PETA slams Mayor Bass, city for 'disastrous failure' to animals after Palisades Fire
The Brief
PETA is calling out Mayor Karen Bass and city officials for their "disastrous failure to save animals after the Palisades Fire."
In a new video, PETA claims the city wouldn't allow a PETA team into the fire zone to rescue animals.
Bass' office says the city, with help from the ASPCA and other organizations, has rescued more than 1,000 animals.
LOS ANGELES - A new video from PETA calls out Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and other city officials for what they called their "disastrous failure to save animals after the Palisades Fire."
The organization claims the city turned away one of their teams offering to rescue animals, but the city says Los Angeles Animal Services and other organizations have rescued more than 1,100 animals from the Palisades Fire burn area.
What they're saying
PETA criticized what it called a lack of preparedness for the fire, and a slow response to helping animals left behind in the wake of the Palisades Fire. They claim that pets were left out in the rubble for weeks before the city did anything about it.
"Many animal companions who survived the fires wandered the rubble for weeks, terrified, hungry, and alone, while L.A. Animal Services ignored their families' desperate pleas for help saving them," said PETA Director of Outreach Ashley Byrne.
SUGGESTED: Trump tariffs could raise price of rebuilding for Eaton, Palisades fire victims
The organization also claimed that the city turned them away when they offered to send a team into the burn zone to rescue animals.
"We had a FEMA-certified disaster response team ready to go in and save animals," said Simone Reyes, Vice President of Social Compassion in Legislation, which worked with PETA.
The other side
Bass' office responded to PETA's claims on Thursday. In a statement to FOX 11, the office said that Los Angeles Animal Service worked with several other organizations including Social Compassion in Legislation, which was included in PETA's video, to rescue more than 1,000 animals in the area.
"More than 1,000 animals have been reunited with their owners and work continues to reunify the remaining animals, or to find them new homes," the statement said, in part.
What's next
Now, PETA is demanding the city come up with a emergency plan specifically to help animals before another disaster.
The Source
Information in this story is from a press release and PSA from PETA and a statement from Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass' office to FOX 11.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
LA mayor rails against ‘insulting' Vance visit: A ‘photo-op'
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) called Vice President Vance's remarks 100 percent lies after Vance traveled to Los Angeles on Friday to show support for the Marines deployed during the anti-ICE protests. 'He comes in, he makes all of these statements about what is not happening in LA at all, then insults the senator that he serves with now, as president of the Senate, so it was just disrespectful and it was tough listening to him saying what is going on in our city and it be 100 percent lies,' said Bass. Vance, in front of federal, state and local officials in Los Angeles, justified President Trump's decision to send in the National Guard and Marines to squash anti-immigration protests last week. During his remarks, Vance insinuated that California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Bass were encouraging the protestors and preventing law enforcement from doing their jobs. He referred to the protests as 'riots' and said it was necessary to send the National Guard as the violence was uncontrollable by local law enforcement. The vice president came to LA after a three-judge federal appeals court panel unanimously ruled on Thursday that Trump was allowed to deploy the National Guard in Los Angeles. Newsom sued Trump over his use of the National Guard, as he was not consulted prior to their deployment. During Vance's remarks he also misnamed Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), calling him Jose Padilla. 'I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question,' Vance said. 'I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't a theater.' Padilla was forcibly removed from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) press briefing last week after trying to ask a question. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem claimed the senator did not identify himself. Video footage showed he did identify himself when making remarks. The scene created a scandal among Democrats who fear a normalization of violence against elected officials. 'He knows my name,' Padilla told MSNBC on Saturday. 'Look, sadly, it's just an indicator of how petty and unserious this administration is. But he's the vice president of the United States. You think he'd take the situation in Los Angeles more seriously.' Democratic allies of Padilla say it was done intentionally and accuse the vice president of blatant disrespect. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
San Francisco Chronicle
21 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Less than 20% of troops deployed to L.A. are on the ground. A former commander calls that ‘awful'
