This glassy Boston penthouse is officially the most expensive home for sale in Massachusetts
A brand new Boston penthouse 220 feet above the ground is breaking records.
The two-story condo atop the city's St. Regis Residences listed for $49.5 million this month, Jampress reported.
The luxe property is officially the most expensive listing in the state of Massachusetts, according to Zillow, soundly beating out the $39 million price tag put on the Obama family's former Martha's Vineyard rental in April.
Advertisement
6 The newly listed penthouse tops off Boston's St. Regis Residences.
Jam Press/Surrette Media Group
6 Italian marble spans the two-story great room.
Jam Press/Surrette Media Group
The grand penthouse in Boston's Seaport District spans 10,000 square feet across two floors. The home's interiors are defined by glass, marble and metal, making it look more at home along Billionaires' Row than in Beantown.
Advertisement
Floor-to-ceiling windows overlook the city skyline and Boston Harbor, but the best view is from the pool. Located on the 1,000-square-foot rooftop, the condo's crown jewel is a custom infinity-edge pool. Its transparent bottom and retractable glass roof offer swimmers a transcendent dip above the city.
Entrants to the home are greeted with a foyer of Italian marble inlay floors and a sculptural floating staircase. The two-story great room flows directly into a small, sparse kitchen.
6 The minimalistic kitchen in listing photos is in contrast with the grand scale of the home.
Jam Press/Surrette Media Group
6 Floor-to-ceiling windows flood the home with light.
Jam Press/Surrette Media Group
Advertisement
6 A rendering of the home with additional finishings.
Jam Press/Surrette Media Group
The rest of the home includes six bedrooms and 10 bathrooms, according to the listing, as well as a playroom, a home office, a gym and a private bar.
'Every element is curated for refined living and entertaining at scale,' according to the listing, held by George Sarkis and Manuel Sarkis of Douglas Elliman.
While multimillion-dollar listings are no rarity in Boston, the nearly $50 million unit faces a smaller buyer pool than a similar unit in wealthier metros like New York City or the Bay Area.
Advertisement
Boston is home to 112 millionaires and just eight billionaires, according to a 2025 ranking by the investment firm Henley & Partners. By comparison, the Big Apple boasts 818 millionaires and 66 billionaires.
The St. Regis Residences have a promising track record, however. An apartment there achieved one of the city's priciest ever sales last year when it sold for $20.35 million last year, Mansion Global reported.
6 The luxury building in the Seaport District already claims one of the most expensive residential sales in Boston's history.
Jam Press/Surrette Media Group
The sky-high unit comes with fees to match, including a roughly $22,000 monthly HOA fee and a $1,060 parking fee, Boston.com reported.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor 1
43 minutes ago
- Motor 1
'Respectfully, Maserati Is Not for Sale:' Stellantis Denies Another Rumor About the Brand's Possible Sale
Maserati isn't doing well. Sales for the Italian brand collapsed in 2024 , and they saw a 48 percent decline through the first three months of 2025. That's bleak. The poor sales have led to rumors that Stellantis might sell the Italian brand, but the automotive conglomerate continues to deny any such allegations . Stellantis did so again this week when Reuters asked the automaker if it had plans to sell Maserati amid a new rumor. A spokesperson rebuffed the allegation and told the publication, 'Respectfully, Maserati is not for sale,' reconfirming its commitment to the brand. Photo by: Maserati However, Reuters 's two sources allege McKinsey, the consultant Stellantis hired in April to navigate President Donald Trump's new import tariffs , could recommend that the automaker divest in Maserati in some way. It's supposedly one of the options McKinsey is exploring for the automaker. According to one source, Stellantis has told the consultancy to consider all possibilities for the ailing brand. However, McKinsey is allegedly still in the early phases of its work, so any definitive decision about Maserati's future is unlikely to arrive anytime soon. Another source told Reuters there is disagreement among the board about what to do with the Italian company. Some supposedly believe the brand has value to the automaker as its only luxury marque. However, others think Stellantis doesn't have the resources to support Maserati as it struggles to revamp its lineup. Maserati's Lacking Lineup Maserati has discontinued the Ghibli and the Levante, two of its best-selling models, but their replacements won't arrive until 2028 and 2027, respectively. That leaves the $80,000 Grecale (pictured below) as its only SUV in an industry where consumers continue to flock to such vehicles. It also sells the Gran Turismo , a coupe, and the MC20 supercar. Neither of those cars has broad appeal, and neither are enough to keep a brand afloat. Last year, former Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares admitted that Maserati was ' in the red .' Replacing the Levante and Ghibli could help turn around the brand's sales and financial outlook, but the luxury market is highly competitive. Alfa Romeo, another of Stellantis's Italian companies, is revamping its lineup, and it can't have products that interfere with Maserati's and vice versa. That leaves little room for either. Stellantis: Trump's Tariffs Could Force Stellantis to Sell Alfa Romeo and Maserati Maserati's Problems Go Deeper Than Marketing Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: Reuters Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
Pope Leo XIV Urges Tech Executives to Come Up With an Ethical AI Framework
