Cryptocurrency's future in Pakistan
Legalization of cryptocurrency in Pakistan has evolved into a complex legal and financial dilemma. The Government of Pakistan established Pakistan Crypto Council (PCC) in February 2025 under chairmanship of the Federal Finance Minister, Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb. Appointment of Bilal Saqib as CEO of the PCC and subsequently as Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on blockchain and cryptocurrency has marked a symbolic elevation of digital assets in the national discourse.
The PPC's announcement to allocate 2,000 megawatts of energy to crypto mining and formation of the Pakistan Digital Assets Authority are bold steps, but the licencing frameworks are yet to be developed. Although the reported appointment of World Liberty Financial as a key advisory firm has added international optics, domestic procedural clarity is still not available.
Despite the passage of four months since the PPC's inception no 'white papers', consultation drafts, or public engagement forums to solicit expert feedback or industry alignment are in the offing. Absence of such foundational discourse tends to create regulatory ambiguity and a vacuum of informed public policy. The industry is operating in an atmosphere of speculation where neither the legal model nor its operational dynamics are known and this opacity frustrates stakeholders, impedes innovation, and delays essential compliance-building measures.
Announcement by Bilal Saqib'at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas declaring Pakistan's intention to establish a government-led Bitcoin Strategic Reserve was a dramatic disclosure and sudden escalation. Reference to the United States as an inspirational model also added geopolitical colour, but the declaration raised significant alarm.
The notion of building strategic reserves in a highly volatile asset like Bitcoin without defined risk controls, legal backing, or multilateral support, especially under an active programme of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) creates a scenario fraught with institutional, constitutional, and international tensions. The IMF does not recognize cryptocurrency as reserve assets or legal tender, complicating any alignment with sovereign commitments.
The existing legal framework, including the Constitution of Pakistan, the State Bank of Pakistan Act, 1956 and the Pakistan Currency Act, 1950, prohibits any parallel currency system or strategic reserves outside officially sanctioned instruments. Concerns intensify when factoring in risks such as foreign exchange reserve mismanagement, cyber security threats, lack of transparency, limited liquidity utilization, reputational exposure, and fragile policy credibility.
The subsequent clarification by the CEO of PCC during a televised interview has further complicated the matter. His assertion that Pakistan would build its Bitcoin reserves using seized crypto assets rather than public funds revealed a glaring misunderstanding of international asset forfeiture law. In jurisdictions such as the United States, ownership of seized crypto remains with the accused until judicial forfeiture is finalized.
The legal transfer process mandates court orders, after which assets are either returned to victims, retained by agencies, or liquidated into fiat and deposited into the treasury. The US government does not hold seized cryptocurrencies in reserve but auctions them post-forfeiture. The exposure of CEO of PCC, lacking comprehension and accurately communicating these mechanisms, reflects poorly on regulatory preparedness of the country. It has also eroded already fragile credibility of Pakistan on the global stage.
Despite its economic fragility, Pakistan remains among the top ten crypto-friendly nations. The projected number of cryptocurrency users in Pakistan is expected to reach 28.9 million by 2026, with projected revenues of $2.4 billion in 2025. Legalization of crypto in such a volatile economic environment poses existential risks to monetary sovereignty and financial sector stability.
The unregulated adoption of crypto could erode confidence in the rupee, weaken the ability of State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to manage inflation, and incentivize capital flight. The risk of financial disintermediation grows as users shift to decentralized financial systems, bypassing the regulated banking infrastructure. The situation poses a dual risk of systemic instability and heightened scrutiny from global regulatory bodies, particularly Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the IMF. A more appropriate strategy under these conditions is to recognize crypto strictly as a digital asset class, not as legal tender. The asset treatment model preserves SBP's independence while allowing innovation under strict regulatory conditions.
The formation of a regulated ecosystem of licensed Virtual Asset Service Providers must be the cornerstone of Pakistan's digital asset strategy. Exchanges, wallets, and custodians should operate within a tightly regulated framework governed by Security & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) and SBP with mandatory know-your-client (KYC), anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, transaction reporting, and audit mechanisms.
The development of a regulatory sandbox environment would enable controlled experimentation under the supervision of regulatory bodies. This approach will support technical learning, policy formulation, and risk detection without national exposure. The cross-border use of crypto must be initially restricted to prevent capital outflows and preserve foreign exchange stability.
The government must distance itself from any notion of sovereign crypto reserves and instead focus on integrating blockchain into public services, such as tokenized bonds, digital land registries, welfare programmes, and logistics tracking. The need for dedicated digital asset legislation is critical at this point of time. The legal framework should classify various token types, outline custodial responsibilities, define consumer protection mechanisms, and ensure compliance with global financial regulations.
Regulatory capacity must be developed in tandem. Training programmes must be established for regulators, law enforcement, forensic auditors, and judicial officials to develop the institutional fluency required for effective oversight.
The international investment narrative around Pakistan's digital future must be repositioned. Pakistan should host a 'Crypto Summit' in Islamabad, followed by regional events in Lahore and Karachi. These summits should not pose as PR campaigns but as policy-shaping forums, connecting global blockchain firms with Pakistani fintechs, banks, academic institutions, and startups. These platforms must also educate and guide the next generation of developers, regulators, and entrepreneurs. The goal must be the formation of a trust-based public-private ecosystem capable of managing, scaling, and governing digital asset innovation securely and sustainably.
The broader institutional ecosystem must be evaluated for performance and reform. The PCC, despite bold announcements, lacks transparency. It has also failed to launch consultative processes, technical papers, or stakeholder engagements. Its work remains confined to speeches and symbolic declarations without measurable progress or inclusion.
