Rare whale tooth fossil reveals secrets of ancient Iberian people
A rare whale tooth unearthed at a Copper Age 'mega village' in Spain has shed light on the artistry of Iberian people who lived in the Mediterranean region over 4,000 years ago.
The tooth, discovered at the Valencina archaeological site in southwest Spain in 2018, is the first such fossil dated to this period in Iberia.
According to a study published in PLOS One, the tooth was likely collected from an ancient shoreline and carefully worked on by Copper Age craftspeople.
The craftspeople, living in a coastal village 5,300 to 4,150 years ago, likely used the tooth to fashion personal ornaments or symbolically meaningful artefacts.
After it was worked on, the fossil was deliberately buried as indicated by further wear and tear and the hard crust covering its surface, the study noted.
The findings add to our understanding of the use of ivory to craft ornaments, musical instruments and sculptures since the Old Stone Age, which began almost 40,000 years ago.
Ivory's striking appearance, durability, and strength made it an integral part of trade and sociocultural activities of ancient societies.
However, much of what we know about the use of ivory in prehistoric times is based only on examining ivory sourced from terrestrial animals like elephants, hippos, deer and bears.
While previous research underlines elephant ivory use in Old Stone Age and Copper Age societies of southern Spain, little is known about the significance of the material from marine mammals.
The whale tooth from Valencina, measuring 17cm tall and 7cm wide and weighing over 0.5kg, provides a unique glimpse into the past.
Analysis of the fossil revealed it came from an adult sperm whale and showed evidence of erosion from worms and barnacles as well as suspected shark bites, indicating it spent time on the seafloor.
Researchers also identified signs of human activity on the tooth, like drilled holes and distinct cut marks that could not have occurred naturally.
These observations prompted researchers to conclude that the whale likely died of natural causes, following which its body sank to the seafloor and one of its teeth washed ashore before it was found and used by ancient Iberians.
'Although no ivory artefact has yet been diagnosed as coming from a sperm whale tooth, recent finds of ivory of marine origin in European archaeological contexts have brought a new focus to the study of the use of marine resources by prehistoric societies,' the study said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
The seven strangest historical discoveries made in 2025
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. No matter how many books and TV documentaries are made appearing to give a definite account of life in ancient civilizations, the ongoing work of historians and archaeologists means that the story of the past is never finished. There are always new discoveries being made – here are seven of the most surprising. A form of ancient sunscreen could have helped Homo sapiens survive a period of intense environmental stress that killed off the Neanderthals, scientists have suggested. The two species existed alongside each other for millennia until about 40,000 years ago, when Neanderthals disappeared. The reason for their demise is not entirely clear, but one factor may have been the shift of the Earth's magnetic poles that occurred around that time. Known as Laschamps excursion, this phenomenon lasted 1,000 years and weakened Earth's magnetic field to about 10% of its current strength, leading to a massive increase in solar radiation. Researchers in Michigan have found evidence that Homo sapiens developed what may have been protective strategies: they took shelter in caves and ramped up their extraction of the pigment ochre, perhaps because they were using it to paint their bodies. Needles and awls unearthed at Stone Age sites also indicate the use of tailored clothes – which would have kept them warmer too, enabling them to travel further for food. But there is little evidence that the Neanderthals adapted in such ways. Solar radiation can damage sight and lead to birth defects and infant deaths – so protection from it would "have conferred significant advantage", said Raven Garvey, who co-authored the study. The eruption of Vesuvius almost 2,000 years ago buried Herculaneum and Pompeii under a thick layer of ash, which preserved everything from its residents to the frescoes in their villas. Numerous bodies have been excavated, but one is more unusual than most: that of a young man who was found lying in his bed – and whose brain appeared to have been turned to glass. When this was observed in 2020, such a phenomenon had never been seen before, and scientists were baffled as to how it could have occurred. Now a team have come up with a possible explanation. For glass to have formed, the tissue would have had to have heated very