bit of a morale problem because they've had the local government in this community tell them that they're not allowed to do their job."
'When that Border Patrol agent goes out to do their job, they said within 15 minutes they have protesters, sometimes violent protesters who are in their face obstructing them,' he said.
Melyssa Rivas had just arrived at her office in the Los Angeles suburb of Downey, California one morning last week when she heard the frightened screams of young women. She went outside to find the women confronting nearly a dozen masked federal agents who had surrounded a man kneeling on the pavement.
'It was like a scene out of a movie,' Rivas said. 'They all had their faces covered and were standing over this man who was clearly traumatized. And there are these young girls screaming at the top of their lungs.'
As Rivas began recording the interaction, a growing group of neighbors shouted at the agents to leave the man alone. They eventually drove off in vehicles, without detaining him, video shows.
Rivas spoke to the man afterward, who told her the agents had arrived at the car wash where he worked that morning, then pursued him as he fled on his bicycle. It was one of several recent workplace raids in the majority-Latino city.
The same day, federal agents were seen at a Home Depot, a construction site and an LA Fitness gym. It wasn't immediately clear how many people had been detained.
'Everyone is just rattled,' said Alex Frayde, an employee at LA Fitness who said he saw the agents outside the gym and stood at the entrance, ready to turn them away as another employee warned customers about the sighting. In the end, the agents never came in.
Arrests at immigration courts and other ICE buildings have also prompted emotional scenes as masked agents have turned up to detain people going to routine appointments and hearings.
In the city of Spokane in rural eastern Washington state, hundreds of people rushed to protest outside an ICE building June 11 after former city councilor Ben Stuckart posted on Facebook. Stuckart wrote that he was a legal guardian of a Venezuelan asylum seeker who who went to check in at the ICE building only to be detained. His Venezuelan roommate was also detained.
Both men had permission to live and work in the U.S. temporarily under humanitarian parole, Stuckart told The Associated Press.
'I am going to sit in front of the bus,' Stuckart wrote, referring to the van that was set to transport the two men to an ICE detention center in Tacoma. 'The Latino community needs the rest of our community now. Not tonight, not Saturday but right now!!!!'
The city of roughly 230,000 is the seat of Spokane County, where just over half of voters cast ballots for Trump in the 2024 presidential election.
Stuckart was touched to see his mother's caregiver among the demonstrators.
'She was just like, 'I'm here because I love your mom, and I love you, and if you or your friends need help, then I want to help,'' he said through tears.
By evening, the Spokane Police Department sent over 180 officers, with some using pepper balls, to disperse protesters. Over 30 people were arrested, including Stuckart who blocked the transport van with others. He was later released.
Aysha Mercer, a stay-at-home mother of three, said she is 'not political in any way, shape or form." But many children in her Spokane neighborhood -- who play in her yard and jump on her trampoline -- come from immigrant families, and the thought of them being affected by deportations was 'unacceptable," she said.
She said she wasn't able to go to Stuckart's protest. But she marched for the first time in her life on June 14, joining millions in 'No Kings' protests across the country.
'I don't think I've ever felt as strongly as I do right this here second,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE Inside the ferocious power struggle to control Trump's daily intelligence briefing as he tiptoed toward Iran decision
EXCLUSIVE Inside the ferocious power struggle to control Trump's daily intelligence briefing as he tiptoed toward Iran decision

Daily Mail​

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Inside the ferocious power struggle to control Trump's daily intelligence briefing as he tiptoed toward Iran decision

