South Africa finally has a masterplan for a renewable energy industry: here's what it says

About 85% of South Africa's electricity is produced by burning coal. The country's move to renewable energy means that the coal industry will be phased out. To this end, the South African cabinet recently approved the country's first renewable energy masterplan, which sets out what's needed to establish new renewable energy industries. Ricardo Amansure of the Centre for Sustainability Transitions researches the move towards renewable energy and how communities can benefit from this. He explains what the masterplan aims to achieve, what problems it might face, and how it can succeed.
It is an industrial strategy that sets out how South Africa can set up a new manufacturing industry in renewable energy and battery storage value chains.
The masterplan was developed by the government, some sections of organised labour, a non-profit organisation advocating for renewable energy, and representatives of the renewable energy industries. It sets out a framework to produce renewable technologies locally. These include solar photovoltaic panels, wind turbines and batteries.
Read more:
The masterplan has been drawn up so that it aligns with South Africa's existing national target of adding 3–5 gigawatts of renewable energy capacity each year to 2030. This is a scale that can support the development of local manufacturing hubs. (One gigawatt can supply electricity to about 700,000 average homes.) This steady supply will be enough to give businesses and investors the confidence to commit to long-term investments in local manufacturing hubs. These are zones where renewable systems and components are produced or assembled for domestic and export markets.
The state-owned electricity company, Eskom, has not directly guaranteed that it will buy 3-5 gigawatts of renewable energy each year. But the government's national electricity plan (the Integrated Resource Plan) provides a strong indication of future demand.
The masterplan also aims to attract at least R15 billion (US$784 million) in investment by 2030 and train 'green workers' for employment in 25,000 direct jobs. These roles range from factory work and logistics to engineering and construction. Many will be for youth and semi-skilled workers.
Read more:
South Africa already has a Just Transition Framework to ensure that the shift to a low-carbon economy is fair, and does not leave workers, communities or regions behind. The masterplan is aligned with this. It aims to support Black-owned companies and small-scale and community-based initiatives, especially in places affected by the looming loss of jobs in the coal industry.
However, it is not a response to the country's frequent power cuts and won't decide how electricity is generated. Energy system plans like the integrated resource plan and Energy Action Plan do this. (They focus on power generation, securing a constant energy supply, and expanding the electricity grid.)
In 2023 alone, the country spent over R17.5 billion (US$905 million) on solar and battery imports.
This is unnecessary because South Africa sits on reserves of manganese, vanadium, platinum and other rare earth elements. These are the critical ingredients for manufacturing clean energy systems and storage, which could be made locally.
South Africa already produces solar panels, steel towers for wind turbines, and electrical cabling. Some local firms also assemble inverters and balance-of-system technologies used in solar and battery systems. The potential to grow renewable energy industries is there.
Factories making solar, wind and battery storage components will be financed through private sector investment and government incentives and support. These include tax breaks, localisation requirements, and support in special economic zones. As manufacturing demand increases, expansion is planned into offshore wind and next-generation (longer duration) batteries.
Between now and 2030, the masterplan has these aims:
To fast-track government procurement of renewable energy, ensuring reliable energy planning, and expand the electricity grid to handle new projects.
To develop an industry producing key components like wind turbine towers, solar mounting structures and batteries.
To promote inclusive development by supporting Black-owned firms, small businesses and former coal communities. This is to make sure that everyone gets their fair chance to take part in green economic opportunities.
To grow local skills and innovation. Training and education institutes and the energy industry will partner to make renewable energy skills part of national curricula and workplace training pipelines. They will need the support of government's higher education ministry.
South Africa has a history of ambitious strategies to localise production in energy and car manufacturing. They struggled to get off the ground. These plans were often undermined by delays and mismatched approaches by government departments.
The masterplan could face similar obstacles if these governance and execution gaps are not addressed with urgency.
Another bottleneck is the electricity grid, which cannot accommodate new renewable energy connections. Eskom needs about US$21 billion to expand the grid, which will take time.
Read more:
This is a problem because renewable energy manufacturers need certainty now about future demand if they are to invest in new factories and training programmes.
South Africa also has a huge shortage of renewable energy technicians, electricians, installers and engineers.
A few urgent actions are required:
The government must publish updated procurement rules with a clear and enforceable set of localisation targets. This will give local manufacturers confidence that they'll have a market to sell renewable energy to.
South Africa's official electricity plan, which still emphasises the role for coal-fired power, must be realigned with the renewable energy masterplan.
Eskom may need support from government and development financiers to expand the grid at the pace needed.
Training institutions must modernise their courses and train more students to work in the solar, wind, battery storage and green hydrogen sectors.
The government must create incentives that make it easier for local and international investors to be part of the industry. Red tape – long waits for environmental approvals, land rezoning and licensing processes – must be cut. Simplifying and speeding up these procedures, while maintaining safety and environmental standards, would improve investor confidence.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Ricardo Amansure, Stellenbosch University
Read more:
COP28: South Africa pioneered plans to transition to renewable energy – what went wrong
South Africa and renewable energy: a 12-year-old programme offers insights for countries moving to cleaner power sources
South Africa's coal workers face an uncertain future – Mpumalanga study flags they're being left out of the green transition
Ricardo Amansure does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

