Opinion - Send in the Marines and prepare to throw the book at every LA rioter
A mob of leftist activists surround federal agents, throwing rocks, insults and more. The tension is heightened as politicians do … well, nothing. Yes, police are dispatched as crowd control, but they don't do all that much to control the crowd until at last the tear gas and flashbangs are finally deployed.
This is Los Angeles in 2025. This is also exactly what Democrats want and who they are.
Democrats have made emotional appeals to their activists — appeals based on decades of identity politics and fomenting racial tensions and hatreds. The party of slavery, Jim Crow and segregation never changed its objective, only its tactics. Segregation now is declared 'tolerance' and 'cultural respect' at race-based graduation ceremonies and dances and in segregated dormitories.
When ICE conducts raids and arrests illegal aliens for deportation, local politicians embrace the illegal aliens at the expense of the rule of law out of obedience to the principles of identity politics. No matter how passionately one argues that illegal immigrants are 'a part of our community,' they cannot be because they are not in the country legally. You can't talk the sun out of rising in the east, and you can't talk an illegal immigrant into legal status.
The emotional and violent mob assembled — likely many of them white kids with trust funds and no jobs to keep them busy — and the inevitable soon followed. Cars and stores are now burning because … well, I'm sure this all helps the immigrants somehow. People in an emotional frenzy are not known for being rational, much less the ones who show up to 'progressive actions.'
But once the bricks fly, there must be consequences, and serious ones. If you are trying to injure or kill police officers or National Guard soldiers, whatever 'cause' you may have started off with is no longer relevant.
At a minimum, all of these people should be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I am glad someone stepped up to deploy the Guard to restore order, since Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) would not. I'm glad Trump sent in Marines to protect the federal buildings these hooligans are attacking. I have seen the videos, and in many cases officers would be justified even in using deadly force against those trying to do them harm. A badge does not eliminate one's right to self-defense.
These riots occur in cities that are Democratic and have been for generation. The local politicians are therefore willing to say and do exactly nothing. And these actions are always called 'protests,' no matter how violent they become — the Capitol riot of Jan. 6, 2021 might be the only riot Democrats have ever properly called out. In general, they side with the violent agitators, not with residents or local business owners. You'd think this would occur to the voters there, but not yet — at least not in large enough numbers to make a difference.
The getaway driver in a liquor store robbery is just as guilty of murder as the masked man who actually kills the clerk. Likewise, if you are attending a protest and someone near you pulls a rock to throw or a glass bottle filled with gasoline and a sock, that's when anyone with a conscience must leave. I don't care if you were personally being violent or not — if you stay, you are now a member of a violent mob, and you deserve to be judged through that lens.
The rioters must be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. And it has to be federal law, because local Democrats won't prosecute their own brownshirts. If you get injured participating in such an action, then you got what was coming to you — your choices have consequences.
As for the voters, they will never fix what's ailing Los Angeles right now if they keep electing the same kind of liberal, Democratic politician, generation after generation. Please stop hitting yourself in the head with a frying pan, and maybe, just maybe, some electoral accountability will follow.
Derek Hunter is host of the Derek Hunter Show, daily from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. Eastern on WMAL in Washington, DC. He is a former staffer for the late Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.).
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News Poll: Voters distrust Biden administration on president's mental fitness
Voters say they were aware of former President Joe Biden's decline, and believe the administration lacked honesty and transparency about his mental fitness, with many wanting Congress to investigate the matter. A new Fox News survey finds more than half, 52%, think it is important to investigate whether Biden advisors used an autopen without the president's awareness, while 46% say it's time to move on. House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer is pursuing investigations against former Biden administration staff for allegedly covering up Biden's mental decline and using an autopen for executive actions. Views are split on whether advisors should be scrutinized for making key presidential decisions on behalf of Biden (50% investigate vs. 49% move on), while a majority opposes investigating whether Biden advisors covered up his decline (44% investigate vs. 55% move on). Fox News Poll: Voters Think Iran Poses A Real Threat To Us Security, But Split Oj Israel's Strike Among Democrats, one in five supports investigating whether there was a cover-up, while roughly one in four feels that way about using the autopen and making presidential decisions. Read On The Fox News App Overall, 68% of voters believe the previous administration was dishonest about Biden's condition, including 52% of Democrats, 75% of Independents, and 81% of Republicans. Fox News Poll: Economic Pessimism Abates Slightly As Voters Reflect On The Economy Yet, while a majority agree there was a cover-up, they weren't fooled. Nearly 7 in 10 say they were aware of Biden's cognitive condition even before his jaw-droppingly bad debate performance in June 2024. Some 28% say they knew he was in decline as soon as he took office, 21% say a couple of years into his term, and 19% after he started