logo
#

Latest news with #PCMag

Tesla Robotaxis Will Reportedly Get a Quiet Launch: Just 10 Cars in Select Areas
Tesla Robotaxis Will Reportedly Get a Quiet Launch: Just 10 Cars in Select Areas

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Automotive
  • Yahoo

Tesla Robotaxis Will Reportedly Get a Quiet Launch: Just 10 Cars in Select Areas

PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. Tesla's robotaxis are expected to roll out on June 22, but you may not be able to catch one immediately. The launch is going to be very limited in terms of both cars and operational area, the Financial Times reports. At launch, Tesla's ride-hailing service will use only 10 Model Y cars, which will be geo-fenced to avoid Austin's most challenging roads and areas. Additionally, the cars will be monitored by remote teleoperators who can take control of vehicles in case they run into trouble. No further details have been shared about the upcoming robotaxi service, possibly because Tesla has reportedly tried to block public access to it. The reported fleet, however, falls at the lower end of the 10–20 cars CEO Elon Musk mentioned previously. The project has been delayed for years now, and safety may have a major role to play. The automaker is currently being investigated for crashes linked to its Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology. Earlier this month, Musk said the company was 'being super paranoid about safety' and suggested the robotaxi launch could be pushed beyond June 22. When it comes to regulations, though, Tesla has the all-clear from the Department of Transportation (DOT). It was spotted testing the driverless Model Ys in Austin earlier this month. Before that, in April, the automaker had conducted internal tests for employees in Austin and San Francisco. Google-owned rival Waymo, on the other hand, has become operational in multiple cities and has a fleet of 1,500 autonomous vehicles (AVs). It entered Tesla's home turf Austin in March, following a month-long trial with users who voluntarily signed up. We are just a few days away from the launch date, but Tesla has yet to provide details about a trial program. According to a New York Times report from earlier this week, analysts expect Tesla's robotaxis to be initially limited to company employees and invited guests. They might not be available to the general public 'for several months.'

We're Projecting Big Savings: Take $900 Off the 4K Projector With an 'Excellent' Rating
We're Projecting Big Savings: Take $900 Off the 4K Projector With an 'Excellent' Rating

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

We're Projecting Big Savings: Take $900 Off the 4K Projector With an 'Excellent' Rating

PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. When you shop at Woot, you can be sure you'll find great deals on all kinds of electronics, including brand-name devices. In addition to the low prices, shoppers also receive free shipping with an Amazon Prime membership. It's pretty much all good news, except for the fact that things tend to sell out fast. Really fast. If you wait until tomorrow to make your purchase, chances are it will be gone. So, shop smartly. Today, the top-rated Xgimi Horizon Pro 4K Projector is over $900 off. Plus, you can snatch up a mighty Ecovacs Deebot N8 Pro Robot Vacuum and Mop at half price and Beats Studio Buds+ for under $80. Let's take a closer look at the daily Woot deals (while they're still there)! When it comes to home projectors, the lightweight Xgimi Horizon Pro is a premium model well worth full price – so with a $929 discount, it's a downright steal. This small, 6.4-pound device displays content in sharp 4K resolution, thanks to the super bright LED light source (which is rated at 2,200 ANSI lumens and designed to last for the entire life of the projector!). The audio quality is equally impressive with two 8-watt speakers that can easily fill a large family room with robust sound. Plus, it features an integrated Android TV to simplify set up and streaming. We were so impressed during testing that we awarded it a rating of "Excellent" in our . Epson EF-100 Smart Streaming Laser Projector for $809.76 (List Price $999.99) LG HF65LA 100' 1080p 1000-Lumens Short Throw Projector for $958.72 Epson Pro EX11000 1080p Wireless Laser Projector for $1,299.99 Optoma HD28HDR 1080p 4K Input Home Theater Projector for $860.00 Anker Nebula Capsule 3 Laser 1080p Wi-Fi Mini Projector for $599.99 (List Price $749.99) If you're tired of constantly cleaning your floors, it's time to invest in the half-price Ecovacs Deebot N8 Pro Robot Vacuum and Mop. This powerful machine uses advanced laser-based LiDAR navigation to efficiently map and clean your home, sucking up dirt and debris with four-times greater precision and double the range of standard laser mapping robovacs. Better still, it vacuums and mops the floors all in one go, automatically detecting obstacles to avoid and steering clear of carpets when mopping. While we haven't tested this specific model, we reviewed a similar in 2021 and awarded it a rating of "Excellent". At a sale price of $270, it's an excellent bargain for such a capable (and you can always upgrade with the compatible Auto-Empty Station later on). Eufy RoboVac 11S Max Self-Charging Robot Vacuum Cleaner for $159.99 (List Price $279.99) iRobot Roomba Combo i5+ Self-Empty Robot Vacuum and Mop for $299.99 (List Price $549.99) Roborock Q7 Max+ Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum for $549.99 (List Price $869.99) Roborock Q5 Pro 5,500Pa Robot Vacuum and Mop for $159.99 (List Price $239.99) Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni Robot Vacuum and Mop for $699.99 (List Price $799.97) iLife V3s Pro Robot Vacuum for $109.99 (List Price $159.99) Per our expert review, the sleek were rated "Excellent", thanks to its deep bass and crisp highs, as well as arguably the best noise cancellation you'll find for under $100 ($80 with today's discount). The on-ear push button controls are intuitive to use, and there's even the option to customize the function of long presses (choose between ANC-transparency mode toggling, summoning voice assistants or volume control). Whether connected to Apple or Android devices, they offer a superb 9-hour listening experience, plus an additional 27 hours when you use the charging case. Apple AirPods Pro 2 ANC Earbuds With USB-C Charging Case for $169.00 (List Price $249.00) Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds With Heart Rate Monitor for $199.95 (List Price $249.99) Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4 Smart Earbuds for $230.54 (List Price $299.95) Soundcore P20i True Wireless Earbuds (Black) for $19.97 (List Price $39.99) Sony LinkBuds S Truly Wireless Noise Canceling Earbuds for $158.00 (List Price $199.99) Shopping for something else? Check out even!

ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek: I've Used Both, and the Winner Is Obvious
ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek: I've Used Both, and the Winner Is Obvious

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek: I've Used Both, and the Winner Is Obvious

PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. Although DeepSeek is completely free and ChatGPT isn't, the latter's free version still has more features, such as deep research, image generation and recognition, voice chatting, and more. ChatGPT's paid plans increase usage limits and add even more perks, such as expanded memory, Sora video generation, and a wider model selection. These tiers start at $20 per month (ChatGPT Plus) and scale up to $200 per month (ChatGPT Pro). ChatGPT Plus unlocks the vast majority of the chatbot's capabilities, however, so you likely won't feel the need to upgrade beyond that. DeepSeek doesn't have premium chatbot plans, but it does offer affordable API access pricing. Its flagship V3 model costs $0.07 for input and $1.10 for output (per a million tokens), whereas access to OpenAI's flagship GPT-4.1 model (without any customization) goes for $2 for input and $8 for output. If API access is important to you, then DeepSeek gives you massive savings. Winner: Tie You can access ChatGPT and DeepSeek on the web or via mobile apps (Android and iOS). ChatGPT also has desktop apps (macOS and Windows) and an official Chrome extension. DeepSeek doesn't have either, though many unofficial extensions are available to try. ChatGPT and DeepSeek are available elsewhere, like . Note that many of DeepSeek's (the company) offerings are available on other apps and sites, but not via the chatbot itself. Perplexity, for example, has a deep research feature that uses DeepSeek's R1 model, while Hugging Face takes advantage of DeepSeek's Janus-Pro image generation model. This is the natural result of DeepSeek's business model, but the decoupling of features can be confusing. The interfaces for ChatGPT (first slide above) and DeepSeek (second slide) are very similar and consistent across their apps and sites. Without much to fiddle with, they're both easy to use, too. Still, ChatGPT gives you more settings to adjust, including those related to memory and personality. You also get some extra quality of life features, such as an easy way to share chats with others. Winner: ChatGPT ChatGPT has two primary model series: the 4-series (its conversational flagship line) and the o-series (its complex reasoning line). The latest models are o3 Pro and o4-mini. DeepSeek has the V3 model for general tasks and the R1 model () for more complicated endeavors; both are the most recent ones available. Other DeepSeek models exist, such as DeepSeek Coder V2, DeepSeek Math, and DeepSeek VL (vision learning), but these aren't accessible through the chatbot. Outside of coding or solving a particularly challenging equation, you spend most of your time with ChatGPT's 4o model and DeepSeek's V3 model. Below, you can see how they perform across different tasks. The model you should use depends on the task at hand, but most tasks don't require complex reasoning. Winner: Tie Both ChatGPT and DeepSeek can search the web for information on current events, and both can do so without issue in most cases. However, ChatGPT (first slide) handles sourcing better, offering up icons that display the name of a source at a glance and in-text highlights that tie sources to specific claims in responses. DeepSeek (second slide) doesn't have highlights, and its source icons are merely footnote-style numbers. ChatGPT also automatically includes pictures in its responses when relevant, whereas DeepSeek can't display pictures even if you ask. Finally, ChatGPT includes article tiles, complete with headlines and images, at the bottom of responses for further reading. DeepSeek provides links you can click to learn more about a topic, but doesn't present them nearly as elegantly. Shopping is another feature of ChatGPT: If you ask for buying advice, it presents clickable product tiles with links to retailers. In testing, ChatGPT's recommendations weren't quite as good as those from , but DeepSeek doesn't have anything similar. Winner: ChatGPT With ChatGPT, you can generate reports that run dozens of pages long and cite upward of 50 sources on any topic imaginable for free. Its best-in-class sourcing goes a long way to elevate this function. DeepSeek can't do deep research at all, limiting you to web searches. Winner: ChatGPT Although ChatGPT's image generation feature isn't perfect, it routinely provides pictures with fewer errors and less distortion than competitors. ChatGPT can even handle complicated prompts, such as maintaining a narrative across comic panels. Other chatbots struggle to do