7 hours ago

• Yahoo

World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency

The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. Major development banks have agreed to boost climate spending and are seen as crucial in the effort to dramatically increase finance to help poorer countries build resilience to impacts and invest in renewable energy. But anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund from focussing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. Nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to $300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to reduce the shortfall, with the expectation of "significant" contributions from international lenders. But so far only two -- the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank -- have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. "We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns," he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. "We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting" many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap, he added. - A 'worrisome trend' - His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instead they found institutions "very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all", said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a "worrisome trend", he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. "They're very much needed," he said. The World Bank is directing 45 percent of its total lending to climate, as part of an action plan in place until June 2026, with the public portion of that spilt 50/50 between emissions reductions and building resilience. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has pushed in a different direction. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on "dependable technologies" rather than "distortionary climate finance targets." This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries -- those most responsible for global warming to date -- are obliged to pay climate finance to poorer nations. Other countries, most notably China, make voluntary contributions. - Money matters - Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and have committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to cope with the climate crisis. The issue flared up again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide $120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle income countries, and mobilise another $65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high income countries was $50 billion, with another $65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. "Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change," he said. The World Bank in particular has done "a huge amount of work" to align its lending with global climate goals. "If they choose to step back this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future," he said. The World Bank declined to comment on the record. klm/np/mh/jj

