Can't sleep in the heat? Scientists reveal simple sock hack that's guaranteed to help you doze off
With the UK in the grips of 2025's first heatwave, many of us will be struggling to doze off amid the tropical heat.
If you can't sleep in the heat, scientists may have a counterintuitive solution.
Although it might seem bizarre, putting on a pair of socks before you head to bed could be the key to drifting off peacefully.
Studies have shown that this simple hack can help you fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer, and get a better night of rest.
Wearing socks has even been proven to be effective at bedroom temperatures up to 23°C - hotter than nighttime temperatures in many places across the country this weekend.
This strange trick works because our bodies' sleep and temperature regulation systems are deeply linked.
Professor Eus van Someren, head of the Department of Sleep and Cognition at the Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, told MailOnline: 'The brain not only regulates body temperature, but also reads out skin temperature.
'It may interpret warm feet as the right moment to fall asleep.'
Why should you wear socks to bed?
Our core body temperature has a day-night rhythm, starting to drop in the evening to reach its lowest point around four in the morning.
That means the best time to sleep is when the core body temperature is on its way down.
Normally, your body would cool itself close to bedtime by sending blood to the skin in a process called distal vasodilation, which makes the skin hot.
Professor van Someren says this is like 'opening the radiator in the heating system in your home.'
When you put on socks, this increases the temperature of your skin and creates signals that your brain mistakes for the warming caused by vasodilation.
Your brain will then believe that it is time to fall asleep, and you will find it easier to drift off.
But wearing socks also helps you get to sleep in a more counterintuitive way.
When our skin becomes hot, the brain's temperature control system sends a signal to the body telling it to start venting heat by sending hot blood into veins near the surface.
This causes an increase in vasodilation, sending blood rushing to the skin and dropping the core body temperature down to safe levels.
Dr Michael Gradisar, head of sleep science and clinical psychologist and Sleep Cycle, says that wearing socks can trick the body into triggering vasodilation.
This, in turn, causes the core body temperature to drop and helps you drift off to sleep.
Dr Gradisar says: 'For people who need extra help warming their feet to assist their natural thermoregulation, socks can be helpful.'
That might be especially useful if you suffer from Raynaud's phenomenon, poor circulation, or other conditions that interfere with blood flow to the extremities.
A study published in 2018 by researchers from Seoul National University found that wearing bed socks significantly improved sleep even when the room was a toasty 23°C.
Those who wore socks to bed fell asleep 7.5 minutes faster on average and woke up more than seven times less frequently during the night.
How can you get the most out of this trick?
To make this trick work for you, it's important that you maximise the amount your core body temperature falls before bed.
Studies of skin heating techniques show that the best results were achieved when the feet were warmed about one hour before bedtime.
That means you should put on socks before you get into bed to trigger the core cooling process early.
Wearing the right material can also make a big difference, as you don't want anything that will trap too much heat or moisture.
Dr Gradisar says that 'natural fibres like wool help' since these offer the best balance of breathability and warmth.
Likewise, a study of sleepers conducted at 30°C and relative humidity of 50 per cent found that those wearing Merino wool sleepwear got a better night's rest than those wearing cotton.
Additionally, if you can find a way of cooling down your body while your feet stay hot, that will ensure the best temperature gradient for sleep.
Dr Gradisar recommends using a fan or other means to try and keep the bedroom as cool as possible.
However, with temperatures over 30°C forecast this weekend, it is also important to avoid making your feet too hot during the night.
Professor Bill Wisden, an expert on the neuroscience of sleep from Imperial College London, told MailOnline: 'Heat is like any intrusive stimulus such as pain, or noise or vibration. It wakes you up.
'Even if the socks help you go to sleep, having hot feet in summer will wake you up!'
So, if you do find yourself getting too hot as you doze, simply kick the socks off before falling asleep.
The increased vasodilation will linger for a while afterwards, and exposing your feet to the air could produce an even greater drop in core temperature, helping you fall asleep faster and stay asleep all night.
What if you find socks uncomfortable?
Many people may find the idea of wearing socks to bed an extremely unpleasant thought.
Luckily, if you are one of those people who like to let their feet breathe, there is another way to get the same effects.
Anything you can do to raise the temperature of your skin before getting ready for bed will trigger the same vasodilation effects as putting on a pair of socks.
Professor Wisden says: 'I recommend just before bedtime, take a hot shower or warm bath, even on a warm evening.
'At the end of the day, this raises the probability that you will drift off to sleep.'
You don't even need to have a full bath or shower if that seems like too much effort.
Studies have shown that simply bathing the feet up to the ankle in 40°C water for about 20 minutes, one to two hours before bed, helps people fall asleep about 10 minutes faster on average.
