Von der Leyen's return as China hawk ends talk of diplomatic reset

Summer has arrived in Brussels with a new trend: the doves are out, the hawks are in.
After weeks of telegraphing signs towards a diplomatic rapprochement with China, or at least a thaw, Ursula von der Leyen made an abrupt volte face at the G7 summit with a broadside attack against Beijing's "pattern of dominance, dependency and blackmail" vis-à-vis its trading partners, including the European Union and the United States.
"China has largely shown its unwillingness to live within the constraints of the rules-based international system," von der Leyen said in her intervention.
"While others opened their market, China focused on undercutting intellectual property protections, massive subsidies with the aim to dominate global manufacturing and supply chains," she went on. "This is not market competition – it is distortion with intent."
The president of the European Commission declared, point blank, that the source of "the biggest collective problem" in the global trading system lay in China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001.
Beijing's entry into the WTO has been highly controversial as it opened international markets to a wave of low-cost exports. The admission is linked to the so-called "China shock" and a decline in manufacturing jobs in both the EU and the US.
At the G7 summit, von der Leyen warned a "new China shock" was underway.
It was a gloves-off denunciation that laid bare the state of mind of the Commission chief, her mounting displeasure and exasperation. In many ways, it was a return to the hawkish stance of her first mandate, during which she famously promoted the concept of "de-risking" to slash vulnerable dependencies that China could exploit.
Beijing was quick to hit back at von der Leyen's invective. Guo Jiakun, the spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry, called her remarks "baseless" and "biased".
Guo, however, did not miss the chance to offer a new olive branch.
"China stands ready to increase communication and coordination with the EU, properly handle trade differences, and achieve win-win and shared prosperity," he said.
"That said, we firmly oppose any attempt to hurt China's right to development or even assert one's own interests at China's expense."
The reset that never was
The conciliatory attempt fits in with Beijing's "charm offensive", as diplomats call it, towards the bloc in response to the disruptive policies of US President Donald Trump, who has imposed punitive tariffs on allies and adversaries alike.
Sensing an impending rupture in the Western alliance, China has made several overtures to curry favour with Brussels, including lifting controversial sanctions on lawmakers, ahead of a much-anticipated EU-China summit in late July.
Last month, Chinese President Xi Jinping hailed the 50th anniversary of bilateral relations as an opportunity to "open up a brighter future" in diplomacy.
Von der Leyen replied: "We remain committed to deepening our partnership with China. A balanced relationship, built on fairness and reciprocity, is in our common interest."
But in her G7 intervention, delivered with Trump in the room, this commitment was conspicuous by its absence. Instead, she let the hawk fly free and wild.
At the core of her speech was Beijing's recent decision to restrict the sales of seven rare earth materials, which she said amounted to "weaponising" trade.
China holds a quasi-monopolistic position over rare earths, the 17 metallic elements that are essential for building cutting-edge technologies. The country commands roughly 60% of the world's supply and 90% of the processing and refining capacity.
Although the restrictions have eased in recent days, von der Leyen cautioned "the threat remains" and called on the G7 to close ranks to pile extra pressure on China.
Rare earths are just the tip of an iceberg made up of commercial disputes that have driven a stark wedge between Brussels and Beijing. The past few years have seen the bloc impose steep duties on China-made electric vehicles, exclude Chinese companies from public tenders of medical devices, label Huawei and ZTE as "high-risk suppliers" of 5G networks, and launch investigations into suspicious uses of industrial subsidies.
Brussels has also accused Beijing of engaging in large-scale campaigns of foreign information manipulations and interference (known as FIMI), hacking into state agencies, fuelling military tensions in the Taiwan Strait, violating the human rights of the Uyghur population and acting as the "key enabler" of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Despite loud pleas from Europeans, Xi Jinping has doubled down on his "no-limits" partnership with Vladimir Putin, causing dismay and outrage across the continent.
By offering no significant concessions and sticking to its long-standing practices, China has missed the opportunity offered by von der Leyen after Trump's inauguration, says Noah Barkin, a visiting senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund.
"Von der Leyen's unvarnished criticisms of China at the G7 summit are a response to Beijing's intransigence. Unless China shows a willingness to address Europe's concerns, the summit in July is unlikely to produce any deliverables of substance," Barkin said.
"The likelihood is that tensions between the EU and China will continue to grow. The closing of the US market to Chinese products will lead to a diversion of exports into Europe, increasing the threat to European industry. And the withdrawal of US support for Ukraine will turn China's support for Russia into an even bigger problem for Europe."
Keeping it real
Although von der Leyen has earned plaudits for her clear-eyed, matter-of-fact assessment of EU-China relations, her views have not become universally accepted by member states, the true guardians of political power.
In April, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez flew to Beijing, held a bilateral meeting with President Xi and made a plea to turn the page on the confrontational approach.
"Spain is in favour of more balanced relations between the European Union and China, of finding negotiated solutions to our differences, which we have, and of greater cooperation in areas of common interest," Sánchez said.
The Spaniard's words immediately caught the attention of Brussels and sent speculation of a diplomatic reset into overdrive. But Alicja Bachulska, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), says the buzzy discourse was never credible.
"Hopes of a possible reset, if any, were mostly projected by those who do not see eye-to-eye with von der Leyen's Commission," Bachulska told Euronews.
"This Commission seems quite consistent in explaining its approach towards China and how it sees the threats, the challenges, and the very limited opportunities for cooperation with China under current conditions."
Politics, of course, come with economics attached.
For many countries, particularly those export-oriented, China remains an extraordinarily valuable market of 1.4 billion people, despite the multiple obstacles and hurdles that European companies face when doing business. With Trump threatening a whopping 50% tariff on the bloc if trade talks fail, having a cushion to fall onto is considered indispensable to avoid – or at least mitigate – the potential ravaging impact.
Trade will be at the very top of the agenda at the EU-China summit, with both sides looking forward to having something to announce. Brussels is keen to put an end to China's probes into brandy, pork and dairy products, which it considers unjustified.
But as the date nears, hopes for a trade breakthrough that can make a tangible difference on the ground and relieve some of the tensions are fading, as von der Leyen's hardened tone at the G7 demonstrated.
"It's about being realistic: we still see China as a partner, competitor and rival," a senior diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We have to be perhaps more confident about our interests, what we can do to pursue them better, but also act when actions are taken that threaten the stability of our continent."
A diplomat from another country kept a cool head to lower expectations ahead of the summit, arguing China's alliance with Russia and campaigns of foreign interference remain "serious" and "disturbing" factors with no sign of improvement.
"If you want to really deepen ties with us, that's impossible if, at the same time, you behave like this," the diplomat said.
"The EU needs to stand up for its own interests, no matter who's in the White House."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

