Watch The First Ever Multi-Car Pileup Crash Test
If, like me, you're morbidly curious and you like to watch crash test videos in your free time then buckle up because last week PBS published a comprehensive documentary that recreates and investigates a multi-car pileup. Don't worry if you're on the squeamish side, the test is conducted without putting any living beings in danger. Instead of having humans behind the wheel, test engineers rigged up each test vehicle with remote controls that a group of test subjects operated safely from remote simulators.
This crash test was meant to simulate a multi-car pileup on a freeway, which in the real world poses a significant challenge for accident investigators to recreate without firsthand knowledge of how the accident actually took place. This experiment offers unique insight into what actually happens in the event of a devastating crash scenario, how real drivers react to a sudden road hazard, and how vehicle safety systems perform in such a complex crash.
PBS filmed the test which was staged on a two-mile long stretch of road on a decommissioned Royal Air Force base in Campbeltown, Scotland that was modified to mimic a freeway with a slow lane, middle lane, fast lane, and a shoulder. The film is 1 hour and 40 minutes long and provides a thorough deep dive into the methodology of the test as well as the investigation that follows, so it's perfect for diehard crash test aficionados and normies alike.
Read more: These Movies And TV Shows Have The Best Car Casting
As the first crash test of its kind, this high-speed pileup scenario required countless hours of preparation to ensure that no lives were harmed, no secrets were revealed, and that the accident occurred as it needed to. All eight passenger vehicles and one semi-truck used in the experiment had to be rigged up to operate as full-scale remote-controlled cars so test participants could best simulate a real-world crash, but only some of the vehicles were driven by unknowing volunteers. Half of the vehicles were piloted by test engineers who knew what to expect from the experiment, but the other half were unaware of the plan to simulate a multi-car pileup.
The four unsuspecting drivers were representative of different demographics: one very new female driver who remotely drove a 2002 Porsche Boxster, one mid-twenties male driver who describes himself as a "boy racer" who operated a 2009 Volkswagen GTI, one older woman who operated a 2012 Toyota Prius, and an older man who operated a 2012 Ford F-150. The other vehicles operated by engineers were a 2005 Audi A8, a 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan, a 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML, and a 2012 Vauxhall Vivaro cargo van. Each vehicle was selected to represent different vehicle classes, sizes, and engine layouts to provide a real-world representation of a diverse group of random cars.
Several Smart ForTwos were converted into simulators for the participants to operate their respective remote-controlled cars from, and a psychologist observed the volunteers as they practiced driving the remote-controlled cars and observed that their bodies were reacting to the situation as though they were actually behind the wheel of the moving vehicle. Dummies were placed into the remote-controlled cars, some wearing their seatbelts and others intentionally left unbuckled, and the stage was set for the test.
The accident staged in this test is meant to recreate an icy British motorway with a patch of black ice, as is sometimes the case in real-world high-speed pileups. To simulate a low-traction, icy surface on the airport runway, engineers found that gravel provided a loss of friction that was most similar to an icy roadway, and the test commenced. The team initiated the pileup by driving a remote-controlled semi-truck across the simulated lanes of oncoming traffic, directly in the path of the remote-controlled passenger cars right as the roadway suddenly became slippery. The unsuspecting drivers did their best to avoid the crash but could only do so much given the challenging road conditions.
The results are both alarming and fascinating, but I don't mean to spoil the ending, so give it a watch for yourself. On a totally related note, always wear your seatbelt and remain vigilant when you're behind the wheel of a car, as those are your best defenses against a potentially deadly accident like this one.
H/T to reader Steven Lance for sending this our way!