A high-stakes power struggle sprang up inside the U.S. intelligence community as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard moved to wrest control of President Donald Trump 's daily intelligence briefing from the CIA, the Daily Mail has learned. With the Iran and Israel war in full swing, the Russia-Ukraine war still churning and Chinese military forces training at an accelerated pace, whoever controls the distribution of the nation's most classified intelligence has the upper hand in shaping the decision-making process in whether to wage war. Last month, Gabbard ruffled feathers by threatening the CIA's influence after reasserting the ODNI's authority over the president's daily briefing (PDB), a role long dominated by the CIA. 'She's trying to move, physically move and take control of the President's daily brief,' one senior intelligence official told the Daily Mail. Despite the intelligence director taking over responsibility for the PDB in 2004, the CIA maintained the internal systems capable of creating the intelligence reports, which often contain much of the agency's classified information distilled into digestible memos. But Gabbard's attempt to shift production and delivery of the PDB from CIA headquarters in Langley to her own office has rattled the traditional power structure. 'Obviously, that controls what the president sees,' the source said. 'So she's, I would say, probably caused a lot of ripples within the CIA, especially within the DA, the Director of Analysis, by saying, "Hey, I'm going to take the PDB physically from Langley and move it down the street to the ODNI,"' the source said. Ratcliffe, the CIA director, is not necessarily thought to be grappling for the president's attention, the official confirmed. But others at Langley have been miffed by the recent move. 'Of course, the CIA is unhappy because they want to keep control of the product,' one ODNI official told the Daily Mail. 'Their phrase at the CIA is 'Whoever controls the information the President sees, controls the President.'' 'By housing the PDB staff under the ODNI, the production process aligns more closely with the ODNI's mission to integrate foreign, military, and domestic intelligence,' the official continued. 'This will yield a more cohesive and holistic intelligence product that reflects contributions from all IC agencies, reducing the risk of CIA dominance in the PDB's content.' The CIA did not return the Daily Mail's request for comment. 'There are a lot of folks at the agency, in particular, the Directorate of Analysis, they're used to being the final say,' the senior intelligence official shared. 'They're not used to someone saying, "Hey, I'm gonna ask you some questions about this."' Presidents have received regular morning briefings - comprised of intelligence on the most pressing national security issues - since Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s. Compiling intelligence reports has traditionally fallen to the CIA, specifically its Directorate for Analysis. Though in 2004 the Intelligence Reform Act created the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which then began overseeing the PDB. The ODNI has publicly confirmed last month that some functions located at the CIA will now be moved to the ODNI, including the staff who oversee the PDB. Gabbard is responsible for overseeing all 18 federal intelligence agencies, including the CIA, though its Director John Ratcliffe is also a Cabinet member, creating a natural tension between the two agencies and its staff. While the war in Iran and Israel moves into its second week without any indication of a ceasefire, sources familiar with the DNI have shared that Gabbard is in nearly constant contact with the president on intelligence matters. 'She's been in every meeting,' a White House official told the Daily Mail. The official added Gabbard has been spotted at the White House nearly every day since the start of the conflict. CIA Director Ratcliffe has also reportedly been one of the key figures advising Trump on the war while suggesting the DNI has taken a back seat. Reports of internal jockeying within the administration come just as the president is at what is perhaps the most tenuous point of his second term. 'I think those are coming from people who either like drama for the sake of drama, or they're trying to give the CIA more power,' the official shared. 'I think people are trying to play the palace intrigue game,' he added. 'It's a power play.'

JD Vance says US at war with Iran's nuclear program, not Iran
JD Vance says US at war with Iran's nuclear program, not Iran

Reuters

time42 minutes ago

  • Reuters

JD Vance says US at war with Iran's nuclear program, not Iran

WASHINGTON, June 22 (Reuters) - Vice President JD Vance said on Sunday the U.S. was not at war with Iran but at war with its nuclear program, adding the program had been pushed back by a very long time due to American strikes ordered by President Donald Trump. Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes overnight with massive bunker-busting bombs, joining Israel's assault against its Middle East rival in a significant new escalation of conflict in the region. "We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program," Vance said in an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker" show "I think that we have really pushed their program back by a very long time. I think that it's going to be many, many years before the Iranians are going to be able to develop a nuclear weapon." Vance accused Iran of not negotiating in good faith, which he said served as a catalyst for U.S. strikes. The U.S. had been in diplomatic talks with Iran about Tehran's nuclear program. Tehran vowed to defend itself while UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he was "gravely alarmed" by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. "We don't want a regime change," Vance added. "We do not want to protract this... We want to end the nuclear program, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here." Vance said Trump made the final decision to strike Iran right before the strikes took place and that Washington has received some "indirect" messages from Tehran since the strikes. Vance said the U.S. "had no interest in boots on the ground." Trump said on Friday he was going to decide in the next two weeks about direct U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran war which began with Israel's attacks on Iran on June 13. The war has raised alarm in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. U.S. ally Israel is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons and says it struck Iran to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear program is peaceful, is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. Many Democratic U.S. lawmakers said Trump's actions were unconstitutional and that it was the U.S. Congress that had the power to declare war on foreign countries. Vance responded to that criticism by saying Trump had "clear authority to act to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction."

