Air Force may revive shelved ARRW hypersonic program
The Air Force wants to revive its shelved AGM-183A Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon, or ARRW, hypersonic program — and perhaps move it into the procurement phase.
Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin told lawmakers in a hearing last week that the service wants to include funding for both ARRW and the Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile, or HACM, in the fiscal 2026 budget proposal.
'We are looking, and have in the budget submission — assuming it's what we had put forward — two different [hypersonic] programs,' Allvin told the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday. 'One is a larger form factor that is more strategic long-range that we have already tested several times. It's called ARRW, and the other one is HACM.'
Hypersonic weapons are capable of traveling at more than five times the speed of sound and maneuvering midflight, making them harder to track and shoot down than conventional ballistic missiles and more capable of penetrating enemy defenses.
China and Russia have invested heavily in hypersonic research and touted their advancements, with Russia even using hypersonic weapons in Ukraine. Those nations' successes have worried top lawmakers and Pentagon leaders and increased pressure on U.S. military services to produce their own hypersonic capabilities.
The Air Force once saw ARRW, a boost-glide weapon made by Lockheed Martin, as a promising option for developing hypersonic weapons that could catch up with China's and Russia's programs.
But after unsuccessful tests in late 2022 and early 2023, ARRW's future was in doubt. Andrew Hunter, then-acquisition chief, told lawmakers in March 2023 that the Air Force did not plan to buy ARRW missiles after its prototyping phase ended, spelling major trouble for the program.
The Air Force's budget request for fiscal 2025, which was released in March 2024, included no funding for procurement or research and development for ARRW. The service concluded the prototype phase for ARRW in 2024.
But in his comments to lawmakers last week, Allvin said the service wanted to move both ARRW and HACM beyond research and development and 'into the procurement range in the very near future.'
'We are accelerating in our development not only of the technology, but of the procurement of the capabilities that it will create,' Allvin said.
Now that the Air Force has matured its hypersonic technology, it must focus on lowering costs and getting the systems into production, Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told lawmakers in the same hearing.
'It's got to be affordable,' Meink said. 'We've got to be able to buy more than 10 of these things. A big focus right now is ramping up the production and lowering the cost so we can get enough of that kit to actually make a difference.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Commentary: Trump is suddenly waging two wars — one with trade partners and one with Iran
Life can get complicated awfully fast. President Trump hoped his first year in office would bring victories on tax cuts, trade realignment, and deregulation. Five months in, however, he has not just one war on his hands, but two. First is the trade war with dozens of nations, which many economists say is bound to end up as an unwinnable quagmire. And now, Trump has stepped into a risky Middle East war by green-lighting US attacks on three Iranian nuclear weapons sites, a step other presidents have considered and averted. Saturday's American attack on Iran may turn out to have been a risk worth taking. It came after a week of attacks on Iranian nuclear and military targets by Israel, which says Iran was days or weeks from having the capability to build a nuclear weapon. Iran's Islamic theocracy has long threatened Israel's destruction, and a nuke would give them the means to do it. Starting June 13, Israel mounted a brilliant campaign that neutered Iran's air-defense network, killed several military leaders, and damaged Iran's nuclear complex. But it needed American help to finish the job. Only American 'bunker buster' bombs had the heft to penetrate deeply buried facilities at the heart of Iran's nuclear program. Trump OK'd the raid, and American warplanes dropped at least a dozen of the giant bombs on June 21. Trump says Iran's nuclear program is gone. Maybe. It could take days or weeks to determine if the bombs destroyed everything on the target list. The Pentagon may never know for sure. Iran could have moved some nuclear material or other parts of the program to reconstitute later. Trump obviously hopes the weekend strikes are a one-and-done operation. That would allow him to refocus on a trade war that has key deadlines approaching and a huge tax bill that's bogging down in Congress. But Iran may not cooperate. 'Wars are easy to start, but difficult to end,' Byron Callan of Capital Alpha Partners wrote in an analysis on Sunday. 'We are highly skeptical that Iran 'surrenders.'' Iran is in a weak position, yet it may influence the outcome of Trump's economic agenda, not to mention other Trump priorities: These include immigration enforcement and anything else that depends on Trump holding a reasonable level of popular support at home. Wars can boost a president's popularity and political capital if they go well (and quickly), but they can also drag down a presidency if they bog down or go off the rails. President Lyndon Johnson, most famously, dropped his 1968 reelection bid as opposition to the Vietnam War biggest market concern, for now, is whether Iran will try to close the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway at the eastern end of the Persian Gulf that's a transit point for 20% of the world's oil. Iran could mine the strait, attack oil tankers, or conduct sabotage that could easily send oil prices, which were around $75 per barrel before the US attacks, over $100 and possibly higher. But closing the strait could be self-defeating for Iran. First, it would block its own oil from flowing into markets, depriving the government of badly needed cash. It would also trigger a prompt US response and possibly end with the destruction of much of Iran's navy, making Iran even weaker. 