Johnstown Central Park renovation funding sparks controversy
JOHNSTOWN, Pa. (WTAJ) — The multi-million dollar renovation project of Johnstown's Central Park is moving forward and so is the fierce debate over where the money came from and how it should be used.
The City of Johnstown received millions of dollars in relief funding following the COVID-19 pandemic from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). The council earmarked it for upgrades to Central Park.
The federal guidelines for how that money could be spent may be unclear and there's debate as to whether those funds should cover the cost of a park renovation estimated at up to $8 million.
City manager Art Martynuska recently told WTAJ the project is on track with plans having been approved Thursday.
Johnstown City Council approves designs for Central Park project
'The original plan was going for about $6 million. We hope to be around that same amount, if not lower,' Martynuska said.
But Representative Frank Burns (D-72nd District) questions the price tag and the use of these particular funds.
'Casual upgrades, small upgrades to the park people are fine with. But 6 to 8 million in Central Park is ridiculous. And what people really wanted is meaningful things in their community and infrastructure,' Burns said.
Burns proposed the money be put towards renovating or building a new police department, tearing down blighted homes or even building a new grocery store.
But council has stated they believe the money must be put towards the park.
'City council members are telling us a former city manager, Ethan Imhoff, has misled them and they were told that they had to spend this money on the park…That's at least what they're telling us now, that they had to spend 6 to 8 million on Central Park as part of the Main Street program, which is not true at all,' Burns said.
In a letter sent to each council member in May 2024, Burns stated he felt the lines were blurred between the ARPA funding and the city's RAISE grant when it came to how the project would be funded. The city's RAISE grant had to be used for transportation projects and could not be used for the park, according to the department of transportation who awarded the grant.
WTAJ reached out to former Johnstown city manager Ethan Imhoff. He did not agree to a recorded interview but, in a phone conversation, said the decision to spend the money on the park was already made before he became the city manager.
The grant specified that the money had to be allocated by the start of the year meaning the city has to move forward with current plans. It remains unclear whether this is an appropriate use of the funds as the grant was intended to be invested into COVID-19 response efforts or to address economic impacts.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
The Question Dividing New Yorkers: Is the City Sinking or Bouncing Back?
Heading into the June 24 primary for mayor, New Yorkers say their city is in trouble. In four recent surveys, majorities said that the quality of life was fair or poor, that they were afraid to ride the subway at night, that housing and child care were unaffordable, and that city government and the public schools were dysfunctional. Yet on a muggy evening in Manhattan's meatpacking district, that pessimism was nowhere to be found. A skateboard ramp the size of a dollar van had been erected on the cobblestone street outside an art gallery, and skateboarders showed off tricks as onlookers with tattoos, baggy pants and stylish scarves shouted encouragement. Inside the exhibition space, a very 'if you know, you know' collection of New Yorkers — graffiti artists, skaters, photographers, musicians — mingled, hugged and laughed in front of huge photographs of a deceased actor slash skateboard legend who was being honored. As the D.J. played a mix of old-school hip-hop and Brazilian lounge music, two bartenders mixed bespoke cocktails made from a small batch spirit splashed with a lime-and-yuzu soda. It certainly didn't feel like a scene from a city in crisis. New York, which was hit hard as the country's epicenter of the Covid pandemic, remains a beacon for people across the country and the world, a destination for immigrants, artists, entrepreneurs and business scions. Watchful outsiders and New Yorkers themselves anxiously question whether the city is 'back' from the troubles of recent years. And every New Yorker could have a different answer about what a comeback looks like — what the city should be, and what it is right now. 'From where I'm sitting, it looks pretty good,' said Lloyd Blankfein, who grew up in public housing in Brooklyn and went on to run Goldman Sachs until his retirement in 2018. He compared the city today with the one of the late 1970s, when the Son of Sam serial killer terrorized locals and the city was on the verge of default. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
San Francisco Chronicle
5 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Former S.F. Mayor London Breed reveals her post-City Hall career plans
Former San Francisco Mayor London Breed has been quiet about her professional plans since she left office in January, but that's starting to change. The Aspen Policy Academy announced Wednesday that Breed and G.T. Bynum, the Republican former mayor of Tulsa, are its first bipartisan 'civic innovation' advisers-in-residence. The academy, a Bay Area-based operation of the Washington, D.C. think tank Aspen Institute, said Breed and Bynum will spend six months mentoring fellows on policy projects, representing the academy at events and working on projects about policy subjects of their choosing. It's not a full-time job, though it does come with a stipend, and Breed is believed to be exploring other unspecified career opportunities as well. Still, the academy's announcement provided the first public indication of how San Francisco's former mayor is spending some of her time following 12 years as an elected official in the city. 