
Tikehau Capital: Disclosure of Shares Repurchases from 06 June 2025 to 12 June 2025
PARIS, June 13, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Regulatory News:
In accordance with Article 5 of EU Regulation n° 596/2014 (Market Abuse Regulation), detailed information is available on the website of Tikehau Capital (Paris:TKO): https://www.tikehaucapital.com/fr/shareholders/regulatory-information
Name of the issuer
Issuer Identity Code (LEI)
Trading Day
ISIN
Aggregated volume per day (number of shares)
Weighted average price per day
Market (MIC Code)
TIKEHAU CAPITAL
969500BY8TEU16U3SJ94
06/06/2025
FR0013230612
1,016
19.1754
XPAR
TIKEHAU CAPITAL
969500BY8TEU16U3SJ94
09/06/2025
FR0013230612
463
19.1254
XPAR
TIKEHAU CAPITAL
969500BY8TEU16U3SJ94
10/06/2025
FR0013230612
1,071
19.0114
XPAR
TIKEHAU CAPITAL
969500BY8TEU16U3SJ94
11/06/2025
FR0013230612
892
19.0490
XPAR
TIKEHAU CAPITAL
969500BY8TEU16U3SJ94
12/06/2025
FR0013230612
1,086
18.8606
XPAR
TOTAL
4,528
19.0311
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250613906813/en/
Contacts
Tikehau Capital
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Redfin Reports U.S. Home Prices Hit All-Time High
While the median home-sale price is sitting at a record high, it's notably lower than the median asking price. That's because sellers are open to negotiating in today's cooling housing market, in which sellers outnumber buyers. SEATTLE, June 20, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--(NASDAQ: RDFN) — The median U.S. home-sale price hit a record $396,500 during the four weeks ending June 15, up 1% year over year, according to a new report from Redfin ( the technology-powered real estate brokerage. Prices are at an all-time high even though this spring's housing market is fairly cool because prices don't yet fully reflect the historic imbalance of sellers and buyers in today's market. Note that sale prices are seasonal and typically peak in June or July, and that price growth is cooling: The 1% year-over-year increase is in line with the last several weeks, but down from about 5% at the start of the year. While the median sale price is at an all-time high, it's roughly $26,000 lower than the median asking price of $422,238. That 6% discount is similar to that of the last several weeks, but marks a reversal from 2021 and 2022, when the median sale price was typically much higher than the median list price because the market favored sellers. Homes are selling for under asking price because there are many more sellers than buyers in today's market. That gives buyers the upper hand and often allows them to negotiate prices down, though it's still difficult for many people to afford homes because costs are so high. New listings of homes for sale are up 4.4% year over year, and total listings are up 14.5%. Meanwhile, pending sales are down 1.5% year over year, and mortgage-purchase applications are down 3% week over week. Homebuying demand has been fairly weak this spring due to widespread economic uncertainty and high housing costs. In addition to sale prices sitting at an all-time high, the median monthly housing payment is just $53 shy of its own all-time high. "I'm explaining to sellers more and more that we need to be strategic in our pricing strategy because homes that are overpriced, even slightly, are likely to sit on the market and invite buyers to negotiate," said Kelly Connally, a Redfin Premier agent in Tulsa, OK. "Pricing is most important, but with fewer buyers than usual out there, sellers should also make sure their home is in excellent condition and be ready to make repairs upon inspection. There are a few exceptions: Homes in desirable locations that are in perfect condition are still hot and typically sell at or above asking price." The mismatch between supply and demand is likely to lead to a nationwide decline in home-sale prices by the end of the year. For Redfin economists' takes on the housing market, please visit Redfin's "From Our Economists" page. Leading indicators Indicators of homebuying demand and activity Value (if applicable) Recent change Year-over-year change Source Daily average 30-year fixed mortgage rate 6.87% (June 18) Down slightly from 6.93% one week earlier Down from 7.04% Mortgage News Daily Weekly average 30-year fixed mortgage rate 6.81% (week ending June 18) Down from 6.89% three weeks earlier, but still near the highest level since Feb. Down from 6.95% Freddie Mac Mortgage-purchase