Trump endorses Pakistan's rise as a regional stabiliser
Listen to article
The White House luncheon hosted by US President Donald Trump for Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir on Wednesday marked more than just a routine meeting — it signalled a major reset in US-Pakistan relations.
This major reset in the relations between the two countries includes a permanent and enduring bilateral partnership, such as cooperation in counter-terrorism, mutual trade in mines and minerals, and cryptocurrency.
President Trump's praise for Pakistani political and military leadership, particularly Field Marshal Asim Munir, during his press conference after the meeting, clearly reflects the world's growing confidence in the strong leadership and decision-making of the Pakistani leadership.
Donald Trump hosted Field Marshal Asim Munir at an unprecedented White House luncheon on Wednesday. Speaking to reporters at the Oval Office following the meeting, Trump said he was "honoured" to meet Field Marshal Asim.
Trump said that the primary reason for hosting Pakistan's army chief was to "thank" him for avoiding further escalation with India in May and helping bring an end to tensions. "I wanted to thank him for not going into the war, just ending the war," Trump said.
When asked what he wanted to achieve from the meeting, Trump told reporters: "Well, I stopped a war ... I love Pakistan. This man was extremely influential in stopping it from the Pakistan side — he did. They were going at it — and they're both nuclear countries. I got it stopped."
Pakistan and India were embroiled in a four-day conflict, exchanging missiles and drones for the first time since both sides became nuclear powers in 1998. The conflict, dubbed Marka-e-Haq, occurred between May 7-10 and was sparked by Indian missile strikes inside Pakistan on May 7.
Against this backdrop, what makes the meeting between Field Marshal Asim Munir and President Donald Trump historically significant? This is because Pakistan has demonstrated its role as a key regional stabiliser in South Asia.
The meeting took place amid heightened regional tensions due to the Iran-Israel conflict. Amid this escalation, Iran says "Tashakur [Thank you] Pakistan" on the one hand, while on the other hand, Trump is also saying that it was an honour for him to meet Field Marshal Asim Munir.
At the White House media talk, Trump acknowledged that Iran situation was also discussed in the meeting and that Pakistan knew Iran better. He appreciated Pakistan's perspective and positive role during the Iran-Israel war. Furthermore, Pakistan also has very excellent relations with China.
In the South Asia region, India's relations with all the regional and many global players have been affected due to its biased mentality. India is clearly becoming isolated at the world stage because of its arrogance and belligerence. This became clearer after the Marka-e-Haq.
Pakistan is a clear winner in the Marka-e-Haq and emerges as a regional power in South Asia. India, on the other hand, is losing its global political capital for being an arrogant, stubborn and illogical war-mongering country.
It now emerges that Pakistan and India are hyphenated at the global level, and India's attempts in the past to isolate Pakistan have failed miserably. After the Marka-e-Haq, the decades-old Kashmir issue has returned to the global limelight, and the US is ready to play its role in resolving this important issue.
In fact, Field Marshal Asim Munir's visit to the US is historic and his meaningful meeting with President Trump, that too at a time of Iran-Israel tensions, has elevated Pakistan's status as a source of regional stability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
23 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan to recommend Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
U.S. President Donald Trump gives a thumbs up as he walks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 25, 2025. PHOTO:REUTER Listen to article Pakistan said on Saturday it would recommend US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that he has said he craves, for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between Pakistan and India. Some analysts in Pakistan said the move might persuade Trump to think again about potentially joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has condemned Israel's action as a violation of international law and a threat to regional stability. Pakistan agrees that US diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries. "President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation," Pakistan said. "This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker." Governments can nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize. There was no immediate response from Washington. A spokesperson for the Indian government did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has repeatedly said that he's willing to mediate between Pakistan and India over the disputed Kashmir region, their main source of enmity. In a social media post on Friday, Trump gave a long list of conflicts he said he had resolved, including India and Pakistan and the Abraham accords in his first term between Israel and some Muslim-majority countries. He added: "I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do." Mushahid Hussain, a former chair of the Senate Defence Committee in Pakistan's parliament, suggested nominating Trump for the peace prize was justified. "Trump is good for Pakistan," he said. "If this panders to Trump's ego, so be it. All the European leaders have been sucking up to him big time." But the move was not universally applauded in Pakistan, where Trump's support for Israel's war in Gaza has inflamed passions.
