Despite the 98% audience score, the live action 'How to Train Your Dragon' is a misfire – here's why you should stream the original on Prime Video instead
How to Train Your Dragon is literally the best movie of all time. There's no question about it. I've seen is so many times that I've got most of the script memorized. I listen to the soundtrack a little too often. I have 4 Toothless plushies and a Toothless onesie.
When the remake came out last week, loads of my friends messaged me asking if I'd seen it. Unfortunately, I have. I was so excited for the How to Train Your Dragon live-action remake that I pre-booked my tickets for the first showing on release day.
But when I left the movie theater, I was disappointed and (most importantly) sad.
However, not all is lost. The original How to Train Your Dragon is streaming on Prime Video, one of the best streaming services right now. You can even get Prime Video for free right now.
So, if you ask me, the live-action How to Train Your Dragon isn't worth your time, and you should just watch the OG over and over again. Here's why I think the new How to Train Your Dragon is a misfire.
If you don't already know, I'll give you a quick run-down of the beloved kids' movie. So How to Train Your Dragon is set on Berk, an island some unspecified location in Scandanavia, and follows the story of Hiccup, a young Viking. Hiccup's an outsider — he's not strong, bloodthirsty, or violent like the rest of the Vikings.
Berk is tormented by dragon attacks, and the other Vikings are hell-bent on eradicating all dragons. So when Hiccup befriends the most dangerous dragon of all, he starts to realize killing dragons might be is wrong. Check out the live-action trailer above.
Let me explain myself by discussing what made the original "How to Train Your Dragon" so magical.
In the OG, Hiccup's personality is flawed. He's sarcastic, jaded and lonely. At the start of the movie, he's a Boy-Who-Cried-Wolf, desperate to be accepted and will lie to his peers to achieve that. He's an outcast because he's different: he's weak, scrawny and a bit of a wimp. By the end of the movie, he's rounded, tolerant and adored because of this uniqueness.
In the remake, though, he comes off more petulant. His line delivery is different: gone is the tentative, witty jabs of Jay Baruchel's Hiccup, replaced with an unpleasant snark. Sure, this is probably more accurate to real life (you'd definitely hate everyone if they hated you), but it doesn't accurately reflect the character we were introduced to in the original.
Hiccup's not charmingly unique, he's standoffish and whiny.
Hiccup's interaction with the other characters feels flat, too. The barbed jokes that went over the others' heads are few and far between, and when they are there, they're not funny, they're whinge-y.
I'd like to see more intelligence from Hiccup in future remakes (if they make them, of course). Not just cruelty, but wit and charm, because that's the Hiccup we were introduced to in the original movie.
This brings me onto the humor. The OG "How to Train Your Dragon" is stuffed full with jokes, quips, and vibrancy. However, most of this was either cringeworthy or nonexistent in the remake.
In the scene where Astrid finds Toothless and Hiccup says, "I'm through with the lies—I've been making outfits..." (etc etc), there's no life at all. The line delivery is rushed and bland, like the actors just wanted to get the scene finished so they could go home. It's missing energy, and it's not just this scene.
The scenes during dragon training are perhaps the only parts of the movie that I thought improved on the original. But the secondary characters (Fishlegs, Snotlout, Ruffnut, Tuffnut) were just awful. Cringeworthy delivery and mismatched humor resulted in a stilted and awkward watch.
I'm not sure if others will have noticed this issue, but seeing as I've got 90% of the OG script memorized, I sure did.
In the original movie, a lot of dialogue is interrupted. It makes the characters feel real, and the world feel lived in.
For example, in the scene where Hiccup and Toothless are making friends in the cove, Hiccup says: "Toothless. I could've sworn you had—" Toothless cuts him off by snapping his teeth and chomping the fish. Hiccup hurriedly finishes with a perplexed, "Teeth."
But in the live-action, it's like the actor was waiting for the CGI dragon to extend his teeth, and the delivery fell flat. This happened multiple times throughout the movie, and it wasn't just Mason Thames — other actors stumbled with this, too.
