
Naf Naf: call for tenders issued to find buyers
Naf Naf employees are yet again facing a time of uncertainty. Less than a year after the French womenswear chain changed hands after receivership proceedings, it was again placed in receivership on May 30. A search for buyers has just been triggered by the court in Bobigny, seeking investors wanting to acquire all or part of Naf Naf, which had been bought by its Turkish supplier Migiboy Tekstil in June 2024.
According to the call for tenders issued by the court, Naf Naf currently has 588 employees and operates 102 directly owned stores and 11 affiliated ones in France. In addition, it has 90 retail concessions and five stores outside France. The Migi Naf Naf company, which owns the chain, generated revenue of €47.5 million over a nine-month period, from June 2024 to March 2025. The last reported revenue result for Naf Naf was €141 million in fiscal 2022, over 12 months.
Potential buyers must put forward their bid by July 2, 2025. A hearing has also been scheduled on July 23, while a six-month monitoring period for Naf Naf is ongoing. Will the chain, which was set up by the Pariente brothers in 1973, attract international interest? In the case of another French womenswear chain, Jennyfer, which went into liquidation in April, potential buyers opted to bid for only a small part of the store fleet (involving approximately 30% of the workforce).
Naf Naf's current owners have indicated to the company's employee representatives and the court that they are keen to implement a business continuity plan. Migiboy Tekstil, which kept 90% of the employees when it acquired Naf Naf last year, is the chain's fourth owner in less than a decade. Previously, Naf Naf was the property of French group Vivarte, which sold it to Chinese group La Chapelle in 2018. After filing for receivership in 2020, Naf Naf was then bought by Franco-Turkish group SY International, but had to file for receivership again in 2023.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Von der Leyen's return as China hawk ends talk of diplomatic reset
Summer has arrived in Brussels with a new trend: the doves are out, the hawks are in. After weeks of telegraphing signs towards a diplomatic rapprochement with China, or at least a thaw, Ursula von der Leyen made an abrupt volte face at the G7 summit with a broadside attack against Beijing's "pattern of dominance, dependency and blackmail" vis-à-vis its trading partners, including the European Union and the United States. "China has largely shown its unwillingness to live within the constraints of the rules-based international system," von der Leyen said in her intervention. "While others opened their market, China focused on undercutting intellectual property protections, massive subsidies with the aim to dominate global manufacturing and supply chains," she went on. "This is not market competition – it is distortion with intent." The president of the European Commission declared, point blank, that the source of "the biggest collective problem" in the global trading system lay in China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001. Beijing's entry into the WTO has been highly controversial as it opened international markets to a wave of low-cost exports. The admission is linked to the so-called "China shock" and a decline in manufacturing jobs in both the EU and the US. At the G7 summit, von der Leyen warned a "new China shock" was underway. It was a gloves-off denunciation that laid bare the state of mind of the Commission chief, her mounting displeasure and exasperation. In many ways, it was a return to the hawkish stance of her first mandate, during which she famously promoted the concept of "de-risking" to slash vulnerable dependencies that China could exploit. Beijing was quick to hit back at von der Leyen's invective. Guo Jiakun, the spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry, called her remarks "baseless" and "biased". Guo, however, did not miss the chance to offer a new olive branch. "China stands ready to increase communication and coordination with the EU, properly handle trade differences, and achieve win-win and shared prosperity," he said. "That said, we firmly oppose any attempt to hurt China's right to development or even assert one's own interests at China's expense." The reset that never was The conciliatory attempt fits in with Beijing's "charm offensive", as diplomats call it, towards the bloc in response to the disruptive policies of US President Donald Trump, who has imposed punitive tariffs on allies and adversaries alike. Sensing an impending rupture in the Western alliance, China has made several overtures to curry favour with Brussels, including lifting controversial sanctions on lawmakers, ahead of a much-anticipated EU-China summit in late July. Last month, Chinese President Xi Jinping hailed the 50th anniversary of bilateral relations as an opportunity to "open up a brighter future" in diplomacy. Von der Leyen replied: "We remain committed to deepening our partnership with China. A balanced relationship, built on fairness and reciprocity, is in our common interest." But in her G7 intervention, delivered with Trump in the room, this commitment was conspicuous by its absence. Instead, she let the hawk fly free and wild. At the core of her speech was Beijing's recent decision to restrict the sales of seven rare earth materials, which she said amounted to "weaponising" trade. China holds a quasi-monopolistic position over rare earths, the 17 metallic elements that are essential for building cutting-edge technologies. The country commands roughly 60% of the world's supply and 90% of the processing and refining capacity. Although the restrictions have eased in recent days, von der Leyen cautioned "the threat remains" and called on the G7 to close ranks to pile extra pressure on China. Rare earths are just the tip of an iceberg made up of commercial disputes that have driven a stark wedge between Brussels and Beijing. The past few years have seen the bloc impose steep duties on China-made electric vehicles, exclude Chinese companies from public tenders of medical devices, label Huawei and ZTE as "high-risk suppliers" of 5G networks, and launch investigations into suspicious uses of industrial subsidies. Brussels has also accused Beijing of engaging in large-scale campaigns of foreign information manipulations and interference (known as FIMI), hacking into state agencies, fuelling military tensions in the Taiwan Strait, violating the human rights of the Uyghur population and acting as the "key enabler" of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Despite loud pleas from Europeans, Xi Jinping has doubled down on his "no-limits" partnership with Vladimir Putin, causing dismay and outrage across the continent. By offering no significant concessions and sticking to its long-standing practices, China has missed the opportunity offered by von der Leyen after Trump's inauguration, says Noah Barkin, a visiting senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund. "Von der Leyen's unvarnished criticisms