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
The Unexpected Generations Paying Top Dollar for Auto Loans
Experian reported at the end of 2024 that monthly average car payments were $742 for new vehicles and $545 for used ones, but new data from auto refinancing company Caribou has shown that the amounts that different generations pay vary more than you might think. Caribou's study included Gen Z, born between 1997 and 2012, millennials, born from 1981 to 1996, Gen X, born between 1965 and 1980, and baby boomers, born from 1946 to 1964. In its report, Caribou cited Gen Z as spending the largest share of their income on car payments, but millennials were listed as having bigger average loan balances at $38,600. Gen Z was listed as spending the least monthly income on vehicle payments, and baby boomers had the highest average credit score at 735. According to Caribou, Gen Z drivers are most likely to be behind the wheel of a Honda Civic, with an average loan amount of $32,069 and having a 14.05% APR. Millennials were cited as frequently driving a Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and taking on loans with a 12.44% APR. Their higher loan balances can be attributed to the colliding costs of education, housing, and family. Gen X is described as carrying the most significant original loan amounts due to a fondness for larger trucks like the Ford F-150, but these higher starting costs meant the demographic was more likely to achieve the highest monthly savings after refinancing at $147. Next to Gen Z, baby boomers took out the lowest loans at $35,844 on average, and they carried the lowest APR of 11.91%, aligning with millennials in their preference for the Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Caribou evaluated what these generations' auto loans looked like after refinancing by accessing its customers with good credit scores and steady incomes who refinanced their auto loans in 2024. Gen X scored the highest average refinance monthly savings of $147, with millennials following at $143, and baby boomers and Gen Z logging $131 and $126 average monthly refinance savings, respectively. Gen X and baby boomers were tied for the lowest monthly refinance APR at 8.39%, while millennials landed at 8.42%, and Gen Z at 8.50%. Across the board, annual percentage rate (APR) reductions ranged from 3.51 to 5.56 percentage points. "Car payments are one of the biggest monthly expenses for millions of Americans, and for too long, people have assumed they're stuck with the rate they got at the dealership. Our data shows that drivers of all ages can unlock real savings by refinancing. This isn't just some money hack; it's a necessity for many households," said Simon Goodall, CEO of Caribou. While refinancing might pose upfront costs that increase your overall loan cost, Caribou's data shows that generations from baby boomers to Gen Z can benefit from the practice. Higher original loan balances mean larger payments earlier in a borrowing term, but they can also lead to greater savings through refinancing. Caribou's report also illustrates that Gen Z drivers face unique affordability challenges with their pattern of spending larger shares of their monthly income on car payments despite lower loan amounts. Baby boomers exhibited strength in multiple categories on account of their stronger average credit scores. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Miami Herald
3 days ago
- Miami Herald
EV owners don't pay gas taxes. In Minnesota next year, they'll pay double or more to register their cars
Starting next year, Minnesota electric vehicle owners will have to pay at least double to register their EVs. Blame the change on their freedom from gas taxes. A provision in the transportation bill that passed earlier this month raises the EV registration surcharge from $75 to at least $150. Drivers of plug-in-hybrids will also have to pay a minimum of $75 to register their vehicles. The new fees, which go into effect in January, will scale up with more expensive vehicles - meaning some drivers could see their annual registration costs hit $200 or more. For years, Minnesota lawmakers have debated how to fill a growing gap in roadway funds as more fuel efficient cars and trucks, as well as more electric vehicles, leads to less revenue from the state's gas tax. "Electric vehicle drivers are going to be paying over the next four years somewhere around $40 million," said Rep. Jon Koznick, the Republican co-chair of the House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee. "That does help offset declining gas tax revenues." Rep. Erin Koegel, Koznick's DFL counterpart on the Transportation Committee, said the new fee structure is far from perfect, but she's glad lawmakers included a sliding scale rather than a flat fee of $200, as originally proposed. Lawmakers said that EV drivers will see reduced registration fees in July 2027, when a public charging station tax takes effect. Under that scheme, owners of certain fast chargers will have to pay 5 cents for every kilowatt hour. Minnesota's transportation bill also created a work group to study electricity as a fuel source and recommend a kilowatt hour tax similar to the gas tax. Republicans and DFLers each hold 67 seats in the House, which left little room for disagreement during the budget negotiations. "This is kind of the best that we could get with the circumstances of divided government and all that," Koegel said. Not everyone was happy with the compromise. "We're actually going against the state's electrification goals by doing this," said Carolyn Berninger, who works on public policy issues for Drive Electric Minnesota, a coalition of clean energy advocacy groups. "It's going to make some prospective EV buyers pretty nervous. Electric vehicles already cost more upfront than a comparable gas car." Berninger said she's especially concerned with the timing of the new fees, which come as Congress considers phasing out federal tax incentives for electric vehicle purchases in this year's budget bill. The bill, backed by President Donald Trump, also includes a new $250 annual fee for electric vehicle drivers. That provision is similarly meant to address declining revenue from gas taxes. Jukka Kukkonen, an electrical engineering instructor at the University of St. Thomas and founder of the Minnesota-based EV consulting firm Shift2Electric, said EV drivers were already paying their fair share in taxes with the $75 annual fee. If someone driving a Toyota Prius hybrid, which gets 45 miles to the gallon, paid the gas tax, their average annual cost would be less than $100, he said. How much Minnesotans pay in gas taxes each year on average is a matter of debate. The Bureau of Transportation Statistics estimates that the average gasoline car gets roughly 25 miles per gallon, while trucks and SUVs get about 17 miles per gallon. Minnesotans drove an average of 13,957 miles in 2022, according to the most recent data made public by the Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration. When put together with Minnesota's gas tax rate, which stands at 31.8 cents per gallon, an average driver in the state pays anywhere from $177 to $246 a year in gas taxes. Others, including DFL Rep. Steve Elkins, have calculated a smaller figure - closer to $132 annually - saying that Minnesotans only drive an average of 11,500 miles per year. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Miami Herald