'This program is about more than learning how government works — it's about inspiring a new era of civic leadership,' Breed said in a statement released by the academy. Aspen Institute CEO Dan Porterfield said in a statement that mayors 'bring distinctive insights to the work of policymaking given their proximity to the people and communities they serve.' Breed and Bynum 'will be an invaluable resource to future policy leaders,' Porterfield said. The Aspen Institute has connections to Bloomberg Philanthropies, the charitable organization tied to former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. He was one of Breed's top benefactors when she ran for reelection last year. Breed also appointed a former Bloomberg staffer to the board of supervisors during her final weeks in office. Breed was elected mayor in 2018 and served in the role for more than six years, until she was unseated in November by Daniel Lurie. A native of the city who grew up in public housing in the Western Addition, she was the first Black woman mayor of San Francisco. Her tenure at City Hall was marked by a series of overlapping crises, including the pandemic, which hurt the city's economy and upended the agenda on which she campaigned. Breed won praise for her early response to COVID-19, but her tenure quickly became dominated by public outrage over rampant drug use on city streets and record overdose deaths driven by the rise of fentanyl. As downtown offices emptied out, major retailers fled Union Square and viral videos of brazen property crimes spread online. San Francisco's reputation took a nosedive, further complicating Breed's fight for another term. Her reelection campaign last year centered around a hopeful message, pointing to a drop in reported crime and other developments as evidence that she was leading San Francisco out of its pandemic doldrums. But Lurie, a political outsider who'd never held elected office before, ultimately defeated her by 10 points
San Francisco Chronicle
8 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
June 2025 SAT scores are out. Here's how California students can check theirs
SAT scores from earlier this month are now available, marking a major milestone for thousands of California high school students preparing their college applications. The College Board, which oversees the SAT, confirmed that results began rolling out Friday. Students who tested on June 7 can now check their scores through their College Board account, the BigFuture School mobile app — if they provided a phone number on test day — or by contacting their school counselor. Historically, SAT results have become accessible in phases due to high online traffic. Some students reported receiving results as early as 6 a.m., though most will gain access by 8 p.m. 'The release date of your scores depends on when you took the test and when your test was submitted, not on your scores, grade or location,' according to the College Board. Students who took the SAT during in-school testing earlier in the spring should have already received their scores. Those who elected to send scores directly to colleges using the four free reports available during registration can expect those institutions to receive the results by June 30. To send scores to additional colleges, students must sign in to their College Board account, search for desired institutions, and select which test dates' scores to submit. Many colleges allow applicants to send only their best results, though some require all scores. A shifting role for the SAT in college admissions The SAT, once a near universal milestone for college-bound high schoolers, has seen its influence wane dramatically since the COVID-19 pandemic. With test-optional and test-blind policies now common, many students — especially in California — face a new dilemma: whether taking the test is even necessary. The University of California and California State University systems no longer consider SAT or ACT scores for undergraduate admissions. Most private colleges in the state remain test-optional, further complicating the decision for students and families. • Data tools: Acceptance rates by major | UC acceptance rates by high school | Cal State admissions rates 'College admissions has turned from somewhat unpredictable to chaotic in the last few years,' Irena Smith, a college admissions consultant and former Stanford admissions officer, told the Chronicle in March. As a result, test-taking has become far more selective. In 2019, nearly 70% of California high school graduates had taken the SAT. By 2023, that number had dropped to just 25%, and only about 9% of graduates submitted scores to colleges. Those who still take the SAT are typically aiming for highly selective universities such as Stanford or USC — schools where, while scores aren't required, they can still make a difference in competitive admissions. The average scores among those who do submit results have risen. From 2019 to 2023, the share of California students scoring above 1400 grew by 5 percentage points, reflecting a smaller pool of high-performing test-takers. For some students, especially those scoring in the mid-1300s, the decision whether to submit can feel like 'an excruciating guessing game,' Smith said. Others are grappling with limited access to testing sites. In the Bay Area, fully booked centers have forced students to travel hundreds of miles to cities like Fresno or Reno just to take the exam. What to expect on test day and beyond The digital SAT now runs 2 hours and 14 minutes and includes two sections: reading/writing and math. Students applying early decision or early action are encouraged to take advantage of the remaining 2025 test dates: Aug. 23, Sept. 13, Oct. 4, Nov. 8 and Dec. 6. For those still planning their college path, the College Board's BigFuture platform offers tools to explore schools, scholarships and careers based on individual test performance.