the same. DeepSeek doesn't generate images. Below is an example of a ChatGPT image generation. Winner: ChatGPT If you sign up for ChatGPT Plus, you get access to its Sora video generation feature. Sora isn't as advanced as (which can also generate audio), but it can create lifelike videos if you spend time carefully tweaking prompts and go through enough iterations. DeepSeek can't generate videos. Winner: ChatGPT DeepSeek can process files, but only for text extraction. ChatGPT excels at image recognition, identifying computer components even when they were behind a glass panel with reflections. When it comes to understanding documents, DeepSeek generally performs well, as does ChatGPT. For example, neither had trouble answering questions about my motherboard and watercooling pump based on the manuals I provided, but DeepSeek did force me to upload these documents one at a time. More problematically, however, DeepSeek is far slower than ChatGPT, especially when it comes to uploading files. Both chatbots can sometimes hallucinate and make up quotes. Winner: ChatGPT ChatGPT and DeepSeek are both capable of generating monologues, plays, stories, and more. In testing, I prompted them with the following: 'Without referencing anything in your memory or prior responses, I want you to write me a free verse poem. Pay special attention to capitalization, enjambment, line breaks, and punctuation. Since it's free verse, I don't want a familiar meter or ABAB rhyming scheme, but I want it to have a cohesive style or underlying beat.' Both chatbots delivered acceptable results, which you can see below. DeepSeek's poem (second slide) reads quite similarly to ChatGPT's poem (first slide), particularly its beginning. Chatbots tend to have trouble generating creative writing that feels distinct from prior generations, but different models almost always produce different results. The similarities here are especially worth noting, since OpenAI accused DeepSeek . Winner: Tie Both chatbots can answer questions across computer science, math, and physics topics, thanks to their complex reasoning models. However, DeepSeek gets answers wrong significantly more often than ChatGPT. DeepSeek also took considerably longer to process the images with the questions I uploaded in testing. ChatGPT can and will get things wrong occasionally, but it's more reliable overall. Regardless of which chatbot you use, make sure to double-check any answers you get. Both chatbots can help with coding, but that's outside the scope of our coverage. However, you can still . Winner: ChatGPT ChatGPT offers Custom GPTs, which are customizable AI assistants. You don't get any major benefits versus just talking to ChatGPT directly, but they do enable some unique functionality with third-party services. One such example is a Custom GPT for Wolfram Alpha, which gives you access to Wolfram Alpha's computational power and math knowledge within ChatGPT. You can also set up Custom GPTs to do things outside the ChatGPT ecosystem and source information from the broader internet. DeepSeek doesn't have AI assistants. Winner: ChatGPT ChatGPT and DeepSeek both have context windows of up to 128,000 tokens. Usage caps are largely dynamic, changing based on server load. Anecdotally, I was able to hit usage caps on ChatGPT's free plan (but not its paid plan). I didn't manage the same with DeepSeek. However, in my testing, DeepSeek was often slower than ChatGPT and regularly failed to return responses. The latter instances felt like they could be a form of rate limiting after sustained use. Winner: Tie Data collection on ChatGPT and Gemini is a mixed bag. Both collect tons of user data (including the contents of all your chats) and use it to train their models by default. Both at least give you the option to opt out. Neither DeepSeek nor OpenAI is a stranger to data leaks and shady digital practices, either. However, DeepSeek 'the CCP's latest tool for spying, stealing, and subverting US export control restrictions' and found that it funnels Americans' data to the Chinese government, manipulates its results to align with CCP propaganda, and likely stole from US AI models to create its own, among other things. I don't recommend sharing sensitive information with any chatbot, but DeepSeek's privacy concerns go far above those I have with ChatGPT. Winner: ChatGPT Disclosure: Ziff Davis, PCMag's parent company, filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in April 2025, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.

