Carney, Modi hold talks to reset India and Canada ties after tense two years
KANANASKIS, Alberta, June 17 (Reuters) - The leaders of India and Canada on Tuesday held their first bilateral meeting since then-Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused New Delhi in 2023 of involvement in the killing of a Canadian Sikh separatist.
Relations have been poor for almost two years but there was no sign of tension when Prime Minister Mark Carney warmly welcomed Indian counterpart Narendra Modi to the Group of Seven summit he is chairing in Alberta.
India denied Canada's allegations of involvement in the murder, and both nations are looking to shore up global partnerships as trade tensions and wars are recasting long-standing alliances.
Carney has previously said he invited India, which is not a G7 member, due to its importance in global supply chains.
"It is my great honor to have you here," Carney told Modi, saying their meeting was a "testament to the importance of your country" and the issues they needed to tackle together.
These included energy security, artificial intelligence, and the fights "against terrorism" and against transnational repression.
Carney did not mention the furor sparked when Trudeau accused India's government of involvement in the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar on Canadian soil.
Modi did not mention the case either. Speaking through an interpreter, he said the two nations could work together to strengthen democratic values.
"I'm sure, under your leadership, we will be able to work together in a positive way," said Modi, paying his first visit to Canada for a decade.
India is Canada's top source of temporary foreign workers and international students, as well as an important market.
Greg Cherewyk, president of the Pulse Canada industry group, said Canadian farmers hope to export more agricultural products to the world's most populous nation, including lentils.
Canada's Sikh community, the largest outside of the Indian state of Punjab, has voiced outrage over Modi's visit, saying Canada should have set conditions before inviting him. A few dozen Sikh protesters in downtown Calgary tore apart Indian flags in protest on Tuesday.
Modi's government has denied involvement in the killing and accused Canada of providing a safe haven for Sikh separatists.
Last year, Canada expelled six Indian diplomats, linking them to Nijjar's murder and alleging a broader government effort to target Indian dissidents in Canada. Four men have been charged with his murder.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
9 hours ago
- Times
‘We had seconds to decide if India's missile was nuclear'
As President Trump deliberated over whether to enter Israel's war with Iran, there was another potential conflict taking his attention last week. His unexpected guest on Wednesday was Field Marshal Asim Munir, Pakistan's army chief, for a closed-door lunch in the cabinet room, the first time a US president had hosted a Pakistan military chief who was not also the head of state. With Trump was Marco Rubio, his secretary of state, and Steve Witkoff, the former property developer turned special representative for the Middle East. Munir was accompanied only by Lieutenant General Asim Malik, the national security adviser. There were no civilian officials, perhaps reflecting whom Trump sees as holding power in Pakistan. 'The reason I had him here was that I wanted to thank him for not going into the war [with India],' said Trump. 'And I want to thank PM [Narendra] Modi as well, who just left a few days ago.' Pakistan has said that although all-out war between the two nuclear powers was narrowly averted by US intervention last month after the deadliest fighting in decades, the conflict in a region that is home to 1.6 billion people is far from resolved. As a result Pakistan and India were now closer to nuclear war than at any previous point, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, the former foreign minister, told The Sunday Times. • No ceasefire will let India and Pakistan escape their history On the final day of clashes, he said, India had deployed a dual-use cruise missile capable of holding a nuclear warhead and Pakistan had had to make an immediate decision about whether it was under nuclear attack. 'In that atmosphere you've got only a few seconds to decide looking at an image: is this missile going to be used within the nuclear connotation or not? And in those split seconds decisions are made.' 