Business Wire

16 hours ago

• Business Wire

SINOVAC Board of Directors Prevails Against Advantech/Prime's New York Lawsuit

BEIJING--(BUSINESS WIRE)--SINOVAC Biotech Ltd. (NASDAQ: SVA) (' SINOVAC ' or the ' Company '), a leading provider of biopharmaceutical products in China, today announced it has prevailed against Advantech/Prime Success' ('Advantech/Prime') Petition for Emergency Injunctive Relief in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The result in the New York court represents another failure in the campaign by Advantech/Prime in coordination with Vivo Capital (together known as the 'Dissenting Investor Group') to wrest control of SINOVAC from its recently installed, lawfully-elected Board of Directors (the 'current SINOVAC Board') in accordance with the Privy Council order and Antiguan Law, and to interfere with the payment of the US$55.00 per common share special cash dividend declared by the current SINOVAC Board. Following the New York court's ruling, the current SINOVAC Board is free to pursue its legal action in Antigua seeking to cancel the PIPE shares invalidly issued to the Dissenting Investor Group by the former illegitimate board (the 'Imposter Former Board'). If the current SINOVAC Board succeeds in legal proceedings on the PIPE shares, it has announced its intention to redistribute an additional US$11.00 per common share to SINOVAC's valid shareholders. Dr. Chiang Li, Chairman of the SINOVAC Board, commented, 'We will continue our mission to restore fairness and deliver value to all valid SINOVAC shareholders, starting with paying the $55.00 per share special cash dividend as soon as July 7, 2025.' The Dissenting Investor Group's self-serving, multi-pronged lawfare strategy against SINOVAC has one goal: to prevent all valid SINOVAC common shareholders from receiving any dividend payments unless the Dissenting Investor Group receives an allocation for their invalid PIPE shares, despite the fact that they have already received over US$1 billion in dividends from a SINOVAC operating subsidiary. The current SINOVAC Board has set aside in escrow the pro rata portion of dividends for the PIPE shares — funds the Dissenting Investor Group could receive if the legal proceedings they initiated rule in their favor. The current SINOVAC Board is fighting back – and winning. We feel certain that we will prevail against any further legal action by the Dissenting Investor Group and look forward to ensuring all valid shareholders receive their fair share. Your Vote is Important Your vote on or before July 8 will be about the future of SINOVAC, your receipt of your make-whole dividend payments in the near-term, and the long-term value of your investment. We urge you to keep SINOVAC's Board in place and vote on the WHITE proxy card ' AGAINST ' Proposal 1 to remove the current Board and ' AGAINST ' Proposal 2 to appoint the Reconstituted Imposter Board Slate. Your vote is critical to ensuring that SINOVAC remains on the path to stability, growth, and value creation for all shareholders. DISCARD any items you received asking you to vote for the Reconstituted Imposter Former Board Slate. If you have already voted for the Reconstituted Imposter Former Board Slate, you can subsequently revoke it by using the WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form to vote. Only your latest-dated vote will count! If you have questions about how your vote can be counted, please contact our proxy solicitor, Georgeson LLC, toll free at (844) 568-1506 in the U.S. and (646) 543-1968 outside the U.S. or via email at SinovacSpecialMeeting@ About SINOVAC Sinovac Biotech Ltd. (SINOVAC) is a China-based biopharmaceutical company that focuses on the R&D, manufacturing, and commercialization of vaccines that protect against human infectious diseases. SINOVAC's product portfolio includes vaccines against COVID-19, enterovirus 71 (EV71) infected Hand-Foot-Mouth disease (HFMD), hepatitis A, varicella, influenza, poliomyelitis, pneumococcal disease, etc. The COVID-19 vaccine, CoronaVac®, has been approved for use in more than 60 countries and regions worldwide. The hepatitis A vaccine, Healive®, passed WHO prequalification requirements in 2017. The EV71 vaccine, Inlive®, is an innovative vaccine under "Category 1 Preventative Biological Products" and commercialized in China in 2016. In 2022, SINOVAC's Sabin-strain inactivated polio vaccine (sIPV) and varicella vaccine were prequalified by the WHO. SINOVAC was the first company to be granted approval for its H1N1 influenza vaccine Panflu.1®, which has supplied the Chinese government's vaccination campaign and stockpiling program. The Company is also the only supplier of the H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine, Panflu®, to the Chinese government stockpiling program. SINOVAC continually dedicates itself to new vaccine R&D, with more combination vaccine products in its pipeline, and constantly explores global market opportunities. SINOVAC plans to conduct more extensive and in-depth trade and cooperation with additional countries, and business and industry organizations. Important Additional Information and Where to Find It In connection with SINOVAC's Special Meeting, SINOVAC has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC') and mailed to shareholders of record entitled to vote at the Special Meeting a definitive proxy statement and other documents, including a WHITE proxy card. SHAREHOLDERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND ALL OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS WHEN FILED WITH THE SEC AND WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THOSE DOCUMENTS WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Investors and other interested parties will be able to obtain the documents free of charge at the SEC's website, or from SINOVAC at its website: You may also obtain copies of SINOVAC's definitive proxy statement and other documents, free of charge, by contacting SINOVAC's Investor Relations Department at ir@ Safe Harbor Statement This announcement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as 'may,' 'will,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'aim,' 'estimate,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'believe,' 'potential,' 'continue,' 'is/are likely to' or other similar expressions. Such statements are based upon current expectations and current market and operating conditions and relate to events that involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Company's or Board's control, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Further information regarding these and other risks, uncertainties or factors is included in the Company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company and Board do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required under law.