9 Simple Tips to Make Your Switch 2 Games Really Pop on Your 4K TV
9 Simple Tips to Make Your Switch 2 Games Really Pop on Your 4K TV

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

9 Simple Tips to Make Your Switch 2 Games Really Pop on Your 4K TV

PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. The Switch 2 is Nintendo's most powerful game system yet, and the first capable of running games at resolution and in high dynamic range (). Its 6.8-inch LCD screen is big and bright, but it's only 1080p, which means you need to dock it and connect it to a TV if you want to see every single pixel it's capable of pushing. Ideally, the new console will do most of the work of making that happen, but that's not always a certainty. Fortunately, I'm not only PCMag's resident Nintendo system reviewer, I'm also its home theater expert and a certified TV calibrator. Follow these steps to make sure you're getting everything you can out of your Switch when you're playing it on your TV. Not all HDMI ports are created equal. They're classified under different standards that enable different features like higher resolutions, faster refresh rates, and HDR. The most current standard is HDMI 2.1, which supports 4K video at 120Hz. The Switch 2 can't go quite that far, but it can output 4K video at 60Hz or, optionally, lower-resolution 1080p (HD) or 1440p (QHD) video at 120Hz. You'll probably want to use the sharpest 4K60 video most of the time, and for that, you need an HDMI 2.0 port. HDMI 2.0 is very common now and can be found on almost all 4K TVs made in the last several years. If your TV is older, though, it might only have HDMI 1.4b, which will accept 4K video but only at up to 30Hz. It also might mix and match the HDMI port standards between those three. Look at the ports on the back of your TV and check if there are any identifiers beyond 'HDMI.' Most TVs mark their ports clearly as resolution and refresh rate combinations like 4K60, 4K120, 4K144, or as the HDMI standards themselves. Make sure your Switch 2 is plugged into a 4K60/HDMI 2.0 port or better. That will let you get the most out of the system. If you have other game consoles or a gaming PC, consider saving any 4K120/HDMI 2.1 ports for them since they are capable of outputting at higher refresh rates. Like HDMI ports, also have different capacities. Fortunately, Nintendo has you covered here: The Switch 2 comes with a cable that supports the system's output (4K60 and 1080p/1440p120). You should use it. If you lose the included cable, make sure you replace it with a . This type of cable has a bandwidth of 18Gbps, which is required for 4K60. These cables will be clearly marked as Premium High Speed and should have a fancy sticker on the box showing that they're certified as such. The Switch 2 should automatically output at 4K and enable HDR once you connect it to your TV, but check to make sure. Go into the system menu and scroll down to Display, then select Dock Output Information. This will bring up a screen showing what the dock is currently sending to your TV. If it says 3,840 x 2,160 under Resolution and HDR under Outputting, you're all clear. You can start playing Switch 2 games at 4K60 in HDR. Have fun! If it doesn't say that, or if you want to use a higher refresh rate at a lower resolution, read on. In the same Display menu, right above Dock Output Information, there's a TV Resolution option. When set to the default Automatic, it should output at 4K, but if not, you can try to force it to output at 4K by selecting 2160p (4K) from the dropdown menu. If the screen blacks out and doesn't come back after a few seconds, double-check the HDMI cable and port to see if there's a bottleneck there. The Switch 2 should detect HDR support and walk you through enabling it when you first set it up, but if that isn't the case, you can fix it in the Display menu. First, make sure the RGB Range option is set to Full Range. Next, scroll all the way down through the TV settings to HDR Output and make sure it's set to For All Software or