Pope Leo XIV, who took over leadership of the Catholic Church in May, is revealing one area that he'll be focusing on: artificial intelligence. The Pope has called for tech companies to develop a "superior ethical criterion" against which AI should be evaluated. This message was delivered to tech leaders, including leaders from Google, Meta, OpenAI, and IBM, attending the second annual conference on AI and its ethics in Rome. The framework the Pope is asking for would ensure that AI takes "into account the well-being of the human person not only materially, but also intellectually and spiritually." In the Friday message, the Pope also points to AI's unprecedented and rapid access to information as potentially impacting children's development the most. "Our youth," he said, "must be helped, and not hindered, in their journey towards maturity and true responsibility." This isn't the first time the Pope has discussed AI; he mentioned it in his first papal address in May. He also recently spoke of the challenges that "call into question respect for the dignity of the human person" in a speech to Italian bishops. Artificial intelligence, biotechnologies, the data economy and social media were all included in that speech. He's not condemning AI outright. There is potential for good, he noted, saying that if used right, AI could "promote greater equality." However, the Pope notes that AI also offers the possibility of "misuse for selfish gain" to "foment conflict and aggression." The Vatican doesn't have any regulatory power, but that hasn't stopped it from being vocal about the ethics of AI. In 2020, the Vatican created the Rome Call for AI Ethics, a document about the ethical considerations of AI algorithms. IBM, Qualcomm and Microsoft all signed on, agreeing to abide by the principles. The Pope's firm stance on AI is similar to that of his predecessor, the late Pope Francis, who urged that AI be used only to benefit humanity.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
NYC's new broker fee law already being flouted by sneaky real estate agents, tenants say: ‘Exploiting a loophole'
Well this is just un-FARE. Sneaky New York City landlords have been using tricky tactics to get around a new law that bans them from charging broker fees to renters, The Post has learned. Advertisement Some prospective renters have reported being faced with thousands of dollars in 'management' or 'technology' fees — that look awfully similar to those previously charged by landlords to pay for real estate brokers. 'They're exploiting a loophole in the law,' said Todd Roulich, a tenant broker in New York, of landlords and agents. 6 Some New York renters are still shelling out thousands of dollars in fees for real estate brokers they didn't hire, The Post has learned. Paul Martinka Advertisement Others have reported being told to sign forms stating that they were the ones to hire the broker — even when that wasn't true. The so-called FARE Act — or Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses — prohibits renters from being charged a 'broker fee' — which is typically about 15% of the annual cost of a unit. But the city Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, the agency responsible for enforcing the FARE Act, told The Post it has received nearly 300 'questions and complaints' about violations of the new law since it went into effect June 11. 6 One Zillow listing demands a security deposit, one months' rent and a 'service/broker fee.' r/NYCapartments/KittyInaPinkHoodie Advertisement 6 'I'm trying to apply for an apartment, and the broker said to apply I need to hire him as my broker to represent the application,' one Reddit user said, 'which of course includes a broker fee.' ZJL Studio – Queens native Kelly McGarry told The Post she met brokers at two different apartment showings this month — both of which used sneaky methods to try to collect a fee. McGarry, 27, reported that each one of the agents she met with tried to get her to sign paperwork saying she hired them, even though she hadn't. 'I've applied for apartments in the past before, and I've never had to verify anything … of that sort,' McGarry said. 'They knew the FARE Act was coming, and they were prepared to do what they could to get around it.' Advertisement One Zillow listing for an apartment in Bayside, Queens blatantly reads: 'For compensation as 'Service/Broker Fee', you as Renter agrees to hire Jack as Broker [sic].' 6 'With the FARE Act going into effect June 11, landlords will be prohibited from passing on the fees of real estate brokers they have retained to prospective tenants,' DCWP said in a statement. Christopher Sadowski Another listing, in Brooklyn's Prospect Lefferts Gardens, even appeared to ask for a security deposit and first months' rent as a mysterious lump sum of $5,040 — followed by $1,800 each additional month. Reports of similar underhanded schemes also abound on Reddit, with one disgruntled tenant writing: 'Some places we reach out [to] … makes us agree to 1 month payment of fees if we sign a lease with them, and they won't show without it.' 'I'm trying to apply for an apartment, and the broker said to apply I need to hire him as my broker to represent the application. which of course includes a broker fee,' another user said. Other agents appear to be even more bold, with one Reddit user posting a StreetEasy listing that outright asked for a $3,500 broker fee – despite the website's own disclaimer that 'under NYC law, you can't be charged a broker fee if you didn't hire a broker.' 6 One Reddit user posted a breakdown of fees they were charged post-FARE Act enactment, including a $3,500 broker fee due at signing. r/NYCapartments/maraxlee 'I'm pretty sure thru FARE we don't have to pay this broker fee,' the user wrote. 'The issue is we desperately need this place lol.' Advertisement The Dept. of Consumer and Worker Protection said when the law went into effect that 'landlords will be prohibited from passing on the fees of real estate brokers they have retained to prospective tenants' under the FARE Act. 'Landlords and their agents will be unable to pass their brokers' fees on to a prospective tenant after the effective date of this law, even if a lease was signed before the effective date,' the agency said in a statement. Some tenants may become even more desperate in the coming months according to The Real Deal, which reported that some landlords are already looking to raise rents to offset costs associated with hiring a broker themselves. 6 A November rally for the FARE Act, with council member Chi Osse speaking. Paul Martinka Advertisement Allia Mohamed, CEO of real estate website Openigloo, deemed that sneaky agents and landlords attempting to ignore and try to work around the law are simply a part of a 'very natural correction period' and that the matter will stabilize when bad actors are disciplined. 'What is really important is for renters to understand their rights when it comes to the FARE Act,' Mohamed said, and 'making sure that they're taking screenshots, saving links, keeping receipts, filing those complaints until we get through this correction period.' City council member Chi Osse, who introduced the legislation last year, urged New Yorkers to report agents and landlords who continue trying to charge a broker fee to tenants. Advertisement 'If you see an online listing that says a broker is working as a prospective tenants' broker, they're lying,' Osse said. 'They posted with landlords' permission, so they're working for the landlord.' To file a complaint regarding a FARE Act violation, consumers can visit or call 311.