applications (seasonally adjusted) Down 3% from a week earlier (as of week ending June 13) Up 14% Mortgage Bankers Association Redfin Homebuyer Demand Index Down 5% from a month earlier (as of week ending June 15) Up 1% A measure of tours and other homebuying services from Redfin agents Touring activity Up 36% from the start of the year (as of June 16) At this time last year, it was up 28% from the start of 2024 ShowingTime, a home touring technology company Google searches for "home for sale" Up 10% from a month earlier (as of June 16) Unchanged Google Trends Key housing-market data U.S. highlights: Four weeks ending June 15, 2025 Redfin's national metrics include data from 400+ U.S. metro areas, and are based on homes listed and/or sold during the period. Weekly housing-market data goes back through 2015. Subject to revision. Four weeks ending June 15, 2025 Year-over-year change Notes Median sale price $396,500 1% All-time high Median asking price $422,238 5% Median monthly mortgage payment $2,820 at a 6.81% mortgage rate 4.5% Down $53 from May's record high Pending sales 87,397 -1.5% New listings 102,784 4.4% Active listings 1,160,350 14.5% Smallest increase in 15 months Months of supply 4 +0.7 pts. 4 to 5 months of supply is considered balanced, with a lower number indicating seller's market conditions Share of homes off market in two weeks 37.2% Down from 41% Median days on market 36 +5 days Share of homes sold above list price 28.6% Down from 32% Average sale-to-list price ratio 99.1% Down from 99.6% Metro-level highlights: Four weeks ending June 15, 2025 Redfin's metro-level data includes the 50 most populous U.S. metros. Select metros may be excluded from time to time to ensure data accuracy. Metros with biggest year-over-year increases Metros with biggest year-over-year decreases Notes Median sale price Philadelphia (5.5%) New Brunswick, NJ (5.4%) Pittsburgh (5.3%) Nassau County, NY (5%) New York (4%) Oakland, CA (-5.9%) Jacksonville, FL (-3.9%) Dallas (-3.1%) San Diego (-2.4%) Atlanta (-2%) Declined in 12 metros Pending sales Cincinnati (5.2%) Chicago (5%) Dallas (4.1%) San Francisco (4%) Columbus, OH (4%) San Jose, CA (-18.5%) Fort Lauderdale, FL (-15.5%) Las Vegas (-14.9%) Miami (-14.6%) San Diego (-11.1%) New listings Warren, MI (14%) Cincinnati (13.7%) Columbus, OH (11.3%) Cleveland (10.3%) Indianapolis (9.5%) Tampa, FL (-11.5%) Orlando, FL (-8.7%) Jacksonville, FL (-7.2%) San Jose, CA (-7%) Atlanta (-6.6%) To view the full report, including charts, please visit: About Redfin Redfin ( is a technology-powered real estate company. We help people find a place to live with brokerage, rentals, lending, and title insurance services. We run the country's #1 real estate brokerage site. Our customers can save thousands in fees while working with a top agent. Our home-buying customers see homes first with on-demand tours, and our lending and title services help them close quickly. Our rentals business empowers millions nationwide to find apartments and houses for rent. Since launching in 2006, we've saved customers more than $1.8 billion in commissions. We serve approximately 100 markets across the U.S. and Canada and employ over 4,000 people. Redfin's subsidiaries and affiliated brands include: Bay Equity Home Loans®, Rent.™, Apartment Guide®, Title Forward® and WalkScore®. For more information or to contact a local Redfin real estate agent, visit To learn about housing market trends and download data, visit the Redfin Data Center. To be added to Redfin's press release distribution list, email press@ To view Redfin's press center, click here. View source version on Contacts Contact RedfinRedfin Journalist Services:Tana Kelleypress@ Sign in to access your portfolio

Wall Street Journal
17 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Oil Futures Diverge on U.S. Holiday Price Lag, Contract Expiration
Oil prices were mixed in European afternoon trade on Friday, with Brent crude down more than 2% to around $77 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate edging 0.7% higher to $74 a barrel. Brent futures fell after President Trump set a two-week deadline to decide whether the U.S. will strike Iran, easing fears of an imminent military intervention. The international oil benchmark had settled 2.8% higher on Thursday at $78.85, its highest close since January.


Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
Dispute Resolution: Is Decentralization The Answer?
