logo
Northwest Missouri Residents to Join National 'NO KINGS' Rally on June 14

Northwest Missouri Residents to Join National 'NO KINGS' Rally on June 14

Yahoo02-06-2025

ST. JOSEPH, Mo. (News-Press NOW) — Northwest Missouri residents will gather in Maryville and St. Joseph on Saturday, June 14, as part of the nationwide 'NO KINGS Day of Defiance.'
In Maryville, participants will rally on the sidewalk in front of the Courthouse from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., carrying signs and flags.
In St. Joseph, demonstrators will meet from 4 to 5:30 p.m. at the intersection of Belt Highway and Frederick Boulevard, also with signs and flags in hand.
The NO KINGS movement has organized more than 1,200 peaceful rallies across all 50 states and several foreign countries. Millions of citizens, led by volunteers, are expected to take part; marking Flag Day with a show of support for democracy over oligarchy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cuomo the a--hole
Cuomo the a--hole

Politico

time32 minutes ago

  • Politico

Cuomo the a--hole

POLITICAL ANAL-YSIS: The word 'asshole' has become so closely associated with mayoral primary front-runner Andrew Cuomo that one needs not even name him — the profane sobriquet is enough. 'I'd rather have an asshole than a progressive,' a retired lawyer named Robert told mayoral candidate Brad Lander at a farmer's market on the Upper West Side Sunday. 'Those are the choices we have: a socialist or an asshole.' Everyone in earshot knew who he was talking about. Zohran Mamdani is the socialist. Cuomo is the asshole. The former governor has a well-earned reputation for domineering and bullying. So does the president of the United States of America. And the semi-apologetic line from many Cuomo supporters has been 'we need an asshole to fight an asshole.' That argument has made it into print, emphasizing that it has become too widespread for squeamish editors to avoid the curse word. 'He'd stand up to Donald Trump. He's an asshole, but he's our asshole,' The Atlantic wrote last week, summarizing the case for Cuomo. Actor and activist Cynthia Nixon responded — speaking from the position of somebody who ran against Cuomo in the 2018 primary for governor, and who knows assholes from a four-decade career in Hollywood. 'I don't think that we need our own sphincter to challenge Trump,' she said at an anti-Cuomo rally ahead of the No Kings march in Manhattan Saturday. Cuomo 'is bought and bossed, not just by random billionaires or corporations, but in many cases, by the exact same billionaires and corporations that bought Donald Trump four more years,' she added. 'Andrew Cuomo is not our asshole. Say it with me!' The crowd, soaked in the rain, yelled back: 'Andrew Cuomo is not our asshole!' It's not just supporters who've dubbed him with the term. 'He's an abuser and an asshole,' state Sen. Gustavo Rivera said when asked if Cuomo was a tough guy. 'There's one thing about having that as an option available to you and play it as a card. It's another thing to operate like that on a day to day basis.' You can buy a 'Cuomo is an asshole' flag on Amazon for $9.00 — with the image of the Democratic donkey replacing the word. Cuomo has been associated with the word going back a decade, at least. 'You gotta fight asshole with asshole,' a democratic operative told POLITICO early in 2016, selling Cuomo as an anti-Trump campaign surrogate for Hillary Clinton. It came up again when Cuomo was earning national acclaim for his covid pandemic briefings. 'Stop trying to make Andrew Cuomo happen,' Current Affairs wrote in 2020. 'Andrew Cuomo is an asshole.' And Cuomo's alleged assholery came up again in 2021, after women came forward accusing him of sexual harassment. Comedian John Oliver devoted the opening monologue of his show to the 'colossal asshole.' The Daily Beast also published an essay: 'Cuomo Is Not Your Dad. He's Your Dad's Asshole Boss.' The expletive is coming up again, as Cuomo runs for mayor. But as he heads into primary day as the favorite in the race, Cuomo's campaign continues to emphasize his get-stuff-done ethos over any criticisms of his personality. 'New Yorkers know Andrew Cuomo fights for them and has produced a real record of results that improve their lives, that cut through the bureaucracy and cut through the mediocrity and got stuff done,' Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said. 'They know he is the only candidate with the experience and the record to fix what's broken. And after 12 long years, put city hall back on the right track,' he added. 'Since this word is apparently now fair game, nobody better blush when I start using it to talk to reporters.' — Jeff Coltin FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL ADAMS SAYS BALLOT NOT SO SECRET AFTER ALL: City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams went back on her word today and clarified who she wants her supporters to rank on their ballots after her. 'I encourage New Yorkers to rank the full slate of Working Families Party candidates,' Adams said in a statement. The candidates on the WFP slate include Mamdani, Brad Lander, Adams and Zellnor Myrie, in that order. Adams did not specify what in order her supporters should rank the slate. The announcement came after Adams declined to back those candidates — and repeatedly refused to answer if she voted for Mamdani and Cuomo amid an internal debate among her aides, POLITICO reported Thursday. 'I still believe in the secrecy of the ballot, and I voted for me and my community,' Adams told reporters after voting in Jamaica, Queens. In her statement today, Adams clarified that she does not think Cuomo should be on voters' ballots. 'His record is part of the same pattern of neglect that our communities, and so many New Yorkers, have faced,' she said of the former governor. — Jason Beeferman FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: A state-of-the-race memo released today by the Working Families Party reviews its strategy and lays out its progress with Primary Day just around the corner. Its mission for 2025? Combat the disillusion that led 900,000 Democratic voters in New York State to sit out the 2024 election. Its strategy? Present the choices as working families versus billionaires. 