Express Tribune
33 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
FO assails Amit Shah for 'weaponising water'
Listen to article Pakistan on Saturday slammed India's Home Minister Amit Shah's "brazen disregard" for international agreements after the latter said New Delhi would never restore the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) with Islamabad. "We will take water that was flowing to Pakistan to Rajasthan by constructing a canal. Pakistan will be starved of water that it has been getting unjustifiably," Shah said in an interview with Times of India on Saturday. Responding to Shah's comments, Foreign Office spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan said they reflected "a brazen disregard for the sanctity of international agreements" and noted that the IWT is an apolitical agreement without provisions for unilateral action. India put into "abeyance" its participation in the 1960 treaty, which governs the usage of the Indus river system, after 26 civilians in IIOJK were killed. "India's illegal announcement to hold the treaty in abeyance constitutes a clear violation of international law, the provisions of the treaty itself, and the fundamental principles governing inter-state relations," the Foreign Office stated. "Such conduct sets a reckless and dangerous precedent — one that undermines the credibility of international agreements and raises serious questions about the reliability and trustworthiness of a state that openly refuses to fulfil its legal obligations." The statement added that "weaponising water for political ends" is irresponsible and contrary to the behaviour of a responsible state. It demanded that India immediately restore the full implementation of the IWT. "For its part, Pakistan remains firmly committed to the treaty and will take all necessary measures to protect its legitimate rights and entitlements under it," the statement concluded. The latest comments from Shah, the most powerful cabinet minister in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's cabinet, have dimmed Islamabad's hopes for negotiations on the treaty in the near term. Last month, Reuters reported that India plans to dramatically increase the water it draws from a major river that feeds Pakistani farms downstream, as part of retaliatory action. "No, it will never be restored," Shah told The Times of India earlier today. "We will take water that was flowing to Pakistan to Rajasthan by constructing a canal. Pakistan will be starved of water that it has been getting unjustifiably." The latest comments from Shah, the most powerful cabinet minister in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's cabinet, reveal Delhi's intentions as Islamabad hopes for negotiations on the treaty in the near term.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Govt scrambles for oil backup plans
Listen to article Amid escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra) has warned oil marketing companies (OMCs) to maintain a minimum of 20 days of oil stock in accordance with licensing requirements. The prime minister has already constituted a high-level committee to explore alternative options in the wake of the Iran-Israel conflict to pre-empt any potential oil shortages in the country. Oil Marketing Companies are obligated to maintain 20-day oil reserves under their licensing terms. Ogra has previously issued directives to this effect and has now reiterated its warning, stating that companies failing to comply will face penalties and fines. In a statement, the Ogra spokesperson said, "The Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) has confirmed that the country currently holds sufficient stocks of petroleum products to meet existing demand". However, in light of future needs and the volatile market environment, Ogra has formally advised all OMCs to adhere strictly to the mandatory 20-day stock levels, as stipulated in their respective licences. "OGRA remains committed to monitoring the situation closely and will continue to take proactive steps to ensure national energy security," the spokesperson added. In response to the evolving geopolitical situation following Israel's recent attack on Iran and the resulting fluctuations in global oil markets, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif constituted a high-level committee to oversee petroleum pricing and supply dynamics. The committee is headed by the finance minister and includes senior representatives from key federal ministries, regulatory bodies and energy sector experts. It has already held its first meeting and is scheduled to reconvene early next week to assess possible supply routes and contingency measures. During its initial meeting, the committee explored alternative oil supply routes from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), including pipeline transport, in case the Strait of Hormuz – a critical global oil supply route – is blocked due to escalating hostilities. The committee was informed that Saudi Arabia possesses an existing pipeline network, including the East-West Pipeline (Petroline), which transports crude from its eastern province to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. Similarly, the UAE's Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline (Adcop) to Fujairah is designed to bypass the Strait of Hormuz, ensuring uninterrupted exports. The Petroleum Division, in a submitted report, stated that the Strait of Hormuz handles 20% of global crude oil exports. Any closure of this route by Iran could severely impact global supply chains, including Pakistan's. Under a worst-case scenario, global oil prices could surge to $100$150 per barrel. While there is currently no immediate threat of a spike in prices, Pakistan is in discussions with international oil suppliers to ensure continuity of supply. At present, the country has access to up to one million tons of furnace oil storage capacity through abandoned power plants. Experts have recommended that the government utilise these facilities to store strategic oil reserves. It has also been proposed that the government purchase these storages, as the power sector plans to dispose of them as scrap.
