How Iran's response to Israel's strike could shake up global markets — in 5 scenarios
How Israel's strike on Iran could affect the global markets largely depends on the scale, nature and duration of Iran's response.
In the worst-case scenario, oil prices may surge to $120 per barrel, according to Lazard Geopolitical Advisory.
Israel-Iran clash delivers a fresh shock to investors. History suggests this is the move to make.
I'm in my 80s and have 2 kids. How do I choose between them to be my executor?
These defense stocks offer the best growth prospects, as the Israel-Iran conflict fuels new interest in the sector
My husband is in hospice care. Friends say his children are lining up for his money. What can I do?
'I'm 68 and my 401(k) has dwindled to $82,000': My husband committed financial infidelity and has $50,000 in credit-card debt. What now?
Oil prices rose on Friday, with U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude for July delivery CL.1 CLN25 up 7.4%, near $73 a barrel, after climbing as high as $77.62 after Israel launched strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and military officials. Iran retaliated on Friday by launching dozens of missiles towards Israel, the Israel Defense Forces said.
Stocks DJIA SPX COMP were sharply lower Friday, but the conflict's broader impact on global markets mostly depends on Iran's response, Lazard analysts noted.
They put together a list of five potential response scenarios — with the most likely one being that Iran targets Israel directly, which may lead to an increase of $10 to $20 per barrel in oil prices and an increase to the cost of energy and goods in the region, the analysts wrote in a Friday note.
It's also highly likely that Iran targets U.S. military or diplomatic assets in the Middle East, which may lead to an upward swing in oil prices to $80 or $90 per barrel, according to the analysts. That poses medium to high risks to global markets, they noted.
In a more severe outcome, oil prices could jump to $85 to $105 per barrel if Iran attacks Gulf oil-and-gas infrastructure, which could lead to a rise in global inflation expectations. Such a scenario looks less likely to happen compared with the previous two, Lazard analysts said.
The worst-case scenario, however, would be a disruption to or the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route for Middle East energy exports.
Read: Why the Strait of Hormuz is now a major focus of worry for oil prices and the global economy
That outcome, seen as unlikely, could lead to a surge in oil prices to up to $120 per barrel, potentially causing oil-driven inflation to reach crisis levels, the analysts noted. It also could cause severe disruptions to the global supply chain, they added.
Still, even that scenario would most likely be short term, as it could trigger a U.S. military intervention to reinstate the shipping lanes, the analysts said.
'He failed in his fiduciary duty': My brother liquidated our mother's 401(k) for her nursing home. He claimed the rest.
Walmart's stock looks like it's in trouble. What the chart says may come next.
Why bonds aren't acting like a safe haven for investors amid the Israel-Iran conflict
My friend wants me to join in a political protest. I'm worried about my job. Am I a coward if I say no?
'I am getting very frustrated': My mother's adviser has not returned my calls. He manages $1 million. Is this normal?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
‘We can't wait forever': GOP frustrated but unwilling to act on Trump's TikTok extension
President Donald Trump's latest move to keep TikTok alive is yet again frustrating congressional Republicans, many of whom object to China's continued involvement in the popular app but just want to be done with the whole drama. 'Not my favorite thing,' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), along-time proponent of the ban, deadpanned, when asked about the president's plan to issue another extension. He spoke a day before the White House confirmed Trump signed a 90-day suspension of enforcement of the law requiring TikTok to divest from ByteDance, its China-based parent company, throwing another lifeline to the short-form video app. By Friday, some House lawmakers registered a note of resigned irritation. The extension — Trump's third since the law went into effect on Jan. 19 — is a unilateral decision not envisioned in the bipartisan law passed by Congress and upheld last year by the Supreme Court. Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.), a member of the House Intelligence and China committees, told POLITICO. 'The national security concerns and vulnerabilities are still there, and they have not gone away. I would argue they've almost become more enhanced in many ways.' But Trump's extension of the TikTok law largely boxed out Republicans in both chambers who have shown little inclination — beyond stern words — to prevent him from making these postponements almost routine. Many GOP lawmakers saw themselves as granting the president space to cut a promised deal while the White House deals with urgent priorities, like trade negotiations and the Israel-Iran conflict. 'In light of everything going on, I think he did the right thing,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a China hawk who voted for the ban, told POLITICO of Trump. 'I have concerns about all kinds of things — that [the extension] is on the list — but it's not at the top of the list.' Though Trump has promised his TikTok negotiations areclosely tied to trade talks with China, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testified last week to a Senate panel that TikTok's sale was not currently a part of the negotiations with China, raising a further potential obstacle to Trump inking a deal in the near future. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close ally of the president and longtime national-security hawk said earlier in the week: 'The sooner we get that issue solved, the better,' without offering any ideas for further enforcement. 'I just want finality,' Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told POLITICO. 'I want some certainty and just know that the Congress isn't being played when we make a decision [that the app] be sold.' Another member of the House China Committee, Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa), told POLITICO, 'No more extensions. It's time to follow through.' Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.), also a member of the China panel, noted in a post on X Thursday the law only allows one extension of the compliance deadline, adding, 'I was proud to support the ban of TikTok and believe the law should be implemented as written.' With their comments, the lawmakers echoed House China Chair John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who in early June called for the U.S. to 'let [TikTok] go dark' to bring China to the table to negotiate. He reiterated that stance on Friday. 'Delays only embolden the Chinese Communist Party,' Moolenaar said in a statement to POLITICO. 'I urge the administration to enforce the law as written and protect the American people from this growing national security threat.' Still, observers say Republicans are not exercising their leverage to demand the White House enforce the law they helped write, for example by withholding funding or congressional oversight hearings. 