Fujifilm Instax Mini 41
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.
The Fujifilm Instax Mini 41 mixes retro style with an approachable one-button take on instant photography. This slim, purely analog snapshot machine captures images on wallet-sized Instax Mini film, and looks good enough to take out to a party or a night on the town. Picture quality isn't any different from the most basic camera in the line, the cutesy Instax Mini 12 ($79.95), which is our Editors' Choice for its value and ease of use. But we can understand why older teens and adults would prefer the more stylish Mini 41.
In an uncommon move, Fujifilm has not set final pricing for the Mini 41 at announcement time; a representative cites "evolving market conditions" as the cause. We expect the company to sort it out quickly, as the camera is supposed to begin shipping to customers later this month. We'll update this story with a rating and our definitive buying advice once we know how much it costs.
The Instax Mini 41 has an all-plastic construction, styled to look like a vintage film camera. Its steel-gray-and-black finish, old-school knurling around the lens, and stylized typefaces make for an aesthetically pleasing look, which matters to some people. It's not too much to carry either: The body measures 4.8 by 4.0 by 2.4 inches (HWD) and weighs 15.1 ounces with batteries and film.
The camera is decently rounded, though not as curvy as the Mini 12. It's pretty comfortable to hold, too, with a rough, diamond-knurled finish on much of the body that keeps it from slipping out of your hand. An included wrist strap attaches to either of two lugs, located on the left and right sides. Because there are two connection points, you have the option to add a crossbody strap if you prefer. Just be aware the connection points are too narrow to work with Peak Design's popular anchor and strap carry system.
The Mini 41 works with Instax Mini film, which comes in either color or black-and-white and is often available in limited-run packs with playful border designs. The instant film has a wallet-sized image area (1.8 by 2.4 inches). It's the smallest of Fuji's three instant film formats, so consider an Instax Square SQ1 ($119.95) if you prefer a bigger 2.4-by-2.4-inch frame or the Instax Wide 400 ($149.95) for 3.6-by-1.8-inch prints. Mini film sells for around $7.50 per pack of 10 shots in color and $8 for monochrome.
Fuji makes both instant cameras in analog and digital styles, and the Mini 41 falls into the former camp. Its optical plastic 60mm f/12.7 lens projects light directly onto photochemical film, which starts to develop as it ejects from the camera. The lens has a moderately wide angle of view (about the same as a 35mm full-frame prime) and two manual focus zones, one for close-up with an 11.8-inch (0.3m) focal distance and a second for subjects further away from the camera.
The Mini 41's purely analog approach to capture means that you're spending some money, around $0.75, each time you press the shutter. If you're not willing to commit fully to film, consider the Instax Mini Evo ($199.95), a digital compact with a built-in printer that spits out pictures on Mini film. With the Evo, you can print only the photos you want, as opposed to using film for every exposure with the Mini 41. The Evo uses the same type of film for prints but is fundamentally a different experience in use and doesn't have the same purely analog character as the Mini 41. Ultimately, choosing between analog and digital instant photography is a matter of personal preference.
The camera is powered by a pair of AA batteries (included) that load in the side. A sliding plastic door covers the compartment, and film loads in the rear. The Mini 41 includes a reminder window on the rear that shows how many images are left in the film cartridge. Each Mini cartridge holds ten pictures.
Like the Mini 12, the Mini 41 does not include a tripod attachment thread. The Mini 41's wide, flat bottom allows it to sit upright on a table or another flat surface, but if you want an instant camera that you can use with a tripod, you'll want to upgrade to Fuji's premium Mini 99 or an interchangeable lens camera like the Nons SL645 ($539). We've not yet reviewed the SL645, which also uses Mini film, but previously tested the Instax Square edition, the Nons SL660 ($599).
The Instax Mini 41 is very basic as far as controls go. The camera has just one button to take photos, plus a three-stage ring (Off, On, Close-Up) around the lens to control power and set focus. This lines up exactly with the Mini 12 but falls behind Fuji's premium analog Instax, the Mini 99 ($199.95), which adds EV compensation, manual flash control, and a mid-distance focal zone (0.3-0.6m), all absent from the Mini 41.
The camera offers two ways to frame pictures—either from behind the lens using the optical viewfinder or in front of it with a selfie mirror. The mirror is a good feature; just set the lens to its 0.3m zone, point the camera at your face, and use the mirror to fine-tune your framing to get the perfect selfie.
The optical viewfinder serves as your window to the world. It's decently large and shows a clear, bright view of a scene. It has the same advantages and drawbacks as every fixed optical finder—it's always bright and in focus, but framing isn't precise since you don't get a through-the-lens view. That said, the finder has an internal diopter that engages during close focus to counteract the optical parallax effect, as well as a circle marker at its center point. It may not be as precise as a through-the-lens viewfinder, but it's accurate enough for an instant snapshot camera.