Less than 20% of the nearly 5,000 National Guard and Marine troops deployed to Los Angeles were actually on the ground in the city as of earlier this week, according to text messages by a state official with direct knowledge of staffing. That level is so low a former National Guard commander called it 'awful' in an interview with the Chronicle and questioned whether the $134 million deployment is justified. Of the 4,946 National Guard members and Marines deployed by President Donald Trump to Los Angeles in response to protests of immigration raids, just 978 were in the city, the state official with firsthand knowledge of National Guard staffing levels wrote Wednesday in the text messages obtained by the Chronicle. 'Federalized National Guard and USMC forces are grossly underutilized,' the state official wrote to another state official. 'That's at 19.77% utilization rate. Insane.' The officials were discussing how the deployment was pulling soldiers away from the National Guard's wildfire mitigation work. The Chronicle is not naming the officials in accordance with its policy on anonymous sources. The former National Guard commander, Brig. Gen. Peter Cross, told the Chronicle that the less than 20% rate is consistent with what he's heard in his role as president of the National Guard Association of California. Even accounting for soldiers working in shifts, he said, soldiers should be working at a rate much closer to 100%. 'It's awful. … So far as I understand, we're not even approaching, under that shifting model, full utilization of the soldiers,' he said. 'That's extremely concerning to me as a former military commander." Democrats have been saying for weeks that the deployment is a waste of money. 'You really have to use the National Guard as a last resort,' said Cross, a retired military police officer who was deployed to the 1992 Los Angeles riots and has served in Iraq and Afghanistan. 'This is literally the most expensive option we as a society, as a country, can utilize.' Many of the troops deployed in Southern California in response to the protests are stationed at the Joint Forces Training Base in Los Alamitos, where the military has constructed massive tents to house them. The base is about 30 miles from downtown Los Angeles in Orange County. It typically is used for the National Guard and Army Reserves. Trump began federalizing National Guard troops, who are normally under governors' control, nearly two weeks ago in response to protests over aggressive immigration raids in Los Angeles. Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass opposed the deployment, saying that local and state police were sufficiently staffed to handle the protests. Trump argued that the protests had gotten out of hand. 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' the president wrote in a post on his social media website on Saturday, June 7. Shortly after the post, Trump issued an executive order federalizing 2,000 members of the National Guard for 60 days to respond to protests. The order does not specify that the troops be deployed in California or Los Angeles. Trump has since called up additional National Guard members and has also deployed 700 Marines to respond. The protests in Los Angeles, which grew after Trump deployed the troops, have since calmed significantly. Earlier this week, Bass lifted a curfew she had imposed last week for the area of downtown that has seen the most protests. Newsom has sued to regain control of the National Guard troops. He argues that Trump's federalizing of the troops is illegal and amounts to a dangerous overreach by the president. On Thursday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Trump could retain control of the Guard troops while legal challenges proceed in lower courts. 'This brazen abuse of power by a sitting President inflamed a combustible situation putting our people, our officers, and the National Guard at risk,' Newsom said in a speech several days after Trump deployed the troops. 'When Donald Trump sought blanket authority to commandeer the National Guard, he made that order apply to every state in this nation. … California may be first — but it clearly won't end here. Other states are next.' Most of the 300 National Guard members who had been working on a vegetation management team called Joint Task Force Rattlesnake have been taken off the wildfire prevention work as part of the Los Angeles deployment, according to Newsom's office. Newsom has also criticized the deployment for moving National Guard troops who had been doing drug interdiction work at the border. 'You just pulled National Guard I placed at the border who were stopping fentanyl smuggling,' Newsom wrote on social media in response to a post from a Trump administration official. 