rapidly until it liquefied, then cooled fast enough to prevent crystals forming as it solidified. Analysis of fragments of the man's brain has shown that it was heated to 510C, before fast-cooling. The pyroclastic flows from the volcano did not get that hot; nor would they have allowed for rapid cooling. However, the ash cloud that swept through the town first would have been far hotter. This heat, says the study, could have evaporated the water in the man's brain, causing it to explode into tiny pieces. The cloud would then have rapidly cleared, allowing the fragments to cool and vitrify. We think of gladiators being made to fight tigers, lions or bears as a staple of the Roman circus. But though the Romans wrote about such spectacles and depicted them in frescos and mosaics, there has never been any direct physical evidence for their existence – until now. Archaeologists have analysed wounds on the hip bone of a gladiator who died in England in the 3rd century AD, and concluded that their shape is "consistent" with the bite marks of large cats, with lions being the closest fit. The skeleton was one of dozens unearthed 20 years ago in a cemetery in York. Most belonged to well-built young men, and had been decapitated; their bones bore marks of injuries inflicted by blades; one had been shackled; and DNA tests indicated that they came from all over the Roman empire. All of which led the team to conclude that they were gladiators. The researchers do not think that this gladiator was killed by the lion bite, however, but that he'd been injured already and was dragged off at the point of death – which "must have been absolutely terrifying", said Tim Thompson, one of the study's authors. Given the difficulty of transporting big cats, the find also underlines the importance of York in the Roman world. Archaeologists have been startled to find evidence that humans lived on Malta some 8,500 years ago. The findings, published in Nature, mean that the seafaring abilities of hunter-gatherers must be rethought. Previously, it was assumed that journeys of such length across the Mediterranean only started following the invention of boats with sails. The archaeologists, from the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, believe that they arrived in dug-out canoes, having undertaken a journey in open water of at least 100km, some of which (given the limited speed of such vessels) must have been in darkness. The island is so small and isolated, the presumption had been that it could not have sustained a population that wasn't growing its own food. But carbon dating of charcoal, found in hearths outside a cave complex in the north of the island, indicates that hunter-gatherers were there a millennium before farming became widespread. Other evidence at the site shows that these ancient people hunted meat, in the form of deer, birds and seals; they also cooked sea urchins, crab and fish. The Romans came into so much contact with lead – via everything from their paints to their coins, water pipes and drinking vessels – that historians have long speculated that lead poisoning could have hastened the fall of their empire. Now, a study has shown that there were also high levels of lead in the air they breathed – enough, in fact, to have affected brain development. Romans' mining of lead and their smelting of lead ore to obtain silver would have released vast amounts of lead into the atmosphere. To gauge the scale of this, a team in the US analysed residues trapped in ice that formed between 500BC and AD600. Their findings indicate that levels of the neurotoxin in the air increased sharply in around 15BC, and remained high for two centuries. They then used atmospheric models to map the pollutants' spread, and modern health studies to assess its impact. Their results showed that, at its peak, the lead pollution across Europe (believed to be the first widespread industrial pollution) was severe enough to cause a two-to three-point drop in IQ. That might not sound much, but, "when you apply [it] to essentially the entire European population, it's kind of a big deal", said co-author Nathan Chellman. In our "always on" world, there is a feeling that no one is getting enough sleep; and that the time we spend staring at screens is preventing us from sleeping well. Yet according to recent research, we get more – and better – sleep than our ancestors in pre-industrial times are likely to have done. For a study published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, scientists in Canada analysed data on the sleep patterns of 866 people in 54 sleep studies from around the world – from the residents of big cities to the members of hunter-gatherer tribes. They found that the participants living in industrial societies slept more, clocking up an average of 7.1 hours a night compared with just 6.4 in the less industrial societies. And they also found there had been no significant