Mom-to-be roasted for naming her daughter after tragic event that shocked the world: ‘Felt like getting punched in the face'

Strange, unique, and eccentric names have come back into fashion for new parents, with monikers ranging from bizarrely-lettered variants to the Millennial-led dog names for babies trend — see short, cutesy names like Max, Sadie, and Bear, as prime examples.
However, one parent-to-be took these trends to the next level and paid the price: relentless mocking on the Internet.
A friend of the parent in question was sent a seemingly innocent baby shower invitation, but after closer inspection, noticed the name, Chernobyl Hope, was especially unique — or, as the Internet dubbed it after the friend posted the invitation to Reddit, 'ridiculous' and 'offensive.'
It appeared as if the parents were unaware of the 1986 nuclear disaster in Chernobyl, Ukraine.
The recipient of this unconventional baby shower invitation posted it to the subreddit r/tragedeigh, where aggrieved Internet users come together to poke fun at unfortunate, offensive, and just plain crazy baby names, particularly where unconventional spelling is involved — hence the Millennial-core 'deigh' epithet.
Many replies said they were so uncomfortable with this baby name, they had no choice but to turn to humor to cope.
'I'm sure everyone at the celebration will be radiant,' one user commented facetiously, prompting the reply: 'Speak for yourself. If I were a guest at that shower and heard that name, I'd have a total meltdown.'
'I guess it's a nuclear family,' another user quipped.
'Honestly, if it didn't have the connotation of being a nuclear disaster, it would be a pretty name,' rationalized one commenter, while another quipped: 'Extra points for having the invitation feature an elephant's foot.'
Wedged between comments making jokes at this family's expense and users expressing outrage at the name was the only other detail — or semblance of an explanation — the original poster left behind: 'I have a feeling they don't know what Chernobyl meant. I asked them where they got the idea from, and said it just sounded nice,' they explained.
Overwhelmingly, users reacted to the wild post with distaste.
The Chernobyl explosion occurred in a nuclear power plant located in a town (now recognized as being in Ukraine) of the same name, and remains the worst nuclear accident in human history. 31 people died immediately as a result of the incident, per the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), but varying studies have produced long-term death tolls ranging into hundreds of thousands of premature deaths as a result of radiation exposure.
'I haven't ever met another person (aside from a cousin) who has been affected by Chernobyl. I was born sick due to it because my mother was pregnant with me and in the area when it occurred,' shared a commenter.
'It has made my life… not fun. Being profoundly disabled at age 37 due to human error… And an error that never offered compensation for all of us who had their lives ruined by it,' the enraged Redditor continued.
'What a legacy. Naming someone after something that has left people with cancer, going through 30+ surgeries just to stay alive, and losing their quality of life. I'm just appalled. Repulsed.'
Many commenters also offered the original poster advice for dealing with the profoundly awkward situation.
'Even if you think your relationship with them will sour, at least for the baby's sake, you need to talk to them and suggest they change the name and explain to them what this means, all politely, of course. If they say they will still continue with the name, you can smile and give a thumbs up.'
'Absolutely remove these people from your life,' recommended another blunt reply.
Obscene and ignorant as this name choice may be, in many countries, it's not necessarily illegal.
In the United States, birth certificate laws and regulations vary by state, but even still, most prohibited names have been disallowed for administrative purposes — monikers in excess of 140 characters and those containing numbers are prime examples.
Some states have outlawed names like Jesus Christ and Santa Claus, but as of now, baby Chernobyl Hope is more than fine the government's eyes.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Vogue

27 minutes ago

• Vogue

La Cambre Fall 2025 Ready-to-Wear Collection

La Cambre in Brussels is surely the closest thing to utopia on Earth for fashion students. Funded by the Belgian government, it's almost free, and even non-EU students pay just 4,174 euros annually (a comparison to sicken US and UK students struggling under tens of thousands of in fees.) It's not the inexpensiveness which makes La Cambre Modes fashion department stand out as an educational phenomenon, though. It's the dizzying number of alumni names-to-conjure-with who've studied under Tony Delcampe in the school, set in a 13th-century abbey in this quiet, beautiful Belgian city. Names such as Matthieu Blazy at Chanel, Anthony Vaccarello at Saint Laurent, Nicolas Di Felice of Courrèges, Julien Dossena at Rabanne, Julian Klausner at Dries Van Noten. Not to mention Marine Serre, Ester Manas, Louis-Gabriel Nouchi, and Marie-Adam Leenaerdt, all of whom are making a mark with their own businesses. Everyone in the industry is wildly curious to divine exactly what kind of sorcery takes place here. This year an international jury of buyers, curators, designers, headhunters, PRs, the legendary Belgian makeup artist Inge Grognard and editors—me amongst them—came to see the class of 2025. There were just 12 of them. Often, you sense a vibe running through a class. This year, there was a lot of experimentation with multiple surfaces, latticed, caged silhouettes, bodies submerged as if in furniture, carpets, or vehicle upholstery. The human form merging with inanimate objects. Not a lot of sex or sensuality involved. Yet as is often the case, the students' themes, research and techniques became much more alive—and amazing—off the runway and in conversation. French student Théodora Hadj Moussa Laube made a collection based on the idea of a sailboat, splicing strips of wood veneer together with delicate, hyper-feminine florals. 'I had this idea that living life is like being on a boat. It's very personal,' she said. 'I had this kind of metaphor that it was a very beautiful way to live.' She made a parallel between corsetry and boning and the curves of a ship's hull, fusing fabric and wood laminate in an incredibly light way. She won top marks of the year. 'I knew I had to come to La Cambre,' she said. 'I need to learn techniques, and love the seriousness of the school. I felt really happy when I was doing this.' Tony Delcampe, the head of the faculty, would have been pleased to hear this. Technical innovation is pushed at the school—a kind of specificity of developing ideas which will always result in fashion ideas. 'In many schools, I think today, they say they have to express themselves, to do whatever—something that is not related with garments,' said Delcampe. 'But our goal here is to make garments, to generate new ways of thinking, new volumes of fabrics and finishing, that's what we think is most important.'