Saro McKenna is the CEO of Dacoco GmbH and cofounder of Alien Worlds. Although the godfather of online dispute resolution, Ethan Katsh, once observed that "the power of technology to resolve disputes is exceeded by the power of technology to generate disputes," as human beings, we cannot help ourselves. Even the prospect of AI sentience and bots capable of overpowering their flesh-and-bone creators cannot halt our penchant for relentlessly leveraging tech to achieve advancement in one area or another. As far as disputes are concerned, the technology that has increasingly been used to intercede is blockchain. This is no surprise. Of all the suggested use cases for a censor- and tamper-proof decentralized digital ledger, jurisprudence rightly ranks high. Over the past decade, many technologists have attempted to adapt traditional legal concepts and resolve conflicts on-chain, with mixed success. So, why is blockchain considered the best "lawtech" tool to settle disputes? Decentralized dispute resolution is appealing because of its ability to bypass centralized authorities that are prone to bias or bureaucracy. Smart contracts and empowered jurors streamline arbitration, handling all kinds of disputes with transparency. As traditional legal systems often prove unwieldy or unfit for specific disagreements, DDR offers fast, fair outcomes. Evidently, there are many factors that entice developers to build Web3 protocols that are concerned with dispute resolution. Blockchain, being apolitical, decentralized and transparent, is perceived to be perhaps the best vehicle for administering justice when two or more parties are in disagreement. These parties can consist of individuals or even companies and governments. Perhaps blockchain is too broad a term, however, because it is often specific features of certain chains, like decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and smart contracts, that prove useful in an arbitration capacity. The economic incentives baked into blockchains are another important consideration, with the general idea being that users can become jurors, reviewing evidence and voting for the party they believe is right. In blockchain-based systems, jurors are usually financially motivated to make a sound judgment, i.e., one that accords with the majority. Kleros is one of the earliest examples of a decentralized adjudication system, one that uses jurors and game theory to produce judgments in a secure and inexpensive way. Founded in 2017, the Ethereum-based arbitration service was designed to "resolve any kind of dispute," building on the work of early Web3 pioneers like Vitalik Buterin and Paul Sztorc, whose idea to use Schelling Point-based incentives for blockchain oracles gave rise to the notion of "decentralized truth-telling." In the case of Kleros, the probability of crowdsourced jurors being selected is proportional to the amount of tokens staked. Staking, then, signifies one's willingness to participate in the adjudication process in contrast to the traditional court system, where jurors are selected at random. Arbitration fees, meanwhile, make it difficult for attackers to spam the system by creating frivolous disputes. Many similar protocols appeared around this time, among them Jur (2018) and Aragon (2016). While the former focused on enterprise use cases and selected jurors based on their reputation rather than token stake, the latter favored a subscription model and was intended for arbitration within DAOs themselves. Although they held promise, neither project is currently actively maintained. The popularization of DeFi around 2020 prompted renewed interest in dispute resolution, most notably in the case of the UMA protocol's Data Verification Mechanism (DVM), which resolves disputes about the price of a synthetic token derivative contract. This type of system, of course, has a much narrower focus than projects like Kleros, which seek to be multipurpose courts. A watershed moment for DDR occurred in 2021 when a Mexican court enforced a decentralized arbitration award governed by Kleros, which related to a real estate dispute. Last year, Mexico also passed the General Law of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms, the first national legislation recognizing decentralized justice as a valid dispute resolution system. Central to the premise of DDR is the idea that arbiters can come to a fair and transparent judgment based on the available evidence: the wisdom of the crowd, enforced on-chain. Arbiters play a key role in the recently unveiled Worker Proposal System of blockchain-based metaverse Alien Worlds (which I cofounded), which is centered on the activity of various DAOs. While the system empowers users to suggest and execute new projects, arbiters act as neutral mediators in any disputes that arise. For example, arbiters can step in and cast a deciding vote when there is a disagreement about project milestones. In this particular arbitration model, a blockchain escrow account is also used since the Worker Proposal System is designed to furnish the awarded party with tokens for meeting pre-agreed targets. Arbiters must complete an identity verification process, demonstrate a solid understanding of the Alien Worlds ecosystem, commit to a minimum term of four months to ensure continuity and dedicate specific weekly hours to their role. They are also paid a set rate for performing this role. As the primary contributor to Alien Worlds, my company, Dacoco, takes a notable approach to dispute resolution by blending Web2 and Web3 concepts in a unique way. While disputes are enforced on-chain, and a DAO system transparently manages worker proposals, the arbiter functions similarly to an independent mediator in any traditional legal process. In other words, Dacoco is not relying entirely on blockchain to adjudicate. In most cases, protocols promising to administer decentralized justice have failed to achieve their objectives, whether due to technical, market or other challenges. This is a great shame because on-chain arbitration offers many advantages over a sluggish legal system that is notorious for its inequity (the most powerful people can afford the best litigators) and complexity. Although decentralized dispute resolution has yet to gain widespread adoption, and many challenges remain, expect lawtech solutions to grow more sophisticated over time and for traditional courts to follow Mexico's lead in recognizing such systems. In a sense, it is analogous to the way in which the financial world has gradually recognized Bitcoin, a consequence of the number of individuals storing their wealth in the network. Ultimately, the best and most efficient solutions have a tendency to break into the spotlight. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?