'Even small increases in turnout among our base could tip the balance in critical races across the state,' local party co-directors Jasmine Gripper and Ana María Archila wrote. In New York City, the third party endorsed Mamdani as its first choice in the Democratic primary for mayor, followed by Lander, Adams and Myrie. It lauded the Mamdani-Lander cross-endorsement, which came late in the cycle as Cuomo continues to lead almost every poll. The party's ranked endorsement was also relatively late in a cycle dominated by Cuomo. One of its choices broke with party leadership: state Sen. Jessica Ramos endorsed Cuomo and got dropped from the slate altogether. Myrie hasn't done any cross-endorsements, but said he'd rank the party's slate, as did Adrienne Adams today, as noted above. And it argued that Cuomo, 'the candidate favored by Trump's billionaires,' is hitting his ceiling in polling. A recent Marist poll found Cuomo leading Mamdani by 10 points in the final round of a ranked-choice voting simulation, and Mamdani's critics argue he too has hit his ceiling. The third party — whose line Cuomo was accused of seeking to nix in 2020 — is also backing Dorcey Applyrs for Albany mayor, Sharon Owens for Syracuse mayor and Sean Ryan for Buffalo mayor. — Emily Ngo SPEAKING OF MEMOS: Moderate national think tank Third Way released its own memo today urging New York City Democrats not to rank Mamdani, writing, 'Leaving aside Mamdani's positions that some believe border on antisemitism, it is his proud affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) that worries us most.' The memo excerpts parts of the DSA platform. And the group argued that Mamdani as mayor would help Trumpism and hurt Democrats nationwide in upcoming elections. 'Republican attack ads in swing districts attaching moderate Democratic candidates to Mamdani and the DSA practically write themselves,' Third Way said in its memo. Asked whether Cuomo as mayor would also hurt the Democratic brand nationally, given his sexual harassment allegations and having taxpayers foot his legal costs, Third Way co-founder Matt Bennett told reporters, 'I don't want to get into Cuomo and whether he is or isn't a good candidate for New York. ... I will point out the things that you noted are personal to him and very hard to connect to other Democrats.' — Emily Ngo FROM THE CAMPAIGN COFFERS THE CAP STAYS: The city's Campaign Finance Board threw cold water on a request from Mamdani to raise the spending cap for mayoral candidates. In a statement today, the board said there is no legal mechanism allowing it to relax the roughly $8 million expenditure limit for primary candidates. 'We understand the challenge posed by independent spenders to the goals of the matching funds program,' spokesperson Timothy Hunter said in a statement. 'The Campaign Finance Board closely monitors spending by all campaigns as well as independent spenders and provides expenditure relief when permitted by law.' The democratic socialist sent a letter to the board seeking more leeway to counteract two super PACs supporting Cuomo. Together, they have flooded the race with a record $19 million to boost the former governor and attack Mamdani. 'Andrew Cuomo is trying to buy this election,' Mamdani said at a press conference outside the Campaign Finance Board's headquarters. 'He has a super PAC, that is now the best funded super PAC in New York City's history … that is ensuring that every New Yorker, when they turn on their television, they open their mailbox, and they watch a video on YouTube will be met with yet another attack ad that is lying about myself and this campaign.' The board said it can only raise the cap in response to excess spending from other campaigns operating outside the public matching system — such as Ray McGuire's mayoral bid in 2021 — and not super PACs. — Amira McKee and Joe Anuta LANDER'S LAST STAND: Brad Lander's campaign is throwing $320,000 into an attack ad against Cuomo, in a final effort to curb the former governor's lead in the final days of the race. Titled 'Cost,' the ad tears into Cuomo's record as govenor, citing the numerous sexual harassment allegations that precipitated his resignation in 2021. Cuomo denies the allegations, but his contentious record has been picked apart by his competitors. Lander, the candidate who has been the most consistently tough on Cuomo, zeroed in on the claims during the final mayoral debate last week. The ad also claims the former governor is funded by 'Trump's billionaire donors,' echoing a Mamdani ad last week. Playbook reported that Cuomo received nearly $400,000 from GOP or Conservative Party donors, and his super PAC received funds from high-profile Trump donor and billionaire Bill Ackman. Cuomo has said some of those donors, and specifically Ackman, gave to him before ever donating to Trump and insists he is unmoved by campaign contributions to him or his super PAC. The ad could be a boost for Mamdani, who cross-endorsed Lander last week. Lander's polling a distant third in the race. The ad features a clip of Ocasio-Cortez, who endorsed Mamdani as her first pick, telling voters, 'do not rank Andrew Cuomo on your ballot.' One of the last major expenditures of Lander's run, the ad leaves it all on the table as the bookish city comptroller delivers an energetic finale to a slow-to-build campaign. — Amira McKee IN OTHER NEWS — ADVICE FOR THE NYT: Twelve veteran political observers weighed in to give their opinion on The New York Times' 'vexing' editorial on the mayor's race. (Vital City) — ERIC ADAMS SAYS NEVERMIND ON HEALTH PLAN: Mayor Eric Adams pulled the plug on a Medicare Advantage move for New York City retirees. (POLITICO Pro) — 'FUCK THE DECORUM': Justin Brannan explains why 'people want fighters' to represent them in the Democratic party. (Interview Magazine) And WELCOME TO THE WORLD: Victor Botnick, born on 6/13 to Jeanette and Mark Botnick, a Bloomberg alum. pic. Missed this morning's New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.