France 24

an hour ago

• France 24

Nigeria receives over 100 looted artifacts from Netherlands

It is the latest return of artefacts to Africa, as pressure mounts on Western governments and institutions to hand back the spoils of colonial oppression. Nigeria celebrated the return of the priceless "Benin Bronzes" -- metal and ivory sculptures dating back to the 16th to 18th centuries -- with a ceremony held at the National Museum in Lagos, showcasing four of them in the museum's courtyard. The selection included a bronze carving of a king's bust, a carved elephant tusk and a small leopard. In the 19th century, British troops stole thousands of Benin Bronzes in the then-independent kingdom of Benin, in the south of present-day Nigeria. The sculptures were pillaged from the kingdom's royal palace and had since been held in museums and private collections across Europe and the United States. The four artefacts currently on display in the capital will remain in the museum's permanent collection while the others will be returned to the Oba of Benin, Ewuare II -- the traditional ruler of the kingdom of Benin in southern Nigeria. "These are embodiments of the spirit and identity of the people from which they were taken from," said Olugbile Holloway, director-general of Nigeria's National Commission for Museums and Monuments. "All we ask of the world is to treat us with fairness, dignity and respect," he said at the ceremony, where he announced that Germany had agreed to return more than 1,000 additional Benin Bronze pieces. "The German government has actually signed a transfer agreement to hand over a 1,000 Benin Bronzes back" to Nigeria, he said. Nigeria's art and culture minister Hannatu Musa Musawa, who signed the handover document with the Dutch ambassador for international cultural cooperation, Dewi van de Weerd, said "Nigeria needs to reclaim its history and its heritage". "The deal reached with Germany further underscores the growing international commitment to right historical wrongs and foster mutual respect," she added.

