How to fill the gaps in governance
The writer is a former Secretary to Government, Home and Tribal Affairs Department and a retired IGP. He can be reached at syed_shah94@yahoo.com
Listen to article
The recent address by Chief of Army Staff General Syed Asim Munir to the Parliamentary Committee on National Security highlighted a critical issue: the persistent governance gaps in Pakistan. He questioned, "For how long shall we continue to fill the governance gaps with the blood of armed forces martyrs?" His statement underscores a fundamental challenge in public policy — ensuring effective governance to eliminate terrorism and maintain national stability.
'Good Governance' has consistently been a top priority in the manifestoes of political parties and international organisations. Its primary goal is public welfare, with peace and security as essential prerequisites for fundamental rights. However, Pakistan has long struggled with governance deficiencies, navigating a fractured system marred by multiple fault lines. These weaknesses fuel crises, trigger unrest and hinder development.
Identifying these governance fault lines is crucial. Political instability, rising crime, extremism, terrorism, economic decline, social injustice and civil-military tensions all stem from governance failures. One perspective holds that neglecting grievances fosters divisions, ultimately leading to violence.
Theorists like Charles Tilly argue that societal violence arises from perceived inequalities - economic, political and cultural. Relative deprivation, exclusion and marginalisation further contribute to unrest. Distributive injustice reinforces this sense of deprivation, deepening societal divides.
Political theorist Francis Fukuyama emphasises the importance of a strong state, asserting that governance starts with the ability to enforce laws and maintain order. A state must have the exclusive monopoly on legitimate force to prevent disorder. This concept gained global traction after 9/11, linking weak states to international terrorism.
Fragile states are now seen as potential breeding grounds for extremism, capable of disrupting global security. Consequently, the study of failing, failed and collapsed states has become critical in governance discourse.
Many studies suggest that extremism and militancy stem from governance failures. Addressing these challenges requires understanding the indicators of good governance and implementing them effectively. Scholars have identified several enduring governance fault lines in Pakistan. Maleeha Lodhi, in Pakistan: Beyond The Crisis State, outlines five key factors shaping Pakistan's governance struggles: 1) The imbalance of power between elected and unelected institutions; 2) A feudal-dominated political culture fostering clientelism; 3) An oligarchic elite dependent on external financial support while resisting taxation; 4) The use of geography as leverage in national security strategy; and 5) Divisive ideological debates over Islam's role in the state and society, alongside the appeasement of religious extremists.
Another critical governance issue is the disruption of civilian rule. Hussain Haqqani argues that Pakistan's national security priorities have driven the country towards an ideological state model, often at the cost of democratic governance. Excessive focus on military strength, ideology enforcement and foreign alliances has weakened internal political structures.
One of the most persistent governance cracks is the ongoing struggle over political authority. Ethnic and provincial differences further fragment the state, while the unresolved question of religion's role in governance has deepened ideological divisions. Religious parties, well-funded and heavily armed, exert substantial influence over state affairs. Their ability to mobilise street power and challenge state authority is evident, particularly in Islamabad, where unauthorised structures have been erected on state land with impunity.
Given these governance gaps, the critical question remains: what is to be done? The foundation of good governance lies in a well-structured and smoothly functioning system, defined by constitutional principles, legal frameworks and established conventions.
Effective governance requires continuity, inclusive participation and responsiveness to diverse perspectives. A system that fosters mutual understanding ensures collective progress, allowing all segments of society to contribute to national development.
Good governance is built on efficiency, transparency, accountability and the rule of law. Achieving these objectives necessitates institutional reforms, skill enhancement in the public sector and leadership that is competent, visionary and free from vested interests. A merit-based, depoliticised civil service must support governance efforts, aligning political decisions with socioeconomic progress while avoiding hybrid administrative models.
Economic revival is another urgent necessity. Mobilising resources, ensuring macroeconomic stability and maintaining fiscal discipline are essential. Expanding the tax base, strengthening revenue-generating institutions and addressing population growth through family planning and education are critical steps. Promoting female literacy, vocational training and employment opportunities will enhance human capital and social stability.
Restoring law and order is paramount for societal well-being. Governance must prioritise human development, skill-building and universal primary education within the next decade. Integrating Pakistan into global economic networks and reassessing foreign policy alignments are crucial for long-term progress.