The one-button approach makes the Mini 41 an easy camera to pick up and use—apart from the focus zone, there are no settings to ponder. It can leave advanced-level photographers wanting more, however. The Instax Mini 99 is a better point-and-shoot instant camera for shutterbugs because it allows you to control when the flash fires and set the meter to make a brighter or darker exposure. The Mini 99 also includes some neat features, including internal lights for creative filter effects and support for double exposures, that aren't included in the basic Mini 12 or 41.
The Mini 41's picture quality is on par with others in Fujifilm's Mini series as it uses the same 60mm f/12.7 optical formula and film. Instax film has a glossy finish and shows strong color fidelity, but like most positive films has a very narrow exposure latitude and dynamic range. In layman's terms, this means that bright areas of scenes can blow out as all-white, as you can see in the following image:
Because of this, it's important for the Mini 41 to properly meter a scene to calculate exposure and decide whether or not to fire its flash. The camera does a decent job for scenes that are evenly lit but suffers in tough situations. The overexposed image above happened because the statue in the foreground was shadowed, but the sky behind was so bright that it overexposed the film—this happens easily with Instax Mini film because of its relatively high ISO 800 sensitivity.
Conversely, the image below is underexposed. I took this photo in a conservatory with ample ambient light, but the wall of flowers I chose as the subject was in shadow. The Mini 41's flash always fires, so in this situation, the camera should have chosen a longer shutter speed to avoid the silhouette look. The Mini 99 offers more granular control over exposure for tough scenes like this one, and its Lighten and Darken exposure adjustment dial comes in handy for backlit scenes.
When it comes to picture quality for instant prints, film size and exposure accuracy are the biggest concerns, though lens quality matters, too. Fans of the Mini format have a few options if you prefer the pop that comes from a glass lens, including the aforementioned Nons SL645 (which works with SLR lenses) and the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass ($189).
The other way to get a more impactful image is to choose a camera with a larger film format. Instax Square options range from the basic Fuji SQ1 to the quirky folding Lomo'Instant Square ($129). Instax Wide is even larger and works with cameras like the Fuji Instax Wide 400 and the Lomo'Instant Wide Glass ($279). Polaroid film is also an option; the brand has the entry-level Now Generation 3 ($119.99) and the premium I-2 ($599.99), but be aware that its large square film is more expensive and, in my experience, requires more care and patience to use.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Replace Dropbox With This 2TB Alternative Without Recurring Fees
The following content is brought to you by PCMag partners. If you buy a product featured here, we may earn an affiliate commission or other compensation. Keeping files organized and backed up usually means paying for cloud storage subscriptions like Dropbox or iCloud month after month. FileRule Cloud Storage offers a much cheaper, one-time alternative. For $69 (reg. $690), you get 2TB of secure cloud storage without any ongoing fees. FileRule handles all the same basics you would expect from the big-name services. You can upload documents, photos, videos, and more with simple drag-and-drop tools right in your browser. Once your files are uploaded, built-in WebDAV integration keeps them synced across all your devices, whether you are using Windows, macOS, or Linux. You don't have to worry about juggling devices or complicated setup processes. Unlike some services that make sharing files feel clunky, FileRule makes it easy to create shareable links, embed files directly into websites, or even post content straight to social media. It also includes useful features like file previews, advanced analytics, and seamless file embedding, giving you more flexibility with how you manage and share your data. Security is built in, with encrypted storage and permanent file retention so your data stays safe long-term. And since this is a one-time purchase, you won't be stuck with another subscription fee. You can connect unlimited devices and enjoy a simple, ad-free experience. It's only $69 (reg. $690) to get a 2TB of FileRule Cloud Storage. Prices subject to change. PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through StackSocial affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's What Reviewers Are Saying About Nintendo's New Switch 2 Console
Nintendo figured its Switch 2 console would be hot—and it is. The Japanese gaming giant predicted sales of 15 million of the new Switch 2 in its first year, and it's already managed to sell 3.5 million in its first few days after hitting stores earlier this month. Now it's in the (literal) hands of millions of players, as well as reviewers who've sought to unpack what the new system offers in the early going. The second-generation Switch, which sells for $450, was advertised as having a better display, more power, and improved controllers. So, how did the system and its initial set of games go over? We read a range of reviews from different publications; for snippets of some of those reviews, along with links, read on. An improved screen was among Nintendo's selling points, and PC Mag liked what it saw. 