Aurora Cannabis says AI-generated news reports of $215M deal and new partnership are 'entirely false'
Aurora Cannabis (ACB.TO)(ACB) is denying the validity of multiple news reports published on Wednesday. One claims the Canadian pot company is acquiring a New Zealand-based cannabis producer in a $215 million cash and stock deal. Another announces a partnership to distribute medical cannabis in Europe.
'Neither of these stories are true in any way. This is entirely false information,' Aurora's vice-president of communications and public relations Michelle Lefler stated in an email to Yahoo Finance Canada on Thursday. 'I can confirm we take this situation very seriously and are taking the appropriate actions.'
Toronto-listed Aurora shares fell more than 20 per cent on Wednesday, despite the Edmonton-based company reporting strong financial results in its most recent quarter before the opening bell.
A story posted on the website Investing.com says Aurora 'announced today the acquisition of MedLeaf Therapeutics, a specialized medical cannabis producer, for $215 million in a cash and stock transaction.'
The article, which says it was generated with the support of artificial intelligence and reviewed by an editor, quotes Aurora CEO Miguel Martin, and cites filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
A separate article appearing on Investing.com published Wednesday, also quoting Martin and citing SEC filings, references a new strategic partnership between Aurora and European pharmaceutical distributor MediPharm GmbH to expand its medical cannabis presence in Germany and other EU markets.
More to follow.
Jeff Lagerquist is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance Canada. Follow him on X @jefflagerquist.
Download the Yahoo Finance app, available for Apple and Android.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Ukraine Amasses $43 Billion for Defense Industry, Zelenskiy Says
By and Daryna Krasnolutska Save Ukraine has accumulated $43 billion for its defence industry so far this year between local funding and aid from allies, using it to ramp up the production and purchase of drones, artillery and other weaponry, said President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Kyiv has also launched a 'Build with Ukraine' program and announced new agreements to be signed this summer, including opening production lines in European countries.


Fast Company
40 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Autodesk CMO Dara Treseder on how brands are navigating attention and polarization at Cannes Lions
At the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity, top agencies and brands vie for awards and hustle to close deals. As this year's event wraps up, Autodesk CMO Dara Treseder shares the insider buzz—from the continued rise of creator-led content to how brands navigate getting the right kind of attention in a polarized market. This is an abridged transcript of an interview from Rapid Response, hosted by Robert Safian, former editor-in-chief of Fast Company. From the team behind the Masters of Scale podcast, Rapid Response features candid conversations with today's top business leaders navigating real-time challenges. Subscribe to Rapid Response wherever you get your podcasts to ensure you never miss an episode. What are you hearing people talk about here at the festival? A lot is going on. There's a recurring theme. I think . . . everyone is trying to figure out, How can I cut through without being cut out? How can I cut through without alienating a core part of my audience? Because we're living in such a polarized time, where there are very few things people can align on. And so there is really that, but we are also in an attention recession, where it's so difficult to get attention, and getting attention is not enough, because you have to convert that attention into intention, right? To get people to actually go into discovery, consideration, and ultimately purchase. So, it's not just getting the attention, but the attention in the way that's right for your brand. Exactly. Getting attention in a way that's right for your brand and drives action, drives engagement. And now, there's just so much that grabs people's attention, so grabbing attention isn't enough. It's actually converting the attention into intention, into buyer intent. Are there any rules about it, or is it that each brand has to do it in its own way? I think that there are some themes that we're seeing about