So, although it might sound odd, if you want to beat the heat this weekend, the best thing to do is to get as hot as possible before bed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
NHS sends patients abroad after waiting lists hit record high
The NHS is paying to send rising numbers of British patients abroad for treatment after waiting lists in England hit record highs. The health service is funding treatments across Europe in countries including Poland, Lithuania and the Czech Republic. Treatments being carried out abroad range from routine operations, including hip replacements and cataract operations, to more complex cancer surgery. The number of people having such procedures overseas has jumped by 42 per cent in just two years, The Telegraph can reveal. The Health Secretary described the situation as 'unacceptable', saying a 'broken NHS' had left patients waiting 'far too long for treatment, forcing many to go private or even seek healthcare abroad'. The revelations come as Wes Streeting prepares to publish a 10-year health plan that aims to clear backlogs and reform the way services are delivered. On Friday night, he pledged his plan would 'catapult the NHS into the 21st century and get people seen on time in a modern health service on British shores'. Experts said the rising cases were a 'terrible indictment' of the state of the NHS, with Poland, Germany, Italy and Belgium among the main beneficiaries. Under a little-known post-Brexit healthcare agreement, the NHS will pay another European country to treat UK patients where there is 'undue delay' to them accessing equivalent treatment on the NHS within a 'medically acceptable timeframe'. Patients desperate to have gynaecology surgery and hip replacements were the most likely to get NHS approval to travel overseas for their treatment. Those waiting for cancer treatment, and surgery to repair hernias, remove gallbladders and treat cataracts also fled Britain to get help more quickly, the investigation reveals. The treatment or surgery must be provided by a state healthcare system, not a private clinic, and patients must fund their own travel and accommodation costs. There has been a rapid rise in the number of UK patients using the scheme, as the NHS battles to reduce waiting lists, which peaked in 2023. In the last three years, the NHS has spent £4.32 million sending 352 patients overseas for treatment, according to data from the NHS Business Services Authority, which handles the payments. The number of overseas treatments paid for by the NHS jumped from 99 in 2022-23 to 112 in 2023-24 and rose again to 141 in 2024-25, according to figures obtained by The Telegraph under Freedom of Information laws. Mr Streeting said: 'This Government inherited a broken NHS, with patients left waiting far too long for treatment, forcing many to go private or even seeking healthcare abroad. This is unacceptable and, since day one in office, we have been delivering the investment and reform needed to turn the NHS around. 'We are focused on delivering for patients, so they get the treatment they need, when they need it, closer to home. In less than a year, we've delivered 3.6 million more appointments, cut the waiting list by almost a quarter of a million, and diagnosed an extra 100,000 suspected cancer patients on time. 'There's a long way to go, but we are finally putting the NHS on the road to recovery. 'Our forthcoming 10-year plan will lay out how we catapult the NHS into the 21st century and get people seen on time in a modern health service on British shores.' Dennis Reed, from Silver Voices, said: 'This is a terrible indictment of the state of the NHS. People have to be desperate to think about having hospital treatment in another country, hundreds of miles away. 'It is really worrying and it's also worrying about the inequalities – most of us wouldn't know about this scheme, and many could not afford the travel and hotels, so the vast majority of the population just have to put up with really long waits.' 'Says a lot about pressures on NHS' There are currently 1.4 million people waiting for NHS gynaecology or orthopaedic procedures, including hip replacements, in England. Of these, nearly 43,000 have waited more than a year for treatment since being diagnosed, latest figures for April 2025 show. Siva Anandaciva, director of policy at The King's Fund, said it was 'striking' that more Britons were getting treatment overseas. 'It was only a few years ago that the concerns about medical tourism were that too many people were coming to the UK to seek treatment. It says a lot about the pressures the NHS is under that the concern now is that too many people [from the UK] are seeking treatment overseas,' he said. 'The NHS has made substantial progress in tackling the very longest waits for care that built up before and after the Covid-19 pandemic, but the reality is that it will be several years before national waiting list targets are routinely met again.' Patients were most likely to travel to Poland for treatment, with the NHS paying for 72 procedures to be carried out there between 2022-23 and 2024-25. This was followed by Germany (59 procedures), Italy (32), Belgium (31) and Ireland (26). But the NHS spent the most money on treatments performed in Ireland, which cost around £3.15 million over the last three years. It also spent £224,000 on NHS patients having treatment in Germany; £147,000 on treatments in Poland; £138,000 in Switzerland; £138,000 in Italy; and £134,000 in Austria. Payment figures were recorded by the NHS in the local currency and converted to pound sterling by The Telegraph based on currency exchange rates at the time of writing. Separate NHS England figures also revealed that nearly two out of every five applications (37 per cent) made by patients wanting to travel abroad for treatment were approved in 2024, up from just one in five (21 per cent) in 2022, suggesting more applications are meeting the criteria for 'undue delay'. Rachel Power, chief executive of The Patients Association, said when patients felt compelled to seek treatment abroad, it was 'a reflection of the state of the waiting lists and the very severe problems of the NHS'. Mrs Power suggested the system could worsen 'inequalities', as the scheme is only accessible to those able to work out the application process and who have the means to pay for travel and accommodation. 'To do this, you have to have the confidence and ability to navigate the system – we talk to patients all the time who can't navigate and access treatment [on the NHS],' she said. Prof Ranee Thakar, president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said the fact patients were travelling long distances for treatment was 'clear evidence that they can't access the care they need, when they need it'. She added the Government must tackle the 'critical issue' of long waits for gynaecology treatment in its upcoming NHS 10-year health plan. 'There are more than three quarters of a million women in the UK waiting for hospital gynaecology care, with serious conditions that have a devastating impact on almost every aspect of their lives,' said Prof Thakar.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Lucie Southall: Brother vows 'never again' after 21-hour walk