of China at the G7 summit are a response to Beijing's intransigence. Unless China shows a willingness to address Europe's concerns, the summit in July is unlikely to produce any deliverables of substance," Barkin said. "The likelihood is that tensions between the EU and China will continue to grow. The closing of the US market to Chinese products will lead to a diversion of exports into Europe, increasing the threat to European industry. And the withdrawal of US support for Ukraine will turn China's support for Russia into an even bigger problem for Europe." Keeping it real Although von der Leyen has earned plaudits for her clear-eyed, matter-of-fact assessment of EU-China relations, her views have not become universally accepted by member states, the true guardians of political power. In April, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez flew to Beijing, held a bilateral meeting with President Xi and made a plea to turn the page on the confrontational approach. "Spain is in favour of more balanced relations between the European Union and China, of finding negotiated solutions to our differences, which we have, and of greater cooperation in areas of common interest," Sánchez said. The Spaniard's words immediately caught the attention of Brussels and sent speculation of a diplomatic reset into overdrive. But Alicja Bachulska, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), says the buzzy discourse was never credible. "Hopes of a possible reset, if any, were mostly projected by those who do not see eye-to-eye with von der Leyen's Commission," Bachulska told Euronews. "This Commission seems quite consistent in explaining its approach towards China and how it sees the threats, the challenges, and the very limited opportunities for cooperation with China under current conditions." Politics, of course, come with economics attached. For many countries, particularly those export-oriented, China remains an extraordinarily valuable market of 1.4 billion people, despite the multiple obstacles and hurdles that European companies face when doing business. With Trump threatening a whopping 50% tariff on the bloc if trade talks fail, having a cushion to fall onto is considered indispensable to avoid – or at least mitigate – the potential ravaging impact. Trade will be at the very top of the agenda at the EU-China summit, with both sides looking forward to having something to announce. Brussels is keen to put an end to China's probes into brandy, pork and dairy products, which it considers unjustified. But as the date nears, hopes for a trade breakthrough that can make a tangible difference on the ground and relieve some of the tensions are fading, as von der Leyen's hardened tone at the G7 demonstrated. "It's about being realistic: we still see China as a partner, competitor and rival," a senior diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We have to be perhaps more confident about our interests, what we can do to pursue them better, but also act when actions are taken that threaten the stability of our continent." A diplomat from another country kept a cool head to lower expectations ahead of the summit, arguing China's alliance with Russia and campaigns of foreign interference remain "serious" and "disturbing" factors with no sign of improvement. "If you want to really deepen ties with us, that's impossible if, at the same time, you behave like this," the diplomat said. "The EU needs to stand up for its own interests, no matter who's in the White House."

LeMonde
9 hours ago
- LeMonde
The French government is stepping in to rescue Eutelsat
On Friday, June 20, President Emmanuel Macron is expected at the Paris Air Show in Le Bourget and aims to make the event a turning point for France and Europe's space strategy. "We are witnessing a dramatic acceleration of the space sector" that "is being privatized at breakneck speed with extremely ambitious projects, especially from the Americans, but also from Chinese players." It is also "becoming militarized very, very quickly," explained an Élysée adviser ahead of the president's midday speech from the "Paris Space Hub" – the Le Bourget hall devoted entirely to the sector. The war in Ukraine has highlighted Europe's dependence on Starlink, Elon Musk's satellite communications network. "Europe needs to "act independently, not be dependent on external solutions," the Élysée acknowledged. In this context, the government announced on June 19 that it would strengthen the state's stake in Eutelsat, the French satellite operator whose low-Earth orbit constellation is, for now, the only viable European alternative to Starlink. To achieve this, France's State Participation Agency (APE, the government's shareholdings agency) will take a major share in Eutelsat's €1.35 billion capital increase; the APE alone will contribute €717 million. At the same time, it will purchase the 13.6% stake currently held by Bpifrance, bringing its total holding to 29.9% – just below the threshold that would trigger a mandatory takeover bid for the entire company.

LeMonde
13 hours ago
- LeMonde
Kevin Durant buys minority stake in PSG, eyes global expansion with Qatari owners
NBA star Kevin Durant has purchased a minority stake in Champions League winner Paris Saint-Germain, the French soccer club said Friday, June 20. Qatar Sports Investments, PSG's majority shareholder, signed an investment and strategic partnership agreement with Durant, the club said in a statement. Financial terms were not disclosed. The announcement comes amid talks between the NBA, FIBA and other entities about the potential of adding a new league in Europe. Durant will provide expertise on the PSG's multi-port strategy, including potential expansion into basketball, the club said. "Under the terms of the partnership, Durant – via his media and investment company Boardroom, co-founded with long-time business partner Rich Kleiman – will acquire a direct minority stake in the club," PSG's statement said. The Phoenix Suns forward is a two-time NBA champion and became the first four-time men's gold medalist in Olympic basketball history when the US took gold at last summer's Paris Games . "It is an honor to partner with QSI and be a shareholder in Paris Saint-Germain – a club and city that is deeply close to my heart," the 36-year-old Durant said in comments provided by PSG. "This club has big plans and I look forward to being part of the next phase of growth and exploring new investment opportunities with QSI." As part of the deal, Boardroom Sports Holdings – Durant's personal investment vehicle, which holds stakes in a number of major sports teams and leagues – and QSI will join forces on a wide range of commercial, investment and content production initiatives. PSG added that Durant will support the club's diversification and growth strategy, as well as the club's development in the US and other international markets. "Together with Kevin, we look forward to developing ambitious initiatives that will drive the continued global growth of Paris Saint-Germain and QSI," PSG president Nasser Al-Khelaïfi said.