how brands in general are doing this, across all industries, B2B, B2C, healthcare, technology, beauty, retail. We're seeing some recurring themes. And I think one of the big themes is leaning into creators and community, because people show up for people. They might not necessarily show up for brands in the same way as we've seen in the past. So a lot of brands are leaning into [that]. I mean, creators are all over the place. Creators and athletes. Because creators and athletes come with a more dedicated and a more engaged and a more, I'm going to use the word rabid, a little bit, fan base. Yes, real fans. Real fans, rather than just celebrities that you see. I mean, we've been talking for a few years about influencers and how that has sort of changed the marketplace. It sounds a little bit like we've broken through to a new layer with that? We've certainly broken through to a new layer. And in fact, they don't want to be called influencers. They want to be called creators. Because they're saying, 'Hey, I'm not here to just influence. I'm here to co-create with you to drive a certain outcome.' So we're seeing that happen more now. And does that change the relationship that a brand like yours has with a traditional advertising firm? Are you going to creators in a different way? It definitely changes, because creators have, I think, a lot more say and a lot more power, and they're taking a bigger space at the table. So, gone are the days, I think, where it's just you find a creator, you tell them exactly what you want to do. If you're actually trying to drive real results and you want their fans to show up, they're taking an audience-first approach. So first of all, you've got to find that creator that aligns with your values. So you have to know they agree with you or they're simpatico in that way before they start. There's got to be trust. . . . And the trust goes both ways. You have got to trust that they are aligned to your brand values, they are aligned to your customer base, because remember, you want to cut through, you want to break through, but you are not trying to cut out a big portion of your customer base. So you need to make sure that you have that trust that yes, they are aligned to your brand values, they're aligned to your purpose, they're aligned to the outcomes, but then you also have to trust them to give them the space to do what they do. Because it can't come across as an ad. It has to come across as something more organic, something that they would truly want to do on their own, because that's when their audience shows up, and that's what determines the result. Are you, in your conversations with your peers, with other CMOs, are you hearing them privately acknowledge like, 'Oh, we didn't do that quite right? We alienated a group we didn't want to.' One hundred percent, especially in today's world. . . . As we're having these private CMO roundtables, we're all sharing, here's what went wrong, here's what went right, here's what I learned. And a lot of it is just, the margin for error is a lot slimmer than it ever was. There is a very thin line between cutting through and cutting out. It's like walking on high heels on a teeny-tiny thread. There is no margin for error. And so . . . a lot of CMOs are thinking about, How do I do this and how do I do this well?. . . And I think one of the things that's really important is making sure that you have a broad pull at the table as these decisions are being made, and that you are also able to pivot and adjust very quickly. Yes. The idea that to break through, you have to say something sharp, but you're also saying that the risk is higher than ever, but you have to take that risk. There's no way out of this bind. There's no way out. Let me tell you. We've got to give CMOs and marketers, all marketers at all levels, we've got to give [them] a break. It is a tough world out there. And so, yes, you have to opine with a spine, but you got to be careful what you opine on. So you need to pick the thing that truly makes sense for your brand and business. You cannot opine on everything. If you speak about everything, you're speaking about nothing. And if you end up speaking about things that you have not earned the right to speak about, you don't have the credibility to speak about, you could end up in some real hot water that you don't want to be on. Not the good kind of bath, the scalding kind of bath. So there really is that thoughtfulness that has to go into it.