Pakistan's governance challenges are deeply rooted and complex, but they are not insurmountable. Addressing them requires political will, institutional strengthening and a commitment to inclusive, rule-based governance. These essentials can help Pakistan move beyond crisis management and towards sustainable stability and development.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
17 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump endorses Pakistan's rise as a regional stabiliser
Listen to article The White House luncheon hosted by US President Donald Trump for Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir on Wednesday marked more than just a routine meeting — it signalled a major reset in US-Pakistan relations. This major reset in the relations between the two countries includes a permanent and enduring bilateral partnership, such as cooperation in counter-terrorism, mutual trade in mines and minerals, and cryptocurrency. President Trump's praise for Pakistani political and military leadership, particularly Field Marshal Asim Munir, during his press conference after the meeting, clearly reflects the world's growing confidence in the strong leadership and decision-making of the Pakistani leadership. Donald Trump hosted Field Marshal Asim Munir at an unprecedented White House luncheon on Wednesday. Speaking to reporters at the Oval Office following the meeting, Trump said he was "honoured" to meet Field Marshal Asim. Trump said that the primary reason for hosting Pakistan's army chief was to "thank" him for avoiding further escalation with India in May and helping bring an end to tensions. "I wanted to thank him for not going into the war, just ending the war," Trump said. When asked what he wanted to achieve from the meeting, Trump told reporters: "Well, I stopped a war ... I love Pakistan. This man was extremely influential in stopping it from the Pakistan side — he did. They were going at it — and they're both nuclear countries. I got it stopped." Pakistan and India were embroiled in a four-day conflict, exchanging missiles and drones for the first time since both sides became nuclear powers in 1998. The conflict, dubbed Marka-e-Haq, occurred between May 7-10 and was sparked by Indian missile strikes inside Pakistan on May 7. Against this backdrop, what makes the meeting between Field Marshal Asim Munir and President Donald Trump historically significant? This is because Pakistan has demonstrated its role as a key regional stabiliser in South Asia. The meeting took place amid heightened regional tensions due to the Iran-Israel conflict. Amid this escalation, Iran says "Tashakur [Thank you] Pakistan" on the one hand, while on the other hand, Trump is also saying that it was an honour for him to meet Field Marshal Asim Munir. At the White House media talk, Trump acknowledged that Iran situation was also discussed in the meeting and that Pakistan knew Iran better. He appreciated Pakistan's perspective and positive role during the Iran-Israel war. Furthermore, Pakistan also has very excellent relations with China. In the South Asia region, India's relations with all the regional and many global players have been affected due to its biased mentality. India is clearly becoming isolated at the world stage because of its arrogance and belligerence. This became clearer after the Marka-e-Haq. Pakistan is a clear winner in the Marka-e-Haq and emerges as a regional power in South Asia. India, on the other hand, is losing its global political capital for being an arrogant, stubborn and illogical war-mongering country. It now emerges that Pakistan and India are hyphenated at the global level, and India's attempts in the past to isolate Pakistan have failed miserably. After the Marka-e-Haq, the decades-old Kashmir issue has returned to the global limelight, and the US is ready to play its role in resolving this important issue. In fact, Field Marshal Asim Munir's visit to the US is historic and his meaningful meeting with President Trump, that too at a time of Iran-Israel tensions, has elevated Pakistan's status as a source of regional stability.
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
COAS for broad, multi-dimensional US partnership
ISLAMABAD: Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir underlined the potential for a broad-based, multi-dimensional partnership between Pakistan and the United States, rooted in mutual respect, shared strategic interests, and economic interdependence. He made these remarks during an interactive session with leading US scholars, policy analysts, and international media representatives in Washington DC. As part of his official visit to the United States, Field Marshal Munir held an in-depth exchange of views with senior members of prominent think tanks and strategic institutions, discussing a range of regional and global developments. In meeting with COAS Munir, Trump lauds Pakistan's ongoing efforts for regional peace, stability According to the ISPR, the army chief emphasised the longstanding Pakistan-US relationship, noting its historical convergences—particularly in counter-terrorism, regional security, and economic cooperation. He expressed Pakistan's intent to further broaden and deepen the partnership across multiple sectors. Reaffirming Pakistan's commitment to regional peace and global stability, the COAS stressed the country's constructive role in promoting a rules-based international order. He highlighted the significance of dialogue and diplomacy in resolving conflicts and emphasised adherence to international law. Touching upon Pakistan's counter-terrorism efforts, Field Marshal Munir referenced key military operations such as Maarka-e-Haq and Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, and condemned the role of certain regional actors in perpetuating terrorism through hybrid warfare tactics. He reiterated Pakistan's frontline role in the global war on terror and the sacrifices made by the nation in both human and economic terms. The COAS also drew attention to Pakistan's untapped economic potential—particularly in the IT, agriculture, and mining sectors—and invited international investors to explore opportunities for mutually-beneficial partnerships. Participants praised the COAS's clarity of thought and strategic insight. The session was widely seen as a meaningful step toward enhancing Pakistan-US engagement and strengthening mutual understanding on key global challenges. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