This weird delivery makes the world feel like a set, not a truly immersive experience. I felt like I knew the actors were acting, and they knew they were acting, so I felt distant from the characters.
I'm not saying the remake is unwatchable (98% of the Rotten Tomatoes audience disagree with me, clearly) but these are just a few of the reasons why the OG "How to Train Your Dragon" is infinitely better.
Gerard Butler played Stoic, Hiccup's chief dad, in the original "How to Train Your Dragon". And he also played Stoic, Hiccup's chief dad, in the live-action "How to Train Your Dragon" remake. I think that was a major shot in the foot.
Because Butler absolutely bodied his role as Stoic, it showed up every other actor. I couldn't help but compare Butler to everyone else in the scene. Unsurprisingly, Butler always came out on top.
Gerard Butler was one of the only 100% positive parts of the How to Train Your Dragon remake. Everything about him was perfect: his delivery, his wit, his costume, his vibe. As a result, that made the lack of perfection in the rest of the movie all the more obvious. Maybe if they'd cast a different actor as Stoic, the stark difference wouldn't have been so bad. (But, then again, Butler wouldn't have owned his role even more.)
Because Gerard Butler absolutely slayed his role — pun kind of intended — it just showed up everyone else. Particularly Nick Frost as Gobber. Now, I love Nick Frost. I think he'll do an amazing job as Hagrid in the new HBO Potter. I love Hot Fuzz, and Shaun of the Dead. But I can't lie — I think he was horrendously miscast in this movie.
Most of his line delivery was flat, like the actor himself was bored during production. I'm not sure if this was due to direction, perhaps if DeBlois wanted to show Gobber in a different light. But in my opinion, it simply didn't work. Craig Ferguson as Gobber in the OG is tenacious, snarky, and kind of brutal, and that's why you should just watch the OG "How to Train Your Dragon" on Prime Video.
Now, this last point is kind of an occupational hazard. There was no way around this. DreamWorks and Universal set up "HTTYD" to fail.
Toothless, the deuteragonist (secondary character to the protagonist, aka Hiccup), is literally a dragon. Dragons, if you haven't noticed, don't exist. So Toothless would have to be brought to life by CGI, regardless of the movie being live-action or animated.
The whole time when I was watching the "HTTYD" remake, I couldn't help but think: Who asked for this? Because it wasn't me, "HTTD"'s number one fan. I wanted to love it. I wanted to love it so bad.
I would have loved it if the new "HTTYD" had managed to capture the magic of the original. But it just... didn't.
I'm not sure if it's miscasting secondary characters, the screenplay, or the direction. As the "HTTYD" remake has the same director and writer as the original, I doubt it's the latter.
Even so, I think Mason Thames (live-action Hiccup) did a wonderful job of embodying the character he was given. These issues aren't acting — my best guess is direction. I think most of the problems lie in a combination of script, direction and a two-dimensional supporting world.
I'll be the first person to admit that the OG How to Train Your Dragon isn't perfect. Rewatching as an adult makes me realize that Astrid's character was mishandled. However, the live-action completely rectified that.
The only part of the remake that outshone the OG is Astrid. Now, I don't have anything against America Ferrerra, who voiced Astrid in the original — she did an amazing job with the script she was given. This is completely a writing issue.
In the OG, Astrid is kick-ass, sure. But she doesn't have agency. She doesn't have personal motivations — she's there to be Hiccup's antagonist, and then his love interest.
However, in the remake, Astrid has a purpose. She's dead-set on being the best — she wants to be the village chief one day — and she has to work hard because she doesn't come from money.
Hiccup cruises along, the son of the chief, never having to worry about money. But Astrid is from a less privileged background, so she has to work harder to get to the same place.
It's kind of ironic that Astrid's actress Nico Parker is a nepo baby, but I digress. Parker did a fantastic job bringing the new-and-improved Astrid to life. While, yes, she's a nepo baby, she's a nepo baby who definitely shone in her first major movie.