"What's Happening In This Country Is Horrific": 29 Of The Best Political Tweets From This Chaotic, Messy Week
"What's Happening In This Country Is Horrific": 29 Of The Best Political Tweets From This Chaotic, Messy Week

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

"What's Happening In This Country Is Horrific": 29 Of The Best Political Tweets From This Chaotic, Messy Week

Editor's Note: While we can't endorse what X has become, we can bring you the worthwhile moments that still exist there, curated and free of the surrounding chaos. American politics — well, frankly, global politics — is chaos right now, but I find it comforting to know I'm not alone in thinking the world has gone bananas. So, here are 29 of the best, most relatable, and sometimes funny political tweets from the last week: 1. 2. 3. I've watched this like 20 times. Carlson sets traps and Cruz walks into them like a Cancun vacation — Van 'Not Going Anywhere' Lathan Jr (@VanLathan) June 18, 2025 The Tucker Carlson Show / Twitter: @VanLathan 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Using the phrase "humanizing children" reveals so much about you — evan loves worf (@esjesjesj) June 17, 2025 RSBN / Twitter: @esjesjesj Related: "Honestly Speechless At How Evil This Is": 26 Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week 9. 10. You have to remember, a lot of these older folks from the 60s and 70s have been fighting for equal rights for decades. What's happening in this country is horrific, they've watched as rights were gained (like Roe) and then lost again. It's devastating. — Simone (@girlpowertbh) June 15, 2025 Fox News / Twitter: @girlpowertbh 11. 12. 13. 14. Nah. You're doing just fine on your own. — Mike Lupica (@MikeLupica) June 17, 2025 RSBN / Twitter: @MikeLupica Related: MAGA Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Doesn't Like This Army Vet's Now-Viral Speech 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. this is how our government is being run — Dj (@DjsokeSpeaking) June 18, 2025 Paramount / Twitter: @DjsokeSpeaking 25. 26. 27. 28. finally: See you next week! For more political tweets, check out our most recent roundup: "Americans Should Be Alarmed": 24 Of The Most Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week Also in In the News: "The Most Honest Accidental Summary Of This Administration's Foreign Policy": A Clip From Karoline Leavitt's Latest Press Briefing Is Going Viral For Being So, So Cringey Also in In the News: Trump Had A Middle-Of-The-Night Meltdown About... Well... So Many Things Also in In the News: "Let Them Eat Teslas": People At The "No Kings" Protests This Weekend Brought Signs That Were So Clever I'm Still Laughing About Them

