Social pension hike sparks political slugfest
Patna: A day after CM Nitish Kumar announced a nearly three-fold increase in social security pensions, a war of words has begun in the state with the ruling JD(U)-BJP alliance and the opposition RJD trading accusations of imitation and inaction ahead of the upcoming state assembly elections.
On Saturday, the govt raised the monthly pension for widows, the elderly and the differently abled from Rs 400 to Rs 1,100. While the JD(U) credited the hike to feedback received during Nitish Kumar's "Pragati Yatra" across the state, RJD leader Tejashwi Prasad Yadav accused the CM of copying the opposition's promise to increase the pension to Rs 1,500. He alleged that Nitish lacked the strength or originality to initiate new welfare measures and was merely replicating ideas raised by the opposition, which he claimed had consistently focused on social justice.
Reacting sharply, JD(U) spokespersons Anjum Ara and Anupriya defended the CM, questioning the RJD's contribution to women's empowerment during its previous tenure. They argued that the hike was part of Nitish's long-standing commitment to social welfare and not a reaction to the RJD's agenda. "If RJD was so serious about pensions, why didn't they act during the 37-month-long Grand Alliance govt?" they asked.
Deputy CM Samrat Choudhary also countered Tejashwi's allegations, saying that the state has witnessed consistent development over the last two decades under Nitish Kumar's leadership.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Scam Exposed: What They Won't Tell You about zero trust!
Expertinspector
Click Here
Undo
Highlighting a spate of recent initiatives, Choudhary pointed to the social pension hike, PM Narendra Modi's announcement of Rs 6,000 crore in new projects and the ₹33,000 crore allocated for 52 National Highway Authority schemes in Bihar.
He also mentioned the construction of Kanya Vivah Bhavans in over 8,000 panchayats, expansion of Jeevika Didis' roles in govt services and the doubling of their honorarium. "The govt has also begun providing financial aid to 94 lakh poor families identified in the caste survey and proposed the construction of a grand Ma Janaki Temple at Punaura Dham in Sitamarhi," he said.
As the state heads toward elections in Oct-Nov, the clash over credit and development narratives appears set to intensify with both sides laying claim to the state's social and infrastructural progress.
Patna: A day after CM Nitish Kumar announced a nearly three-fold increase in social security pensions, a war of words has begun in the state with the ruling JD(U)-BJP alliance and the opposition RJD trading accusations of imitation and inaction ahead of the upcoming state assembly elections.
On Saturday, the govt raised the monthly pension for widows, the elderly and the differently abled from Rs 400 to Rs 1,100. While the JD(U) credited the hike to feedback received during Nitish Kumar's "Pragati Yatra" across the state, RJD leader Tejashwi Prasad Yadav accused the CM of copying the opposition's promise to increase the pension to Rs 1,500. He alleged that Nitish lacked the strength or originality to initiate new welfare measures and was merely replicating ideas raised by the opposition, which he claimed had consistently focused on social justice.
Reacting sharply, JD(U) spokespersons Anjum Ara and Anupriya defended the CM, questioning the RJD's contribution to women's empowerment during its previous tenure. They argued that the hike was part of Nitish's long-standing commitment to social welfare and not a reaction to the RJD's agenda. "If RJD was so serious about pensions, why didn't they act during the 37-month-long Grand Alliance govt?" they asked.
Deputy CM Samrat Choudhary also countered Tejashwi's allegations, saying that the state has witnessed consistent development over the last two decades under Nitish Kumar's leadership.
Highlighting a spate of recent initiatives, Choudhary pointed to the social pension hike, PM Narendra Modi's announcement of Rs 6,000 crore in new projects and the ₹33,000 crore allocated for 52 National Highway Authority schemes in Bihar.
He also mentioned the construction of Kanya Vivah Bhavans in over 8,000 panchayats, expansion of Jeevika Didis' roles in govt services and the doubling of their honorarium. "The govt has also begun providing financial aid to 94 lakh poor families identified in the caste survey and proposed the construction of a grand Ma Janaki Temple at Punaura Dham in Sitamarhi," he said.