decline in sleep in Westernised places over the past half-century. The study also revealed that people in these societies tend to get more efficient sleep – meaning they are asleep for more of the time they spend in bed (88% compared with 74%). The researchers suggest modern living conditions are simply more conducive to restful sleep: "We don't have to fend with rival human groups at night or predators," said David Samson. But if that is the case, why then do so many people in the West seem to wake up feeling exhausted? This may be due to the study's other main finding, which is that people living in industrialised countries have a less regular circadian rhythm: their sleep patterns don't match the natural cycles of light and dark. When the Romans invaded Britain, they found the natives strange, says The Times. Their warriors painted themselves blue; and they had moustaches – a concept so foreign to Romans, they had no name for it. Perhaps worst of all, Roman scribes recorded that Celtic rebellions against Roman rule were often led by women. This would have seemed outlandish in Rome, where women were legally owned by their fathers and their husbands, and had no role at all in public life. But while the existence of female warriors such as Boudicca is not in doubt, historians have long distrusted these accounts, suspecting the extent of female power and influence was overstated, to make Celtic societies seem completely barbaric. Now, however, archaeologists at Trinity College Dublin and Bournemouth University have backed up the scribes' observations. The research was based on the remains of 57 people unearthed at an Iron Age cemetery in Dorset. By tracing mitochondrial DNA (which is only passed on by women), the team established that most of the female members of this community were related and all descended from a single woman; by contrast, there was considerable diversity in the male Y chromosomes, suggesting that the men came from lots of different families. This, the study says, indicates that men moved into their wives' community on marriage – a pattern known as matrilocality – perhaps because land and wealth passed down through the female line. The grave goods found back up this theory: the higher status items tended to have been buried with women.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rare whale tooth fossil reveals secrets of ancient Iberian people
A rare whale tooth unearthed at a Copper Age 'mega village' in Spain has shed light on the artistry of Iberian people who lived in the Mediterranean region over 4,000 years ago. The tooth, discovered at the Valencina archaeological site in southwest Spain in 2018, is the first such fossil dated to this period in Iberia. According to a study published in PLOS One, the tooth was likely collected from an ancient shoreline and carefully worked on by Copper Age craftspeople. The craftspeople, living in a coastal village 5,300 to 4,150 years ago, likely used the tooth to fashion personal ornaments or symbolically meaningful artefacts. After it was worked on, the fossil was deliberately buried as indicated by further wear and tear and the hard crust covering its surface, the study noted. The findings add to our understanding of the use of ivory to craft ornaments, musical instruments and sculptures since the Old Stone Age, which began almost 40,000 years ago. Ivory's striking appearance, durability, and strength made it an integral part of trade and sociocultural activities of ancient societies. However, much of what we know about the use of ivory in prehistoric times is based only on examining ivory sourced from terrestrial animals like elephants, hippos, deer and bears. While previous research underlines elephant ivory use in Old Stone Age and Copper Age societies of southern Spain, little is known about the significance of the material from marine mammals. The whale tooth from Valencina, measuring 17cm tall and 7cm wide and weighing over 0.5kg, provides a unique glimpse into the past. Analysis of the fossil revealed it came from an adult sperm whale and showed evidence of erosion from worms and barnacles as well as suspected shark bites, indicating it spent time on the seafloor. Researchers also identified signs of human activity on the tooth, like drilled holes and distinct cut marks that could not have occurred naturally. These observations prompted researchers to conclude that the whale likely died of natural causes, following which its body sank to the seafloor and one of its teeth washed ashore before it was found and used by ancient Iberians. 'Although no ivory artefact has yet been diagnosed as coming from a sperm whale tooth, recent finds of ivory of marine origin in European archaeological contexts have brought a new focus to the study of the use of marine resources by prehistoric societies,' the study said.
Medscape
18 hours ago
- Medscape
First Scan for Suspected AxSpA: X-rays, MRI, or CT?
