Former Labour candidate in 'racist' tweets storm given top trade union job

EXCLUSIVE: Figures in UNISON union are angry Wilma Brown is to become a regional organiser after the race row.
A trade union has given a £55,000 job to a former Labour candidate who stood down over a row about racist tweets.
Figures in UNISON are angry Wilma Brown has been appointed to a top regional organiser's job.
‌
Brown was set to stand for Labour in the winnable Cowdenbeath and Kirkcaldy seat at the general election last year.
‌
But she was suspended and replaced as the candidate after a row blew up over offensive posts that were shared on her X account.
The liked posts described former First Minister Humza Yousaf as "Hamas Yousless" while another told an Indian man he would "never be an Englishman".
The SNP said at the time of the controversy that the shared tweets were 'deeply offensive' and 'racist'.
Brown also left her post at NHS Fife, with the local UNISON branch saying she was moving to a 'new adventure'.
An internal email last month from Lilian Macer, the most senior figure in the union in Scotland, revealed Brown had been offered a regional organiser's post focusing on Aberdeen.
One UNISON source said: 'Staff and Reps are deeply concerned that this support for someone 'liking' social media posts of a racist nature will harm the hard won reputation of all staff, reps and members'.
‌
A second insider said: ' UNISON members are appalled that Wilma Brown, who was suspended from standing as a Labour Party candidate over her endorsement of racist social media posts, has now been handed a senior role within the union.
'This decision shatters trust and sends a deeply troubling message about UNISON 's commitment to equality and integrity.'
‌
The full remuneration package for the job is believed to be worth up to £60,000, with a salary of nearly £55,000.
UNISON has an 'anti racism charter' which commits the union to tackling prejudice. It includes actions such as: 'Challenge racism internally and externally wherever it arises in relation to the organisation.
' Recognise the impact of racism upon staff members' wellbeing.'Set and regularly review strategy to improve racial equality, diversity and inclusion so that the organisation reflects the communities it serves.'
‌
In April, the STUC 's annual congress was marred by a row over Brown being given a ceremonial speaking role praising Macer, who at that time was also president of the trade union body
Brown' s contribution was followed by speeches from senior trade unionists condemning Islamophobia and the far right.
A UNISON spokesperson said: "Wilma Brown stepped down as a prospective parliamentary candidate and no action was taken against her. This was entirely a matter for the Labour Party.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Times