Compatible Software Only. After that, you can choose Adjust HDR below it and follow the instructions to adjust HDR brightness to best fit your TV. If you don't have HDR after that? Check the cable and port to make sure the signal is getting to your TV properly. After all that, you might actually want to turn HDR off to get the best picture on your TV. HDR should let the Switch 2 tell your TV to get brighter and more colorful than a standard dynamic range does because that's the point of the technology: It increases the range of light each pixel displays. However, some TVs will actually show a dimmer and more washed-out picture when the Switch 2 is outputting in HDR. I encountered this on my Hisense TV and have seen several reports of users experiencing the same issue. If the Switch 2 doesn't look quite right on your TV despite all the settings seeming correct, go back into the Display menu, scroll down to TV settings, and set HDR Output to Off. The TV should blackout for a few seconds and then look better than it did with HDR. Note: Don't disable the HDR Output option at the top of the Display menu. That setting is for the Switch 2's screen itself, not your TV, and that screen should automatically and consistently look good. The Automatic resolution setting will default to outputting at 4K60 if your TV can handle it. If you're willing to compromise sharpness on the chance that the game you play can push past a 60fps frame rate, you can manually set the output to 1080p or 1440p (QHD). With that set, scroll down the Display menu again and make sure 120Hz Output is checked. If the game you're playing supports it, you can then play at a lower resolution and higher refresh rate. This is a big if, depending on both the game and your TV. I've found that TVs handle video signals that combine lower-than-4K resolutions with higher-than-60Hz refresh rates very inconsistently, especially when the source device doesn't have variable refresh rate (VRR). VRR is a feature that synchronizes the refresh rate of the signal and the TV even if it changes, and it's very helpful for games where frame rates can change wildly based on what's being rendered. While the Switch 2 has VRR for its own 1080p120 screen, its HDMI output is locked to 60Hz or 120Hz. In other words, if you really want the smoothest gameplay possible, you might want to just take the system out of the dock and play it in your hands instead of on your TV, and save the docked mode for nice, sharp 4K games at a more modest 60Hz. Even if the right signal is being sent out from your Switch 2, your TV has to know how to best handle it. This should be automatic, especially if your TV is fairly new. The Switch 2 supports Auto Low-Latency Mode (ALLM), which tells your ALLM-equipped TV to automatically switch to its Game mode to reduce input lag when you're playing on it. If your TV doesn't have ALLM, though, you should manually switch its picture mode to Game or Gaming. Doing so can be the difference between your game feeling like it's responding to you instantly and feeling like you're playing a bathtub full of pudding. Most TVs from the '90s and early 2000s had a 4:3 aspect ratio instead of the 16:9 widescreen we're all used to today. Nintendo was forward-thinking at the time, though, and so the N64 and GameCube both support outputting widescreen video. Most games were still released in 4:3, but a few were programmed to take advantage of their systems' 16:9 capabilities. Today, when you play an N64 or GameCube game on Nintendo Switch Online + Expansion Pack, you'll be greeted with a 4:3 picture with black bars on the side. You'll probably want to fix that, and for games that support widescreen, you can. You just need to manually enable it in each game as you play it. In some games, like F-Zero GX, the option is in the Settings menu off of the main menu. In Goldeneye 007, it's hidden in a sub-menu in the pause menu. You might need to dig, but it's worth finding the setting, whether you're playing on your 16:9 TV or the Switch 2's own 16:9 screen.

