RFK Jr. Fact-Checked for Spouting 'Dangerous Falsehoods' About Vaccines on Fox News: 'I Have Receipts'
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made a series of inaccurate claims about vaccines during a Fox News appearance Thursday.
Kennedy claimed that "97% of the people on the [CDC vaccine advisory] committee had conflicts of interest," that children receive "between 69 and 92" mandatory vaccines, and that "none of them have been safety tested" — aside from the COVID-19 vaccine. He also asserted that vaccines are designed to "deregulate" the immune system, linking them to an "epidemic of chronic disease."
Dr. Jake Scott, a doctor specializing in infectious disease and associate professor at Stanford Medical School, issued a detailed rebuttal on social media, accusing Kennedy of spreading "egregious, dangerous falsehoods" and backing up his criticism with data from peer-reviewed studies and CDC records.
"Fox News might not fact-check him, but I will," Scott wrote. "I've reviewed the trials. I've catalogued them. I have receipts."
Scott went claim by claim.
Kennedy said 97% of CDC vaccine committee members had conflicts of interest, but didn't cite where he obtained that figure. Scott refuted the claim, sharing findings from a Reuter's investigation which found that while 41% of members received a form of industry payment, it was mostly in small sums for travel or meals. Furthermore, the CDC has stringent guidelines in place requiring recusals for any conflicts.
Even the Fox anchor commented that Kennedy's claim that children now receive between 69 and 92 mandatory vaccines sounded quite high. It was disputed by Scott as well, who noted that vaccine mandates are set by states, and most states mandate slightly over 30 immunizations.
Regarding Kennedy's claim that no vaccines other than the Covid vaccine have gone through placebo-controlled trials, Scott said, "One of the most misleading claims I've ever seen a government official make on national television." He went on to link to a database that contains 164 placebo-controlled vaccine trials, and specified at least one example for every routine childhood vaccine.
Kennedy said, "Nobody has any idea what the risk profiles are on these products," which Scott countered, noting that 90% of vaccine studies include safety outcome reports, and listing four methods of post-licensure safety monitoring. He cited three instances where safety issues with vaccines were discovered and acted upon.
Finally, Scott dismissed Kennedy's claim that "vaccines deregulate the immune system."
"This isn't science; it's a scary-sounding buzzword," Scott wrote. "Vaccines don't 'deregulate' anything. They educate the immune system through targeted antigen exposure so it can defend against real pathogens later."
Scott emphasized that while no medical intervention is risk-free, the evidence overwhelmingly supports the safety and public health benefits of routine childhood immunizations.
"As a father of two, I'm extremely grateful," he added, citing dramatic drops in child deaths and disease since the introduction of vaccines like Hib, hepatitis B, and rotavirus.
Kennedy's comments have drawn condemnation from health experts and lawmakers alike, with many warning that misinformation of this nature could further erode trust in lifesaving vaccines.
Originally published on Latin Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
What is the Strait of Hormuz, and could Iran block it? – DW – 06/23/2025
The Strait of Hormuz is considered the world's most important gateway for oil transport. With Iran now threating to close the waterway, industrialized nations are on edge. China has called on the international community to work toward de-escalation of the Iran crisis, given the mounting risk of a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz at the mouth of the Persian Gulf. Foreign Ministry Spokesman Guo Jiakun said on Monday that China was working to prevent instability in the region caused by the Israel-Iran war from spilling over into the global economy. Iran's parliament on Sunday backed closing the vital strait, saying the move has come in response to the bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities by the United States over the weekend. After the decision, a senior Iranian lawmaker, Esmaeil Kowsari, told reporters in Tehran that parliament has concluded that it should close the Hormuz Strait, but added that "the final decision lies with the Supreme National Security Council." Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called on China to prevent Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz. "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them [Iran] about that, because they heavily depend on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil," Rubio said in an interview with Fox News on Sunday. "If they [close the Strait]... it will be economic suicide for them. And we retain options to deal with that," he said. The Strait of Hormuz is a key waterway that lies between Oman and Iran, and connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) describes it as the "world's most important oil transit chokepoint." At its narrowest point, the waterway is just 33 kilometers (21 miles) wide, with the shipping lane just two miles wide in either direction, making it crowded and perilous. Large volumes of crude extracted by OPEC countries like Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq from oil fields across the Persian Gulf region and consumed globally flow through the strait. Around 20 million barrels of crude, condensate and fuels are estimated to flow via the waterway daily, according to data from Vortexa, an energy and freight market consultant. Qatar, one of the world's largest producers of liquefied natural gas (LNG), relies heavily on the strait to ship its LNG exports. The conflict between Israel and Iran has put renewed focus on security in the waterway. Iran has in the past threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz for traffic in retaliation to Western pressure. Since the war between Israel and Iran broke out, however, there haven't been any major attacks on commercial shipping in the region. But shipowners are increasingly wary of using the waterway, with some ships having tightened security and others canceling routes there, the AP news agency reported. Electronic interference with commercial ship navigation systems has surged in recent days around the waterway and the wider Gulf, naval sources told the Reuters news agency. This interference is having an impact on vessels sailing through the region, they said. As there appears to be no immediate end to the conflict, markets remain on edge. Any blockade of the waterway or disruptions to oil flows could trigger a sharp spike in crude prices and hit energy importers hard, particularly in Asia. Meanwhile, tanker rates for vessels carrying crude and refined oil products from the region have jumped in recent days. The cost to ship fuels from the Middle East to East Asia climbed almost 20%, Bloomberg reported last week, citing data from the Baltic Exchange. Rates to East Africa, meanwhile, jumped more than 40%. The EIA estimates that 82% of crude and other fuel shipments that traversed the strait went to Asian consumers. China, India, Japan and South Korea were the top destinations with these four countries together accounting for nearly 70% of all crude oil and condensate flows that traversed the strait. These markets would likely be most affected by supply disruptions in the strait. If Iran takes concrete action to close the strait, it could potentially draw military intervention from the United States. The US Fifth Fleet, based in nearby Bahrain, is tasked with protecting commercial shipping in the area. Any move by Iran to disrupt oil flows through the waterway could also jeopardize Tehran's ties with Gulf Arab states like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — countries Iran has painstakingly improved relations with in recent years. Gulf Arab countries have so far criticized Israel for launching the strikes against Iran, but if Tehran's actions obstruct their oil exports, they might be pressured to side against Iran. Moreover, Tehran itself relies on the Strait of Hormuz to ship its oil to its customers, making it counterproductive to close the strait, say experts. "Iran's economy heavily relies on the free passage of goods and vessels through the seaway, as its oil exports are entirely sea-based," Reuters quoted JP Morgan analysts Natasha Kaneva, Prateek Kedia and Lyuba Savinova as saying. "Cutting off the Strait of Hormuz would be counterproductive to Iran's relationship with its sole oil customer, China." Gulf Arab nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have sought alternative routes to bypass the strait in recent years. Both countries have set up infrastructure to transport some of their crude via other routes. Saudi Arabia, for instance, operates the East-West Crude Oil Pipeline with a capacity of five million barrels per day, while the UAE has a pipeline linking its onshore oil fields to the Fujairah export terminal on the Gulf of Oman. The EIA estimates that around 2.6 million barrels of crude per day could be available to bypass the Strait of Hormuz in the event of disruptions in the waterway.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Strait of Hormuz shipping at risk amid Iran blockade threat – DW – 06/23/2025