'Now they're twiddling their thumbs in LA.' Lt. Carl Trujillo, a spokesperson for the California Military Department, referred all questions about the deployment to U.S. Army North Public Affairs. He said that when National Guard troops were deployed to assist with wildfire recovery in Los Angeles earlier this year, they were stationed at the Rose Bowl and a base in Malibu, not the training base in Los Alamitos. He said the base is not typically used to station large numbers of troops for extended periods of time because it is relatively small. U.S. Army North Public Affairs declined to respond to questions about staffing levels and whether it was typical that less than 20% of the deployed troops would be used in Los Angeles on any given day, citing security concerns. The office said that the National Guard troops are being housed at Los Alamitos, while the Marines are located at Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, also in Orange County. Photos posted online by the military show the tents at the base in Los Alamitos, with some housing rows upon rows of cots and folding tables set up like a cafeteria. Images taken by a Chronicle photographer from a helicopter that flew near the base show multiple massive tents and other temporary structures that have been erected on the base. Other photos obtained by the Chronicle from inside the base also show soldiers in fatigues walking around the area as well as construction projects with cranes and wooden pallets. A nearby resident, who declined to give his name, said he has a good view of the base from his backyard. He said it's common for troops to stage there for training. He said troops had camped in smaller tents when they arrived, but now are staying in a massive tent that he estimated is longer than a football field but about the same width. The resident described the National Guard troops as 'wonderful neighbors' even if they make noise early in the morning. Reached by phone Thursday afternoon, he said he could hear troops marching down the middle of a road near his home. Cross said it's not surprising that National Guard soldiers would be stationed at the base in Los Alamitos and that it's normal protocol to build massive tents to house soldiers. But he noted that the activity at the base underscores why deploying the Guard is also the most expensive option available in a situation like this. It also takes a personal toll on the soldiers who are deployed, who must leave their families, their jobs and their educational pursuits behind. Typically the Guard should be deployed only when all local law enforcement options are exhausted. That doesn't seem to be the case here, he said. 'This melodramatic talk about people worried about the military shooting someone or being more violent than is necessary — I'm just not worried about that because of the training we have,' he said. 'I'm just skeptical whether we were needed.' In his current role with the California National Guard, Cross oversees the Youth and Community Program, which runs educational programs for struggling teens. The programs have continued to function, he said, even as many of the soldiers who work on them have been deployed. But if the deployment is still happening in a few weeks when the new school session starts, he's worried he'll have to turn more troubled teens away. 'When you're called up, you're pulled up from your employer, from your life,' Cross said. 'You want it to have value, you want it to have purpose, and if you're sitting in your armory, not tasked, that will erode your morale.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court questions judges' ability to review Trump's LA National Guard deployment
A group of appellate court judges is pondering what role the courts should play in determining whether President Donald Trump can keep control of the National Guard to protect immigration enforcement agents and suppress protesters in Los Angeles. Trump ordered 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles following protests over the raids by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard arguments on June 17 on whether to continue Trump's mobilization of the troops. It comes less than a week after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer granted California Gov. Gavin Newsom a temporary restraining order, which would have blocked Trump's deployment of the California National Guard and returned control of the troops to Newsom. The governor, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, and other leaders repeatedly claimed that Trump inflamed the protests by sending in the military when it wasn't necessary. The appellate court judges temporarily halted the federal judge's order on June 12. On June 17, the three-judge panel quizzed lawyers from the Trump administration and Newsom on whether they should factor into Trump's decision at all. Justice Department lawyer Brett Shumate told the panel that Breyer had "improperly second-guessed the president's judgment" about the need to call up the National Guard to protect federal property and personnel from "mob violence" in Los Angeles. "There is no role for the court to play in reviewing that decision," Shumate said. During the hourlong hearing on June 17, California's attorney, Samuel Harbourt, asked the appeals court to deny the Trump administration's motion. He called the federalization of the National Guard an "unprecedented, unlawful executive action." Harbourt argued that the governor doesn't have any problems giving the president "some sort of deference" for implementing federal law, but that there's nothing to defer to in the case since Newsom did not consent to the National Guard's activation as typically mandated by law. "There's really nothing to defer to because the president has not, and the defendants have made no attempt whatsoever to provide an argument or evidence that they even contemplated more modest measures