3 hours ago

• Times

Abortion overreach will backfire on women

One of the many, many reasons I prefer living in the UK to the US is the former's more clement weather, which reflects the country's calmer politics. By contrast, America's storms and wildfires feel like a metaphor for its political debates, not least on abortion. So it's apt that, just as a heatwave arrives in this country, the British left loses its mind over abortion. Last week MPs voted to support an amendment, proposed by the Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, which argues that women who obtain an abortion should never be prosecuted, even if it's after the legal 24-week limit. This sounds good in theory (abortion should not be criminalised, yes, agreed) but is in fact completely nuts. The law already allows late-term abortions in extreme circumstances, but now a woman could have an abortion the day before her due date for any reason she fancied. Now, very few women will do this, and in fact very few ever have, and the harrowing stories that have been used to justify this vote largely took place during the Covid lockdown, when women were buying abortion pills in the post and couldn't see doctors to find out how far along they were in their pregnancy. So: not a widespread problem, and one that could be resolved by re-examining how the Crown Prosecution Service deals with these sad cases. • `Read more: MPs vote to decriminalise abortion Instead, MPs have decided to chuck out the UK's heretofore liberal but pragmatic approach in favour of something far more radical that most people don't want: 87 per cent of the British public are in favour of legalised abortion, but more than half draw the line at the abortion of a healthy baby over the six-month limit. Antoniazzi's amendment upends the delicate compromise that existed until now. Sensing their moment has come, politicians on the right are already arguing that the time limit here should be cut, in line with most of Europe. Meanwhile, some on the left are arguing the amendment doesn't go far enough. Stella Creasy proposed a further amendment, which was written by the part-time tax barrister, occasional fox murderer and full-time tweeter Jolyon Maugham, that would have made it impossible even to prosecute those who coerced women into late-term abortions. This was considered so extreme it was rejected by every abortion provider in the country, and also, wisely, by MPs. Undaunted, Creasy, who seems to believe she represents Washington DC rather than Walthamstow, implied that rejecting her amendment was on a par with the overturning of Roe v Wade. By way of evidence, she reeled off voguish American clichés ('the Donald Trump playbook', 'women's bodies as battlefields') which always suggest the speaker is so high on progressive platitudes they have turned off their brain. If Creasy and her ilk want to take lessons from America, they should look at what happened last week to what is euphemistically called 'paediatric gender healthcare'. On Wednesday the Supreme Court allowed red states like Tennessee to ban doctors from giving hormone treatments and body-altering surgery to gender-confused children. It is the latest blow for the gender movement in the US, and it was entirely caused by overreach by activists. Until about a decade ago, people who wanted to live as the opposite sex were seen as a niche adult demographic who should be treated with kindness. But activist groups destroyed that moderate status quo with their ludicrous arguments, such as that male rapists could be sent to women's prisons and there should be no age limit on body-altering surgery for children. The Biden administration blindly supported them until belatedly realising it was following the wilfully blind, and American politicians are now, at last, trying to undo some of the damage. None of this worked out well for trans people or the left. Progressive overreach and reality denial will always cause a backlash, something Maugham should know, given his own flailing gender activism. Creasy, too, has argued that 'some women are born with penises', suggesting a strong disconnect between her beliefs and actual biology. I'm not sure when Labour politicians decided to follow their Democrat counterparts in defending the most extreme version of a social shift, but they need to get a grip. One reason US feminists lost the abortion argument is they insisted abortion was no big deal and derided Hillary Clinton for describing it as something that should be 'safe, legal and rare', saying that last word was 'stigmatising'. It turned out that it's a lot more stigmatising to pretend getting an abortion is just a jolly lark that should come with a loyalty card. When I was 23 and 11 weeks pregnant, I had an abortion, an experience neither jolly nor terrible but necessary. Afterwards, I felt pure gratitude, which is how I still feel about it now. Since then I've sampled many experiences on the fertility menu: given birth to twins, miscarried, had a baby. You don't need to be a wet-eyed sentimentalist to know a baby becomes a baby well before it's born; I could feel when it happened to all of my babies at about the six-month mark. The legal limit exists for good reasons, including the mother's mental health, and maintaining public support for abortion. Arguing that a woman has the right to terminate a fully gestated healthy baby is the most self-defeating version of the pro-choice movement, because it will reinvigorate the anti-abortion argument in this country, just as arguing for the most extreme version of trans rights destroyed the moderate accommodations that existed before. Labour has kicked a hornets' nest with this vote. And it's women who are going to be stung.

Daily Mail​

3 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: Dogma cares little for the state of Britain's economy

This country's economy is now in serious peril. This is not only because the Government is nudging at the very outer limits of what it can raise in tax and borrowing – though it is. It is also because that government is increasingly driven by ferocious dogma which cares little for such concerns. It may be that some in the Cabinet can see the danger, yet others do not even view it as a danger, but as an opportunity for yet more upheaval and dramatic change. The extraordinary developments of last week, in which the current very large Labour majority in Parliament brought about revolutions in abortion law and in assisted dying, are a warning that we are now in uncharted waters. It may possibly be that we have never had a government whose parliamentary forces are so radical. And the uncrowned queen of those forces is the Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, increasingly influential and remarkably effective in the Commons and in Whitehall. It is true that there has always been a role for disruptive and troublemaking men and women near the top of the Labour Party. In the Tony Blair years, a similar position was filled by the late John Prescott, a majestic steam-powered Dreadnought originating in the (now remote) days of real class war. Let nobody underestimate Lord Prescott's considerable influence on the government he served. But Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and the apparatus of New Labour kept him under control. In this case, it looks very much as if a confident and popular Ms Rayner has slipped free of any restraint by the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer. Her Employment Rights Bill, which is alarming businesses all over the country, would have been strangled at birth in the days of Blairism. The unions would have been told – rightly – that the public had grown heartily sick of their overmighty antics in the past, and did not want to see them given back the unrestrained power they had rightly lost. And while Sir Keir and his Chancellor Rachel Reeves must know this, they seem either powerless to act, or surprisingly untroubled by the danger of it. Speaking to The Mail on Sunday last week, Ms Reeves simply evaded the question of Ms Rayner's plans. When a successful businessman such as Sir James Dyson accuses you of being 'vindictive' and of 'waging a war on aspiration', you really ought to listen. It is on the success of such businessmen that any future economic growth must be based. Without that growth, where are the taxes to come from to pay for the advanced welfare state in which we live? So we must applaud the open letter to British businessmen sent out by Shadow Business Secretary Andrew Griffith, in which he does what Sir Keir and Ms Reeves will not do, and makes it plain just how dangerous Ms Rayner's plans are. He warns those business chiefs that they are being sleepwalked into disaster, that the Rayner Bill will fundamentally change the balance of power in workplaces, at huge cost. Coming after the idiocy of the National Insurance increase, this a grave threat to the jobs of trade union members, as well as to the economy as a whole. We can only hope that the Prime Minister and his Chancellor will listen and act, for the nation's sake as well as their own.