I'll fight anyone in the comments who disagrees with me — go on, I dare you. Me and my Toothless plushies are ready.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Weekend Box Office: ‘Dragon' Slaying '28 Years Later' And ‘Elio'
Mason Thames in "How to Train Your Dragon." How to Train Your Dragon is projected to top the domestic box office again ahead of newcomers 28 Days Later and Elio. The live-action version of the 2010 animated hit How to Train Your Dragon is projected by Deadline to earn $35.2 million in its second-weekend frame from 4,373 theaters, which is below the trade publication's forecast of $40 million earlier this week. If Deadline's projection holds, it will up Universal Pictures' How to Train Your Dragon's domestic tally to $158.6 million through Sunday. Meanwhile, director Danny Boyle's zombie thriller 28 Years Later is projected by Deadline to gross $28 million to $30 million from 3,444 theaters through Sunday, which is in line with the trade's projections earlier this week. The projected weekend domestic tally is on the low end, however, of Box Office Pro's long-range tracking for 28 Years Later, which on June 7 was forecasting a $30 million to $40 million opening. Released by Sony Pictures Entertainment, 28 Years Later — which stars Ralph Fiennes, Jodie Comer and Aaron Taylor-Johnson — had a production budget of $60 million before prints and advertising, Deadline reported. A scene from "Elio." 'Elio' Tops Projections But Has A Lot Of Ground To Make Up Disney and Pixar's animated sci-fi adventure Elio is projected by Deadline to earn $22 million to $24 million from 3,750 million in its opening weekend frame, which is ahead of the trade's $20 million-plus forecast from earlier this week. Still, an opening weekend tally of $24 million domestically falls far short of Box Office Pro's long-range tracking forecast from May 31, which pegged the film to open in the $35 million to $45 million range. Elio a lot of ground to make up in the long term, since the film cost $150 million before its marketing spend, Deadline noted. By contrast, Disney's Pixar's Inside Out 2 opened with $154.2 million from 4,440 North American theaters a little over a year ago. There's also one other newcomer this week — Bride Hard — though it's not opening nearly as wide as 28 Years Later or Elio. Directed by Con Air and Lara Croft: Tomb Raider helmer Simon West, Rebel Wilson and Anna Camp's action comedy Bride Hard is debuting in 2,000 theaters domestically. Bride Hard is the product of Magenta Light Studios, which distributed last summer's indie serial killer thriller Strange Darling. Note: This box office report will be updated throughout the weekend with the most current numbers as they become available. The final numbers for this weekend's box office will be released on Monday.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
'We Were Liars': Esther McGregor breaks down 'bravest' and 'difficult' scenes with Candice King, Emily Alyn Lind
The most popular show on Prime Video, We Were Liars, is bringing fans to tears with it's devastating and shocking finale. Starring Emily Alyn Lind, Mamie Gummer, Caitlin FitzGerald, Candice King, David Morse, Shubham Maheshwari, Esther McGregor, Joseph Zada and Rahul Kohli, the captivating drama has audiences hooked. We Were Liars really leans into its most emotional moments, with the cast really taking on every twist, turn and wounding moment with conviction. One of those moments that really stands out is between Mirren (Esther McGregor) and her mother Bess (Candice King), after Bess finds out her daughter saw her affair with "Salty Dan," a harbour service worker, and shared that information with The Liars. Specifically, Bess is angry her sister Penny (Caitlin Fitzgerald) has that information and is holding it over her head, preventing her from getting more money from her father to reconcile her debt. In Episode 5 Bess confronts Mirren, destroying all of Mirren's beautiful art. "You are not an artist. You are a dilettante and you're a child," Bess says. "I'm your child," Esther says in response. "I didn't ask for you to waste your life on me. And neither did the twins. You chose to be a mother. ... It's not our fault that you decided to hate it." "It was written very well, first of all, so it was easy to kind of get there," McGregor told Yahoo Canada. "I think that it is a lot of people's narratives to kind of feel shut out as a kid, especially if you've got a young mother, or whatever it is." "I've not necessarily [had that] with my mother, but I've dealt with similar stuff in terms of ... not feeling like I have a place. And I think the courage it takes to say that is really big. ... When she hurts me, ... she hurts my art, and she hurts my art that I made because I was so