logo
Shopee responds after pet owner says deliveryman slammed window on senior dog

Shopee responds after pet owner says deliveryman slammed window on senior dog

Straits Times05-06-2025

A Singapore pet owner shared her distress after a delivery incident allegedly caused injury to her senior dog.
Instagram user @graceey.t shared a post on May 30 detailing a distressing incident involving her senior dog and a deliveryman.
She claimed that the delivery worker, while delivering a Shopee parcel to her unit, slammed the sliding window on her dog, Bobby, after it barked at him.
She said this act resulted in bleeding in her dog's mouth, and that even a week later, she was still finding traces of blood.
She expressed frustration that Shopee had repeatedly assigned the same delivery personnel to her unit despite her complaints and said she wasn't asking for the delivery personnel to be fired, but simply wanted him reassigned to ensure her dog's safety.
Stomp understands the incident involved a Jack Russell Terrier - a highly active breed known for its energy.
When the delivery personnel approached the unit, the dog lunged forward and barked at him.
The courier, who is in his 50s and has over a year of delivery experience, instinctively closed the window to prevent the dog from jumping at him.
While this reaction might have been meant to protect himself, it may have unintentionally caused the injury.
In response to a Stomp query, a Shopee spokesperson said they have reached out to the buyer to acknowledge the seriousness of the concern raised.
"Our logistics partner has taken steps to ensure the matter is addressed constructively, including making arrangements for the reassignment of the delivery partner involved," a spokesperson said.
"We are taking this as an opportunity to review our customer support and service partner training to better manage sensitive situations.
"Shopee is committed to providing a safe and respectful experience for all users, and we appreciate the feedback that helps us continue to improve."
In an update, the Instagram user thanked netizens for reading and reposting her story and confirmed that Shopee has reviewed the case and addressed the issues.
"I'm grateful that necessary actions have been taken and they're finally making things right after the most frustrating two months of 2025 for my family and I."
Click here to contribute a story or submit it to our WhatsApp
Get more of Stomp's latest updates by following us on:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman slammed for using restaurant chopsticks to feed pet dog
Woman slammed for using restaurant chopsticks to feed pet dog

Independent Singapore

time10 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

Woman slammed for using restaurant chopsticks to feed pet dog

Photo: Freepik (for illustration purposes only) SINGAPORE: A woman has come under fire online after she was seen using restaurant chopsticks to feed her pet dog during a meal at a hotpot restaurant in Bugis. The incident reportedly occurred on the evening of June 7 at around 7pm at Bugis BBQ and Hotpot, located at Bugis Cube. A diner, who witnessed the interaction, captured the moment on video and submitted it to citizen journalism platform Stomp. In the video, the woman is seated at a booth with her dog standing on its hind legs next to her. According to the eyewitness, the woman was seen attempting to feed the dog using her chopsticks. 'I even saw the lady trying to feed the dog with her chopsticks. I think it's kind of inconsiderate,' the witness told Stomp. The act drew backlash from members of the public, many of whom expressed concern about hygiene and etiquette in shared dining spaces. A spokesperson for the restaurant clarified the establishment's pet policy and told Stomp, 'Pets are allowed in the outdoor areas of our restaurant. However, regarding the customer feeding the dog with her chopsticks, our staff were not nearby and had no knowledge of the incident.' The spokesperson added that due to the size of the restaurant, it is not feasible for staff to monitor every customer closely. 'As our restaurant is quite large, it's not possible or appropriate for our staff to constantly watch every customer, as that would be considered impolite,' they explained. Following the incident, the restaurant has taken steps to remind staff of hygiene expectations and customer conduct. 'Our manager has informed all staff members to make it clear to customers that they are not allowed to use our utensils to feed their pets,' the spokesperson added. While some online comments defended the woman's affection for her pet, many others called for stricter enforcement of dining etiquette, particularly in shared dining environments like hotpot restaurants, where utensils often come into contact with communal dishes.