LeMonde

6 hours ago

• LeMonde

Leila Sansour, filmmaker: 'France's recognition of Palestine would summon others to follow'

On June 13, I stood among a group of Palestinian and Israeli delegates on the lawn of the Elysée Palace, listening to President Emmanuel Macron reiterate his commitment to recognizing the state of Palestine. Despite the gathering storms and the burdens of realpolitik, he seemed to be telling us he would stand firm. I, a Palestinian from Bethlehem, and a friend from Gaza stood at the edge of the crowd, clapping with everything we had – as if trying to breathe life into his words. In that moment, Macron looked rather presidential, especially against the backdrop of the managerial figures who now dominate global leadership. The spirit of the Republic was in the air – or so we chose to feel – amplified by the striking absence of overbearing security and Macron's willingness to freely mingle with the guests. My friend and I exchanged a glance. Could we dare believe that one world leader might still move by codes of honor, not cold calculation? We had long stopped hoping. Yet in that moment, the air was thick with fragile expectation. Foundational step But even as I write, history leans dangerously toward senseless ruin. The clash between Israel and Iran is unfolding before our eyes. And once again, the question of Palestine – the unfinished project – risks being pushed further into the margins of global attention. This war, horrific in its own right, is already obscuring the one conflict that has destabilized the region for decades. Yet, Palestine is not a sideshow. Its fate is a central node in the architecture of Middle Eastern peace. And, a nuclear Iran, should this become a reality, in a world where Palestine is free, is a very different equation than a nuclear Iran in a world where Palestinians still live under Israel's domination. It is with this in mind that I write – because we cannot wait. Postponing the recognition is not just illogical. It is dangerous. Western leaders have long argued that recognition should be the final act – the crowning achievement of a successful negotiation. The tragedy is: No real negotiation will ever begin without this foundational step. Recognition is what will make real talks possible. It defines the endgame and draws the map of an inevitable journey we must take – before the map is swallowed by chaos. It forces a reckoning with ambiguity and evasion. It tells all actors – Palestinians, Israelis, and the international community – what the future must include, so that the first steps can, at last, be taken.

Euronews

7 hours ago

• Euronews

Turkish President Erdogan warns against 'new Sykes-Picot order'

Speaking at the 51st Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the Turkish leader also warned against a "new Sykes-Picot order" in the Middle East, in reference to a 1916 secret deal between Western powers to divide up the region. 'We will not allow the establishment of a new Sykes-Picot order in our region with borders to be drawn in blood,' said President Erdogan in Istanbul. In 1916, the English and French met in secret to define their mutually agreed spheres of influence and control if the Ottoman Empire was partitioned - an agreement dependent on an Allied victory during World War I. The agreement proposed France would have control or influence over modern-day Syria and Lebanon, and Britain over modern-day Iraq, Jordan and parts of Palestine. President Erdogan also today described the conditions in Gaza as worse than those of Nazi concentration camps during his speech at the OIC meeting. "2 million of our sisters and brothers in Gaza have been struggling to survive under these conditions for the past 21 months," the Turkish President said. His comments come as tensions continue to escalate in the Middle East, particularly between Iran and Israel as the conflict enters its second week. The OIC is set to hold a special closed-door session Saturday evening at the request of Iran, according to Turkish media Anadolu news site.