National Housing Bank ‘will boost delivery of new homes'

The National Housing Bank, a subsidiary of Homes England, will be publicly owned and act as a consistent partner to the private sector, bringing stability and certainty to housing developers and investors, the Government said.
It will be designated as a public financial institution and will work with mayors and local leaders to back housing projects meeting regional priorities.
It is hoped the bank will help to unlock a wide range of sites, including bigger ones which struggle to get upfront lending given their risk and complexity.
The Government also said the move will help SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) to grow and build out their housing pipeline more quickly.
Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner said the Government's foot is 'firmly on the accelerator' (Gareth Fuller/PA)
The bank will deploy some of the £2.5 billion in low-interest loans announced at the spending review to support the building of social and affordable homes.
It will be backed with £16 billion of financial capacity, on top of £6 billion of existing finance to be allocated this Parliament, the Government said.
It said the new public investment could help build more than 500,000 new homes.
Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner said: 'Our foot is firmly on the accelerator when it comes to making sure a generation is no longer locked out of homeownership – or ensuring children don't have to grow up in unsuitable temporary accommodation, and instead have the safe and secure home they deserve.'
The announcement builds on plans for a 10-year affordable homes programme and comes ahead of a 10-year infrastructure strategy to be published on Wednesday, setting out plans to 'rebuild the UK' over the decade ahead.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'The new National Housing Bank will unlock £53 billion of additional private investment.'
Homes England chairwoman Pat Ritchie said: 'Establishing the National Housing Bank, as a part of Homes England, builds on the agency's expertise at providing a wide range of finance to partners and places to unlock the delivery of new housing and mixed-use schemes.'
A spokesperson for the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors said: 'The launch of a National Housing Bank is an exciting innovation which could propel much-needed investment into housebuilding.
'The industry, and especially SMEs, need all the support they can get for the country to build.
'Confidence is key if the Government is to meet its 1.5 million home target and new streams of investment and support should invigorate new and existing projects.'
The Conservatives warned the remit of the new bank must be 'laser-focused'.
Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, said: 'While the ambition to increase housing supply is welcome, history teaches us that governments are often poor at picking winners and Homes England has very mixed results.
'The new National Housing Bank must be laser-focused: it must not crowd out private capital, must not subsidise developments that would have proceeded anyway and must not be lured into funding pie-in-the-sky or unviable projects – instead its role should be limited to de-risking only those schemes that are genuinely unable to attract finance, to ensure taxpayer money is not wasted and private investment is not crowded out.
'But beyond this we must look at the root cause of the housing problem – including why SME developers have been driven out of the market and why financing has become so unattractive that the Government needs to step in. Only Kemi Badenoch and the Conservatives are doing the deep thinking necessary to address these root issues.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Herald Scotland

an hour ago

• The Herald Scotland

Edinburgh private school Fettes College warns of staff cuts

The school's fees range from £5,000 to £18,000 per term depending on age and whether pupils are boarding there but, as reported by The Scotsman, it is considering cutting staff amid financial pressures. The private school said that factors such as the introduction of VAT on fees and a rise in National Insurance were "having an impact on our costs and numbers" despite Fettes College being "financially very well managed". Read More: It is undertaking a consultation process aimed at cutting staff which "may result in some redundancies". The school employs around 125 teaching staff and 210 operation staff for a payroll of £15.4million, with its latest accounts showing income of £24.2m and outgoings of £26.2m. Fettes College said in a statement: "Various factors have conspired to increase costs on all organisations and schools are not immune, particularly with the recent imposition of VAT on school fees and rise in National Insurance contributions. "Despite being financially very well managed with a strong student roll, these factors are having an impact on our costs and numbers, and we are obliged to run our operations as efficiently as possible. 'These headwinds obviously affect our families too, and our parents need to be certain that we are taking the necessary decisions to run the school efficiently and to use their money effectively.' Private schools were previously exempt from VAT, but the UK Government changed that policy in an effort to raise around £1.8bn a year for state schools. Earlier this month a legal challenge by private schools, pupils and parents was rejected by the High Court.