to the extreme response in calling in the National Guard and militarizing the situation," Harbourt said. Harbourt did say that Los Angeles has seen "certain episodes of unrest and even violence in recent days, including violence directed at state and local law enforcement officials." But Harbourt added that local and state law enforcement have "strongly condemned these acts, and it has responded forcefully to them." The attorney urged the judges to remove the National Guard from Los Angeles so that they can return to their regular duties, including responding to emergencies such as wildfires. Harbourt concluded the troops' presence is "causing harm to our nation's broader democratic tradition of the separation of the military from civilian affairs." The hearing came as local organizers vowed to continue protesting against immigration raids, despite demonstrations in downtown Los Angeles having calmed and Bass lifting a curfew in the area. More than just ICE raids: Trump's battle with Newsom, California expands beyond immigration Meanwhile, Shumate said the appeals court should indeed grant the request for a stay of the lower court's order. Shumate said the lower court's ruling would have blocked Trump's deployment of the California National Guard and returned control of the troops to Newsom. Shumate argued that Trump complied with the statute by informing the general in charge of the troops of his decision and that the president does have the authority to call in the National Guard. Shumate also said before the lower court's ruling that the president's decisions are not subject to judicial review. The attorney said there is "documented record of sustained, ongoing mob violence." Shumate told the three-panel judges on June 17 that on June 6 more than "1,000 violent protesters" had been outside a federal building that required the National Guard. "They were essential to protecting that building," Shumate said. Shumate then argued to the appeal court judges that Trump has "unreviewable" powers as the commander-in-chief to deploy troops for any reason he sees fit. The three judges, who consist of two judicial appointees of Trump and one of former President Joe Biden, did not issue a ruling but seemed to indicate they might keep the current stay in place. The two Trump appointees, Judges Mark J. Bennett and Eric D. Miller, appeared doubtful of the Trump administration's claim that courts can't review Trump's decision to invoke a statute allowing him to activate the National Guard. But they also appeared to lean into the notion that the occasional violent protests were enough to warrant Trump's decision. And the Biden appointee, U.S. Circuit Judge Jennifer Sung, had some doubts about the case made by Harbourt, Newsom's attorney. Bennett suggested that the court could act before a hearing that Breyer has scheduled in the case for June 20. The arguments in court is another episode in "an interesting paradigm of power," between Trump and Newsom as the governor is trying to assert his role as a major leader in America's most populous state that also has the world's fourth-largest economy, said Brian Sobel, a longtime political analyst based in the San Francisco Bay Area. "Newsom is trying to establish with people that he's a national player, that he's presidential-worthy because he's willing to take Trump on," Sobel told USA TODAY. "He's choosing battles where he can have similar stature as the president, where he can assert his power and appear almost like a co-equal." Los Angeles police have said that more than 500 arrests have been made related to protest activity since June 7. The June 17 appeals court hearing comes as the Los Angeles mayor announced that she lifted the city's curfew. "The curfew, coupled with ongoing crime prevention efforts, have been largely successful in protecting stores, restaurants, businesses and residential communities from bad actors who do not care about the immigrant community," Bass said in a statement. "I am lifting the curfew effective today, and as we continue quickly adapting to chaos coming from Washington, and I will be prepared to reissue a curfew if needed. My priority will continue to be ensuring safety, stability and support in the downtown neighborhoods." 'I hate it': LA residents who surveyed vandalism fear more violence in future protests Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said this week that his department was "not letting our guard down" with the then-adjusted curfew hours. McDonnell said the decision showed the progress authorities have made in reducing crime and vandalism within the city's curfew zone. "The curfew has been an effective tool in helping us maintain public safety in the downtown Los Angeles area and deter those looking to exploit peaceful protests for criminal activity," McDonnell said in a statement. "The LAPD will maintain a strong presence in the area and continue to monitor conditions closely to protect lives, uphold the right to lawful assembly, and safeguard property." Bass first announced the six-day curfew on June 10 in a stretch of downtown Los Angeles where the protests have largely taken place, "to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting." Contributing: Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Appeals court likely to keep Trump in control of National Guard in LA