'The escalation ladder was rising so fast,' Bhutto Zardari said. The situation in the region remained 'incredibly perilous'. He said: 'We've achieved a ceasefire but we haven't achieved peace. And that's problematic because following this recent conflict we have lowered the threshold for full-blown military conflict to the lowest it has ever been, to what I believe are dangerously low levels.' Bhutto Zardari was speaking while visiting London as head of a nine-member delegation of MPs sent by Shehbaz Sharif, the prime minister, to 'pitch for peace' and call for international talks to resolve the problem of Kashmir over which the two nations have fought three wars. He said Pakistan had agreed to the ceasefire because it was promised such a summit, which has not materialised. India has sent a rival delegation of politicians and diplomats led by the Congress MP Shashi Tharoor to London, Washington and elsewhere to argue that Pakistan is a sponsor of cross-border terrorism and a threat to global stability. The fighting between the two broke out last month after an April terrorist attack in the Indian-controlled part of Kashmir, which India blamed on Pakistan. Twenty-six people were shot dead in a meadow in the tourist resort of Pahalgam. • How the Kashmir massacre unfolded Islamabad denied responsibility but India launched strikes deep in Pakistan against what it claimed were terrorist training camps. Pakistan claimed that it shot down six Indian fighter planes before a US-brokered ceasefire came into force on May 10. Bhutto Zardari, 36, is leader of the Pakistan People's Party (PPP), which is in coalition with the ruling party, and the son of the president. His mother, Benazir Bhutto, was Pakistan's first female prime minister –— an office she held twice, the first time in 1988 just two months after giving birth to him. He insists that Pakistan had nothing to do with the Pahalgam attack, which was initially claimed by a little-known organisation called the Resistance Front that India says is an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (L-e-T), a Pakistani terrorist group long linked to Pakistan's military intelligence. The Resistance Front later retracted the claim. MUZAMMIL AHMED/AFP/GETTY IMAGES 'To this day, they [the Indian government] haven't provided the Indian public, their allies, or us, or the media, with names of the individuals involved in this attack,' Zardari said. 'If they did indeed come from Pakistan, who are they? Where did they come from? What border crossing points did they use? Who facilitated them? One of the largest and supposedly most efficient intelligence agencies in the world should be able to share this information.' Groups that Delhi claims are proxies for Pakistan have a long history of attacks in India — most notably the Mumbai massacre in 2008 in which terrorists laid siege to five-star hotels, going door to door shooting guests, murdering 166 people. The only attacker captured alive said the terrorists were members of L-e-T. Bhutto Zardari admits Pakistan has 'a credibility problem', adding: 'I'm not denying Pakistan has a complicated past.' That past is personal for him. He was thrust into frontline politics in 2007, when he was 19 and his mother was assassinated by terrorists. His grandfather, who founded the PPP, was executed by the military. Both his uncles met mysterious ends. For years Pakistan's military differentiated between militant groups, using some for their own purposes while pursuing others. He argues things have changed. 'This credibility and perception problem is rooted in deep biases, tainted by Islamophobia, and obfuscates from our actual effort to combat terrorism. 'I grew up during 9/11. My mother championed the fight against terrorism — she warned the world then. She gave her life doing that. Ever since she was assassinated, I at every point have opposed appeasement with any groups. We took the fight to these guys and my generation living in Pakistan now has nothing to do with it. 'I don't believe we should punish the children of Pakistan today for whatever happened in the past, particularly when we've fought against these groups and continue to as we've proven before international forums and under extreme scrutiny. We can't be condemned for past mistakes.' Bhutto Zardari accused the West of worsening Pakistan's security situation by abandoning Afghanistan and 'leaving a vacuum' there. Pakistan's military intelligence historically had close links to the Taliban but since the group took power in 2021 it has turned against its former backers. 'The rest of the world may have moved on from Afghanistan and exited Kabul, but we're fighting terrorism from there,' Bhutto Zardari said. 'The single largest number of terrorist attacks anywhere in the world is Pakistan.' At a meeting in London with Hamish Falconer, the Middle East minister, the Speaker and MPs, Bhutto Zardari raised the subject of an international conference on Kashmir. Pakistan sees the UK as having a particular responsibility, given that the conflict dates back to the British partition of India in 1947. Bhutto Zardari said: 'At a time where the Pakistani army believes that we had a military upper hand in the conflict, we agreed to a ceasefire because we believed there was a commitment from the United States that we'd go on to have a dialogue in a neutral location on all friction points. 'Now that isn't happening. We don't want the international community to get a false sense of ease as a result of the ceasefire. There's still a very real threat.'