Yahoo

29 minutes ago

• Yahoo

'He helps us to do that': James Gunn reveals the surprising impact of including Jason Momoa's Lobo in DC's new Supergirl movie

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. James Gunn has teased why Jason Momoa's Lobo is vital to Supergirl's plot His inclusion helped the DC movie's creative team to crack the story they want to tell Gunn also confirmed which actor will play the film's primary villain James Gunn has confirmed who'll play the villain in Supergirl – and opened up on the importance of Jason Momoa's Lobo in the forthcoming DC Universe (DCU) movie. In a broad-ranging interview on episode 15 of the official DC Studios podcast, Gunn revealed that Belgian actor Matthias Schoenaerts will portray Krem. For the uninitiated: Krem is the Big Bad in 'Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow', an eight-part graphic novel series that the second DCU film, which releases on June 26, 2026, is heavily inspired by. In fact, the movie bore the title of its comic book namesake until very recently, with Gunn admitting Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow was now known by its much simpler and cleaner title Supergirl. But back to Krem. Last October, Deadline claimed Schoenaerts had been cast as the movie's terrifying antagonist, but it's only now that Gunn has admitted The Regime and Amsterdam star is part of its cast. For more details on everyone else you'll see in Kara Zor-El's first feature film outing in over 40 years (the first, 1984's Supergirl, is available to stream on Max, FYI) , check out my dedicated Supergirl guide. That's not the only interesting information that Gunn discussed. Indeed, the DC Studios co-chief also provided more details on why Milly Alcock was cast as Supergirl, how director Craig Gillespie positively fought to include certain scenes in the superhero flick, and the initial text that Jason Momoa sent to Gunn to persuade him to let Momoa play Lobo. It's a continuation of that final conversation that'll pique the interest of DC devotees. Indeed, as co-host/comic book expert Coy Jandreau mentioned during the podcast's latest installment, the original draft for Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow's eight-part literary series was set to feature the immortal, motorbike-riding bounty hunter. Tom King, who wrote the graphic novel, confirmed this was the case in an interview with in February 2023. Given Lobo was due to appear in King and Bilquis Evely's comic book series before he was eventually cut from the story, plus the fact that Momoa will play the last surviving Czarnian in Supergirl, Landreau asked if the forthcoming DCU Chapter One film would incorporate "some of the [comics'] original draft ideas" concerning how Lobo fits into the story that Supergirl will tell. "Woman of Tomorrow, in the comics, is a bunch of little stories," Gunn said, "And we needed to create one through-line, one three-act, more traditional story. So, Lobo helps us to do that. "It's not an amalgamation of him and Krem," Gunn added about rumors that Lobo and Krem would somehow be combined into a single character. "He [Lobo] is a totally separate character. I love Lobo. I always thought he was a great character to adapt and, maybe, in some way, the biggest comic book character that's never been in a film. So, I think it was a cool thing to do [include him in Supergirl], yeah." Are you happy that Lobo is in Supergirl? And what do you make of Schoenaerts playing its main villain? Let me know in the comments. First image for Supergirl shows Milly Alcock's Kara Zor-El in a place that'll be very familiar to DC comic book fans Superman will include characters who haven't been revealed yet, James Gunn says – and I think I know who one of them is 'We were blown away by this guy': Clayface lands unlikely star for its lead role as DC's budget horror movie continues to take shape

Yahoo

44 minutes ago

• Yahoo

A Young and the Restless Newman Takeover After June 16

Victor, Nikki, and Nick are all off to meet the mysterious Aristotle Dumas on the June 16 episode of The Young and the Restless. Along with Sharon, Sally, and Billy, they're all playing a lively guessing game of Who Is Dumas? Which means they've taken their eyes off the prize? And what's the prize? Why, Newman Enterprises, of course… and who was left at home to watch the store? We all know that Victor (Eric Braeden) calls Nikki (Melody Thomas Scott) 'my baby.' (Which is patronizing and condescending and, if we do say so ourselves… creepy.) But we — and she — know who Victor's real baby is. It's the company he built from the ground up with no help from anyone and without ever doing a bad or illegal thing ever: Newman Enterprises. Victor cares more about it than he does about his precious family, no matter how much he might insist to the contrary. That's why he keeps hiring and firing his children and other relatives from it. Nobody is quite good enough to run it — not the way Victor wants it run. MORE: Find out what happened on Y&R today. Victor is only going to France with Nikki and Nick (Joshua Morrow) because he wants to make sure Dumas doesn't do anything silly, like give Billy (Jason Thompson), Sally (Courtney Hope) or Phyllis (Michelle Stafford) the means by which they might put a chink in Newman Enterprises' armor. He left Adam (Mark Grossman) in charge, confident that his younger son would never do anything that might make his daddy love him less (especially since Victor has already made it clear in countless way to Adam that he loves him less than Victoria [Amelia Heinle] and Nick. Abby [Melissa Ordway] doesn't count.) READ MORE: Here's what happens next on Y&R. Except Victor didn't count on Chelsea (Melissa Claire Egan) making sad faces at Adam about following Victor's orders and going after Billy. Adam will do anything Chelsea says. He told her he'll deal with Victor. Could that be stealing his entire company out from under Victor while he's away? What will Victor do without his 'baby' then?