Judge rules in favour of Justin Baldoni, opening the door to key evidence in Blake Lively-Taylor Swift case
A New York judge has ruled that Justin Baldoni can obtain messages exchanged between Blake Lively and Taylor Swift, which could be crucial to his ongoing lawsuit linked to the film "It Ends With Us'.
Judge Lewis L. Liman deemed these communications "relevant" as the case unfolds, highlighting their potential to either prove or disprove allegations made by Lively.
In a significant legal victory for director Justin Baldoni , a New York judge has ruled that he can obtain messages exchanged between Blake Lively and Taylor Swift , which could be crucial to his ongoing lawsuit linked to the film "It Ends With Us'.
On June 18, Judge Liman stated, "Lively herself has identified Swift as someone likely to know about complaints or discussions regarding the working environment on the set of 'It Ends With Us'," according to E! News.
This ruling follows Lively's plea for the court to shield her conversations with the pop star from scrutiny.
While Swift's subpoena to appear in court was dismissed, Baldoni's legal team expressed that messages between the two actresses could provide insights into Lively's claims of harassment and retaliation, which have been central to the litigation.
The court has ordered that a protective order be established covering any correspondence to ensure that information does not leak to the media.
The case took a complex turn last month when Baldoni sought to subpoena Swift herself, claiming Lively had used her friendship with the pop star to gain more creative control over the film project.
Swift's spokesperson impulsively rejected this notion, emphasising that Swift's only involvement with the film was to license a song - an act that she shared with 19 other artists.
Following this denial, Baldoni quickly withdrew the subpoena request.
This development arrives just one week after a judge dismissed Baldoni's ambitious $400 million (around R7 billion) defamation lawsuit against Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds.
Lively heralded the dismissal as 'a total victory and a complete vindication".
Nevertheless, Baldoni remains resolute, having successfully filed an amended complaint against both Lively and Reynolds, alleging unlawful interference with the contract and asserting additional claims against Lively for breach of the implied covenant.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
15 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Materialists — Save the date for a witty but biting take on modern relationships
Past Lives filmmaker Celine Song pairs glossy romance with uncomfortably sharp insights on modern dating in Materialists, where a love triangle is shaped by Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans. For the second consecutive year, cinemagoers are being treated to a romance that is more than its shiny exterior and good-looking cast suggest it will be. Last year, it was the Blake Lively-starring It Ends With Us, where the pretty people love triangle actually incorporated toxic relationships, domestic violence and repeated patterns of abuse. Now, in 2025, we have Materialists, which presents as a sleek and smart romantic comedy, only to pierce through the facade like a boba tea straw to reach the juiciest bits at the bottom: sharp-tasting insights about modern dating that can be tough to swallow. Then again, Materialists is released by A24 (in the US at least) and written, directed and produced by acclaimed playwright-turned-filmmaker Celine Song. Song's 2023 big screen romance Past Lives was nominated for Best Picture and Best Original Screenplay at the Oscars, and was celebrated for its nuanced exploration of the human condition, specifically the complexities of past and present love, which can exist simultaneously. The point is that neither Song nor A24 sticks to the conventional. There's always something creatively ambitious and artful flowing through the veins of their projects, and Materialists is no different. Though it centres on matchmaking, Materialists is no breezy and cute Hitch clone. Lead character Lucy (Dakota Johnson) is a successful matchmaker in New York City. While she's great with a sales pitch about finding love, Lucy approaches dating like a business investment. All her behind-the-scenes discussions are about assets, value, probability and maths. She has no interest in relationships of her own, until the wedding of one of her clients — the peak achievement of her profession — brings both dashing millionaire Harry Castillo (Pedro Pascal) and Lucy's struggling actor ex John (Chris Evans) into her life. Who will our heroine choose? Will the film stick to genre expectation, with a 'love is all you need' message, or will it chart its own course? Materialists doesn't dabble with its decision for too long actually, resulting in a final act that feels drawn out, and low on energy. Before that, though, the film excels at showing what dating has become in the 21st Century – a mix of mercenary entitlement and desperation, with marriage the end goal, no matter what. Settling is fine; just make sure it results in you walking down the aisle and coupled up. In Materialists, Song has characters vocalising the unsaid, admitting their most selfish drives in ticking off this particular life box. Viewers should be aware that Materialists is a romantic comedy in the same sense that restaurant series The Bear is considered comic. The humour arrives in momentary pricks. It's dark, sharp and entirely dialogue delivered. Lucy's clients act like they're ordering off a restaurant menu, and while hobbies and political views may get a mention, the vast majority of partner wants are appearance-based and materialistic: age, height, body type, income. No compromise. No consideration of character. It's a shocking and sad commentary on what makes someone a viable life companion today. And yet Song doesn't simply slap a judgment on these superficial priorities. Once more, she presents and then unpacks them, largely through the self-aware character of Lucy. Is it wrong to want financial security? Are you a bad person if love and hope of better days aren't enough to keep you in a relationship? Johnson is an acquired taste as a performer, owing to her subdued delivery (especially in comparison with the warm and effortlessly charismatic Pascal and Evans), but it makes sense for the character of clinical and cynical Lucy. There's also the bonus meta pleasure of remembering that Johnson was Anastasia Steele in the Fifty Shades films, a woman won over through lavish acts of affection despite her partner's constant red flag behaviour. Lucy appreciates demonstrations of wealth, but her eyes are always wide open, looking out and inward as she assesses her response. There's a sense that critics may appreciate Materialists more than mainstream audiences, because of the film's cerebral and contemplative nature, versus being powered by passion in keeping with romcom tradition. That said, anyone should be able to appreciate the film's perceptiveness, however uncomfortable it is to look in the mirror held up by Song — one that seems gilded from a distance but is actually quite grubby and dirt-flecked on closer inspection, like even the most perfect appearing life. Materialists may be more glossy and escapist than Past Lives, but its observations still ring true. DM