Fan gets three-year ban for racially abusing player on Instagram
Fan gets three-year ban for racially abusing player on Instagram

Straits Times

time15 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Fan gets three-year ban for racially abusing player on Instagram

A fan who racially abused former Tamworth striker Chris Wreh after the fifth-tier club's FA Cup defeat to Tottenham Hotspur has been banned from attending matches for three years, the Football Association said on Friday. Harry Dunbar, of John Bunyan Close in Whiteley, admitted to sending a racist message to Wreh, who is Black, via Instagram after losing a bet on the match, which Tamworth lost 3-0 to Tottenham in the FA Cup third round on 12 January. Dunbar, 20, was sentenced at Portsmouth Magistrates Court on Wednesday. In addition to the banning order, Dunbar will serve a 12-month Community Order of 200 hours unpaid work and 10 Rehabilitation Activity Requirement days. "We welcome the decision of Portsmouth Magistrates' Court to impose a three-year football banning order on Harry Dunbar," the FA said in a statement. "We hope that this ruling sends a clear message that incidents of discrimination – whether in person or online – will not be tolerated, and that strong action will be taken against perpetrators of this unacceptable behaviour." Wreh refused to play for the National League side following the incident. He wrote on X, two days after the match that though he had the support of manager Andy Peaks, he was "disappointed" the club had not made a public statement condemning the abuse he had suffered. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Jail for cop who told woman that he could help with her CNB case if she had sex with him
Jail for cop who told woman that he could help with her CNB case if she had sex with him

Straits Times

timea day ago

  • Straits Times

Jail for cop who told woman that he could help with her CNB case if she had sex with him

Sean Teo arriving at the State Courts on April 15. He was sentenced to 13 months' jail over three charges on June 20. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG Jail for cop who told woman that he could help with her CNB case if she had sex with him SINGAPORE – A police sergeant heard that a group of people – five women and three men – were arrested i n a drug case in late 2019 , and he wanted to learn more about the women. Sean Teo then accessed a police computer platform even though he was not involved in the case, saved the women's particulars on his mobile phone and went through their social media profiles. Assuming a false identity, he met one woman he found attractive and told her in December 2019 that he would help her with the case if she had sex with him. But the insurance agent rejected his advances. On June 20, Teo, 29, was sentenced to 13 months' jail over three charges. He had pleaded guilty to one count each of misusing a computer system, soliciting sexual gratification from the woman and an offence under the Official Secrets Act. Court documents do not disclose the outcome of the woman's case, and the police said in an earlier statement that Teo has been suspended from service since January 2020. Deputy public prosecutors David Menon and Jonathan Tan stated in the documents that the woman and seven others were arrested in a suite at Marina Bay Sands (MBS) hotel on Nov 2, 2019. Teo was conducting patrol duties that day when he heard a radio transmission about the case. He was not dispatched to the scene, but one of his colleagues later shared a picture on a WhatsApp chat group of police officers, including Teo. Taken at the suite, the photo showed a white powdery substance on a plate, an MBS access card and a rolled up $2 note. Teo saved the photograph on his mobile phone, went on a police computer system and unlawfully accessed an incident report about the case to find out more about the five women. The prosecutors said: 'The accused recorded (their) names and contact numbers... and saved them on his personal mobile accused searched for (their) social media profiles... as he wanted to see what they looked like.' Teo found the insurance agent's public Instagram profile and decided to reach out to her. He then used a Telegram account that was not linked to his mobile phone number and added her on the messaging platform. He did this in an attempt to conceal his identity and avoid being implicated in any offences, said the prosecutors . Teo contacted the woman via Telegram on Dec 7, 2019, claiming to be interested in buying insurance. He introduced himself as 'James' when they met the next day and told the woman that he knew about the MBS incident. He also claimed that he could help with her case by 'leveraging his connections' with senior officers at the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB). When the woman expressed her doubts, he showed her the picture taken at the MBS suite. Teo was not authorised to show it to her, and he had committed an offence under the Official Secrets Act by doing so. After seeing the photo , the woman became convinced that Teo could help her. The prosecutors said: 'The accused told (the woman) that he had friends in CNB, and that he was aware of cases where subjects with connections in CNB could have their urine test results fabricated. '(Teo claimed that) to do this, male subjects had to pay money, while female subjects could either pay money or sleep with the IO (investigation officer). None of this was true. The accused was not personally aware of any instance where CNB investigations had been resolved in this way.' Teo then told the woman that he was willing to help her with the case if she had sex with him. The woman replied that she would ponder over the proposal and the pair parted ways. After the meeting, Teo continued exchanging messages with her via Telegram. In these messages, he alternated between reminding the woman that he could help with her case, and soliciting a sexual and romantic relationship from her. Teo also repeatedly asked her to 'be his woman', saying that she 'could sleep with him instead of sleeping with the CNB IO'. To cover his tracks, he told the woman not to tell anyone about their exchanges, and he deleted his chat logs with her. Court documents do not disclose how his offences came to light, but he later admitted to the authorities that he had been motivated by lust. Teo's bail was set at $15,000 on June 20, and he is expected to begin serving his sentence on July 7. Shaffiq Alkhatib is The Straits Times' court correspondent, covering mainly criminal cases heard at the State Courts. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store