New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
What I'm hearing about the Winnipeg Jets: Jonathan Toews' impact on Nikolaj Ehlers' future, more
The Winnipeg Jets can sign famous Conn Smythe Trophy-winning unrestricted free-agent players with glittering resumes after all. It helps when his name is attached to a prominent city community centre. Or that he maintains close, positive relationships with Jets general manager Kevin Cheveldayoff and True North chairman Mark Chipman. Jonathan Toews is famously proud of his Winnipeg roots, and his homecoming has seemed like a fait accompli — pending good health — since he told The Athletic he was serious about his comeback bid. Advertisement The Jets have signed Toews to a bonus-laden contract, with a base salary of $2 million and the potential for Toews to earn as much as $7 million He is beginning the final act of a career that includes three Stanley Cup titles, the aforementioned Conn Smythe Trophy, 883 points in 1,067 regular-season games and 119 points in 137 playoff games. His next game will be his first since April 2023, after long COVID derailed the now 37-year-old's NHL career. He's been to Costa Rica, Indonesia and India in search of good health — and has most recently been skating and training in Minneapolis. But what can Toews be at this stage of his career? How does his signing affect Nikolaj Ehlers or Winnipeg's other UFAs? And what's the latest on Dylan Samberg, Gabriel Vilardi, the Jets' plans at the draft and Winnipeg's other key roster decisions? This is what I'm hearing about the Jets' offseason so far. There are two schools of thought on Toews' impact on Ehlers' future. One is that Toews' bonus-heavy contract will force the Jets to keep $7 million in cap space allocated for him, thus eating up too much budget and forcing Ehlers out the door. That's not the case. Or: It's not automatically the case. Toews' base salary of $2 million will count against Winnipeg's salary cap during the season. At the end of the year, the bonuses he achieves will be added to the Jets' final cap hit. As per PuckPedia: If Toews' bonuses bring Winnipeg over the $95.5 million cap, then the amount by which Winnipeg exceeds $95.5 million will be applied to the 2026-27 Jets cap as a carryover. If the Jets are willing to go into overages on all $5 million of Toews' bonus, they have about $23 million to sign Samberg, Vilardi, Ehlers and two depth forwards. AFP Analytics projects an $8.1 million contract for Ehlers, $5.2 million for Samberg and $6.8 million for Vilardi, leaving sufficient room to sign all three and bring up whichever depth forwards they choose. Advertisement If the Jets want to pay Ehlers $8.5 million — and he wants to take it — there's room for him to stay. Does he want to stay? We're headed for a situation in which Ehlers explores everything the UFA market has to offer. It's sensible to think that contending teams with cap space and roster room — or plans to open up that room — will include the Carolina Hurricanes, the Washington Capitals, the New Jersey Devils and both New York teams, among others. Ehlers wants to win, wants to get paid, wants to play a big role and might not want to do it in a fishbowl. I don't think his future runs through Toronto or Montreal, for example, nor do I expect a rebuilding team such as the Chicago Blackhawks to be at the front of his mind. It's important to highlight the degree to which Ehlers has kept his negotiations out of the media. He has said he loves Winnipeg and his teammates and nothing more, including in one-on-one conversations throughout the season. The impact of this approach is to leave the door open. If (and when) he explores the UFA market, he'll have the opportunity to evaluate an array of offers, contrast them with the Jets' offer, and — if he finds the grass doesn't look greener — he'll be able to circle back. As much as I expect Ehlers to sign elsewhere, he hasn't burned any bridges, nor have the Jets. That's a vital consideration that (obviously) speaks well of both sides. There's no doubt in my mind the Jets are thrilled to have signed Toews. The on-ice bet is sensible: Mark Scheifele is the team's No. 1 centre, and Adam Lowry plays a lot of top competition in a shutdown role. If Toews replaces Vladislav Namestnikov — last year's nominal second-line centre, despite averaging 12:34 at five-on-five compared with Lowry's 12:43 — it will be Toews' smallest workload since he was a rookie. Advertisement Even at 37 years old, on the downswing of his career — and even coming back from chronic inflammatory response syndrome and symptoms of long COVID — this is a job Toews might succeed in. The Jets don't need him to be the Conn Smythe Trophy-winning perennial All-Star he once was. They need him to be something closer to the equivalent of Paul Stastny during Stastny's second stint with the team. Toews' contract structure mitigates some but not all of that risk. If he's entirely unable to play and this whole thing goes poorly, then the Jets burned $2 million on a one-year contract. There's really no