'The next move is up to the Iranians,' economist Ed Yardeni of Yardeni Research wrote in a June 22 analysis. "Our bet is that they will sue for peace. While the Mullahs and their generals may be fanatics, they aren't crazy. If that's the case, then the price of oil should fall and stock markets around the world should resume their ascents.' Iran has other moves, however. Instead of targeting the Strait of Hormuz, it could attack US ships and bases in the region with drones and missiles. There are several ways to go about that. One might be a symbolic fireworks show that lets Iran say it retaliated, without doing much harm. That may let both sides say they've done what they needed to do and are wrapping things up. But Iran has killed Americans before, and it could do so again, which might leave Trump feeling he has no choice but to escalate further. In an escalation scenario, Iran would still have the option to go after the strait, which would keep oil prices elevated. Iran could also sit back for a while and plot something more cunning. Affiliated terrorist groups could plot overt or covert attacks on American assets in the Middle East or elsewhere. Iran backed the 1983 bombing of the Marine barracks in Lebanon, the 1996 bombing of an Air Force housing complex in Saudi Arabia, and numerous attacks against US troops in Iraq from 2003 to 2011, among other crimes. They'd relish a few more notches on the bloody belt. As the first US president to approve a direct attack on Iran, Trump risks an open-ended entanglement involving dead Americans, damaged American prestige, and a disapproving electorate. There are already signs that Iran salvaged some of the enriched uranium needed for nuclear bombs. If so, that would raise the question of whether the United States should attack again and whether it could even destroy all of Iran's uranium if it wanted to. It may be more likely following the US attacks that Iran decides to fully end all cooperation with international inspectors and nonproliferation regimes and sprint toward a nuclear weapon, even a crude one. 'It is possible an Iranian regime could pick up the pieces and get to a bomb in a couple of years,' Ilan Goldenberg, a former Defense Department Middle East analyst, wrote in Foreign Affairs. 'The best and most durable option for the United States all along was to pursue a diplomatic deal that verifiably restrained Iran's nuclear program. That option is much less likely.' Trump has entered the Middle East cauldron just as his trade war is approaching a climactic moment. Trump set a July 9 deadline for dozens of countries to negotiate trade deals favorable to the United States or face punitive 'reciprocal' tariffs. But the whole world has seen that Trump backs down on tariff threats when markets slide, and the Iran standoff will make markets much twitchier than they'd otherwise be. That could force Trump to postpone the July 9 deadline. Markets would cheer, since tariffs damage corporate profitability, and any delay is a reprieve. But another delay would also prolong the uncertainty that's suppressing the US stock market and possibly weakening the economy. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Trump also can't afford a sudden spike in oil and energy prices, which would create significant inflationary pressure if it lasted. Economists already think Trump's tariffs could add a percentage point to inflation, or more, and that's with relatively low energy prices. An energy spike would make tariff inflation more painful. It's not all downside for Trump. Iran's theocratic government might lose its nerve and decide its quest for the bomb isn't worth the trouble. If Trump did manage to rid the world of an Iranian nuclear menace, without much cost, it could stabilize the Middle East, a little, and solve one very dangerous problem. Any kudos for that, however, will only come after weeks, months, or even years of tension. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
The US bombed Iran. Now, the whole world is watching the Strait of Hormuz.
Good morning. Hallam Bullock here, filling in for Dan for the summer while he finishes his parental leave. In today's big story, US warplanes bombed three of Iran's nuclear sites. Now, all eyes are on the Strait of Hormuz, a 90-mile strip critical to global oil prices. What's on deck Markets: How young people are turning to day trading as an escape route from the usual 9-to-5. Business: Husbands are quitting their jobs to work with their Etsy-famous wives. But first, global investors are on alert. If this was forwarded to you, sign up here. The big story All eyes on Hormuz After US President Donald Trump announced the US had " totally obliterated" three of Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend, oil prices initially surged to a five-month high on fears of widespread disruption to trade. Prices cooled just hours later. Where oil prices go from here depends on Iran's response. Iran's parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz — a critical global transit chokepoint for about a quarter of global seaborne oil and one-fifth of the world's liquified natural gas trade. If the Strait of Hormuz were closed, the impact would be felt across the globe, especially at the gas station. You could also expect higher inflation, slower growth, and higher interest rates, Kyle Rodda, a senior financial markets analyst, told BI. Goldman Sachs, meanwhile, said closing the Strait of Hormuz could push oil prices to $110 per barrel. It would also do significant economic harm to Iran itself, which uses the passage for its energy exports. China, the world's largest buyer of Iranian oil, would suffer too. This isn't the first time Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz. So far, it's never delivered on that threat. We've been working around the clock to bring you full coverage of this critical moment. We've got details from a rare Pentagon press briefing, during which officials revealed the deception tactics behind the mission. We took a closer look at the B-2 Spirit stealth bombers used to drop 14 GBU-57s — 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs capable of penetrating 200 feet into the earth before exploding. It marks the first time these formidable weapons have been used in combat. New satellite imagery revealed the extent of the damage at Iran's Fordow nuclear facility. We've also gathered business leaders' reactions to the strike, from Bill Ackman to Dustin Moskovitz. 