Telegraph
14 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour must put energy security ahead of net zero ideology
British Government ministers appear to enjoy nothing quite so much as interfering with complex systems they don't entirely understand. Research commissioned by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has highlighted one set of clearly unintended consequences that could soon come about as a result of Energy Secretary Ed Miliband's fanatical pursuit of his 2050 target. Interactions between high temperatures, solar panels, heat pumps and the transmission network may result in a greater likelihood of 'electricity shortfalls and loadshedding', a polite euphemism for controlled blackouts. The driving mechanisms are straightforward: heat pumps, soon to be mandatory in newbuilds, and highly incentivised in older properties, offer cooling capabilities that are likely to increase electricity demand during hot periods. At the same time, Britain's distributed renewables grid will be more exposed to degradation of performance due to these same high temperatures as solar panel efficiency falls and transmission networks are pushed to their limit as carrying capacities fall, increasing 'the likelihood of widespread blackouts'. It is a fascinating combination of incentives and outcomes, particularly for a department with 'energy security' in its title. It is also an excellent illustration of why we should be deeply sceptical of government schemes that seek to remake society on a grand scale: the choices to push certain approaches has created this pathway to instability. It is far from the only way in which net zero puts energy security at risk. There are the dark, windless winter days where neither solar nor wind provide significant inputs into Britain's grid, potentially leaving us reliant on backup power sources – an additional source of capital costs – or on interconnectors to European countries, which may also find their generating capacity limited. At the other end of the spectrum, a report into Spain's April blackouts has highlighted that particularly sunny days may drive prices negative, causing producers to switch off in a cascading failure. Britain does at least seem to have learnt this lesson ahead of time, taking steps to prevent a similar incident here. As the UK report has highlighted, however, it would be foolish to assume perfect foresight of future risks. It is surely time the Government put energy security ahead of net zero ideology.
Times
15 hours ago
- Times
Pakistan to recommend Donald Trump for Nobel peace prize
Pakistan has announced that it will formally recommend President Trump as a nominee for the Nobel peace prize for his 'great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship' in securing a ceasefire its recent conflict with India. The announcement came on Saturday, hours after Trump took credit for a peace deal negotiated in Washington between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, and at a time the US leader is considering potential intervention in the Middle East. • US moves B-2 stealth bombers as Israel-Iran conflict continues 'The government of Pakistan has decided to formally recommend President Donald J Trump for the 2026 Nobel peace prize,' the Pakistani government wrote on social media. It said the decision was taken 'in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis'. It comes after Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, had an unprecedented one-on-one meeting with Trump on Wednesday at the White House, during which they engaged in discussions for more than two hours. Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of the Pakistan Armed Forces, reported that Munir conveyed his 'deep appreciation' for Trump's role in brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after a four-day conflict in May between the two nuclear-armed nations. Last month, Trump recounted his memory of the conflict while speaking to reporters. 'I said, 'Come on, we're going to do a lot of trade with you guys [India and Pakistan]. Let's stop it. Let's stop it. If you stop it, we'll do a trade. If you don't stop it, we're not going to do any trade.'' India, meanwhile, denied that the US president had any role in its ceasefire with Pakistan. 'The talks regarding cessation of military action were held directly between India and Pakistan under the existing channels established between both militaries,' India's foreign secretary, Vikram Misri, said in a press release on Wednesday. Some analysts have said Pakistan's nomination is absurd. Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani ambassador to the US and UN, said: 'Ingratiation cannot serve as policy. It is unfortunate that the government is recommending Trump for a Nobel peace prize. 'A man who has backed Israel's genocidal war in Gaza and called Israel's attack on Iran as 'excellent'. This move does not reflect the views of the people of Pakistan.' Despite concerns in Washington about Pakistan's close alignment with Beijing, Pakistan remains significant to the US. Islamabad has not alleviated these worries, particularly as it seeks new deals for advanced weaponry and technology from China, its primary arms supplier. Amit Ranjan, a research fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies at the National University of Singapore, told The Sunday Times: 'Trump's lunch with Field Marshal Munir suggests a growing closeness between Pakistan and the US. However, the nature of this relationship will depend on how China looks at it. 'The nomination is Pakistan's way to thank Trump for his role in the ceasefire during military confrontation with India.' Pakistan has had a complicated security relationship with the US, collaborating with Washington while also supporting militants opposing Nato forces in Afghanistan. General Michael Kurilla, the head of US Central Command, recently commended Pakistan's military, describing their collaboration as a 'phenomenal partnership' in the fight against Afghanistan-based militant Islamist group Isis-K. Trump expressed gratitude to Pakistan for handing over an Isis-K member suspected of involvement in a bombing that killed 13 American troops during the withdrawal from Afghanistan. In the past, Trump has received several Nobel peace prize nominations from his supporters, and is said to crave the award. However, on Friday he posted on social media to lament he will probably never win the accolade. 'No, I won't get a Nobel peace prize no matter what I do … whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me!' he wrote.