A brother from Redditch has vowed "never again" after walking more than 50 miles through the night in tribute of his late sister. Ashley Southall, from Redditch, lost his 12-year-old sister Lucie when she died from leukaemia in 2013. Her family set up the Lucie Southall Leukaemia Fund a year later to raise money for charity through challenges and events. The 31-year-old completed the challenging on Saturday, walking through fields, bridleways, canals and footpaths in a mammoth 21-hour stint. The route took him and friend from Lucie's dedicated bench in Arrow Valley Lake to Ronald McDonald House in Birmingham. The centre provides en-suite bedrooms for family members whose children are being treated at Birmingham Children's Hospital. It can accommodate up to 60 families at any one time and supports more than 6,000 in an average year. Lucie's family say it gave them a place to stay when it mattered most. In a renewed fundraising push, they are trying to raise £5,000 to sponsor two rooms for three years. The pair set off on a warm Friday afternoon and Mr Southall said he felt okay for about 35 miles before the blisters and the cramp set claimed they also had to contend with unruly wildlife including "an angry bull and fierce swans". But he still managed to "keep his head while his body took a bettering", he added. After the challenge, though, he jokingly had one message: "Never again." Lucie's cousin David Southall helped organise the event but was unable to take part due to an injury. The newly-qualified firefighter was advised against the challenge to avoid making his bad knee worse, but said loved ones were impressed by the effort. "Everyone that knows Ash knows that he is way out of his comfort zone but he's also not someone that will give up easily either," he said. "All family and friends are proud of both of the lads and the Lucie Southall Leukaemia Fund is grateful for all of the funds raised." Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Medics arrested at eco protests should not be struck off, say doctors
Doctors who are arrested while demonstrating at climate change protests should not be struck off, a union is being urged to say. A series of motions to be put before the British Medical Association (BMA) are calling for unwavering support to be given to NHS staff who take part in 'non-violent' eco action. If successful, the union would call for a ban on disciplinary proceedings being brought against activist doctors who are arrested for protest stunts that may include inflicting criminal damage on property and businesses. One motion submitted to the annual representative meeting in Liverpool, which begins on June 23, says the BMA should recognise ' climate change is a public health emergency ' so doctors 'have an ethical duty to advocate for direct action'. It adds that medics should 'condemn' any complaints or disciplinary actions brought 'against doctors who engage in non-violent climate activism'. 'Non-violent climate advocacy' It also calls for 'explicit protections within employment contracts… to ensure doctors do not face career detriment for engaging in non-violent climate advocacy'. Another motion asks BMA members to formally recognise 'that it is a mark of tyrannical regimes that they seek to destroy the careers of those who challenge them' and for the union to refuse to take part in any disciplinary action against medics convicted of 'forms of civil disobedience which do not involve violence to the person'. The moves follow a series of high-profile court cases that have seen doctors sanctioned for taking part in climate activism. In January, Dr Sarah Benn lost an appeal against the suspension of her medical license after she was jailed for breaching a court order by taking part in climate protests. She took part in three Just Stop Oil protests at an oil terminal in Warwickshire in 2022 before being suspended from practising for five months by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) in April 2024. Dr Benn, who had worked in Birmingham and has since retired, sought to challenge the tribunal's findings at the High Court. However, a judge rejected her case after concluding she 'intended to act in a way that did not meet the standards of behaviour to be expected of a doctor'. Also in January, Dr Patrick Hart was jailed for a year after being found guilty of causing criminal damage after damaging petrol pumps with a hammer and chisel at an M25 service station. In total, 16 fuel pumps at Thurrock Motorway Services, in Grays, Essex, were attacked by Hart on Aug 24, 2022. When the doctor is released from prison, he will face a tribunal after being referred for a disciplinary hearing by his medical regulator, the General Medical Council. A spokesman for the GMC said at the time that Dr Hart was not currently suspended. Before he was sentenced, Dr Hart told the court: 'Right now, the greatest health threat to all of us is the unfolding climate catastrophe. 'It is the greatest health threat we have ever faced. All healthcare workers have a responsibility to protect the health of their patients. 'If we do not stand up to the oil and gas executives who are wreaking havoc on our climate and the politicians who enable them, if we do not end the burning of fossil fuels, then we will have failed as a profession and the health systems that we have developed over centuries will collapse. 'I will continue to fight against the death sentence of fossil fuels for as long as I have strength in me. I have no greater duty as a doctor at this moment in history.'