The passive role of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) must also be addressed. The SIFC must assume leadership in developing Pakistan's crypto economy, beginning with the orchestration of global summits enabling the regulatory apparatus to scale in line with international best practices.
The strategic vision should prioritize safe integration, regulatory maturity, and private sector participation. The global digital economy presents Pakistan with a unique opportunity to redefine itself as a competitive, secure, and innovation-driven hub.
In Pakistan, the future of crypto is bright, anchored in its youthful demographic, entrepreneurial appetite, and capacity to leapfrog institutional bottlenecks through decentralized infrastructure. The right legal architecture, international cooperation, and governance transparency can turn this potential into a powerful national asset.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
World Bank seeks more transparency in debt practices
WASHINGTON: The World Bank said Thursday it is worried that some countries are less and less transparent about their public debt and use complex borrowing tools, making it harder to measure how much they owe. To remedy this the bank called for a fundamental change in the way debtor and creditor countries report and disclose debt. The worries concern in particular low-income countries that make increasing use of borrowing arrangements the bank considers opaque. These include private placements — a kind of funding round done not publicly but privately, central bank swaps, and collateralized transactions, the bank said in a report on debt transparency. The proportion of low-income countries publishing some debt data has grown from below 60 percent to more than 75 percent since 2020. But only 25 percent disclose loan-level information on new debt, the report states. And countries are now turning to local investors as they take on debt but not publishing numbers on these loans. 'Recent cases of unreported debt have highlighted the vicious cycle that a lack of transparency can set off,' said the World Bank's Senior Managing Director, Axel van Trotsenburg. In Senegal, for instance, an independent administrative court that serves as an auditor said in February the government debt in that African nation had risen to 99.67 percent of GDP — a rate one-quarter higher than what had been announced by the previous government. An IMF team that visited Senegal in March said officials had made false statements regarding budget deficits and public debt for the period 2019-2023.
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
FBR officials: OICCI says concerned at proposed arrest powers
KARACHI: The Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce and Industry (OICCI) has expressed serious concerns over the proposed powers of arrest granted to Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) officials under the Finance Bill 2025-26, warning that the move has significantly undermined investor confidence, particularly among foreign stakeholders. In a letter addressed to Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, the OICCI expressed deep concern over proposed amendments in the Finance Bill 2025-26, relating to Section 37 AA of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, seeking to extend wide powers to the Inland Revenue officials relating to arrest/prosecution without necessary check and balance. The chamber criticized the provision for granting sweeping powers of arrest and prosecution to Inland Revenue officials without adequate checks and balances, which it believes could lead to misuse and harassment of businesses. Tax laws: PM directs formation of arrest powers review panel 'Local business leadership has also reacted very negatively to the proposed measure; however, this move has dented the confidence of the leadership of our 200-plus members belonging to over 30 countries,' Abdul Aleem Chief Executive and Secretary General OICCI said in the letter. He said that such arbitrary measures, without thorough consultation with key stakeholders or due consideration of its potential impact on the business environment, add to the negative perception of the country as a business-friendly destination for local and foreign investors. OICCI has also appreciated the timely intervention from Prime Minister, Mian Shehbaz Sharif, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb and senior members of Parliament in ensuring that such far-reaching and potentially disruptive proposals are not enacted without rigorous oversight and due diligence. He said there should be any consideration to retain this clause for exceptional circumstances, the OICCI looks forward to reviewing the specific safeguards proposed to prevent misuse. In the Chamber's view, at a minimum, explicit prior approval from the FBR Chairman should be mandated in any such extraordinary case involving the arrest of an alleged defaulter. The OICCI further emphasized its trust that the government leadership and relevant authorities including the FBR fully recognize the potential reputational damage that such unnecessary and excessive measures could cause to Pakistan's image as a welcoming and dependable destination for both foreign and domestic investors. The OICCI has also conveyed its concerns to FBR Chairman Rashid Mahmood Langrial and urged a reconsideration of the proposed clause. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Rs1.275tr loans signed to ease circular debt
Pakistan has signed term sheets with 18 commercial banks for a Rs1.275 trillion ($4.50 billion) Islamic finance facility to help pay down mounting debt in its power sector, government officials said on Friday. The government, which owns or controls much of the power infrastructure, is grappling with ballooning "circular debt", unpaid bills and subsidies, that has choked the sector and weighed on the economy. The liquidity crunch has disrupted supply, discouraged investment and added to fiscal pressure, making it a key focus under Pakistan's $7 billion IMF programme. Finding funds to plug the gap has been a persistent challenge, with limited fiscal space and high-cost legacy debt making resolution efforts more difficult. "Eighteen commercial banks will provide the loans through Islamic financing," Khurram Schehzad, adviser to the finance minister, told Reuters. The facility, structured under Islamic principles, is secured at a concessional rate of 3-month KIBOR, the benchmark rate banks use to price loans, minus 0.9%, a formula agreed on by the IMF. "It will be repaid in 24 quarterly instalments over six years," and will not add to public debt, Power Minister Awais Leghari said. Existing liabilities carry higher costs, including late payment surcharges on Independent Power Producers of up to KIBOR plus 4.5%, and older loans ranging slightly above benchmark rates. Meezan Bank, HBL, National Bank of Pakistan and UBL were among the banks participating in the deal. The government expects to allocate Rs323 billion annually to repay the loan, capped at 1.938 trillion rupees over six years. The agreement also aligns with Pakistan's target of eliminating interest-based banking by 2028, with Islamic finance now comprising about a quarter of total banking assets.