World Order — exceptionalism, aggression, brazen hypocrisy
The writer heads the independent Centre for Research and Security Studies, Islamabad. He is currently a visiting Research Fellow at Fudan University, Shanghai Listen to article Israel's ongoing reaction to the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023, and the current ungrounded aggression against Iran only reinforced a bitter reality of the world today — the post-9/11 order rests on brazen aggression and high-handedness of the mighty ones who have arrogated to themselves the right to define conflict, self-defense, evil, terrorism and victimhood. The world order today knows no values, no morality. Nor any consideration for national or international law. Notions such as rule of law and democracy have meanwhile been reduced to fiction. We still hear a lot of western pontification on extremism and terrorism but it's pretty ironic that they don't apply the same yardstick to Israeli actions against women and children in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran. On the contrary, all leaders defended this as "Israel's right to self-defence". Donald Trump — as it turns out — simply lied when he vowed to "end wars" and uttered his contempt for the deep state. He had vowed to reform the justice department which he described as "department of injustice" immediately after his reelection. Bit by bit, the G-7 nations have scornfully pulled down the very values they championed for decades by inventing a self-serving exceptionalism in their own favour (read in Israel's favour). Today, they condemn attacks on Israel as criminal but hail the killing of nearly 60,000 Palestinians as self-defence. All G-7 leaders dub Iran as the source of instability but are literally blind to — in fact complicit with - the Israeli actions of first killing Palestinians and now recklessly bombarding Iran to neutralise their nuclear weapons, although a US report, according to CNN, says Iran is far away from making a nuclear bomb. But all that seems just an excuse for crippling Iran and brining about a regime change. On the sidelines of the recent G-7 summit in Alberta, Canada, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz spelt out this backhanded approach by the Israel apologists - a virtual endorsement of Israeli actions to date. "This is the dirty work Israel is doing for all of us — this mullah regime [in Iran] has brought death and destruction to the world," Merz said in an interview with the ZDF broadcaster. In a separate interview with Welt TV, Merz also suggested Israel's attacks on Iran could lead to the demise of the Islamic republic's leadership. "To be honest, I can hardly imagine the mullah regime returning to its old functions," he added, in a glaring display of hypocrisy born off cold-blooded geopolitics. The G-7 essentially endorsed the Israel position on Iran. This way they themselves undercut the very themes they touted for decades as the West's unique selling point (USP) i.e. democracy, rule of law and human rights with the United Nations watching on as a silent, literally irrelevant spectator. Its predecessor — the League of Nations — had ceased to exist on April 20, 1946, largely due to its inability to prevent major global conflicts, particularly World War II. Will the United Nations meet the same fate and drown in irrelevance? For all practical reasons, the UN has been reduced to a debating club of the elite that thrives off the funding from member countries. Israel today is doing what Rudolf Hitler did first against neighbouring European countries and then against Russia. Hitler's invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939 triggered reaction from America, Russia, Britain and France, with the last two mentioned countries declaring war on Germany on September 3, and so began the World War II. Will the murder of nearly 60,000 Palestinians and hundreds of Iranians as well as the potential Chinese and Russian reaction lead to the undoing of the United Nations that has been irrelevant at least since October 2023? Blind exceptionalism — basically another synonym for hypocrisy — is causing a major shift in global politics. Battle lines have further deepened with willful demonisation of Iran and its major supporters thus far i.e. China and Russia. This exceptionalism is stinkingly obnoxious, evident also from a recent article in The Wall Street Journal. "The US, Israel and India blundered by allowing Pakistan to acquire nuclear weapons. Repeating the blunder with Iran would be far worse," says an oped by Sadanand Dhume in the Journal's June 18, 2025 issue. Once again, this extremely self-serving argument — as if it were the benevolence of these countries and not relentless efforts of Pakistani scientists and engineers — exposes the exceptionalism being peddled in western official corridors and media houses. Nobody speaks of how Israelis and Indians got hold of nuclear weapons. Neither of them has signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, but continues to demonise Pakistan's nuclear capability like a crime committed. For the G-7 nations crimes, it seems, against hapless Palestinian women and relentless attacks on Iran are self-defence, while Pakistan's nuclear capability and Iran's nuclear pursuits are an unacceptable offence.