Yahoo

17 hours ago

• Yahoo

Building a $28,000 TFSA Portfolio One Contribution at a Time

Written by Adam Othman at The Motley Fool Canada Ever since central banks in the US and Canada started cutting key interest rates, economic activity has picked up pace in both countries. While the rate cuts are currently paused amid trade and geopolitical tensions, analysts predict two more rate cuts of 25 basis points as inflation and tariff-related headwinds ease. Lower interest rates also mean you cannot generate too much interest income from cash held in high-interest savings accounts. If you have $28,000 of contribution room available in a Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA), I can tell you a much better way of generating good monthly returns. The TSX has no shortage of monthly dividend-paying stocks. Building a portfolio of high-quality TSX stocks paying monthly distributions to shareholders can be a great way to generate extra monthly income. Here's a table giving you a quick look at how a hypothetical amount of around $28,000 across three such TSX stocks can deliver $144 in monthly dividends in a TFSA without incurring taxes. After that, you can read a bit about each. Ticker Recent Price Number of Shares Amount Invested Monthly Dividends Per Share Total Monthly Payout Per Stock PZA $14.91 625 $9,318.75 $0.0775 $48.44 SIA $18.52 503 $9,315.56 $0.078 $39.23 $25.37 368 $9,336.16 $0.1542 $56.75 Total Monthly Payout $144.42 Pizza Pizza Royalty Corp. (TSX:PZA) is a $497.3 million market-cap company that owns and franchises quick-service restaurants under several brands, boasting almost 800 restaurants from one coast to the other. The monthly dividend-paying stock generates revenue by collecting royalties from its franchisees based on how much they sell, making its cash flows less vulnerable to wage increases or commodity price fluctuations, which weigh on many businesses in the industry. The brands under the company's banner consistently keep adding value to end consumers by updating menus and using creative brand messaging. The company is also planning to continue to increase its locations. I believe this stock can be a good investment for earning relatively safe monthly dividends. Sienna Senior Living Inc. (TSX:SIA) is a $1.7 billion market-cap giant in the senior living space. It is among the largest owners of senior housing facilities in Ontario, servicing the aging population. Occupancy rates are getting higher and higher, and it generates revenue from several business segments catering to different markets within Canada. As long as the growth in the senior population continues, so will the demand for the services that SIA stock offers. The company ended the first quarter of fiscal 2025 with $445 million in liquidity, indicating that it has more than enough capital to fund monthly dividends and acquire more facilities under its banner. It can be another solid investment to consider for monthly dividends. SmartCentres REIT (TSX: is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) that can help you earn monthly income like a lazy landlord. If you have the cash outlay for stock market investing, you have the ability to invest in the real estate sector, all without the hassle of being an actual landlord. has a portfolio of almost 200 properties in key locations across the country, with over 95% of its tenants having a regional or national presence. Most of its revenue comes from commercial tenants offering essential services, giving it solid cash-generating opportunities. Boasting an impressive 98.4% occupancy rate, it can be a solid investment. I feel that you should take any opportunity you can to make more money, and the TFSA gives you the perfect chance to do that. The tax-sheltered nature of the account means you can enjoy the returns from your investments in the account without incurring taxes. The table at the start paints a picture of what the monthly income might look like with a hypothetical $28,000 across three monthly dividend stocks. Add capital gains in the long term into the mix and your total returns over a few years can be much higher. The post Building a $28,000 TFSA Portfolio One Contribution at a Time appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. More reading Made in Canada: 5 Homegrown Stocks Ready for the 'Buy Local' Revolution [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit Best Canadian Stocks to Buy in 2025 Beginner Investors: 4 Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for 2025 5 Years From Now, You'll Probably Wish You Grabbed These Stocks Subscribe to Motley Fool Canada on YouTube Fool contributor Adam Othman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025