3 days ago
- Miami Herald
Tesla Pauses Cybertruck, Model Y Production to Cut Backlogs
Tesla will temporarily halt operations at its Austin, Texas Gigafactory later this month, a move it says will allow it to run maintenance at the plant. But the move also will permit it to draw down increasingly bloated inventories of both the slow-selling Cybertruck pickup and the recently updated Model Y SUV. Though it remains the largest U.S. producer of battery-electric vehicles, the automaker has undergone a sharp decline in sales this year, something analysts blame on both rising competition and the backlash that's hit Tesla due to CEO Elon Musk's political shift to the hard right. The production pause will come just days after the Austin plant is set to roll out the first Tesla robotaxi – something Musk has declared essential to the automaker's future. But a group of Texas lawmakers have called on Tesla to put the launch of its new driverless ride-sharing service temporarily on hold. Tesla revealed plans to pause production at the Texas Gigafactory during a staff meeting this week, according to Business Insider. The Austin team was told the move was meant to give Tesla time to performance maintenance at the factory. "Most automakers have a summer shutdown for a couple weeks which they use to work on their machinery," said Sam Abuelsamid, lead analyst with Telemetry Research. "I wouldn't totally rule out they'll do some maintenance," he added, "but I'm skeptical that's the only reason" This marks the third time that production of the Cybertruck will have been paused over the past 12 months, but the first halt for the updated Model Y launched around the end of the first quarter. In Farmington Hills, Michigan, scores of unsold Cybertrucks have been stored in the parking lot of a now-closed Bed Bath & Beyond store. The situation reportedly is repeated at locations around the country as demand for the electric truck continues to slow. Shortly after it was first revealed in November 2019, Tesla claimed to have received 1 million advance reservations, complete with $100 deposits. That led Tesla to tool up the Austin plant to produce as many as 250,000 of the trucks annually. But demand hasn't come close. The automaker confirmed selling than 39,000 of the pickups all last year and the trendline has continued declining this year, S&P Global Mobility reporting just 7,126 Cybertrucks were registered during the first quarter of 2025. To put that into perspective, that's 10% fewer than the 7,913 Ford F-150 Lighting EVs registered during the same period. There are indications another critical Tesla product line may be fizzling, despite a major midcycle refresh. The Model Y has been the automaker's best-selling product and the update, known insider Tesla by its codename, Jupiter, was expected to reverse declining sales. Though Tesla only reports production and delivery numbers on a quarterly basis, preliminary registration data does not look encouraging, said Abuelsamid. "All indications are that the refreshed Model Y isn't selling as well as expected, nor even as well as the old one did last year." Tesla remains the EV segment's 800-pound gorilla in the U.S. market, but its share is now below 50% and continuing to fall. New EV registrations, overall, fell 4.4% in April, marking the first monthly decline in 14 months, according to S&P. But the majority of brands in the battery-electric sector actually reported gains. Chevrolet and its upscale sibling Cadillac were up by triple digits. "It was mostly Tesla," said Sam Fiorani, lead analyst with AutoForecast Solutions. The automaker reportedly suffered a 16% year-over-year dip in registrations in April, despite the launch of the new Model Y. A variety of factors appear to be in play. To start, the Model Y update didn't go far enough, said Fiorani, contending that "a ground-up makeover" was what Tesla really needed. If anything, Tesla simply doesn't have enough product to compete as more and more competition come to market, he and other analysts agree. The automaker continues to delay introducing a new entry model to compete with the likes of the Chevrolet Equinox EV that starts in the mid-$20,000 range after factoring in federal incentives. Then there's Musk's active move to the political right which became increasingly obvious after his October 2022 takeover of social media site Twitter and his subsequent role as head of the controversial Department of Government Efficiency under Pres. Donald Trump. That's alienated many traditional Tesla buyers, Fiorani and Abuelsamid agreed, leading to protests and boycotts. Even before Musk shifted his focus away from politics last month he was signaling to investors that the company's future would become less about EVs and more about technologies such as AI, humanoid robots and autonomous ride-sharing. Earlier this month, Musk said he was "tentatively" scheduling a rollout of the first 10 to 20 "robotaxis" on June 22 from the Austin factory – though he warned the date could be pushed back because, "We are being super paranoid about safety." The first of those driverless vehicles will be modified versions of the new Model Y, though Tesla continues development of a new model, the CyberCab, specifically designed for the driverless service. Musk isn't the only one "paranoid" about safety. A group of Democratic lawmakers from Texas have requested Tesla delay the robotaxi launch "in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations." They want Tesla to wait until a new law, revising the state's earlier autonomous vehicle regulations, goes into effect on September 1. The new rules will require, among other things, that companies like Tesla report any failures, have a limp-hone mode for any vehicle that may suffer glitches while in operation, and have a plan of action in the event of a more serious crisis. Even if it declines to delay the robotaxi launch, the Texas lawmakers are hoping to get a commitment from the automaker that it will obey the new guidelines without waiting for September. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