As the state heads toward elections in Oct-Nov, the clash over credit and development narratives appears set to intensify with both sides laying claim to the state's social and infrastructural progress.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Of two contesting models of social justice
Recently, in village in Bhojpur district, Bihar, which is dominated by Most Backward Castes (MBC), I heard a sohar (birth song) sung by a few unlettered women. It goes, 'Babua hamar DM hoyihe, okara upar CM hoyihe (My son will become a District Magistrate and he will also become Chief Minister)'. I also heard a slogan during a political rally in Sasaram town, which goes, 'Vote se lenge CM, PM, Aarakshan se lenge Collector, DM (I will become Chief Minister with votes and District Magistrate with reservation)'. Both these expressions reflect aspirations for social justice. They also show how the aspirations of backward communities becomes the essence of their politics. Together, these anecdotes illustrate how social justice is the driving force in grassroots development and politics in Bihar. In north India, for several centuries, the Bhakti movement challenged social hierarchies and promoted equality and inclusivity. But the road to social justice has nevertheless been long and fraught. Leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, B.R. Ambedkar, Mahatma Phule, and Ram Manohar Lohia have had their own visions and versions of social justice; these various imaginations continue to co-exist in India. While in most parts of India, the social justice discourse remains mostly centred around Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, in Bihar the most dominant social justice discourse is of Other Backward Classes (OBCs). According to the Bihar caste survey of 2023, OBCs and Extremely Backward Classes comprise more than 63% of State's population. This is not new — Bihar politics has always been largely dominated by OBC politics. OBC communities, particularly the Yadavs, Kurmis, and Koirees, began emerging as lower and middle peasants due to various land-based reforms implemented in both pre-independent and independent India. The leaders of these three communities formed the Triveni Sangh in 1934 and began asserting their voice for political representation. Other leaders echoed the aspirations of OBC communities in later years as well. Apart from the OBC social justice discourse, Bihar has other social justice models, which can be loosely categorised as Gandhian, Congressi, Nehruwadi, Ambedkarite, Lohiyaite, and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led social justice model (samgra samajik nyay model). Bihar is set to go to polls later this year. I have found during my fieldwork that the contest is set to take place primarily between two models. The first is the social justice model crafted by selective interpretations of the views of Ambedkar and Lohia. It emphasises caste-based historical inequality. The propagators of this model are Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Lalu Prasad, RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav, and Congress leader Rahul Gandhi. The RJD and Congress are part of the Mahagathbandhan. This model appears to be unilinear as it focuses on the demand for a caste census and the extension of reservations. The second is the samgra samajik nyay model. It combines the arguments of caste-based historical inequality with other forms of horizontal social inequalities that emerged during the process of distribution of democratic resources. The BJP, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, promotes this model, which combines the visions of Swami Vivekananda, Deendayal Upadhyaya, and Ambedkar. In Mr. Modi's book Samajik Samrasata, we may find the traces of the evolution of this model of social justice. This model combines historical injustices with developmental injustices. It tries to address vertical and horizontal injustices faced by marginal communities. Social justice appears to be a multi-pronged strategy to counter backwardness of various forms. Countering caste-based injustice is tied to beneficiary politics, which refers to the use of government welfare programmes and benefits for targeted communities. Beneficiary politics emerged through the implementation of various social support schemes for backward castes, Dalits, Adivasis, and women. Thus, both the alliances have two different yet overlapping social justice models. The difference is that the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance has a few advantages. Both Mr. Modi and Chief Minister Nitish Kumar enjoy a positive image. On the other hand, the Mahagathbandhan is represented by Mr. Lalu Prasad, whose regime was perceived as corrupt. The image of Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav as a popular youth leader does not seem to have served as a counter-balance yet. And the benefit of the caste census, which the RJD-led Opposition was advocating, has been minimised by the Union government's announcement of a caste enumeration in the Census. Badri Narayan is Director, Govind Ballabh Pant Social Science Institute
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
CM: businesses will no longer need police licence to run operations
Hotels, swimming pools, guest houses, video game parlours, auditoriums, and amusement parks in Delhi will no longer require licences from the police to be operational, said Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Sunday. However, municipal corporations and the departments concerned should now grant permission for their functioning. On June 19, Lieutenant-Governor V.K. Saxena had approved an order withdrawing the requirement of the Delhi police to issue licences for seven business sectors under the Delhi Police Act, 1978. Businesses will now be exempted from having to obtain a no-objection certificate from the police. The exemption encompasses entities such as hotels, motels, guest houses, restaurants (eating houses), swimming pools, auditoriums, video game parlours, discotheques, and amusement parks. The licensing power will now be transferred to local bodies such as the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, New Delhi Municipal Council, or Delhi Cantonment Board. The move comes after hotel and guest house operators sought the repealing of licences during a meeting with Chairman of the Chamber of Trade and Industry Brijesh Goyal and Industries Minister Manjinder Sirsa. Ms. Gupta said the reform is a direct reflection of the government's 'visionary approach' and in line with the BJP-led Centre's 'minimum government, maximum governance' and Ease of Doing Business policies. 'This decision is not only a big step towards administrative reform but also the result of the policy and thinking of the Central government,' said the CM. 'The Centre is adopting ease of doing business for the benefit of the country, which is being implemented in Delhi,' she added. Ms. Gupta said Union Home Minister Amit Shah has categorically said the police force should be relieved from non-core duties so that their energy and resources can be focused on law and order, security, and crime control. The subject of policing in the national capital lies under the Home Ministry. 'We want to make Delhi not only the political capital of India but also a model of good governance. That is the mission of our double-engine government,' the CM said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
BJP MLA slams Cong for ‘pro-terror' stand
Lucknow: BJP MLA from Sarojininagar, Rajeshwar Singh, on Saturday launched a scathing attack on the , accusing it of adopting a "pro-terrorism" stance by siding with Iran and vilifying Israel. Singh condemned Congress for what he termed a "shocking and shameful" defence of Iran, a country he described as a known sponsor of and a rogue nuclear aspirant. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "While the global community — from the United States to Europe and Israel — is uniting against Iran-backed terror networks, Congress has chosen to defend Tehran and criticise Israel, the only democracy in the region," Singh said. Taking strong exception to Congress referring to Iran as a "long-standing friend," Singh reminded the public that Iran had repeatedly insulted India over Kashmir, interfered in domestic matters like the CAA protests and Delhi riots, and echoed Pakistan-like narratives on Muslim persecution. "A nuclear Iran is not Israel's crisis alone — it's a global nightmare," Singh warned. Calling for national unity, he urged all political parties and citizens to reject Congress's alleged soft stance on terror regimes.