issue with that, with any amount of belief in Toews' ability. A league source told The Athletic that Toews' contract pays $2 million in base salary with another $5 million available in potential bonuses: Toews would thus cost $5.25 million if Toews plays at least 50 games and the Jets make the playoffs. He wouldn't have to play well — he'd just need to play. The Jets are banking on the Stastny-Part-2 type of impact, but the range of possibilities here is wide. Toews' compete level and hockey IQ are elite such that he's a viable NHL player even if his wheels are gone; even if he's a fourth-line centre, say, he can help … but he'd be an awfully expensive fourth-line centre. My guess is Toews will help in a secondary capacity even if he's unable to return to top-six excellence. Even without Ehlers, there are multiple viable combinations. One version of the Jets' top-nine forward group: Connor — Scheifele — Vilardi Perfetti — Toews — Iafallo Niederreiter — Lowry — Namestnikov It's not ideal, but it's solid. Winnipeg would be more explosive with Ehlers in the lineup, and seven of these nine forwards are left-handed shooters. But Toews and Lowry could each play substantial roles in the middle six, if everything works out. If Toews struggles, then Lowry and Scheifele will play more. If he excels at any point, there's room for his role to grow. Advertisement The toughest ask might be of Scott Arniel: Toews is Toews, whatever level he can get to. It would be hard for most coaches not to tap him for his next shift, regardless of his level of play. A little early-season restraint could go a long way. Dominic Toninato has parted ways with his agent, Neil Sheehy, who said his understanding is that Toninato intends to represent himself in offseason negotiations. Toninato, 31, played in five regular-season games and two playoff games for Winnipeg this season, along with 60 AHL games for Manitoba. He was also named Moose captain this season and is well appreciated by the Jets organization. I expect him to sign another two-way NHL/AHL contract with Winnipeg. I'm less confident in contracts for pending UFAs Mason Appleton and Brandon Tanev. They've earned larger contracts than I expect Winnipeg to value — the ultimate case of 'I like that player, but not at that price.' If the Jets do let them go, Jaret Anderson-Dolan and Parker Ford will compete for depth jobs at a fraction of the cost. Meanwhile, Brad Lambert and Nikita Chibrikov are still waiver-exempt, but it's about time at least one of them seized an NHL job. Rasmus Kupari would have been ideal, but he wanted a bigger role and will get one with Lugano HC in Switzerland. I'd understand some frustration after a season spent mostly as a fourth-line centre, but wonder whether Kupari is costing himself a shot at more opportunity with the Jets themselves — particularly if Appleton's job becomes available. I wouldn't expect either Samberg or Vilardi to sign quickly. Instead, I expect each of them will file for arbitration before the deadline July 5 and then continue to negotiate in advance of their hearings. They're both integral pieces of the Jets' future. Samberg is fully bought in on Winnipeg, and I expect him to sign a long-term contract. Vilardi's development extends the Jets' competitive window, and he's a similarly big priority. Why no rush, then? One reason is there's no deadline. We've seen Kyle Connor, Patrik Laine and Josh Morrissey all sign in September, for example. Arbitration creates a mid-August deadline, depending on the hearing date, because no one truly wants to hear their team carve them apart to keep the money down. Another reason is this summer's $7.5 million increase in the salary cap. Negotiations usually hinge upon apples-to-apples comparisons — UFA to UFA, RFA to RFA, etc. — but the increased cap creates the opportunity for surprising contracts. It might be in everybody's interest to wait and see how July 1 affects the market before committing to a long-term contract. Advertisement The Jets will have eight defencemen under contract once Samberg is signed. That's not a problem — it's easy enough to make it to training camp and waive somebody, as necessary — but there's a chance the Jets will trim their defence pre-emptively this time around. Logan Stanley's name was floated on the trade market last summer, for example, although the interest was not substantial. Ville Heinola is another defenceman who could be had if the Jets received a meaningful offer. Stanley is scheduled to become a UFA next summer, and Heinola could join him. The 24-year-old Finn needs to play 27 NHL games this season to stay under Jets control. There's also the chance Winnipeg will move an older player, such as Luke Schenn or Colin Miller. I have not heard the Jets are looking to make space that way — and, again, the easiest play is to wait until camp and hope good health forces difficult decisions on all fronts. — Salary-cap data via PuckPedia. — The Athletic's Chris Johnston contributed to this report. (Top photo of Jonathan Toews in March 2022: Jamie Sabau / Getty Images)