happy with The Liars, and that was my safe place. And when that fractures, that's big enough to break me. I think Mirren tries to keep it together quite a lot, especially towards her mother. So that was something really interesting ... and I think it's one of her bravest moments in the series. So it's lovely to find that, but really heartbreaking too." By the time we get to the last episode, we see a particularly close bond between Mirren and her cousin Cadence (Emily Alyn Lind), who's spent the season trying to figure out the circumstances of her injury during the summer of her 16th birthday. The conversation in Episode 8 starts with Mirren telling Cadence she wishes she had been kinder to The Littles, but Cadence says Mirren shouldn't have regret, she should be "light as air." Then Mirren starts talking about how she always wanted to be "excellent" at everything, that both she, and her mother, never let themselves me "messy." "I don't think anyone really saw me," Mirren says to Cadence as she starts sobbing. "And now no one ever will." "No, look at me," Cadence says in response. "The Liars saw you Mirren. And I'll see you for the rest of my life." "That moment, that's a difficult one," McGregor said. "It was interesting because that one was I think in the last week of us filming, I think we had like a few days left, so that goodbye felt very real and present." "She was such a guiding light for me, quite motherly towards me, which is really what I needed. Like even if I had my stomach ache, she would set me up with some saltine crackers and my medication. Emily's a very thoughtful person that's very attentive, and I think that definitely blended into our characters and our togetherness." But one satisfying part of the We Were Liars Season 1 ending is that Ed (Rahul Kohli) gets back together with Carrie (Mamie Gummer), after previously leaving following Ed's failed proposal. While Ed and Gat's (Shubham Maheshwari) bond as outsiders to the Sinclairs was compelling to watch, it was also interesting to see how Ed is so important to Carrie's kids, Johnny (Joseph Zada) and Will (Brady Droulis), but is still on the outside of the larger Sinclair family. "That dynamic, it's super relatable," Kohli said. "It's not too dissimilar to my current living circumstances." "I am obviously British born and I live in America, I've been there for 10 years, and some of the people I call my family I still, even at Thanksgiving or across the table, still don't feel 100 per cent a part of that. It's just something that comes with being a fish out of water." But in order for We Were Liars to bring the audience through the peaks and valleys in this thrilling story, the show needed directors who could take on the task. In this case, all five directors, Nzingha Stewart, Julie Plec, Tara Miele, So Yong Kim and Erica Dunton, brilliantly crafted their elements of this intertwining story. "[Nzingha Stewart], who did the very first episode, she set the tone," David Morse, who plays Sinclair family patriarch Harris, said. "She's really excellent with actors and taking time with us as we're discovering things. Especially in that first episode you feel so naked the first time you open your mouth as a character on that first day, and you'd like to know there's somebody there who's there to protect you and help you a little bit. And Nzingha was great with that. ... Towards the end, we had a really terrific director for those really challenging last two episodes. ... And I think we had the right directors at the right time."
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tim Daly's N.Y.C. Apartment in Photos
More from Robb Report 'Wings' Star Tim Daly's Upper West Side Pied-à-Terre Just Listed for $1.6 Million A 1,000-Acre Private Island Steeped in Scottish History Hits the Market for the First Time in 80 Years A Contemporary Artist's Serene Retreat in Bel Air Can Be Yours for $16.5 Million Best of Robb Report The 10 Priciest Neighborhoods in America (And How They Got to Be That Way) In Pictures: Most Expensive Properties Click here to read the full article. An entry foyer with four oversized closets opens to seventh-floor residence, which has two bedrooms and 1.5 baths in 1,300 square feet. North-facing windows in the living/dining room provides city views and plenty of natural light. Ten-foot ceilings and a white-painted wood floor add to the room's cloud-like airiness. A copper light fixture hangs over the dining table. The kitchen is outfitted with Viking and Fisher & Paykel appliances. A compact office space and a powder room are tucked behind the kitchen. The primary bedroom includes a large walk-in closet. The primary shares a simple bath with the secondary bedroom. The secondary bedroom comes with built-in shelving. The floor plan.