3 things in markets 1. Broke: the usual 9-to-5. Bespoke: stock trading all day. For some Gen Zers and millennials, trading stocks full- time offers an escape from the monotonous grind of a typical job. Three day traders told BI the ups and downs of the trade and how much money they've made from it. 2. Why a top market strategist maintains a bearish outlook. While many on Wall Street have eased their economic outlooks, Peter Berezin of BCA Research said his base case is a 60% chance of a recession this year and a 25% stock drop. A weakening consumer, a growing deficit, and trade uncertainty are some of Berezin's concerns. 3. Citadel's not-so-average internship. A five-star hotel. Beach yoga. Company-themed lattes. Citadel's exclusive summer internship, which has a 0.4% acceptance rate, kicked things off with a unique off-site trip in Florida. BI's Emmalyse Brownstein got a first-hand view of it all. 3 things in tech 1. First Tesla robotaxis launched, with Tesla employees in the passenger seat. Musk said he tentatively planned to launch the service on June 22 earlier this month, after more than a decade of hype. Tesla invited a small group of users in Austin to try the self-driving cars for a flat fee of $4.20 on Sunday. The catch? A Tesla employee sitting in the passenger seat. 2. This AI can catch shoplifting before it happens. Paris-based AI startup Veesion uses its gesture recognition algorithm to flag suspicious movements — rather than individual tracking — to a retailer. Veesion aims to predict retail theft and said its tech has been able to cut one store's missing inventory rates from the health and beauty section in half. 3. Where are the workers? Cities across the US are betting big on AI data centers, luring tech companies with millions in tax breaks and promising their communities more jobs. The problem is, these AI data centers aren't producing many permanent full-time positions, a BI investigation found. 3 things in business 1. Goodbye, Instagram boyfriend. Enter the Etsy husband. Women are finding enough success on their Etsy shop to quit their jobs and pursue their side hustle full-time. They're hiring their husbands to help, too. It's a new take on the family-run business, dominated by women. 2. Five things people don't get about consulting. Former consultant AJ Eckstein worked for a Fortune 500 management consultant firm for three years, before leaving to start his own business when he became disillusioned with the industry. He told BI what people don't understand about working in consulting and shared his own experience, from a lack of autonomy, to his career growth stagnating. 3. Show some personality in your next job interview. Hiring managers from McKinsey, Verizon, Exelon, and Kraft Heinz shared with BI their tips on how to stand out among thousands of job applicants. Candidates who show traits like leadership, humor, and genuine interest may improve their chances. In other news Russia's former president says countries are lining up to give Iran their nukes. Analysts are calling his bluff. OpenAI scrubs news of Jony Ive deal amid trademark dispute. Why defense and Airbus dominated this year's Paris Air Show. Eight manager jobs you can get without a bachelor's degree, and how much they typically pay. A former Disney exec says peak TV is over, and there's only so much AI can do to help. Teenage podcaster shares four life lessons from Steve Cohen, Howard Marks, and other Wall Street giants. I'm a retiree living in Mexico who owns a BYD and a Tesla. Here's why I prefer the Chinese car. What's happening today President Donald Trump meets the National Security team. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte holds a press conference ahead of this week's NATO Summit. WHO publishes Global Tobacco Epidemic report. Dan DeFrancesco, deputy editor and anchor, in New York (on parental leave). Hallam Bullock, senior editor, in London. Meghan Morris, bureau chief, in Singapore. Grace Lett, editor, in Chicago. Amanda Yen, associate editor, in New York. Lisa Ryan, executive editor, in New York. Akin Oyedele, deputy editor, in New York. Ella Hopkins, associate editor, in London.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Inside Trump's Decision
A team of Times reporters — Mark Mazzetti, Jonathan Swan, Maggie Haberman, Eric Schmitt and Helene Cooper — have a new article revealing how Trump came to his decision to join Israel's war against Iran, and how he and the military hid their plans to ensure that the attack remained a secret. Late last week, Trump said he would take up to two weeks to decide whether to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. It was a deception: By that point, Trump had all but made up his mind. Military preparations were well underway. Trump began to muse about dropping massive bunker-buster bombs onto Fordo, Iran's uranium-enrichment facility, just hours after Israel's first wave of attacks, on June 13. A day later, one adviser told The Times, Trump seemed to have already decided to go through with it. At times, Trump's penchant for social media was the biggest threat to the operation's secrecy. Last Monday, he posted on Truth Social that 'everyone should evacuate Tehran!' The next day, he revealed that he had left a meeting of the Group of 7 in Canada not to broker a Middle East cease-fire but for something 'much bigger.' He added, 'Stay tuned!' Inside the Pentagon and the U.S. Central Command, military planners worried that Trump was giving Iran too much warning about an impending strike. So they worked up their own ruse: They had two fleets of B-2 bombers leave Missouri at the same time, one flying east and one flying west. Flight trackers spotted the westward planes, which offered some idea of the timing of a possible attack. But those planes were a decoy. The eastbound planes crossed the Atlantic undetected, joined with fighter jets and flew into Iranian airspace. At 2:10 a.m. local time yesterday, the lead bomber dropped two of the bunker-busters on the Fordo site. By the end of the mission, 14 of the bombs had fallen. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