BARCELONA, Spain — Data from a prospective imaging study question the use of x-ray radiography first in the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), a practice that is currently a part of recommendations by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). The study, which evaluated three different imaging pathways based on whether x-ray radiography, MRI, or CT of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) was used first, found that the two latter approaches yielded a higher diagnostic efficacy than the radiograph-first approach. While just 13% of 30 people who were in the radiograph-first arm of the study were confirmed as having axSpA after the initial scan, 22% of 91 patients in the MRI-first and 30% of 84 people in the CT-first arms were given an axSpA diagnosis. X-ray, MRI, or CT first? Dominik Deppe, MD 'To x-ray or not to x-ray? What may sound somewhat philosophical, is a relevant question,' said study investigator Dominik Deppe, MD, who presented the findings at European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2025 Annual Meeting. Deppe, a doctoral student in the Department of Radiology at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, explained that although radiographs could show certain structural lesions, such as erosions, sclerosis, or ankylosis, and used relatively low levels of radiation, interpretation could be problematic. 'Even among experts, inter-reader reliability remains low,' Deppe said. MRIs are often performed if the results on radiography are negative or inconclusive. Such scans provide additional insights, he added, and can show both structural and inflammatory lesions, such as bone marrow edema. However, the high cost and low availability of MRI relative to radiography, however, were issues, he acknowledged. This is where CT could perhaps prove most useful. Although it's not part of the standard imaging pathway as yet, it is 'a gold standard for structural lesions,' Deppe said. He added: 'Historically, CT is considered to have high radiation exposure, but nowadays, we can perform CT with ultra-low dose techniques that allow us to reduce radiation exposure to a level that is comparable, or even less, compared to conventional x-rays.' Strategies Compared and Results The study included 205 people with suspected axSpA, who were randomly allocated into one of three arms: 30 to a radiograph-first or 'standard' arm, 91 to an MRI-first arm, and 84 to a CT-first arm. Scans were designated positive or negative by the consensus of two specialized musculoskeletal radiologists who were blinded to the clinical data. A positive result was defined as clear signs of structural or inflammation suggestive of axSpA and no further imaging was done. Those with negative scans underwent a subsequent scan with another method; those in the radiograph-first arm had an MRI scan and then a CT scan, those in the MRI-first arm had a CT scan, and those in the CT-first arm had an MRI scan. The results are preliminary because the study is ongoing and results from the final diagnosis by a rheumatologist are not yet available, Deppe said. He reported that in the radiograph-first arm, 26 (87%) people had a negative scan and then had an MRI scan. This was positive in three (11%) and negative in 23 (88%) of people. None of the people with a negative MRI scan had a positive CT scan. In the MRI-first arm, scans were positive in 20 (22%) and negative in 71 (78%) of people. Again, CT added no further cases among the people who were also MRI-negative. Finally, in the CT-first arm, there were 25 (30%) positive and 59 (70%) negative scans. MRI performed in the CT-negative patients detected two (3%) additional cases of confirmed axSpA. Deppe said: 'Our standard approach, [which] we're using right now, has the lowest diagnostic efficacy, compared to the MRI-first and CT-first approach.' Patient Characteristics Information about patient demographics were not presented, however, which prompted Uta Kiltz, MD, a senior rheumatologist at Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany, to ask for clarification and about the study design. 'Can you give some information about the population you included in the study?' she asked. 'I think we need to have some more context about the decision-making process to really understand the results.' Deppe responded that the patients had been referred with the suspicion and not confirmed diagnosis of axSpA and had been randomized through a third party into the three different imaging arms. Topline patient demographics had been given in the abstract, which stated that the mean age of the population studied was 38 years (SD, 10.58 years) and just over half (58%) were women. Around half (53%) of the study population was HLA-B27 positive. The mean C-reactive protein level was 3.66 mg/L, and the mean BMI was 25.57. The mean duration of back pain was around 8 years, and 70.6% of people had signs of inflammatory back pain. Questions Raised Several discussants raised concerns about the study design and the interpretation of these early findings. Eric Ruderman, MD, of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, questioned why all patients did not receive all three imaging modalities: 'Ultimately, you don't know the diagnostic specificity of the [ultra] low-dose CT. Why didn't you do all three images in each patient, so that you can actually make a comparison once you have the confirmed diagnosis?' Deppe replied that the team wanted to be pragmatic: 'We wanted to evaluate the clinical settings where the patient does not undergo every imaging, but if we found positive results, as in the clinical practice, we don't need further imaging, and this is something we want to demonstrate in the study.' Xenofon Baraliakos, MD, head of rheumatology at the Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, and the new president of EULAR, raised concerns about potential false positives: 'What happens if the x-ray is it was falsely positive? Have you been able to check for that?' Deppe acknowledged the limitation: 'I think this is something we have to do when we have the final diagnosis by the rheumatologist, to see whether we missed or misinterpreted some of the images.' This study was independently supported. Deppe had no conflicts of interest. The commentators were not involved in the study.