The flags we fly
The flags we fly

Washington Post

time2 hours ago

  • Washington Post

The flags we fly

It has taken a pretend king to bring out a dormant patriotism lying deeper in the hearts of some on the left than they realized — myself included. I predicted in an Aug. 27 letter to the editor, 'Ms. Harris, Democrats add the 'genius spoonful of sugar' we all needed,' that it was possible liberals would co-opt right-wing flag-waving and start waving tiny American flags of their own. Apparently, I was right. At the nationwide 'No Kings' protests, according to an Associated Press article, some organizers handed out little American flags. Were those organizers outliers, or were they harbingers of changes in the left's latent vision for America? I'm proud to fight the right's version of patriotism with our own. That version includes championing democracy and liberal causes. We are proud Americans fighting for our America. I suspect our Democratic leaders are proud Americans, too, and they should say so explicitly. When will it become commonplace for people on the left to start proudly calling themselves patriots instead of acknowledging their nationality sotto voce? Or is that too far-fetched? The idea of progressives waving American flags seemed far-fetched to me a year ago. Look at where we are now. Gary Milici, Milwaukee I totally agree with Enrique Acevedo in his June 16 op-ed, 'Why we fly the Mexican flag at the L.A. protests,' that America is a multicultural society. It makes our country stronger that many if not all Americans identify with other nations, religions, cultures and holidays. It makes sense that many Americans are waving flags from places such as Ukraine, Gaza and Israel at rallies as statements of support. However, flying a Mexican flag at a rally protesting aggressive deportations might inadvertently send the message that the flag bearer would rather be in Mexico, an unnecessary and unproductive interpretation. For example, people against immigration who see images of Mexican flags waved at protests on social media or television might then have their belief that it is perfectly okay to 'send them back' reinforced. Signs in Spanish are okay but put away the flags of other countries. Barry H. Epstein, Silver Spring Enrique Acevedo's June 16 op-ed raised some valid points regarding the complexity of citizenship and identity. We should respect the rights of individuals to protest peacefully and allow them to wave whatever flag they choose, regardless of their citizenship status. That is a right protected by our Constitution. What is troubling, and what Acevedo failed to address or explain, are the images of the Mexican flag being waved in front of cars that had been lit on fire. Acevedo referenced people waving the Irish flag on St. Patrick's Day and their loyalty or patriotism not being questioned. That example missed the point of people's fury completely. It was the juxtaposition of the Mexican flag and violence that is troubling to many Americans. It's simply not a good look, even to those of us who oppose President Donald Trump's immigration policies. James Regan, Oak Hill In sharing his opinion as to why protesters in Los Angeles wave the Mexican flag, Enrique Acevedo wrote 'that being American doesn't require being less of anything else.' My father, a native of the Bronx whose parents came from Southern Italy, flew 62 missions in World War II as a bombardier in the U.S. Army Air Forces. Most of his targets were in Southern Italy. I learned enough from my father about being an American to be able to reply to Acevedo's statement: 'Yes, it does.' Stephen Munro, Silver Spring Nothing hurts the cause of migrants more than the flying of the Mexican flag at protests. Many Americans, including those opposed to President Donald Trump's policies, react warmly to minorities waving the American flag. Waving the flag says that despite the United States' past mistakes and current problems, your loyalty is still to this nation. That's important. We're talking tactics here: Fly the Mexican flag in your home but not in public. Try to make the American flag represent something more, and greater, than what anti-immigration supporters want it to represent. Fly the American flag high, and more people will listen. Jack Dolan, Arlington Flying the Mexican flag at protests is not the real issue. The real issue is that protesters and sanctuary cities are opposing and hindering lawful Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities. That is what gets me upset. Flying another nation's flag, burning cars and rioting are just pouring gas on the fire. Steve Henry, Springfield My father was wounded twice in North Africa, and two of my husbands served in the Navy during that war, so I have the greatest respect for members of the military and their families. I do not care about the cost of the military parade, but I do care about the cost to stroke President Donald Trump's ego. There are far more important programs that the funds could have been used for. I want to thank people such as retired National Guard Maj. Gen. Randy