Daily Mirror

5 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

Labour industrial strategy's £275m boost 'backs young people in whole country'

The long-awaited strategy will include a £275million boost to skills training for the one in seven young people out of work and education - backing British talent instead of importing workers from overseas Labour's long-awaited industrial strategy will prove the Government is 'on the side of working people' across the whole country the Industry minister vows ahead of its publication on Monday. The strategy is intended to boost key sectors of the economy for the next decade, with advanced manufacturing, clean energy and defence among the sectors to see increased focus. ‌ Today, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds vowed to 'power the industrial strategy by investing in working people' ‌ He promised a £275million boost to skills training for the one in seven young people out of work and education - backing British talent instead of importing workers from overseas. And writing for the Sunday Mirror Sarah Jones, the Industry Minister said the strategy would not just focus on London and the south east. 'From Belfast to Barrow, Derby to Dundee, our modern Industrial Strategy will build on the world-leading strengths of our nations and regions to turbocharge investment into our communities, raising wages and living standards for working people,' she wrote. 'We're not just putting a sticking plaster over the cracks of the economy. We're setting out a plan to fix the problems that have plagued us for years.' The training cash will fund the creation of new 'Technical Excellence Colleges' to provide cutting-edge courses in defence and engineering. It's been targeted to address the UK's skills gaps which leave businesses struggling to find people with the talents and skills they need. ‌ 'To make Britain the best place in the world to do business, we also need the best workforce in the world with the right skills and expertise to thrive,' Mr Reynolds said. 'Where past governments have watched from the sidelines as British industry has faced under-investment and opportunities have been shipped overseas, this government is leading the way, and our modern Industrial Strategy is a downpayment on a decade of renewal.' The UK's last industrial strategy was in 2017, when the Tories published a four-year plan ending in 2021. We're giving young people a chance to succeed By SARAH JONES, Minister for Industry This government is on the side of working people. And our modern Industrial Strategy, which we will publish tomorrow, will prove that beyond doubt. For the past 14 years, governments have sat on the sidelines watching British industry struggle – no direction, no support and no strategy. ‌ Neglecting our world-class industrial sectors and leaving workers in the lurch, while only worsening the gap between rich and poor and extending the north-south divide. Even before we entered Government we have been listening to industry and knew bold action was needed. Working hand in hand with industry and the workforce we will take the action needed to keep jobs and investment on our shores for decades to come. And the UK means the whole of our country: not just London or the Southeast. ‌ From Belfast to Barrow, Derby to Dundee, our modern Industrial Strategy will build on the world-leading strengths of our nations and regions to turbocharge investment into our communities, raising wages and living standards for working people. We're not just putting a sticking plaster over the cracks of the economy. We're setting out a plan to fix the problems that have plagued us for years. Currently one in seven young people are unemployed or out of education. We're giving them the chance to succeed by creating thousands of new training opportunities and transforming Britain's skills system, with more than £275 million in new investment to help British workers secure good, well-paid jobs in the industries of tomorrow. ‌ This will fund new training, short courses and other education opportunities right across the country in sectors like defence, AI, clean energies and advanced manufacturing. These are sectors where the UK is already world-leading, and which are expected to add £158 billion to our economy by 2035 and create an astounding 1.1 million new, well-paid jobs. Our skills overhaul will also set up new Technical Excellence Colleges across the UK to help train thousands of new skilled workers by 2029, in careers like engineering, programming and IT systems, helping Britain to stay competitive on the global stage. But that's just the tip of the iceberg. Tomorrow, our new Strategy will set out how we'll invest billions in our high-growth sectors in every part of the country: creating thousands of secure, well-paid and high-skilled jobs, backed by employment rights fit for a modern economy. The number one mission of this government's Plan for Change is growth, and putting more money in working people's pockets. And that's exactly what our modern Industrial Strategy will do.