'I keep reading that Republicans are 'frustrated' and 'impatient' about their TikTok law being ignored, but they should stop complaining to reporters and take it up with Trump,' said Adam Kovacevich, founder and CEO of the pro-tech Chamber of Progress. Among the Republicans being undercut by the president is his own secretary of state. Marco Rubio — who as senator was one of the loudest critics of TikTok's ties to China, and a huge backer of the app's ban — has been conspicuously silent as Trump has repeatedly granted more time to strike a deal for its sale. 'You have to decide what's more important, our national security and the threat that it poses to our national security,' Rubio told POLITICO in March 2023, as Congress was considering a ban. 'You have to weigh that against what you might think the electoral consequences of it are. For me, it's an easy balancing act. I mean, there is no balance. I'm always going to be for our national security.' A spokesperson for Rubio at the State Department did not respond to a request for comment. Democrats — even those who support keeping TikTok online — say Trump's approach is the wrong one. 'These endless extensions are not only illegal, but they also put TikTok's fate in the hands of risk-averse corporate shareholders,' Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) told POLITICO in a statement. 'This is deeply unfair to TikTok's creators and users. I'm prepared to work towards a solution, but Trump isn't coming to the table.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How Israeli Footwear Firms Are Being Impacted During Iran Conflict
As the conflict between Israel and Iran continues, global supply chains are starting to feel the heat — and the situation is also disrupting logistics for Israeli footwear firms as well as retail operations. Tammuz Group posted on LinkedIn that an 'Iranian ballistic missile struck a residential building located close to both our offices and our home,' noting that 'damage to property is extensive, including to our own premises.' More from WWD Knitwear Brand PH5 Collaborates With Charles & Keith on Capsule Collection The Top Men's Shoe Collections From Pitti Uomo's Spring 2026 Edition Vietnam's Ready For High Stakes US Trade Talks To Avoid Steep Tariffs The Tel Aviv-based distributor owns its logistics center and said it can 'collect and distribute over 15,000 different items each day.' It works with footwear brands such as Hoka, Crocs, and Hey Dude, among others. Because of the ongoing security situation, Tammuz said 'all of our stores and offices nationwide remain closed as we continue to prioritize the safety and well-being of our people.' Other companies' operations are impacted too. Source Tactical Gear, Israel's largest tactical gear manufacturer and exporter, said on its website that 'longer processing times and shipping are expected.' The Azrieli Group, which operates shopping malls across Israel, did not respond to a query via email. A Bloomberg story on Sunday said shops and restaurants are closed. The IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) Home Front Command issued an alert two days ago for residents to ensure they are close to bomb shelters, and also banned gatherings, with schools and workplaces to remain closed. The ban is in effect through Tuesday night, after which the Home Front command will make an assessment on the next steps to take. Ayelet Lax Levy, president of U.S. operations at Naot, said offices and operations in Israel have been impacted. 'We are continuing to operate, however, in a more limited capacity,' she said. 'Some of our team members have had their homes hit, and we are prioritizing everyone's safety and well-being. The small teams that are [working] are making sure we continue to get production to the market.' Levy said everyone is following government protocol to stay safe. As for operations in the U.S., she said the company is moving to a new and larger warehouse and offices to accommodate for planned growth. 'We just received a very large sea shipment and have a few more on the way. We have also opened up production in Mexico, Portugal and Italy, and this production should start flowing in within the next month,' Levy said. 'While we may have a slight delay in production in the next few weeks from Israel, we don't expect the delay to last too long. There is a temporary hold on goods coming into Israel, which is impacting our supply chain. However, we are also expecting to be earlier in fall deliveries this year than last.' Levy said the expectation is that the conflict could last for at least another week or two. 'But they're still getting our samples to us and getting an air freight out, hopefully, by early next week,' she said. 'They're finding ways — they're very resourceful over there, and they are making things happen.' Last Thursday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio was quick to note that the U.S. was not involved in any 'strikes against Iran,' adding that 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self defense.' Iran has canceled the next round of nuclear-program talks with the U.S., following Israel's strikes, which was to have commenced this past Sunday. Reports on Monday, the fourth day of the conflict, indicate that Iran had called for U.S. pressure on Israel for a ceasefire. U.S. President Donald J. Trump has advocated on his social media platform Truth Social that 'Iran and Israel should make a deal.' Meanwhile, the Group of Seven summit began on Monday in Canada. An Associated Press report said world leaders at the summit were 'scrambling' to de-escalate the conflict between Israel and Iran, while Trump reiterated his call for the two nations to begin negotiations. Best of WWD All the Retailers That Nike Left and Then Went Back Mikey Madison's Elegant Red Carpet Shoe Style [PHOTOS] Julia Fox's Sleekest and Boldest Shoe Looks Over the Years [Photos]
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Palantir Stock Soars 85% in 2025; Defense Role Grows Amid Israel-Iran Conflict
Palantir Technologies (PLTR, Financials) is up 85% year to date as rising Middle East tensions spotlight its expanding role in defense intelligence. The software firm's battlefield decision-making tools and government contracts are drawing investor interest, with analysts debating whether the rally still has legs. The recent conflict between Israel and Iran has intensified demand for AI-driven military solutions; Palantir is already a known partner of Israel's defense ministry and a key U.S. government contractor. In Q1 2025, the company reported 39% revenue growth, led by a 55% jump in U.S. sales. Its commercial U.S. business also crossed a $1 billion run rate for the first time. Still, Palantir's valuation is a sticking point; its forward price-to-earnings ratio stands at 240ten times the sector median. While Loop Capital raised its target from $130 to $155, calling the company a software leader in enterprise AI, Citi warned of overvaluation and pointed to uncertainty around major defense deals. Wall Street remains divided. The stock holds a Hold consensus based on 3 Buys, 10 Holds, and 4 Sells. The average price target is $104.27, implying a 25.5% downside. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