Manner for his courage in speaking out against the parade. More service members should have followed his lead. I did not watch the parade because I did not want my attention to go toward Trump. I fly the flag every day, and I contribute to the United Service Organizations. I pay tribute to the military privately. Margaret Munson, Penn Valley, California Leading up to Juneteenth, which observes the June 19, 1865, emancipation of the last enslaved Black people, we again saw the bigotry of President Donald Trump's administration. During President Joe Biden's term, his administration rightly re-designated several military bases that had been named for Confederate generals. The new names honored true American heroes such as President Dwight D. Eisenhower. Now, the Trump administration has restored the names of Fort Bragg in North Carolina; Fort A.P. Hill, Fort Pickett and Fort Lee in Virginia; Fort Benning and Fort Gordon in Georgia; Fort Hood in Texas; Fort Polk in Louisiana; and Fort Rucker in Alabama. To do this, the Trump administration named the bases for decorated but mostly obscure soldiers who just 'happen' to have the same last names as the Confederate leaders. In this transparent ploy, Fort Bragg, which the Biden administration renamed Fort Liberty, is supposedly being renamed to honor Roland L. Bragg, a World War II paratrooper, instead of Braxton Bragg, a Confederate general. Every intelligent, decent person should be offended by this duplicity. Today's U.S. soldiers will serve at bases that share the name of some of our nation's most shameful figures — some of whom, such as Braxton Bragg, were enslavers. It's an insult to our service members and to the principle of freedom for all, which those soldiers are expected to defend. What a country commemorates — in statues, flags, monuments and names — shows what it stands for. They are statements both reflective of us and influential to us. They are symbols that create models, good or bad, for Americans to emulate. We should learn from our country's dark side and glorify its bright side. Hopefully, in time, the recent regressions will be rectified as the United States reaffirms its highest values. Roger Buckwalter, Tequesta, Florida The writer is a retired editorial page editor of the Jupiter Courier. The parade on June 14 was unforgettable. I'm incredibly proud and grateful to be part of our Army's 250-year legacy of service to the nation. Serving as one of many ambassadors on the National Mall — supporting the parade and engaging with thousands of fellow Americans — I was filled with powerful reminders of why I serve. This celebration gave the American public a rare chance to connect with soldiers up close and in person, to experience the Army's proud traditions, capabilities and people. These kinds of moments showcase the professionalism and heart of our force and open the door to real conversations. The exchanges that stuck with me most were the ones I had with young people who were curious about what I do, and how the Army and its core values (loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, personal courage) have shaped my life. I had a moment of revelation on the Mall talking to a young man thinking about his future: So many young people don't know anything about the military, and what they do know is colored by bias, distortions perpetuated by the media and fiction. The Army isn't my whole life, but it has been the most formative experience of my life. Reconnecting the public to the people, sacrifice and history that define our military helps avoid diluting our American story to meaningless pageantry and hollow patriotic platitudes. The memory and legacy of millions of soldiers who sacrificed for our freedom in blood endure only if we take time to understand and honor our past. Think of the Americans who held the line at Cantigny, our first major offensive in World War I, or the 77th Division trapped behind enemy lines in the Argonne Forest, surviving days without food, water or relief. Think of the soldiers at Omaha Beach, who waded through gunfire and surf on D-Day during World War II, or those who endured the siege of Hürtgen Forest, fighting inch by inch through freezing mud and relentless artillery. In Korea, soldiers froze in place at the Chosin Reservoir, outnumbered and surrounded, yet fought their way out with courage that defined a generation. These are not just stories; they are the foundation of our service. That legacy lives on in every soldier who raises their hand today, choosing to serve something greater than themselves. If we don't tell these stories — if we don't show our citizens who we are and what we stand for — how will our children understand the cost of the freedoms they enjoy? We owe it to them. We owe it to every soldier who never made it home. And we owe it to the future of our Army. Roxanne Wegman, Fort Belvoir The writer is a major in the U.S. Army. The views expressed herein are her personal views and do not reflect an official position of the Army or the Defense Department.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store