The Strait of Hormuz is considered the world's most important gateway for oil transport. With Iran now threating to close the waterway, industrialized nations are on edge. China has called on the international community to work toward de-escalation of the Iran crisis, given the mounting risk of a blockade of the Straits of Hormuz at the mouth of the Persian Gulf. Foreign Ministry Spokesman Guo Jiakun said on Monday that China was working to prevent instability in the region caused by the Israel-Iran war from spilling over into the global economy. Iran's parliament on Sunday backed closing the vital strait, saying the move has come in response to the bombing attack on Iran's nuclear facilities by the United States over the weekend. After the decision, a senior Iranian lawmaker, Esmaeil Kowsari, told reporters in Teheran that parliament has come to the conclusion that it should close the Hormuz Strait, but added that "the final decision lies with the Supreme National Security Council." Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called on China to prevent Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz. "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them [Iran] about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil," Rubio said in an interview with Fox News on Sunday. "If they [close the Straits]... it will be economic suicide for them. And we retain options to deal with that," he said. The Strait of Hormuz is a key waterway that lies between Oman and Iran, and connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) describes it as the "world's most important oil transit chokepoint." At its narrowest point, the waterway is just 33 kilometers (21 miles) wide, with the shipping lane just two miles wide in either direction, making it crowded and perilous. Large volumes of crude extracted by OPEC countries like Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq from oil fields across the Persian Gulf region and consumed globally flow through the strait. Around 20 million barrels of crude, condensate and fuels are estimated to flow via the waterway daily, according to data from Vortexa, an energy and freight market consultant. Qatar, one of the world's largest producers of liquefied natural gas (LNG), relies heavily on the strait to ship its LNG exports. The conflict between Israel and Iran has put renewed focus on security in the waterway. Iran has in the past threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz for traffic in retaliation to Western pressure. Since the war between Israel and Iran broke out, however, there haven't been any major attacks on commercial shipping in the region. But shipowners are increasingly wary of using the waterway, with some ships having tightened security and others canceling routes there, the AP news agency reported. Electronic interference with commercial ship navigation systems has surged in recent days around the waterway and the wider Gulf, naval sources told the Reuters news agency. This interference is having an impact on vessels sailing through the region, they said. As there appears to be no immediate end to the conflict, markets remain on edge. Any blockade of the waterway or disruptions to oil flows could trigger a sharp spike in crude prices and hit energy importers hard, particularly in Asia. Meanwhile, tanker rates for vessels carrying crude and refined oil products from the region have jumped in recent days. The cost to ship fuels from the Middle East to East Asia climbed almost 20%, Bloomberg reported last week, citing data from the Baltic Exchange. Rates to East Africa, meanwhile, jumped more than 40%. The EIA estimates that 82% of crude and other fuel shipments that traversed the strait went to Asian consumers. China, India, Japan and South Korea were the top destinations with these four countries together accounting for nearly 70% of all crude oil and condensate flows that traversed the strait. These markets would likely be most affected by supply disruptions in the strait. If Iran takes concrete action to close the strait, it could potentially draw military intervention from the United States. The US Fifth Fleet, based in nearby Bahrain, is tasked with protecting commercial shipping in the area. Any move by Iran to disrupt oil flows through the waterway could also jeopardize Tehran's ties with Gulf Arab states like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — countries Iran has painstakingly improved relations with in recent years. Gulf Arab countries have so far criticized Israel for launching the strikes against Iran, but if Tehran's actions obstruct their oil exports, they might be pressured to side against Iran. Moreover, Tehran itself relies on the Strait of Hormuz to ship its oil to its customers, making it counterproductive to close the strait, say experts. "Iran's economy heavily relies on the free passage of goods and vessels through the seaway, as its oil exports are entirely sea-based," Reuters quoted JP Morgan analysts Natasha Kaneva, Prateek Kedia and Lyuba Savinova as saying. "Cutting off the Strait of Hormuz would be counterproductive to Iran's relationship with its sole oil customer, China." Gulf Arab nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have sought alternative routes to bypass the strait in recent years. Both countries have set up infrastructure to transport some of their crude via other routes. Saudi Arabia, for instance, operates the East-West Crude Oil Pipeline with a capacity of five million barrels per day, while the UAE has a pipeline linking its onshore oil fields to the Fujairah export terminal on the Gulf of Oman. The EIA estimates that around 2.6 million barrels of crude per day could be available to bypass the Strait of Hormuz in the event of disruptions in the waterway.