BBC News

2 hours ago

• BBC News

Law change alone not enough to help homeless, say Yorkshire charities

The government has decided to decriminalise homelessness in England and Wales - but charity bosses say the move will do little to give dignity to rough week ministers announced plans to scrap the Vagrancy Act - first introduced in 1824 - with Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner labelling it "cruel and outdated".Representatives from homelessness charities in Bradford and Sheffield said they were unaware of the legislation still being used to prosecute people, with a government spokesperson admitting use of the act had "significantly declined over the years".Tim Renshaw, chief executive of the Sheffield-based Cathedral Archer Project, said: "I think it will bypass most people that they could have been arrested purely for being vagrant." Mr Renshaw, whose organisation helps people off the streets, said the law change was "probably going to be trumped up as something it probably isn't"."Nobody is seeing people who don't have homes as criminals by default," he said."They are seeing the behaviour of some of those people who don't have homes as anti-social and are therefore looking for enforcement against that."According to Mr Renshaw, the announcement "lacks the other element of how do we give dignity, if we are not going to say that people are criminals? How do we include them in society?". The Labour government said it planned to replace the Vagrancy Act with "targeted measures" that would "ensure police have the powers they need to keep communities safe".They would include new offences of facilitating begging for gain and trespassing with the intention of committing a Renshaw said any enforcement measures should be accompanied by support for homeless people."If we say: 'You can't do that activity in that place', at the same time we need to be saying: 'How do we support you not to do that activity in this place?'."It's not that enforcement doesn't have a place, it's just that by itself it will only ever displace [from one area to another]."In Sheffield, the Cathedral Archer Project is working on what Mr Renshaw calls a "support model", backed by authorities including the police and city has become more visible in the city centre in recent years, with an outreach charity counting 71 people sleeping rough in and around central Sheffield in August last year. 'Homeless have complex needs' Steve Richardson, a trustee of Bradford charity Homeless Not Hopeless, welcomed the law change as a "great step forward", but said it "should just be the first step"."People can at least live their lives without automatically being criminalised," he said."Let's start putting in place the mechanisms to actually help and support them."Mr Richardson described the Vagrancy Act as "a convenient rule if somebody needed to be moved on as a threat".However, in his view, "just giving people a flat isn't the answer"."These people, after years of sleeping rough, have complex needs," he added."They need some support to address them." Homeless Not Hopeless supports between 100 and 150 people in Bradford every week, a "significant proportion" of whom are homeless, said Mr is based next to railway arches at Forster Square Station, a location where some of the city's homeless would sleep until they were moved on by Bradford Council last year to provide space for art installations as part of City of Culture Richardson said he was "absolutely confident" people on the streets would "pay back every penny of investment to get them back on their feet"."They want jobs, they want to work, to pay tax. Many, many many of them also try to give something back."We have several people we have supported over the years who have come back and volunteered."The government said it had boosted funding for homelessness services by an extra £233m this financial year, bringing total investment for 2025-26 to nearly £1bn.A spokesperson said the deputy prime minister was also developing a new homelessness strategy with other government departments, as well as mayors and councils, to be published later this year. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

Telegraph

3 hours ago

• Telegraph

It is time to suspend Dominic Grieve's anti-Islamophobia group

There have been too many casualties in the grooming gang scandal. Yet so far, the political consequences have been few. It is far from clear however that Dominic Grieve's Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia Definition Working Group can, or should, survive this week's fall out. What a few weeks ago was dismissed as 'dog-whistle' politics or the agenda of the 'far-Right' – the scandal of mass grooming of girls by mostly Pakistani origin males – is now viewed very differently. This shifting ground greatly impacts attempts to establish a definition of 'Islamophobia ' – controversially signposted by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner in February. A new Policy Exchange report How Not to Tackle Grooming Gangs: The National Grooming Gang Inquiry and a Definition of Islamophobia details just how difficult it has been, for over two decades, to describe openly what people could see about grooming gangs with their own eyes. Let four examples suffice here. For her past work on Rotherham, Louise Casey was put forward for an 'Islamophobe of the year award' by one activist group. The late journalist Andrew Norfolk was vilified, as was then Labour MP for Keighley, Ann Cryer. In 2020, when broadcaster Trevor Phillips was suspended by Labour for alleged Islamophobia, the first charge listed was journalism where he had written of 'the exposure of systematic and longstanding abuse by men, mostly of Pakistani Muslim origin in the North of England.' How ridiculous this orthodoxy now looks. On one level, Government appears to accept this new reality. On Monday the Home Secretary declared 'those vile perpetrators who have grown used to the authorities looking the other way must have no place to hide.' As she spoke, she was surrounded by female Labour MPs who appeared chastened by the weight of events. And yet, there are grounds for pessimism. For the national inquiry into grooming gangs to work it cannot be placed in a straitjacket. It will need to shine a torchlight into every Whitehall office, every stalled police inquiry, each Town Hall in England, and every licensing arrangement between a local authority and a taxi firm. Its hands cannot be tied by political, social or religious considerations. As Yvette Cooper spoke in the Commons, others were risking that very scenario. The call for evidence by Grieve's working group is underway, as he seeks to develop a new definition of Islamophobia. While ministers have said this would not be statutory, if accepted by the public and private sector (as activists will demand) it would in practice become binding policy if not law. To that backdrop, how confident would a care worker, teacher or local councillor in Rochdale or Rotherham be, about speaking openly on issues which concern them? Angela Rayner should thank Dominic Grieve and his team for their work, then put the group on ice. If the grooming gang inquiry finds fears of prejudice and Islamophobia have undermined the response to grooming gangs, then the retirement of the Islamophobia Definition Working Group must become permanent.