running for re-election. Another 20% knew of Biden's decline after his debate with Donald Trump. Fewer than 1 in 10 say he wasn't in decline (9%). These numbers are consistent with what voters said throughout Biden's term. As early as November 2021, only one year after Biden was elected, Fox News surveys found that a 53% majority thought his age was interfering with his job as president, including more than one-quarter of Democrats. By the 2022 midterms, our Fox News Voter Analysis election survey found 57% of voters felt Biden lacked the mental capability to serve and, by July 2024, that grew to 65%. "Somewhat lost in the kerfuffle about the exact timing of Biden's decline is the fact that most knew he was losing it and had factored this into their vote choice long before the presidential debate," says Daron Shaw, a Republican who conducts the Fox News survey along with Democrat Chris Anderson. "Still, Biden's reputation and legacy are clearly taking a hit as the real history of his administration is revealed." Biden's current personal favorability is underwater by 13 points (43% favorable, 56% unfavorable), compared to -19 points in January. During the early days of his presidency, his ratings were net positive by 10 points (54% favorable, 44% unfavorable, April 2021). Today, 75% of Democrats have a positive view of Biden, down from 95% four years ago. CLICK HERE FOR Crosstabs AND Topline Conducted June 13-16, 2025, under the direction of Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R), this Fox News survey includes interviews with a sample of 1,003 registered voters randomly selected from a national voter file. Respondents spoke with live interviewers on landlines (149) and cellphones (566) or completed the survey online after receiving a text (288). Results based on the full sample have a margin of sampling error of ±3 percentage points. Sampling error for results among subgroups is higher. In addition to sampling error, question wording and order can influence results. Weights are generally applied to age, race, education, and area variables to ensure the demographics are representative of the registered voter population. Sources for developing weight targets include the American Community Survey, Fox News Voter Analysis, and voter file data. Fox News' Victoria Balara contributed to this article source: Fox News Poll: Voters distrust Biden administration on president's mental fitness
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
What will it take for Gavin Newsom to focus on his day job?
President Donald Trump rightly took the ruling upholding his National Guard deployment to Los Angeles as a 'BIG WIN,' but it can be a winner for Californians, too — if it inspires their governor to focus on the job they elected him to. Gov. Gavin Newsom vows to litigate on, but if necessary the Supreme Court will slap him down, too. What will get him to quit his near-nonstop posturing to set himself up for a 2028 presidential run, and get his nose to the gubernatorial grindstone? It's bad enough that he sided with LA Mayor Karen Bass in obstructing ICE efforts to deport child predators, murderers and other worst-of-the-worst 'asylum seekers' — posturing that all but invited the riots that Trump deployed the Guard to shut down. Worse that this rush to the left came after Newsom's fake to the right with a series of podcasts where he pretended sympathy to centrist criticisms of the far-left agenda. That follows his haplessness during the Los Angeles fires — a disaster Trump credibly tied to Newsom's green obsessions. Other Gavin grotesquerie included rushing to meet the president on Trump's LA visit bare weeks after prepping for all-out legal #resistance to the new prez. California is plagued with soaring homelessness, elevated crime rates and brutally high costs of living: Even its welcome to illegal immigrants hasn't prevented a historic switch from growth to decline. That is: On Newsom's watch, Cali is for the first time ever losing seats in the House of Representatives because so many residents are fleeing to less-toxic jurisdictions. The Golden State is a natural near-paradise, but Newsom & co. are destroying it. That governor is still devoting his time and energy to a years-off national run is damning proof that he doesn't care a whit for the people of California.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Where the Legal Fight Over the California National Guard Stands
President Trump's decision this month to send National Guard troops to Los Angeles against the wishes of Gov. Gavin Newsom has sparked a legal battle that could reshape how much latitude a president has to deploy the military on U.S. soil. On June 10, days after Mr. Trump federalized the California National Guard in response to protests over immigration raids, the state filed a lawsuit calling the move illegal. Even as the Trump administration added active-duty Marines to the mix, a judge ordered it to return the National Guard to the control of Mr. Newsom. But an appeals court blocked that move, and Mr. Trump maintains authority over those troops today. Mr. Trump's decision to deploy troops came after Immigration and Customs Enforcement started carrying out raids at workplaces in the city, sweeping up hundreds of migrants for potential deportation and drawing protesters. While the majority protested peacefully, a subset committed violent acts like throwing objects and burning vehicles. Here's where things stand in the case. What made Trump's decision to deploy troops significant? Normally, governors control their state's National Guard and dispatch such troops themselves when there is a need to quell civil disorder or fight a natural disaster. On rare occasions, the president may take control of a guard or otherwise deploy troops under federal control on domestic soil, but in recent decades that has happened only at a governor's request. Mr. Trump's move was the first time in more than six decades that a president had taken control of a state guard over a governor's objections, raising profound questions about presidential power, state sovereignty and civil liberties. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