Nintendo Switch 2 vs. Switch 1: What's the Difference?
Nintendo Switch 2 vs. Switch 1: What's the Difference?

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Entertainment
  • Yahoo

Nintendo Switch 2 vs. Switch 1: What's the Difference?

PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. Whether it's the price of technology or tariffs, the Switch 2 is Nintendo's most expensive system yet at $449.99. That's a big ask when the Switch is $299.99, the Switch OLED is $349.99, and the handheld-only Switch Lite is just $199.99. The Switch 2 is still less expensive than a PlayStation 5 or an Xbox Series X, but not by much. Game prices are also moving upward. Mario Kart World is $80. That's higher than the current $70 "normal" of many console games, after decades of the market settling around $60 for major releases. Accessories, like the Switch 2 Pro Controller ($85) and Joy-Con 2 ($90 per pair), are also about $10 more than their Switch equivalents. Winner: Switch The Switch 2 is the first Nintendo console to take the previous system's name and put a simple "2" after it. So, as you might expect, it isn't all that fundamentally different. Both systems are tablets with detachable controllers and a dock that lets you play the device as a handheld or as a home console connected to a TV. It's a great concept because you can play anywhere. I'm glad that Nintendo didn't reinvent the wheel. In terms of size and weight, the Switch 2 is slightly larger and heavier than its predecessor by a half-inch in height, just under an inch in width, and four ounces in weight (with the Joy-Cons attached). However, it doesn't feel much bulkier or more cumbersome in my hands. Winner: Tie The Switch 2's Joy-Con 2 controllers feel similar to the originals and have almost identical designs. They have an analog stick, four face buttons, two triggers, and two menu/capture/home buttons. They're arranged so you can use a single Joy-Con sideways as a mini-gamepad or two for dual-analog gameplay. The Joy-Con 2 have slightly larger analog sticks, which is nice. However, the Joy-Con 2s have much more interesting tech. Optical sensors on the connection rails of each Joy-Con 2 mean the controllers double as mice. This lets you play games like Fortnite and Metroid Prime 4: Beyond using mouse-like aim as you would with a PC game. It's very accurate, but I find that it makes my wrist sore after a while. That might not be an issue for everyone, and it might be something I can mitigate by adjusting how I hold it. Either way, it's a cool feature that the original Joy-Con lack. Winner: Switch 2 The Switch 2 has a bigger and better screen in almost every way. It's 7.9 inches and features 1080p resolution, so it has twice the pixels. It's larger at by 2.5 to 0.9 inches, depending on the Switch 1 model you're comparing it with, and has double the refresh rate (120Hz). It looks great in person. It's an LCD, so the OLED Switch actually has an edge in contrast and color. OLED screens can show incredibly dark blacks and usually have a wider color range than LCDs. That said, the Switch 2's LCD is significantly brighter and more vibrant than the first Switch's screen. Although its colors aren't quite as vivid as the OLED Switch's when looking at the two next to each other, it's within swinging distance and doesn't look remotely undersaturated. Even with a little less color range, the bigger size, higher resolution, and faster refresh rate all make the Switch 2's screen the superior one. Winner: Switch 2 Historically, processing power hasn't been a big priority for Nintendo—the original Switch showed its age pretty quickly compared with competing consoles. It was limited to 1080p60, a best-case scenario in docked mode. The Switch 2 can output 4K60 (or 1080p120 graphics while docked), depending on the game and settings. That means it's the first Nintendo system capable of 4K resolution or frame rates greater than 60 frames per second. It won't necessarily hit those numbers consistently, especially with games that have very detailed graphics, long draw distances, or many objects on screen at once. Even with those caveats, the Switch 2 has much sharper, smoother graphics than the previous system by every measure. Winner: Switch 2 This is the Switch 2's one weakness. Depending on the games you play, it can last between 2 and 6.5 hours on a charge. That's slightly worse than the original Switch at launch (2.5 to 6.5 hours) and much worse than both the currently available LCD Switch with its improved battery and the OLED Switch (4.5 to 9 hours). Winner: Switch You won't immediately need a microSD card with the Switch 2 (though you'll specifically need a microSD Express card for it, not an ordinary microSD card). The Switch 2 has 256GB of internal storage, which can go a long way with Switch titles. The Switch 1 only has 32GB of storage, while the Switch OLED has 64GB. Winner: Switch 2 The Switch 2 has voice chat; the Switch doesn't. The right-hand Joy-Con 2 features a new C button that enables GameChat, the built-in communication system. After pressing it, you can speak to in-game friends using the console's integrated mic. It's an obvious feature Microsoft and Sony figured out some time ago, but it's new for Nintendo, and it's better than the strange smartphone app the company offered with the original Switch. Winner: Switch 2 The Switch 2's new Accessibility menu lets you enable various features to help you use the system if you have visual, auditory, or verbal difficulties. You can tweak the size of system text, toggle a screen zoom, invert colors or set them to grayscale, use a speech-to-text screen reader, and make other adjustments based on your needs. The Switch has a button remapping menu, but that's about it. Winner: Switch 2 The Switch 2 runs almost all Switch 1 games. Some games aren't compatible, but that's an extremely short list that's becoming shorter by the day as patches are released for the few games with compatibility hiccups. Switch 2 supports Switch game cards and eShop downloads, too. Switch games won't necessarily look or play better on the Switch 2 unless they're updated to take advantage of the extra power and higher resolution. Some will simply get minor performance patches for free, but you'll need to spend money for more comprehensive upgrades in "Switch 2 Edition" games. Breath of the Wild, Kirby and the Forgotten Land, Metroid Prime 4: Beyond, Pokémon Legends: Z-A, Super Mario Party Jamboree, and Tears of the Kingdom will have Switch 2 Editions with benefits like 4K60 or 1080p120 video modes and new control schemes. In some cases, you'll enjoy new content. If you already have the original Switch versions, you'll probably pay an upgrade fee of around $10, though some Switch 2 Edition upgrades will be included as part of Nintendo Switch Online + Expansion Pass. The Switch 2 lets you play every classic game collection available through NSO with Expansion Pass, with one big bonus: GameCube games. If you subscribe to the Expansion Pass, you can access GameCube games on the Switch 2, like F-Zero GX, Soulcalibur II, and The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker. Those titles won't be on the Switch 1 at all. Winner: Switch 2 A new console generation means new exclusives, and Nintendo has already announced that some Switch 2 titles won't appear on the Switch 1. You can play the cross-generation Metroid Prime 4: Beyond and Pokémon Legends: Z-A on the original Switch, but you must upgrade to the Switch 2 for Donkey Kong Bananza or Mario Kart World. It's safe to say that many third-party Switch 2 games, such as Cyberpunk 2077 and Final Fantasy VII Remake Intergrade, won't appear on the original Switch. Winner: Switch 2

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store