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Iran: What are the chances for regime change? – DW – 06/23/2025
The longer Israel's attack on Iran goes on, the greater the speculation about the possibility of overthrowing the government in Tehran. But regime change has historically had disastrous consequences in the region. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu openly told the US broadcaster Fox News on Sunday that regime change in Iran "could certainly be the result" of Israel's operation there, because, he said, the Iranian government was "very weak." US President Donald Trump has meanwhile sent out contradictory signals. "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding," he wrote on his personal social network, Truth Social on June 17, singling out Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. "He is an easy target, but is safe there — We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now." In the night between Saturday and Sunday, the US flew strikes against Iran's three main nuclear sites, and Trump has threatened more attacks should Tehran not return to the negotiation table. "There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran," the US president said Saturday, adding that the US "will go for other targets" should that not be the case. On Sunday, Trump again posted on Truth Social, saying: "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change?? MIGA!!!" The longer the conflict with Iran goes on, the more tempting it might appear to Israel and the United States to get rid not just of the Iranian nuclear program, but of the Islamic Republic as well. "It's extremely doubtful that it would be possible to bring about a regime change like that from the outside, with the push of a button," said Eckart Woertz, the head of the German Institute of Global and Area Studies in Hamburg. "If it did come to that, whether things would then go in the right direction is a whole other question." Foreign-imposed "regime change" is a highly controversial concept. Under international law, it is a clear violation of the sovereignty of the affected state. Often, the move is not democratically legitimized, and it frequently leads to a power vacuum or violence and instability. Newly installed governments often find themselves unable to cope with the challenge of resolving the country's problems, and this results in further crises and conflicts. That's what happened in Afghanistan. After the terrorist attacks on New York on September 11, 2001, NATO invoked the mutual defense guarantee contained in Article 5 of the NATO Treaty for the first and (so far) only time. A Western military alliance led by the United States resolved to topple Afghanistan's Islamist Taliban regime, and fight the terrorist organization al-Qaeda. Initially, the operation was quite successful, and by the end of 2001 the Taliban had been driven out of Kabul. But various parties to the alliance disagreed on a number of things, including how military, political and development aid should cooperate. And so, for 20 years, the security situation remained extremely precarious. The country was devastated by attacks as the Taliban launched repeated counteroffensives. Between 2001 and 2021, around 3,600 Western soldiers and almost 50,000 Afghan civilians were killed. The Afghanistan mission cost a total of almost $1 billion (€868 million). After the chaotic withdrawal of the US and its allies in the summer of 2021, the Taliban returned to power. Since then, they have rolled back almost all the progress made over the past 20 years. Afghanistan is isolated and desperately poor, with 23 million people dependent on humanitarian aid. The US once supplies weapons to Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, who was in power for more than two decades. In 2003, however, it decided to overthrow Hussein with help of a "coalition of the willing," but without a mandate from the UN Security Council. Washington justified the decision with the assertion that Hussein was supporting al-Qaeda and was in possession of weapons of mass destruction — claims later proven to be false. "Saddam Hussein was overthrown not because he possessed weapons of mass destruction, but because he did not possess them," said Woertz. And, at the time, Iran took note. Once Hussein had been toppled, the Americans installed a transitional government, which was later heavily criticized for mismanagement and lack of knowledge of the country. Existing enmities between Iraq's different religious groups deteriorated into a situation akin to civil war between Sunni and Shia Muslims. Deadly attacks were an almost daily occurrence. Soldiers discharged from the Iraqi army started fighting the US troops who had previously toppled Hussein. Twenty years after the American invasion and the attempted regime change in Iraq, the situation has improved. Violence has died down, and the next round of parliamentary elections is due to take place in November. Nonetheless, Iraq remains a country in the process of change. Libya is also still suffering the consequences of an attempted regime change, which came from within and was flanked from abroad. In the wake of the Arab Spring, a civil war began in 2011 with protests against the rule of longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi. When Gadhafi attempted to put down the uprisings with bloodshed, NATO intervened militarily in the form of a no-fly zone to protect the civilian population. The regime held on for a few months. Then on October 20, 2011, Gadhafi was killed. But a government acceptable to the entire country was never established. Instead, there have been years of further conflict between rival militias. The state has virtually disintegrated, with two different governments fighting for control since March 2022. The human rights situation remains extremely precarious. Aside from these cautionary examples from recent history, Woertz sees another problem: Ultimately, ground force would be required to force a change of government in Iran. "I don't see a massively strong rebel movement within Iran that could topple the current regime," he said. "While there was a successful regime change in Germany once, at the end of World War II, that required a ground invasion," said Woertz. "And then you need a transition backed by local people. It helps if there is a common external enemy — like the Soviet bloc after 1945 — which glosses over the differences. But regime change has never happened with aerial bombardment alone, and I don't think Iran will be an exception now."