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Judge rules in favour of Justin Baldoni, opening the door to key evidence in Blake Lively-Taylor Swift case
A New York judge has ruled that Justin Baldoni can obtain messages exchanged between Blake Lively and Taylor Swift, which could be crucial to his ongoing lawsuit linked to the film "It Ends With Us'. Judge Lewis L. Liman deemed these communications "relevant" as the case unfolds, highlighting their potential to either prove or disprove allegations made by Lively. In a significant legal victory for director Justin Baldoni , a New York judge has ruled that he can obtain messages exchanged between Blake Lively and Taylor Swift , which could be crucial to his ongoing lawsuit linked to the film "It Ends With Us'. On June 18, Judge Liman stated, "Lively herself has identified Swift as someone likely to know about complaints or discussions regarding the working environment on the set of 'It Ends With Us'," according to E! News. This ruling follows Lively's plea for the court to shield her conversations with the pop star from scrutiny. While Swift's subpoena to appear in court was dismissed, Baldoni's legal team expressed that messages between the two actresses could provide insights into Lively's claims of harassment and retaliation, which have been central to the litigation. The court has ordered that a protective order be established covering any correspondence to ensure that information does not leak to the media. The case took a complex turn last month when Baldoni sought to subpoena Swift herself, claiming Lively had used her friendship with the pop star to gain more creative control over the film project. Swift's spokesperson impulsively rejected this notion, emphasising that Swift's only involvement with the film was to license a song - an act that she shared with 19 other artists. Following this denial, Baldoni quickly withdrew the subpoena request. This development arrives just one week after a judge dismissed Baldoni's ambitious $400 million (around R7 billion) defamation lawsuit against Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. Lively heralded the dismissal as 'a total victory and a complete vindication". Nevertheless, Baldoni remains resolute, having successfully filed an amended complaint against both Lively and Reynolds, alleging unlawful interference with the contract and asserting additional claims against Lively for breach of the implied covenant.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Tuks law student is fast in E-sports and in the cockpit of jets
Tuks law student is fast in E-sports and in the cockpit of jets To say Ronald Wheeldon is an adrenaline junkie would not be an exaggeration. When the Tuks law student is not sitting in lecture halls or studying, he is likely to be zipping through the air at 1000 kilometres per hour. But Wheeldon is also building a reputation as a formidable dualist in Varsity E-sports' Valorant League. In a profile article on the Varsity E-sports website, his virtues are extolled as follows: 'Beyond raw mechanical skill, he serves as the team's 'In-Game Leader'. Orchestrating plays and making critical strategic calls. He takes on the responsibility of determining the approach. Leading the charge and adapting instantly when plans go awry. Quick and effective communication is his weapon'. 'I believe speed is the key to winning most gun fights. A stun or blind gives you those few seconds of opportunity and being aggressive takes the initiative in winning these fights,' he said during an interview with the website. The strategy is undoubtedly working for Tuks. The team has won four of the six games they played, which means they have qualified for the Varsity semifinals. They will face off against Ikeys. The two teams of Maties are contesting each other in the other semifinal. Wheeldon makes no secret of why he does what he does. He is an adrenaline junkie. 'During a Valorant game, when you are in a tense combat situation, the adrenaline is pumping. It is the same with flying. I am passionate about aerobatics. When you are flying a jet at 1000 kilometres per hour, it gets the adrenaline out of the box straight through the roof. You cannot replace it with anything. It is exhilarating,' he remarked. To put things in perspective. Wheeldon's father, Ron, has been doing air shows for over 30 years. His favourite plane is the Hawker Hunter, of which he has two. The younger Wheeldon is an accomplished pilot himself and has performed with his dad at airshows. 'It started when I was a kid playing Lego Star Wars. I don't like losing. That's never going to change,' he commented. When asked what it takes to be competitive in Valorant, Wheeldon answers by saying that it helps to be fit. Then, he mentions that a strong head is crucial. 'The mental side in E-sports is a big part. If you enter a match thinking that things are going to go wrong, then they will. Being in good physical shape is essential because reaction time is key to winning games. If someone 'swings' at you, you must click as fast as possible. In about two milliseconds; otherwise, you will be losing,' he explained. As to his role as dualist for the Tuks team, Wheeldon said his job is to get the first 'peg' to create space. 'Space is essential in attack. If you can't create space, you usually end up stagnant. That is when things start to go wrong,' he said. A definite highlight for Wheeldon was when he got the chance to play in the Apex Legends Global Series' European competition. Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to bennittb@ or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading! Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App here