Florida Republicans racially gerrymandered two state senate districts, court hears
Florida Republicans racially gerrymandered two state senate districts, court hears

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Florida Republicans racially gerrymandered two state senate districts, court hears

Republicans in Florida racially gerrymandered two key state senate districts to disenfranchise Black voters and skew results in the Tampa Bay area, a panel of judges has heard. In one district, they took a small chunk of St Petersburg heavy with minority voters and added it to an area of Tampa in a different county, and across a 10-mile waterway, leaving the remainder of its electorate 'artificially white', the court was told. Lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, representing voters at a four-day trial in Tampa last week, said the state's defense that the waters of Tampa Bay made the new district contiguous was ridiculous, pointing out in the lawsuit that 'manatees don't vote'. 'These are cities on opposite sides of the bay and there's no way to go directly between them,' Caroline McNamara, an ACLU staff attorney, said. 'You either have to go across 10 miles of open ocean at the mouth of Tampa Bay, or you have to cut through other districts in the area through the north end.' The case has direct parallels in previous moves by Republican officials in Florida to manipulate voting districts to their advantage by undercutting Black voting power. Ron DeSantis, the hard right governor, was behind a move in 2022 to redraw congressional maps to secure four additional seats, a plan that resulted in white Republicans winning all four races in northern Florida while cutting the number of districts in which Black voters had a chance to elect a candidate of their choice from four to two. 'It was a lynching,' Brenda Holt, a Black commissioner in Gadsden county, told the Guardian at the time. In the Tampa Bay case, the three judges will give their ruling at a later date on whether the Republican-held senate's 2022 redistricting process was unconstitutional. A decision in favor of the plaintiffs would require a redrawing of Florida's 16th and 18th senate districts, subject to appeal. Currently, the state senator for the split district is Darryl Rouson, a Democrat, who maintains offices in both St Petersburg and Tampa, and must drive through the middle of another district to get from one to the other. 'It's like all of the voters have half a senator, half of the time. It's crazy,' McNamara said. 'Every year there's big celebrations on Martin Luther King Day in January, and he has to alternate years whether he's in St Petersburg or Tampa, because he can't do both.' One of the three plaintiffs, Keto Nord Hodges, a Black Hillsborough county voter, told the court he felt underrepresented. 'We don't really see Senator Rouson in Tampa. I can't remember the last time I saw him,' he said. While the Tampa side of the district Rouson represents was always reliably Democratic, and he secured almost twice the number of votes than his Republican opponent in the 2022 election, the removal of Black voters from St Petersburg diluted their voting power in the newly created district there, the lawsuit states. Republican Nick DiCeglie, who is white, coasted to victory over his Democratic challenger Eunic Ortiz, who is Hispanic and openly gay, in 2022 by more than 30,000 votes in one of the country's most diverse cities. Effectively, the ACLU argued, the maps represent racial gerrymandering because they pack about half of the region's Black population into a single one of the its five senate districts. 'This trial laid bare what many communities have long felt, that Florida's mapmakers chose politics over fairness,' Bacardi Jackson, executive director of the ACLU of Florida, said in a statement. 'When lawmakers choose to prioritize outdated assumptions about where Black voters 'belong' over meaningful representation, it reinforces structural inequities. We're here to ensure that voters in Tampa and St Petersburg are no longer crammed into one district in a way that diminishes the value of their votes.' McNamara dismissed the arguments of lawyers for Cord Byrd, the Florida secretary of state, and Ben Albritton, the Florida senate president, that the maps complied with state law requiring any redistricting process to ensure minority voters have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. 'They just thought this is a box to check they probably wanted to do what they needed to do but not more,' she said. 'We say that they didn't even do what they needed to do, like they just didn't take it seriously, they were dismissive throughout the process.' The Florida department of state did not respond to the Guardian's requests for comment. McNamara said that although DeSantis had no direct role in drawing the senate maps, the process took place against the governor's backdrop of 'disenfranchisement and attacks on communities of color'. She said: 'You could say this is just a technical thing, or it's about numbers, and sure, who cares if it crosses water? 'But the fact they're like, 'who cares if these two completely far-flung areas are joined together without any real connection, and the only basis for doing it is the color of the people's skin?' Well, that's exactly the issue that the 14th amendment of the constitution has a problem with.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store