'Between the size and sharper resolution, the Switch 2 is just more pleasant to view, overall. Even the generic menu—one that's very similar to Switch 1's, but with new sounds—looks cleaner,' it said. 'And that's just in handheld mode. With a dock capable of 4K, the Switch 2 looked great on my TV. After years of using an upscaling add-on for my HDMI cable to get better image quality from my Switch 1, this was an especially appreciated bonus.' Ars Technica appreciated the feel of the device, which is meant to be played both plugged in to big screens and as a handheld system. 'The unit feels a bit more substantial in the hand than the original Switch, but still a good deal less bulky than portable PCs like the Steam Deck, both in terms of weight and overall thickness,' the publication wrote. 'While it's still early, we'd expect long-term portable play to be plenty comfortable here.' 'It's a lovely thing in the hands—larger and, it feels, slightly sleeker than the Switch,' Eurogamer wrote. 'And that beautiful glossy screen makes its older sibling look a bit pokey ... So bright and sharp and large, such colours and such lovely smoothness. The same but slightly different, ditto the Joy-Con, which now snap into place with a lovely magnetic thunk, and which are now removed with a bumpy trigger thing that still feels a little nerve-wracking each time I do it.' The redesigned controllers show the potential for better reliability, according to The New York Times. 'The original Switch's analog sticks were notorious for failing or 'drifting.' However, Nintendo claims to have 'redesigned' the Switch 2's sticks,' the publication wrote. 'We'll have to test them long-term to determine their reliability.' (It also noted: 'You can't attach your original Joy-Con controllers to the Switch 2, but they remain compatible for multiplayer titles, so you won't need to rush out and buy more for your game nights.') At Tom's Guide, a reviewer praised the controllers, display, performance, and games, while grousing about download speeds and one of the high-profile new games. TechRadar's reviewer mostly liked that game—Mario Kart World, calling it 'One of the prettiest Nintendo games ever,' and saying the soundtrack was 'unbelievably good,' but with some quibbles. Tech Advisor boiled it down this way: 'You will not regret either buying a Nintendo Switch 2 outright or upgrading from an original Switch. This is a true next-gen Console with only minor faults, and will likely be a bestseller for years to come.' And 'as long as software keeps pushing those internals and extra features, we're in for an excellent generation,' wrote GamesRadar. Still, some reviewers seemed to have hoped for more. 'Instead of bringing the forefront of what can be done to your living room and on the go, this feels like Nintendo playing a long-overdue game of catch-up,' IGN wrote. 'But in the context of gaming as a whole and with a big ol' '2' slapped on the box rather than the framing of a mid-cycle upgrade, as well as the substantial price increase that has come along with that added digit, it's just not doing very much that truly wows me.' And Rolling Stone, observing that the device was named like a sequel rather than given its own original moniker, wondered whether it offered too little in the way of innovation or just the right amount. 'The messaging is clear: It's more of that thing you already like, rather than something entirely new,' it wrote. 'Yet still, there's a world where that might be enough.' Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Robotaxis Will Reportedly Get a Quiet Launch: Just 10 Cars in Select Areas
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. Tesla's robotaxis are expected to roll out on June 22, but you may not be able to catch one immediately. The launch is going to be very limited in terms of both cars and operational area, the Financial Times reports. At launch, Tesla's ride-hailing service will use only 10 Model Y cars, which will be geo-fenced to avoid Austin's most challenging roads and areas. Additionally, the cars will be monitored by remote teleoperators who can take control of vehicles in case they run into trouble. No further details have been shared about the upcoming robotaxi service, possibly because Tesla has reportedly tried to block public access to it. The reported fleet, however, falls at the lower end of the 10–20 cars CEO Elon Musk mentioned previously. The project has been delayed for years now, and safety may have a major role to play. The automaker is currently being investigated for crashes linked to its Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology. Earlier this month, Musk said the company was 'being super paranoid about safety' and suggested the robotaxi launch could be pushed beyond June 22. When it comes to regulations, though, Tesla has the all-clear from the Department of Transportation (DOT). It was spotted testing the driverless Model Ys in Austin earlier this month. Before that, in April, the automaker had conducted internal tests for employees in Austin and San Francisco. Google-owned rival Waymo, on the other hand, has become operational in multiple cities and has a fleet of 1,500 autonomous vehicles (AVs). It entered Tesla's home turf Austin in March, following a month-long trial with users who voluntarily signed up. We are just a few days away from the launch date, but Tesla has yet to provide details about a trial program. According to a New York Times report from earlier this week, analysts expect Tesla's robotaxis to be initially limited to company employees and invited guests. They might not be available to the general public 'for several months.'
